Skip to content

A Culturally-Based Palliative Care Tele-consult Program for Rural Southern Elders

A Community Developed, Culturally-Based Palliative Care Tele-Consult Program for African American and White Rural Southern Elders With a Life Limiting Illness

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03767517
Enrollment
209
Registered
2018-12-06
Start date
2020-08-24
Completion date
2024-08-30
Last updated
2025-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Cardiac Disease, Pulmonary Disease, Neuro-Degenerative Disease, Renal Disease, Stroke, Sepsis, Hepatic Disease

Brief summary

Rural patients with life-limiting illness are at very high risk of not receiving appropriate care due to a lack of health professionals, long distances to treatment centers, and limited palliative care (PC) clinical expertise. Secondly, although culture strongly influences people's response to diagnosis, illness and treatment preferences, culturally-based care models are not currently available for most seriously-ill rural patients and their family caregivers. Lack of sensitivity to cultural differences may compromise PC for minority patients. The purpose of this study is to compare a culturally-based Tele-consult program to usual hospital care to determine whether a culturally-based PC Tele-consult program leads to lower symptom burden in hospitalized African American and White older adults with a life-limiting illness.

Detailed description

The triple threat of rural geography, racial inequities, and older age hinders access to high quality PC for a significant proportion of Americans. Rural patients with life-limiting illness are at very high risk of not receiving appropriate care due to a lack of health professionals, long distances to treatment centers, and limited PC clinical expertise. Although culture strongly influences people's response to diagnosis, illness and treatment preferences, culturally-based care models are not currently available for most seriously-ill rural patients and their family caregivers. Lack of sensitivity to cultural differences may compromise PC for minority patients. The two major public health consequences of these problems are: 1. Access-Rural patients have sub-optimal or no access to PC. Despite significant nationwide growth, access to PC is grossly inadequate for the 60 million US citizens who live in rural or non-metropolitan areas. There is low PC use in rural and minority populations. As a result, rural patients experience significant suffering from uncontrolled symptoms that PC expertise could alleviate. 2. Acceptability-Even when palliative and hospice services are available, African Americans (AA), compared to Whites (W) are more likely to receive medically-ineffective, poor quality care due to a culturally-insensitive health care system and mistrust of health care providers. Making culturally competent PC available for diverse underserved and rural Americans is a national priority. This community-developed, culturally based Teleconsult Intervention specifically targets the gaps of PC access and acceptability. It was developed by and for rural, Deep South AA and W patients and providers, and uses state-of-the-art telehealth methods, to provide PC consultation to hospitalized seriously-ill patients and family. Using National Consensus Project guidelines, and the culturally-based, community-developed PC Tele-consult intervention, a remote PC expert conducts a comprehensive PC patient assessment, in collaboration with local providers. Following interdisciplinary PC team review, the remote clinician communicates recommendations. Two additional structured follow up contacts at Day 3 and 6 ensure care coordination and smooth transitions that enable patients to receive guideline concurrent PC in their communities. Aims of the study and Hypotheses: Primary Aim: Determine whether a culturally-based PC Tele-consult program leads to lower symptom burden in hospitalized AA and W older adults with a life-limiting illness. Hypothesis 1: Intervention patient participants receiving a culturally-based PC Tele-consult program will experience lower symptom burden on Day 7 post-consultation. Secondary Aim: Determine whether a culturally-based PC Tele-consult program results in higher patient and caregiver quality of life, care satisfaction, and lower caregiver burden at Day 7 post-consultation, and lower resource use (hospital readmission, emergency visits) 30-days post-discharge. Hypothesis 2: Intervention participants and their caregivers receiving a culturally-based PC Tele-consult program will experience higher patient and caregiver quality of life, care satisfaction, lower caregiver burden at Day 7 post consultation, and lower resource use (e.g. hospital admission, emergency visits) at 30 days after discharge. Exploratory Aim: Explore mediators and moderators of patient symptom and caregiver burden outcomes.

Interventions

Half of the patients will receive tele-consult program. Tele-consult intervention includes: initial consult and 2 follow up contacts. Usual care includes assessment and treatment by the admitting physician, along with any subspecialists that are consulted.

OTHERUsual Care

Half of the patients will receive usual care. Usual care includes assessment and treatment by the admitting physician, along with any subspecialists that are consulted.

Sponsors

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* AA or W; * 55 years old; has a condition which fits into one of 3 illness paradigms -cancer, chronic progressive, frailty. * Clinician answers no to question: Would you be surprised if this person died in the next 12 months? * Patient has a caregiver who has been involved in their care. * Able to complete baseline interviews

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to complete baseline interviews; * Currently receiving hospice care; * No family member/caregiver.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])baseline and 7 days post-baseline and 30 days post-baselineChange from baseline in patient-reported symptom burden measured using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) at baseline; change from baseline measured using the ESAS at 7 days post-baseline. Each item is scored using: 0-10 (0= no pain; 10= worst possible pain), yielding a total score between 0 and 90. A higher value represents the worse possible outcome. Higher score indicates higher symptom burden.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.baseline and 7 days post-baseline and 30 days post baselineChange from baseline measured using FAMCARE-2 at 7 days post-baseline. Each item was scored on a Likert scale of VS (very satisfied), S (satisfied), U (undecided), D (dissatisfied), VD (very dissatisfied), or NA (not applicable), which was then dichotomized into very satisfied/satisfied and undecided/dissatisfied/very dissatisfied. The mean percentages in these dichotomized categories was calculated along with the standard error of the mean. A repeated measures generalized linear mixed model was used to calculate the estimated marginal means (least squares means) and associated standard errors at each time point for the intervention and usual care groups. The higher mean percentage of the population that responded very satisfied/ satisfied equals a better outcome.
Patient Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])baseline and 7 days post-baselineChange from baseline in patient-reported quality of life using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 (PROMIS Global Health-10) at baseline; change from baseline measured using the PROMIS Health-10 at 7 days post-baseline. Items 1-6 are scored using: 1-5 (1=poor; 5=excellent). Item 7 is scored using 1-5 (1= not at all; 5= completely). Item 8 is scored using 1-5 (1= always; 5=never). Item 9 is scored using 1-5 (1=very severe; 5=none). Item 10 is scored using 0-10 (0=no pain; 10=worst pain imaginable).Items were summed , then scaled to T-scores (which would have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general adult population) using published procedures from Health Measures, with higher scores representing better health. As the PROMIS Global Health is scaled relative to the referent general population, there are no minimum and maximum values published.
Caregiver Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Baseline and 7 days post-BaselineChange from baseline in caregiver-reported quality of life using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 (PROMIS Global Health-10) at baseline; change from baseline measured using the PROMIS Global Health-10 at 7 days post-baseline. Items 1-6 are scored using: 1-5 (1=poor; 5=excellent). Item 7 is scored using 1-5 (1= not at all; 5= completely). Item 8 is scored using 1-5 (1= always; 5=never). Item 9 is scored using 1-5 (1=very severe; 5=none). Item 10 is scored using 0-10 (0=no pain; 10=worst pain imaginable).Items were summed , then scaled to T-scores (which would have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general adult population) using published procedures from Health Measures, with higher scores representing better health. As the PROMIS Global Health is scaled relative to the referent general population, there are no minimum and maximum values published.
Caregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])Baseline and 7 days post-BaselineChange from baseline in caregiver-reported burden using the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) at baseline; change from baseline measured using the MBCB at 7 days post-baseline. This scale contains a total of 14 questions and 5 Likert scale responses (a lot less, a little less, the same, a little more, or a lot more). Caregiver burden will be quantified by three subscales; objective, subjective and demand burdens. Objective burden is measured by 6 questions (total score between 0-30), subjective burden is measured by 4 questions (total score between 4-20), and demand burden is measured by 4 questions (total score between 4-20).
Resource Use30 days post-BaselinePatient resource use (e.g., number of hospital readmissions, and number of Emergency Department \[ED\] visits) within 30 days after enrollment.
The Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Completely/Quite a Bit to the Patient Satisfaction With Care (Feeling Heard and Understood) Survey.Baseline and 7 days post-BaselineChange from baseline in patient-reported satisfaction with care using the Feeling Heard and Understood questionnaire at baseline; change from baseline using the Feeling Heard and Understood questionnaire at 7 days post-baseline. Likert scale using: completely, quite a bit, moderately, slightly, not at all. Which was then dichotomized into completely/quite-a-bit and moderately/slightly/not at all. The mean percentage of participants in these dichotomized categories were calculated along with the standard error of the mean. The higher mean percentage of the population that responded completely/ quite a bit equals a better outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exploratory Aim 1b. Patient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])Day 7Patient symptom burden measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale \[ESAS\] mediated and/or moderated by patient/caregiver implementation of palliative care recommendations. Patient/caregiver implementation of palliative care recommendations are measured using patient/caregiver report at Day 7. Each item in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale \[ESAS\] is scored using: 0-10 (0= no pain; 10= worst possible pain), yielding a total score between 0 and 90.
Exploratory Aim 1c. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Day 7Caregiver burden measured by Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale \[MBCB\] mediated and/or moderated by hospitalist/clinician implementation of palliative care recommendations. Implementation of palliative care recommendations are measured using Electronic Health Record \[eHR\] documentation of recommendations by hospitalist/clinician at Day 7. This scale contains a total of 14 questions and 5 Likert scale responses (a lot less, a little less, the same, a little more, or a lot more) with higher scores indicating greater burden. Caregiver burden will be quantified by three subscales; objective, subjective and demand burdens. Objective burden is measured by 6 questions (total score between 0-30), subjective burden is measured by 4 questions (total score between 4-20), and demand burden is measured by 4 questions (total score between 4-20).
Exploratory Aim 1d. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Day 30Caregiver burden measured by Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale \[MBCB\] mediated and/or moderated by caregiver/patient implementation of palliative care recommendations. Caregiver/patient implementation of palliative care recommendations are measured using caregiver/patient report at Day 7. This scale contains a total of 14 questions and 5 Likert scale responses (a lot less, a little less, the same, a little more, or a lot more). Caregiver burden will be quantified by three subscales; objective, subjective and demand burdens. Objective burden is measured by 6 questions (total score between 0-30), subjective burden is measured by 4 questions (total score between 4-20), and demand burden is measured by 4 questions (total score between 4-20). Higher scores indicates greater burden.
Exploratory Aim 1e. Caregiver Evaluation of Quality of End-of-Life Care [CEQUEL]2-3 Months after death of patient, if applicableCaregiver evaluation of end-of-life care quality measured by Caregiver Evaluation of Quality of End-of-Life Care \[CEQUEL\]
Exploratory Aim 1f. Caregiver Bereavement (Caregiver Bereavement Items ([CBI])2-3 Months after death of patient, if applicableCaregiver bereavement measured by Caregiver Bereavement Items (\[CBI\]
Exploratory Aim 1a. Patient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])Day 7Patient symptom burden measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale \[ESAS\] mediated and/or moderated by hospitalist/clinician implementation of palliative care recommendations. Implementation of palliative care recommendations are measured using Electronic Health Record \[eHR\] documentation of recommendations by hospitalist/clinician at Day 7. Each item in the ESAS is scored using: 0-10 (0= no pain; 10= worst possible pain), yielding a total score between 0 and 90.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Patient and Caregivers were considered enrolled. The patients were not enrolled without an active caregiver. They were only given one study Identification number.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Intervention
Usual Care + Tele-consult Intervention Active Intervention: Half of the patients will receive tele-consult program. Tele-consult intervention includes: initial consult and 2 follow up contacts. Usual care includes assessment and treatment by the admitting physician, along with any subspecialists that are consulted.
210
Usual Care
Usual care includes assessment and treatment by the admitting physician, along with any subspecialists that are consulted. Usual Care: Half of the patients will receive usual care. Usual care includes assessment and treatment by the admitting physician, along with any subspecialists that are consulted.
208
Total418

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath23
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1610

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive InterventionUsual CareTotal
Age, Continuous
Caregivers
61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
58.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1
Age, Continuous
Patients
72.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
73.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
73.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Patient
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Patient
Not Hispanic or Latino
105 Participants104 Participants209 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Patient
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Black or African American
29.0 Participants27.0 Participants56 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants4.0 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
White
76.0 Participants73.0 Participants149 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients
Black or African American
30.0 Participants28.0 Participants58 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Patients
White
75.0 Participants76.0 Participants151 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
210 participants208 participants418 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers
Female
83 Participants72 Participants155 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers
Male
22 Participants29 Participants51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Patients
Female
53 Participants67 Participants120 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Patients
Male
52 Participants37 Participants89 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 1052 / 104
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1050 / 104
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1050 / 104

Outcome results

Primary

Patient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])

Change from baseline in patient-reported symptom burden measured using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) at baseline; change from baseline measured using the ESAS at 7 days post-baseline. Each item is scored using: 0-10 (0= no pain; 10= worst possible pain), yielding a total score between 0 and 90. A higher value represents the worse possible outcome. Higher score indicates higher symptom burden.

Time frame: baseline and 7 days post-baseline and 30 days post-baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionPatient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])baseline35.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Active InterventionPatient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])Day 738.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Active InterventionPatient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])Day 3040.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Usual CarePatient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])Day 3039.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Usual CarePatient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])baseline34.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Usual CarePatient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])Day 738 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Secondary

Caregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])

Change from baseline in caregiver-reported burden using the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) at baseline; change from baseline measured using the MBCB at 7 days post-baseline. This scale contains a total of 14 questions and 5 Likert scale responses (a lot less, a little less, the same, a little more, or a lot more). Caregiver burden will be quantified by three subscales; objective, subjective and demand burdens. Objective burden is measured by 6 questions (total score between 0-30), subjective burden is measured by 4 questions (total score between 4-20), and demand burden is measured by 4 questions (total score between 4-20).

Time frame: Baseline and 7 days post-Baseline

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows differ from the overall number analyzed because some of the participants failed to answer questions during data collection.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionCaregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])Day 7 Objective Burden19.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Active InterventionCaregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])Day 7 Subjective Burden11.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Active InterventionCaregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])Baseline Demand Burden12.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Active InterventionCaregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])Baseline Objective Burden19.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Active InterventionCaregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])Day 7 Demand Burden11 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Active InterventionCaregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])Baseline Subjective Burden13.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual CareCaregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])Day 7 Demand Burden10.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual CareCaregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])Baseline Objective Burden19.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual CareCaregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])Day 7 Objective Burden19.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual CareCaregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])Baseline Subjective Burden13.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual CareCaregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])Baseline Demand Burden11.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual CareCaregiver Burden Scale (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB])Day 7 Subjective Burden11.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Secondary

Caregiver Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])

Change from baseline in caregiver-reported quality of life using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 (PROMIS Global Health-10) at baseline; change from baseline measured using the PROMIS Global Health-10 at 7 days post-baseline. Items 1-6 are scored using: 1-5 (1=poor; 5=excellent). Item 7 is scored using 1-5 (1= not at all; 5= completely). Item 8 is scored using 1-5 (1= always; 5=never). Item 9 is scored using 1-5 (1=very severe; 5=none). Item 10 is scored using 0-10 (0=no pain; 10=worst pain imaginable).Items were summed , then scaled to T-scores (which would have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general adult population) using published procedures from Health Measures, with higher scores representing better health. As the PROMIS Global Health is scaled relative to the referent general population, there are no minimum and maximum values published.

Time frame: Baseline and 7 days post-Baseline

Population: The number of Caregivers changed at Day 7.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionCaregiver Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Baseline Physical Health48.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Active InterventionCaregiver Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Day 7 Physical Health50.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Active InterventionCaregiver Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Baseline Mental Health50 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Active InterventionCaregiver Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Day 7 Mental Health49.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Usual CareCaregiver Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Day 7 Mental Health48.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Usual CareCaregiver Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Baseline Physical Health47.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Usual CareCaregiver Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Baseline Mental Health47.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Usual CareCaregiver Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Day 7 Physical Health49.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])

Change from baseline in patient-reported quality of life using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 (PROMIS Global Health-10) at baseline; change from baseline measured using the PROMIS Health-10 at 7 days post-baseline. Items 1-6 are scored using: 1-5 (1=poor; 5=excellent). Item 7 is scored using 1-5 (1= not at all; 5= completely). Item 8 is scored using 1-5 (1= always; 5=never). Item 9 is scored using 1-5 (1=very severe; 5=none). Item 10 is scored using 0-10 (0=no pain; 10=worst pain imaginable).Items were summed , then scaled to T-scores (which would have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general adult population) using published procedures from Health Measures, with higher scores representing better health. As the PROMIS Global Health is scaled relative to the referent general population, there are no minimum and maximum values published.

Time frame: baseline and 7 days post-baseline

Population: The number of patients changed because of not completing the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionPatient Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Baseline Physical Health35.1 scaled to T-ScoresStandard Error 0.9
Active InterventionPatient Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Day 7 Physical Health38.6 scaled to T-ScoresStandard Error 0.9
Active InterventionPatient Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Baseline Mental Health45.5 scaled to T-ScoresStandard Error 0.8
Active InterventionPatient Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Day 7 Mental Health45.7 scaled to T-ScoresStandard Error 0.8
Usual CarePatient Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Day 7 Mental Health44 scaled to T-ScoresStandard Error 0.8
Usual CarePatient Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Baseline Physical Health34.6 scaled to T-ScoresStandard Error 0.9
Usual CarePatient Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Baseline Mental Health43.7 scaled to T-ScoresStandard Error 0.8
Usual CarePatient Quality of Life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health-10 [PROMIS Global Health-10])Day 7 Physical Health38 scaled to T-ScoresStandard Error 0.9
Secondary

Resource Use

Patient resource use (e.g., number of hospital readmissions, and number of Emergency Department \[ED\] visits) within 30 days after enrollment.

Time frame: 30 days post-Baseline

Population: Some participants reported that they were not sure which was considered missing data for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionResource UseNumber of Hospital Re-admissions0.2 count the number of visitsStandard Error 0.06
Active InterventionResource UseNumber of ER visits0.19 count the number of visitsStandard Error 0.06
Usual CareResource UseNumber of Hospital Re-admissions0.14 count the number of visitsStandard Error 0.04
Usual CareResource UseNumber of ER visits0.16 count the number of visitsStandard Error 0.05
Secondary

The Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Completely/Quite a Bit to the Patient Satisfaction With Care (Feeling Heard and Understood) Survey.

Change from baseline in patient-reported satisfaction with care using the Feeling Heard and Understood questionnaire at baseline; change from baseline using the Feeling Heard and Understood questionnaire at 7 days post-baseline. Likert scale using: completely, quite a bit, moderately, slightly, not at all. Which was then dichotomized into completely/quite-a-bit and moderately/slightly/not at all. The mean percentage of participants in these dichotomized categories were calculated along with the standard error of the mean. The higher mean percentage of the population that responded completely/ quite a bit equals a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 7 days post-Baseline

Population: Nine of the participants dropped out of the study by Day 7.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Completely/Quite a Bit to the Patient Satisfaction With Care (Feeling Heard and Understood) Survey.Baseline Completely/Quite a bit76.9 percentage of participantsStandard Error 4.1
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Completely/Quite a Bit to the Patient Satisfaction With Care (Feeling Heard and Understood) Survey.Day 7 Completely/ Quite a Bit88.4 percentage of participantsStandard Error 3.3
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Completely/Quite a Bit to the Patient Satisfaction With Care (Feeling Heard and Understood) Survey.Baseline Moderately/Slightly/Not at all23.1 percentage of participantsStandard Error 4.1
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Completely/Quite a Bit to the Patient Satisfaction With Care (Feeling Heard and Understood) Survey.Day 7 Moderately/Slightly/Not at all11.6 percentage of participantsStandard Error 3.3
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Completely/Quite a Bit to the Patient Satisfaction With Care (Feeling Heard and Understood) Survey.Day 7 Moderately/Slightly/Not at all9.5 percentage of participantsStandard Error 3
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Completely/Quite a Bit to the Patient Satisfaction With Care (Feeling Heard and Understood) Survey.Baseline Completely/Quite a bit76.9 percentage of participantsStandard Error 4.1
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Completely/Quite a Bit to the Patient Satisfaction With Care (Feeling Heard and Understood) Survey.Baseline Moderately/Slightly/Not at all23.1 percentage of participantsStandard Error 4.1
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Completely/Quite a Bit to the Patient Satisfaction With Care (Feeling Heard and Understood) Survey.Day 7 Completely/ Quite a Bit90.5 percentage of participantsStandard Error 3
Secondary

The Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.

Change from baseline measured using FAMCARE-2 at 7 days post-baseline. Each item was scored on a Likert scale of VS (very satisfied), S (satisfied), U (undecided), D (dissatisfied), VD (very dissatisfied), or NA (not applicable), which was then dichotomized into very satisfied/satisfied and undecided/dissatisfied/very dissatisfied. The mean percentages in these dichotomized categories was calculated along with the standard error of the mean. A repeated measures generalized linear mixed model was used to calculate the estimated marginal means (least squares means) and associated standard errors at each time point for the intervention and usual care groups. The higher mean percentage of the population that responded very satisfied/ satisfied equals a better outcome.

Time frame: baseline and 7 days post-baseline and 30 days post baseline

Population: The participants number analyzed in one or more rows differ from the overall number analyzed due to participants choosing not to answer certain questions from baseline to day 30.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Availability of Care Team/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied14.6 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Meetings with Care Team/Very Satisfied/Satisfied85.7 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Availability of Care Team/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied90.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Condition and Progress explained-Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied29.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Availability of Care Team/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied9.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Meeting with Care Team/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied14.3 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Emotional Support to Family/Very Satisfied/Satisfied76 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Information on Side Effects Very Satisfied/Satisfied87.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Emotional Support to Family Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied24 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30-Meetings with Care Team/Satisfied/Very Satisfied87.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Emotional Support of Family/Very Satisfied/ Satisfied81.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Patient Comfort Very satisfied/Satisfied94.3 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Emotional Support to Family/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied18.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Meetings with Care Team/Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied12.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Emotional Support to Family/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied90.9 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Information on Side Effects/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied12.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Emotional Support to Family Undecided/Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied9.1 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Speed of Treatment/Very Satisfied/Satisfied71 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Practical Assistance/Very Satisfied/ Satisfied86.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Conditions and Progress explained-Very Satisfied/Satisfied80.6 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Practical Assistance/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied13.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Speed of Treatment/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied29 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Practical Assistance/Very Satisfied/ Satisdfied80 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Information on Side Effects/Very Satisfied/Satisfied91.3 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Practical Assistance/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied20 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Speed of Treatment/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied78.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Practical Assistance Very Satisfied/ Satisfied84.5 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Patient Comfort Undecided/dissatisfied/very dissatisfied23.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Practical Assistance Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied15.5 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Speed of Treatment/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied21.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Doctors Attention to Symptoms/Very Satisfied/Satisfied80.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Information on Side Effects/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied8.7 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Doctors Attention to Symptoms/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied19.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Speed of Treatment/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied91.6 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Doctors Attention to Symptoms/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied84.3 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Conditions and Progress explained- Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied19.4 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Doctors Attention to Symptoms/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied15.7 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Speed of Treatment/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied8.4 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Doctors Attention to Symptoms/Very Satisfied/Satisfied92.9 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline-Respect for Dignity/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied88.1 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Doctors Attention to Symptoms/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied7.1 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Attention to Symptom description/ Very satisfied/Satisfied80.6 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Family Included/Very Satisfied/Satisfied81.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Patient Comfort Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied5.7 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Family Included/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied18.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Attentions to Symptom description/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied19.4 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Family Included/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied85.4 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline-Respect for Dignity/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied11.9 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Family Included/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied14.6 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Attention to Symptom description/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied82.4 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Family Included/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied89.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30-Conditions and Progress Explained- Very Satisfied/Satisfied90.6 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Family Included/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied10.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Attention to Symptom Description/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied17.6 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Info about managing symptoms/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied68.6 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7-Respect for Dignity/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied84.3 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Info about managing symptoms/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied31.4 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Attention to Symptom Description/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied92.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Info about managing symptoms/Very Satisfied/Satisfied83.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Patient Comfort-Undecided/Dissatisfied/very dissatisfied14.3 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Info about managing symptoms/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied16.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Attention to Symptom Description/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied7.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Info about managing symptoms/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied84.9 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7-Respect for Dignity/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied15.7 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Info about managing symptoms/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied15.1 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Physical Needs Met/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied84.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Effectiveness of Care Team/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied81.4 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Conditions and Progress Explained-Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied9.4 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Effectiveness of Care Team/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied18.6 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Physical Needs Met/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied15.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Effectiveness of Care Team/Very Satisfied/Satisfied83.6 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Respect for Dignity/Very Satisfied/Satisfied91.9 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Effectiveness of Care Team/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied16.4 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Physical Needs Met/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied85.1 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Effectiveness of Care Team/Very Satisfied/Satisfied91.7 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline-Conditions and progress explained-Very Satisfied/Satisfied70.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Effectiveness of Care Team/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied8.3 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Physical Needs Met/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied14.9 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Response to Changes/Very Satisfied/Satisfied77 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Respect for Dignity/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied8.1 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Response to Changes/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied23 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Physical Needs Met/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied92.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Response to Changes/Very Satisfied/ Satisfied83.9 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline-Information on Side Effects Very Satisfied/Satisfied77 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Response to Changes/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied16.1 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Physical Needs Met/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied7.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Response to Changes/Very Satisfied/ Satisfied92.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Meetings with Care Team/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied64.4 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Response to Changes/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied7.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Availability of Care Team/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied75.5 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Emotional Support to Patient/Very Satisfied/Satisfied79.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Patient Comfort-Very satisfied/ Satisfied85.7 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Emotional Support to Patient/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied20.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Availability of Care Team Undecided/Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied24.5 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Emotional Support to Patient/Very Satisfied/Satisfied89.7 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Meetings with Care Team/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied35.6 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Emotional Support to Patient/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied10.3 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Availability of Care Team/Very Satisfied/ Satisfied85.4 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Emotional Support to Patient/Very Satisfied/Satisfied89.2 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline-Information on Side Effects/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied23 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Emotional Support to Patient/Undecided Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied10.8 percentage of participants
Active InterventionThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Patient Comfort-Very satisfied/ Satisfied76.2 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Emotional Support to Patient/Undecided Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied9.1 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Patient Comfort-Very satisfied/ Satisfied78.6 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Patient Comfort Undecided/dissatisfied/very dissatisfied21.4 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Patient Comfort-Very satisfied/ Satisfied84.8 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Patient Comfort-Undecided/Dissatisfied/very dissatisfied15.2 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Patient Comfort Very satisfied/Satisfied90 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Patient Comfort Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied10 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline-Conditions and progress explained-Very Satisfied/Satisfied71.9 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Condition and Progress explained-Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied28.1 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Conditions and Progress explained-Very Satisfied/Satisfied85.4 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Conditions and Progress explained- Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied14.6 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30-Conditions and Progress Explained- Very Satisfied/Satisfied92.7 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Conditions and Progress Explained-Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied7.3 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline-Information on Side Effects Very Satisfied/Satisfied72.8 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline-Information on Side Effects/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied27.2 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Information on Side Effects Very Satisfied/Satisfied78.5 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Information on Side Effects/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied21.5 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Information on Side Effects/Very Satisfied/Satisfied86.4 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Information on Side Effects/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied13.6 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline-Respect for Dignity/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied87.4 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline-Respect for Dignity/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied12.6 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7-Respect for Dignity/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied88.8 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7-Respect for Dignity/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied11.2 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Respect for Dignity/Very Satisfied/Satisfied93.3 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Respect for Dignity/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied6.7 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Meetings with Care Team/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied68.2 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Meetings with Care Team/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied31.8 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Meetings with Care Team/Very Satisfied/Satisfied83 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Meeting with Care Team/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied17 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30-Meetings with Care Team/Satisfied/Very Satisfied89.7 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Meetings with Care Team/Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied10.3 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Speed of Treatment/Very Satisfied/Satisfied62.4 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Speed of Treatment/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied37.6 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Speed of Treatment/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied81.7 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Speed of Treatment/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied18.3 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Speed of Treatment/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied87.1 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Speed of Treatment/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied12.9 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Attention to Symptom description/ Very satisfied/Satisfied74.8 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Attentions to Symptom description/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied25.2 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Attention to Symptom description/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied84.1 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Attention to Symptom Description/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied15.9 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Attention to Symptom Description/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied94.1 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Attention to Symptom Description/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied5.9 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Physical Needs Met/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied83.1 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Physical Needs Met/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied16.9 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Physical Needs Met/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied85.3 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Physical Needs Met/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied14.7 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Physical Needs Met/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied93.4 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Physical Needs Met/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied6.6 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Availability of Care Team/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied73.9 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Availability of Care Team Undecided/Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied26.1 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Availability of Care Team/Very Satisfied/ Satisfied87.7 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Availability of Care Team/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied12.3 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Availability of Care Team/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied94.5 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Availability of Care Team/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied5.5 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Emotional Support to Family/Very Satisfied/Satisfied79.4 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Emotional Support to Family Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied20.6 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Emotional Support of Family/Very Satisfied/ Satisfied85 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Emotional Support to Family/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied15 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Emotional Support to Family/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied91.3 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Emotional Support to Family Undecided/Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied8.7 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Practical Assistance/Very Satisfied/ Satisfied78.9 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Practical Assistance/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied21.1 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Practical Assistance/Very Satisfied/ Satisdfied85.1 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Practical Assistance/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied14.9 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Practical Assistance Very Satisfied/ Satisfied85.3 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Practical Assistance Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied14.7 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Doctors Attention to Symptoms/Very Satisfied/Satisfied80.6 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Doctors Attention to Symptoms/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied19.4 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Doctors Attention to Symptoms/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied85.1 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Doctors Attention to Symptoms/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied14.9 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Doctors Attention to Symptoms/Very Satisfied/Satisfied88.5 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Doctors Attention to Symptoms/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied11.5 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Family Included/Very Satisfied/Satisfied75.6 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Family Included/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied24.4 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Family Included/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied86.5 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Family Included/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied13.5 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Family Included/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied92 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Family Included/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied8 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Info about managing symptoms/ Very Satisfied/ Satisfied69.6 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Info about managing symptoms/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied30.4 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Info about managing symptoms/Very Satisfied/Satisfied81.2 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Info about managing symptoms/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied18.8 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Info about managing symptoms/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied92 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Info about managing symptoms/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied8 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Effectiveness of Care Team/ Very Satisfied/Satisfied78.9 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Effectiveness of Care Team/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied21.1 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Effectiveness of Care Team/Very Satisfied/Satisfied90.7 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Effectiveness of Care Team/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied9.3 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Effectiveness of Care Team/Very Satisfied/Satisfied92.4 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Effectiveness of Care Team/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied7.6 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Response to Changes/Very Satisfied/Satisfied77.7 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Response to Changes/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied22.3 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Response to Changes/Very Satisfied/ Satisfied89.5 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Response to Changes/ Undecided/ Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied10.5 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Response to Changes/Very Satisfied/ Satisfied92 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Response to Changes/ Undecided/Dissatisfied/ Very Dissatisfied8 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Emotional Support to Patient/Very Satisfied/Satisfied80 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Baseline Emotional Support to Patient/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied20 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Emotional Support to Patient/Very Satisfied/Satisfied87.5 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 7 Emotional Support to Patient/Undecided/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied12.5 percentage of participants
Usual CareThe Mean Percentage of Caregivers Who Responded Very Satisfied/Satisfied to the Family Satisfaction With Care (FAMCARE-2) Survey.Day 30 Emotional Support to Patient/Very Satisfied/Satisfied90.9 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Exploratory Aim 1a. Patient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])

Patient symptom burden measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale \[ESAS\] mediated and/or moderated by hospitalist/clinician implementation of palliative care recommendations. Implementation of palliative care recommendations are measured using Electronic Health Record \[eHR\] documentation of recommendations by hospitalist/clinician at Day 7. Each item in the ESAS is scored using: 0-10 (0= no pain; 10= worst possible pain), yielding a total score between 0 and 90.

Time frame: Day 7

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionExploratory Aim 1a. Patient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])28.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Usual CareExploratory Aim 1a. Patient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])24.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Other Pre-specified

Exploratory Aim 1b. Patient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])

Patient symptom burden measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale \[ESAS\] mediated and/or moderated by patient/caregiver implementation of palliative care recommendations. Patient/caregiver implementation of palliative care recommendations are measured using patient/caregiver report at Day 7. Each item in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale \[ESAS\] is scored using: 0-10 (0= no pain; 10= worst possible pain), yielding a total score between 0 and 90.

Time frame: Day 7

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionExploratory Aim 1b. Patient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])24.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Usual CareExploratory Aim 1b. Patient Symptom Burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS])28.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Other Pre-specified

Exploratory Aim 1c. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).

Caregiver burden measured by Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale \[MBCB\] mediated and/or moderated by hospitalist/clinician implementation of palliative care recommendations. Implementation of palliative care recommendations are measured using Electronic Health Record \[eHR\] documentation of recommendations by hospitalist/clinician at Day 7. This scale contains a total of 14 questions and 5 Likert scale responses (a lot less, a little less, the same, a little more, or a lot more) with higher scores indicating greater burden. Caregiver burden will be quantified by three subscales; objective, subjective and demand burdens. Objective burden is measured by 6 questions (total score between 0-30), subjective burden is measured by 4 questions (total score between 4-20), and demand burden is measured by 4 questions (total score between 4-20).

Time frame: Day 7

Population: Some participants did not answer which resulted in missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionExploratory Aim 1c. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Objective Subscale19.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Active InterventionExploratory Aim 1c. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Subjective Subscale11.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Active InterventionExploratory Aim 1c. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Demand Burden11 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual CareExploratory Aim 1c. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Demand Burden10.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual CareExploratory Aim 1c. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Objective Subscale19.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual CareExploratory Aim 1c. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Subjective Subscale11.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Other Pre-specified

Exploratory Aim 1d. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).

Caregiver burden measured by Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale \[MBCB\] mediated and/or moderated by caregiver/patient implementation of palliative care recommendations. Caregiver/patient implementation of palliative care recommendations are measured using caregiver/patient report at Day 7. This scale contains a total of 14 questions and 5 Likert scale responses (a lot less, a little less, the same, a little more, or a lot more). Caregiver burden will be quantified by three subscales; objective, subjective and demand burdens. Objective burden is measured by 6 questions (total score between 0-30), subjective burden is measured by 4 questions (total score between 4-20), and demand burden is measured by 4 questions (total score between 4-20). Higher scores indicates greater burden.

Time frame: Day 30

Population: Some participants did not answer which resulted in missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active InterventionExploratory Aim 1d. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Objective burden19.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Active InterventionExploratory Aim 1d. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Subjective Burden11.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Active InterventionExploratory Aim 1d. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Demand Burden11.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual CareExploratory Aim 1d. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Objective burden19.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual CareExploratory Aim 1d. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Subjective Burden12.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual CareExploratory Aim 1d. Caregiver Burden (Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale [MBCB]).Demand Burden11.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Other Pre-specified

Exploratory Aim 1e. Caregiver Evaluation of Quality of End-of-Life Care [CEQUEL]

Caregiver evaluation of end-of-life care quality measured by Caregiver Evaluation of Quality of End-of-Life Care \[CEQUEL\]

Time frame: 2-3 Months after death of patient, if applicable

Population: This data was not collected.

Other Pre-specified

Exploratory Aim 1f. Caregiver Bereavement (Caregiver Bereavement Items ([CBI])

Caregiver bereavement measured by Caregiver Bereavement Items (\[CBI\]

Time frame: 2-3 Months after death of patient, if applicable

Population: This was not collected.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026