Rectal Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective was to evaluate the use and outcomes of robotic proctectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer in the elderly. A retrospective cross-sectional cohort study utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS; 2006-2013) was performed.
Detailed description
The objective was to evaluate the use and outcomes of robotic proctectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer in the elderly. A retrospective cross-sectional cohort study utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS; 2006-2013) was performed. All cases were restricted to age 70 years old or greater. The incidence of robotic proctectomy from 2006 - 2013 both as a whole as well as divided into approach was analyzed. Each approach was compared for both primary and secondary outcomes.
Interventions
Resection of the rectum
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 70 years of age or older * underwent proctectomy
Exclusion criteria
* emergent admissions * abdominoperineal resections
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| In-hospital Complications | through study completion, an average of 5 days | Complications to include mechanical wound, infections, urinary, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, systemic, surgical, and any complication |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| In-hospital mortality | through study completion, an average of 5 days | Death during admission |
| Length of Stay | through study completion, an average of 5 days | Length of in hospital stay |
| Costs and Charges | through study completion, an average of 5 days | Hospital charges refer to the total amount billed by the hospital. Hospital cost refers to the amount paid by the insurance provider |
Countries
United States