Skip to content

Tranexamic Acid vs Fractional CO2 Laser in Post-acne Hyperpigmentation

Tranexamic Acid Versus Fractional CO2 Laser in Post-inflammatory Hyperpigmentation in Acne Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03765021
Enrollment
25
Registered
2018-12-05
Start date
2018-12-31
Completion date
2019-07-31
Last updated
2018-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation

Brief summary

comparing between the effect of intradermal injection of TXA and low power low density fractional CO2 lasers on post acne hyperpigmentation

Detailed description

Randomized controlled split-face study. One side of the face will be assigned to TXA intradermal microinjection using Kapron 500mg/5ml ampoules (Amoun Pharmaceutical Company), the dose of 1 ml syringe with 100mg/ml. TXA will be prepared under sterile conditions. Injections will be applied intradermally on hyperpigmented areas at 1cm intervals. The injection will be repeated every two weeks for three months. The other side of the face will be randomly assigned to low power fractional CO2 laser with a power of 12 watts, spacing 700 micrometers (low density), and dwell time 300 microsecond every four weeks for three months.

Interventions

DRUGTranexamic Acid

One side of the face will be assigned to TXA intradermal microinjection using Kapron 500mg/5ml ampoules (Amoun Pharmaceutical Company), the dose of 1 ml syringe with 100mg/ml. TXA will prepared under sterile conditions. Injections will be applied intradermally on hyperpigmented areas at 1cm intervals. The injection will be repeated every two weeks for three months.

DEVICEFractional CO2 laser

The other side of the face will be randomly assigned to low power fractional CO2 laser with a power of 12 watts, spacing 700 micrometers (low density), and dwell time 300 microsecond every four weeks for three months.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Method of randomization: using closed envelopes containing cards with fractional CO2 Rt and fractional CO2 Lt and the patient will draw one of them blindly.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Egyptians of both sexes. * Age \> 18. * Patients who can avoid sun exposure one week after sessions. * Patients who stopped taking systemic isotretinoin for more than six months.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy and lactation. * Concomitant use of anticoagulants. * Bleeding disorders. * Personal or family history of DVT or thromboembolic events. * Scarring and keloid tendency. * Active skin infection, active HSV. * History of photosensitivity or photosensitizing medication. * Occupational sun exposure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of melanin index to assess change of post-acne hyperpigmentation3 monthsthe melanin index (MI) average is 1.10 +/-0.29 with higher values showing worse outcome. It will be measured using reflectance spectrophotometer in order to assess the degree of hyperpigmentation
Measurement of erythema index to assess change of post-acne hyperpigmentation3 monthsthe erythema index (EI) average is 1.29 +/- 0.38 with higher values showing worse outcome. It will be measured using reflectance spectrophotometer in order to assess the degree of erythema
Measurement of post-acne hyperpigmentation index to assess change of post-acne hyperpigmentation3 monthsthe post-acne hyperpigmentation index (PAHPI) ranges from 6-22 with higher values showing worse outcome. It is a summation of three scores (Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation(PIH) lesion size, median lesion intensity compared with surrounding skin and the number of PIH lesions).
Patient satisfaction score to assess change of post-acne hyperpigmentation3 monthsIt is a score ranging from 1-4 with improvement 0-25%=1, 26-50%= 2, 51-75%=3 and more than 75%=4 so higher values of patient satisfaction score showing better outcome

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026