Feasibility
Conditions
Brief summary
The study team will conduct a two-group study to examine the feasibility of implementing an enhanced microenterprise intervention to reduce sexual risk behaviors. The team will enroll approximately 40 young adults. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first group (control) will receive text messages with information on job openings. The second group (intervention) will receive text messages with information on job openings plus HIV prevention and business educational sessions, mentored apprenticeship, a start-up grant (provided in 6 payments), and HIV behavioral economics text messages.
Detailed description
The study team will conduct a two-group study to examine the feasibility of implementing an enhanced microenterprise intervention to reduce sexual risk behaviors. The team will enroll approximately 40 young adults, aged 18 to 24, who are African-American, homeless, out-of-school, unemployed or under-employed, report unprotected/unsafe sex, and have access to a cell phone. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first group (control) will receive text messages with information on job openings. The second group (intervention) will receive text messages with information on job openings plus HIV prevention and business educational sessions, mentored apprenticeship, a start-up grant (provided in 6 payments), and HIV behavioral economics text messages. Data will be collected for 26 weeks (week 1 to week 26). Participants will undergo a baseline in-person interview at the time of enrollment (week 1) and be randomized to a group after completing a 3-week run-in period (week 1 to week 3). Each group will receive the assigned activities for 20 weeks (week 4 to week 23). An endline in-person interview will be conducted in and around week 26, respectively. Participants will also complete a weekly text message survey from enrollment (week 1) to the end of the study (week 26). The study team will collect feasibility information pertaining to two primary outcomes: (i) the proportion of participants in both groups who have responded to 70% or more of the weekly text message surveys at week 26 and (ii) the proportion of participants in the intervention group who have completed 70% or more of intervention activities (i.e., text message receipt, session attendance, grant spending, and mentor contact) at week 23. As secondary outcomes, the study team will collect feasibility information about the proportion of all participants who receive one or more informational text messages each week, the proportion of all participants who respond to a text message survey each week, the proportion of intervention participants who attend an educational session each week, the proportion of intervention participants who receive one or more mentor contacts each week, and the proportion of intervention participants who spend one or more grant payments each week. The study team will also examine the completion and variation in behavioral outcomes pertaining to the proportion of participants in each group who report one or more unprotected/unsafe sex acts in the last week and last month, the proportion of participants in each group who report one or more safer sex acts in the last week and last month, the proportion of participants in each group who report one or more HIV prevention care-seeking or information-seeking acts in the last week and last month, and the proportion of participants in each group who report one or more paid hours of work in the last week and last month. The study is anticipated to start in December 2018.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALIntervention
Participants will receive job announcements plus educational sessions, mentoring, behavioral economic text messages, and a start-up grant.
BEHAVIORALControl
Participants will receive job announcements only.
Sponsors
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
are: * African American; * Aged 18-24; * Living in Baltimore City; * Having experienced one episode of homelessness in last 12 months; * Unemployed or employed fewer than 10 hours per week; * Not enrolled in school; * Owning a mobile phone with text messaging function; * Reporting at least one episode of unprotected/unsafe sex in prior 12 months
Exclusion criteria
are: * Aged 17 or younger; * Older than 24 years; * Unwilling to provide consent for study participation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Participants in Both Groups Who Have Responded to 70% or More of the Weekly Text Message Surveys | Measured at week 26 | Proportion of participants in both groups who have responded to 70% or more of the weekly text message surveys (description) |
| Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Have Completed 70% or More of Intervention Activities (i.e., Text Message Receipt, Session Attendance, Grant Spending, and Mentor Contact) | Measured at week 23 | Proportion of intervention participants who have completed 70% or more of intervention activities (i.e., text message receipt, session attendance, grant spending, and mentor contact) (description) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Measured weekly at week 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 | Proportion of intervention participants who attend an educational session (description) |
| Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Measured weekly at week 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 | Proportion of intervention participants who receive one or more mentor contacts (description) |
| Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Measured weekly at week 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 | Proportion of intervention participants who spend one or more grant payments (description) |
| Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Unprotected Sex Acts in Last Week | Measured weekly at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 | Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more unprotected sex acts in last week (description) |
| Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Unprotected Sex Acts in Last Month | Measured at week 1 and 26 | Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more unprotected sex acts in last month (description) |
| Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Measured weekly at week 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 | Proportion of all participants who receive one or more informational text messages (description) |
| Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Safer Sex Acts in Last Month | Measured at week 1 and 26 | Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more safer sex acts in last month (description) |
| Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More HIV Preventive Care-seeking or Information-seeking Acts in Last Week | Measured weekly at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 | Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more HIV preventive care-seeking or information-seeking acts in last week (description) |
| Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More HIV Preventive Care-seeking or Information-seeking Acts in Last Month | Measured at week 1 and 26 | Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more HIV preventive care-seeking or information-seeking acts in last month (description) |
| Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Paid Hours of Work in the Last Week | Measured weekly at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 | Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more paid hours of work in the last week (description) |
| Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Paid Hours of Work in the Last Month | Measured weekly at week 1 and 26 | Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more paid hours of work in the last month (description) |
| Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Safer Sex Acts in Last Week | Measured weekly at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 | Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more safer sex acts in last week (description) |
| Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Measured weekly at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 | Proportion of all participants who respond to the text message survey (description) |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Intervention Job announcements plus educational sessions, mentoring, behavioral economic text messages, and a start-up grant.
Intervention: Participants will receive job announcements plus educational sessions, mentoring, behavioral economic text messages, and a start-up grant. | 19 |
| Control Job announcements only
Control: Participants will receive job announcements only. | 19 |
| Total | 38 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Intervention | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 21 Years | 21 Years | 21 Years |
| One or more episodes of homelessness within last 12 months | 19 Participants | 19 Participants | 38 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 19 Participants | 19 Participants | 38 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 19 participants | 19 participants | 38 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 13 Participants | 12 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 13 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 19 | 0 / 19 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 19 | 0 / 19 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 19 | 0 / 19 |
Outcome results
Primary
Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Have Completed 70% or More of Intervention Activities (i.e., Text Message Receipt, Session Attendance, Grant Spending, and Mentor Contact)
Proportion of intervention participants who have completed 70% or more of intervention activities (i.e., text message receipt, session attendance, grant spending, and mentor contact) (description)
Time frame: Measured at week 23
Population: Intervention participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Have Completed 70% or More of Intervention Activities (i.e., Text Message Receipt, Session Attendance, Grant Spending, and Mentor Contact) | 11 Participants |
Primary
Proportion of Participants in Both Groups Who Have Responded to 70% or More of the Weekly Text Message Surveys
Proportion of participants in both groups who have responded to 70% or more of the weekly text message surveys (description)
Time frame: Measured at week 26
Population: Participants in both groups
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of Participants in Both Groups Who Have Responded to 70% or More of the Weekly Text Message Surveys | 5 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Participants in Both Groups Who Have Responded to 70% or More of the Weekly Text Message Surveys | 9 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages
Proportion of all participants who receive one or more informational text messages (description)
Time frame: Measured weekly at week 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23
Population: All participants
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 9 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 4 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 5 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 6 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 7 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 8 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 10 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 11 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 12 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 13 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 14 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 15 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 16 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 17 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 18 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 19 | 38 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Receive One or More Informational Text Messages | Week 20 | 37 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey
Proportion of all participants who respond to the text message survey (description)
Time frame: Measured weekly at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26
Population: All participants including those in intervention arm and control arm
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 1 | 29 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 2 | 33 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 3 | 34 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 4 | 31 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 5 | 31 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 6 | 29 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 7 | 28 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 8 | 23 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 9 | 22 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 10 | 25 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 11 | 25 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 12 | 23 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 13 | 23 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 14 | 23 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 15 | 23 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 16 | 23 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 17 | 18 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 18 | 16 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 19 | 16 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 20 | 15 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 21 | 14 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 22 | 15 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 23 | 17 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 24 | 16 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 25 | 17 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of All Participants Who Respond to the Text Message Survey | Week 26 | 14 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session
Proportion of intervention participants who attend an educational session (description)
Time frame: Measured weekly at week 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23
Population: Intervention Participants Allowed on Site by CBO
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 4 | 12 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 5 | 12 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 6 | 12 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 7 | 10 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 8 | 11 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 9 | 10 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 10 | 11 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 11 | 10 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 12 | 11 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 13 | 8 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 14 | 8 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 15 | 7 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 16 | 6 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 17 | 5 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 18 | 5 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 19 | 3 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 20 | 3 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 21 | 4 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 22 | 4 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Attend an Educational Session | Week 23 | 6 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts
Proportion of intervention participants who receive one or more mentor contacts (description)
Time frame: Measured weekly at week 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23
Population: Intervention Participants
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 4 | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 5 | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 6 | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 7 | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 8 | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 9 | 11 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 10 | 11 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 11 | 8 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 12 | 4 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 13 | 7 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 14 | 3 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 15 | 4 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 16 | 2 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 17 | 2 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 18 | 5 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 19 | 4 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 20 | 3 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 21 | 2 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 22 | 2 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Receive One or More Mentor Contacts | Week 23 | 2 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments
Proportion of intervention participants who spend one or more grant payments (description)
Time frame: Measured weekly at week 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23
Population: Intervention participants
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 4 | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 5 | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 6 | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 7 | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 8 | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 9 | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 10 | 11 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 11 | 11 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 12 | 11 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 13 | 11 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 14 | 11 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 15 | 11 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 16 | 11 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 17 | 6 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 18 | 6 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 19 | 6 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 20 | 5 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 21 | 5 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 22 | 5 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Intervention Participants Who Spend One or More Grant Payments | Week 23 | 5 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More HIV Preventive Care-seeking or Information-seeking Acts in Last Month
Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more HIV preventive care-seeking or information-seeking acts in last month (description)
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 26
Population: Participants in each group
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More HIV Preventive Care-seeking or Information-seeking Acts in Last Month | Week 1 | 18 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More HIV Preventive Care-seeking or Information-seeking Acts in Last Month | Week 26 | 19 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More HIV Preventive Care-seeking or Information-seeking Acts in Last Month | Week 1 | 18 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More HIV Preventive Care-seeking or Information-seeking Acts in Last Month | Week 26 | 14 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More HIV Preventive Care-seeking or Information-seeking Acts in Last Week
Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more HIV preventive care-seeking or information-seeking acts in last week (description)
Time frame: Measured weekly at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26
Population: Outcomes 8, 10, 12, 14 were collected using experimental text messages. As specified, if not feasible, an in-person pre- and post-intervention paper questionnaire would be used and report via Outcomes 9, 11, 13, 15 that are identical to Outcomes 8, 10, 12, 14, respectively. Text messages require modifications given high missing and accurate data.
Secondary
Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Paid Hours of Work in the Last Month
Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more paid hours of work in the last month (description)
Time frame: Measured weekly at week 1 and 26
Population: Participants in each group
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Paid Hours of Work in the Last Month | Week 1 | 6 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Paid Hours of Work in the Last Month | Week 26 | 15 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Paid Hours of Work in the Last Month | Week 1 | 7 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Paid Hours of Work in the Last Month | Week 26 | 9 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Paid Hours of Work in the Last Week
Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more paid hours of work in the last week (description)
Time frame: Measured weekly at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26
Population: Outcomes 8, 10, 12, 14 were collected using experimental text messages. As specified, if not feasible, an in-person pre- and post-intervention paper questionnaire would be used and report via Outcomes 9, 11, 13, 15 that are identical to Outcomes 8, 10, 12, 14, respectively. Text messages require modifications given high missing and accurate data.
Secondary
Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Safer Sex Acts in Last Month
Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more safer sex acts in last month (description)
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 26
Population: Participants in each group
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Safer Sex Acts in Last Month | Week 1 | 16 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Safer Sex Acts in Last Month | Week 26 | 10 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Safer Sex Acts in Last Month | Week 1 | 15 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Safer Sex Acts in Last Month | Week 26 | 13 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Safer Sex Acts in Last Week
Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more safer sex acts in last week (description)
Time frame: Measured weekly at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26
Population: Outcomes 8, 10, 12, 14 were collected using experimental text messages. As specified, if not feasible, an in-person pre- and post-intervention paper questionnaire would be used and report via Outcomes 9, 11, 13, 15 that are identical to Outcomes 8, 10, 12, 14, respectively. Text messages require modifications given high missing and accurate data.
Secondary
Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Unprotected Sex Acts in Last Month
Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more unprotected sex acts in last month (description)
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 26
Population: Participants in each group
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Unprotected Sex Acts in Last Month | Week 1 | 10 Participants |
| Intervention | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Unprotected Sex Acts in Last Month | Week 26 | 7 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Unprotected Sex Acts in Last Month | Week 1 | 7 Participants |
| Control | Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Unprotected Sex Acts in Last Month | Week 26 | 6 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion of Participants in Each Group Who Report One or More Unprotected Sex Acts in Last Week
Proportion of participants in each group who report one or more unprotected sex acts in last week (description)
Time frame: Measured weekly at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26
Population: Outcomes 8, 10, 12, 14 were collected using experimental text messages. As specified, if not feasible, an in-person pre- and post-intervention paper questionnaire would be used and report via Outcomes 9, 11, 13, 15 that are identical to Outcomes 8, 10, 12, 14, respectively. Text messages require modifications given high missing and accurate data.