Skip to content

PooR Embryo Yield Cleavage Stage Versus blaStocyst Embryo Transfer (PILOT STUDY)

Day 3 vs Day 5 Embryo Transfer for Patients With Low Embryo Numbers Going Through in Vitro Fertilization (PILOT STUDY)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03764865
Acronym
PRECiSE
Enrollment
10
Registered
2018-12-05
Start date
2021-03-01
Completion date
2022-02-28
Last updated
2023-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Keywords

cleavage embryo, blastocyst, embryo transfer, in vitro fertilization

Brief summary

The purpose of this small-scale pilot study (10 patients) is to test the study protocol for an RCT comparing IVF outcomes between day 3 and day 5 embryo transfer in patients with five or fewer embryos in a fresh embryo transfer in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. Information derived from this RCT would allow us to maximize the chances of success for these patients undergoing IVF.

Detailed description

Embryos created with assisted reproductive technology (ART, e.g. in vitro fertilization (IVF)) are commonly transferred into a woman's uterus at either the cleavage stage (day 3 after egg retrieval) or blastocyst stage (day 5 after egg retrieval). Until recently, most IVF cycles transferred embryos at the cleavage stage. However, with improvements in in vitro culture technique there has been a steady shift in practice to transfer embryos at the blastocyst stage (day 5 after egg retrieval) as this timing is about the same as when embryos reach the endometrial cavity in natural conception. There now is a general consensus that, for good prognosis patients, those with a high embryo from the IVF cycle, it is beneficial to transfer the embryo on day 5 rather than day 3. The rationale for this is to allow for self-selection of embryos, meaning those that develop to blastocyst in vitro are more likely to be viable in vivo and result in a viable pregnancy. In addition, transferring an embryo on day 5 improves uterine/embryonic synchronicity and thereby improves outcomes. This allows the transfer of fewer embryos and decreases the likelihood of multiples (twins, triplets, etc.). As a result, day 5 transfer has become standard of care for good prognosis patients in the United States. The American Society of Reproductive Medicine1 issued a committee opinion in 2013 to this effect stating that in good prognosis patients, blastocyst transfer results in a significant increase in live birth rates compared to transfer of an equal number of cleavage stage embryos (50.5% vs. 30.1%, P\< .01)2-5. In addition, for unselected and poor prognosis patients, no high-quality studies have evaluated whether blastocyst transfer increases live birth rates when compared to cleavage stage transfer. It is possible that the attrition of day 3 embryos in vivo is lower than the attrition in vitro and that day 5 transfer leads to loss of embryos that may have survived in vivo. In addition, women undergoing blastocyst culture are expected to have a higher incidence of cycle cancellation due to failure of the embryo to develop to a blastocyst6 and of having fewer embryos cryopreserved (frozen)7. Because of this, in Europe and Asia, day 3 transfer is the most common practice. On the other hand, transferring embryos on day 3 decreases our ability to select the best embryo, increases laboratory costs and may increase multiple pregnancy rates as, typically, more embryos are transferred at this time. In addition, in vivo, day 3 embryos are in transit through the fallopian tube during natural conception and are exposed to a different developmental and nutritional environment than day 3 IVF embryos transferred into the uterine cavity. Thus, it is possible that exposing day 3 embryos to the physiologically premature uterine environment (particularly one that has been subjected to superovulation and thus high levels of estrogen) increases embryo attrition compared to day 5 transfer, particularly in poor prognosis patients. Therefore, a clinical dilemma exists for poor prognosis patients (those with ≤5 embryos available on day 1 after egg retrieval). Currently, many practices in the United States transfer embryos from these patients on day 3 due to the risk of not having embryos available to transfer on day 5. Any remaining embryos are then frozen if they meet criteria on day 5/6. Retrospective data from Boston IVF, BIDMC's affiliated infertility treatment center, demonstrates that the live birth rate per transfer among poor prognosis patients is 18% among those who have a cleavage stage transfer and 38% among those who have a blastocyst transfer. At Boston IVF, about 35% of patients have a day 3 embryo transfer, which is consistent with national trends. For a patient undergoing an IVF cycle at Boston IVF, a physician may choose to transfer an embryo on day 3 or day 5 or allow the laboratory to make that decision, based on the number of embryos the patient has on day 1 after egg retrieval and the patient's age. This decision typically is made prior to the IVF cycle. As demonstrated above, pregnancy rates are far lower in the cleavage stage transfer group and there is the possibility that, within a select cohort of these patients, we are unrealistically raising patient's expectations of a live birth. The purpose of this study is to compare IVF outcomes among poor prognosis patients (≤5 embryos with two pronuclei) who have a day 3 transfer to those who have a day 5 transfer.

Interventions

PROCEDUREday 3 uterine transfer

uterine transfer of embryo on day 3 after fertilization (cleavage stage)

PROCEDUREday 5 uterine transfer

uterine transfer of embryo on day 5 after fertilization (blastocyst stage)

Sponsors

Boston IVF
CollaboratorOTHER
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

non-inferiority

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 44 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* First autologous IVF cycle * Written, informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Planned gestational carrier * Planned donor egg * Morbid obesity: BMI \>40 * History of recurrent pregnancy loss (≥2 spontaneous abortions) * Presence of uterine factor infertility * Treatment plan includes embryos cultured 'out of protocol' * Planned preimplantation genetic testing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
live birth9 monthsdefined as delivery of a live born infant ≥22 weeks of gestation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical pregnancy14 daysdefined by confirmation of a gestational sac on ultrasound
Ongoing pregnancy9 monthsdefined by ultrasound confirmation of a gestational sac with at least one fetal pole with a fetal heartbeat
Multiple pregnancy9 monthsdefined as twins or higher-order gestations
Time to pregnancy/live birth2 years

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026