Patient Monitoring
Conditions
Keywords
Wireless monitoring, hospital-territory integration
Brief summary
Study Information Indication\* This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, monocentric study for the evaluation of two different settings of critically ill patients recovered in Internal Medicine unit (IMU) and subsequently sent to subacute managed care unit or to earlier discharge, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of a wireless monitoring of clinical conditions vs. a traditional clinical monitoring on outcomes (critical adverse events, clinical exacerbations). Phase\*: 4, observational prospective Number of subjects\*: GROUP A and GROUP B: N=300 patients (150 per arm)
Detailed description
Background and Rationale\* In IMU there is an increasing concentration of patients with serious illness, under acute exacerbation of previous diseases, elderly patients with co-morbidities and/or fragility, needing high intensity care. Those patients need an overall evaluation of the rank of severity, complexity and dependence of their pathology, together with an evaluation of their risk of clinical deterioration, to implement a stratification of optimal treatments, intensity of care, length of stay. This could allow to optimize the approach to the complexity of the patients while helping containing costs, not only on the patients who are evaluated during their stay in IMUs, but also in those patients who undergo protected hospital discharge or transition to subacute intensive care unit. Objectives\* Some preliminary data on wireless monitoring in IMU have shown that the timely identification of clinical instability could led to a shorter length of stay. Monitoring on clinically unstable patients lets to prevent the deterioration of adverse events, thus allowing a rapid onset of intervention. There are some expected outcomes following the adoption of a wireless clinical monitoring system: 1. Shorter length of stay and earlier discharge 2. Lower transition rate to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) 3. Earlier transition of patients from higher to lower intensity of care 4. Shorter time needed by nurses for the detection of vital signs and clinical parameters, and possibility to dedicate to high-quality activities Therefore the present study aims to provide data regarding the impact of a specific and oriented integrated remote system for the monitoring of vital status of critically ill patients in the improvement of outcomes and in a more efficient prevision of length of stay and costs, and to verify whether the regular use of a wireless remote monitoring system could improve the quality of the assistance and reduce major complications vs. a traditional monitoring of clinical status executed by the nursing staff, in two specific settings of critically ill patients referring to Internal Medicine with acute conditions: GROUP A: Patients who undergo a transition to a subacute intensive care unit, in terms of reduction of re-exacerbation, re-access to emergency department or need of intervention by Internal Medicine unit specialists by the use of wireless monitoring vs. traditional monitoring. GROUP B: Patients who are selected for an earlier discharge from Internal Medicine Unit, in terms of non-inferiority in the incidence of major clinical complications.
Interventions
DEVICEVital signs wireless monitoring system
WIN@Hospital wireless remote monitoring is a modern light monitoring medical device with no need for continuous presence of a dedicated person. WIN@Hospital is based on an innovative modular and wearable device laid out for remote monitoring of several vital parameters 24/7. Dexcom G6 is a continuous glucose monitoring system which measures interstitial fluid glucose levels in people with diabetes from a sensor applied to the skin as an alternative to routine finger-prick blood glucose testing, and can produce a -continuous record of measurements which can be checked using an App. It can also indicate glucose level trends over time. Monitoring devices will be applied to all patients randomly assigned to the wireless monitoring arm, with a continuous monitoring setting over the first 5 days after the initiation of monitoring, corresponding to the starting of the observation (i.e. transition to subacute unit for GROUP A, discharge for GROUP B).
Sponsors
ASL Roma 6
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale del Garda
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, monocentric study for the evaluation of two different settings of critically ill patients recovered in Internal Medicine unit (IMU) and subsequently sent to subacute managed care unit or to earlier discharge, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of a wireless monitoring of clinical conditions vs. a traditional clinical monitoring on outcomes (critical adverse events, clinical exacerbations).
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* 1\. All patients admitted to the Internal Medicine Unit regardless of the reason for admission. 2\. For GROUP A: eligibility to the transition towards subacute managed care unit (based on clinical evaluation). 3\. For GROUP B: eligibility to early discharge based on clinical evaluation and stable MEWS/NEWS scores.
Exclusion criteria
* \- Inability to discernment * Lack of informed consent/unwillingness to participate * MEWS/NEWS out of range * Transition to rehabilitation, Hospice, RSA or other Acute unit * Pacemaker carriers
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Major complications' reduction | 24 months | Difference in the incidence of major complications 30 days after the transfer from the acute to the subacute areas and from the hospital to home among the patients subjected to continuous telemonitoring and those subjected to standard monitoring. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| % of early discharge | 24 months | Percentage of patients admitted to acute medicine who reach the 7-day transfer criteria in the ward for subacutes and percentage of patients admitted to acute medicine who reach the criteria for discharge at home within 7 days |
| % of late major complications | 24 months | 3\. Difference in the incidence of major complications at the conclusion of the standard telemonitoring / clinical monitoring phase 30 after the transfer from the acute to the subacute UOC and from the hospital to the home among the patients subjected to continuous telemonitoring and those subjected to standard monitoring . |
| Complications' risk factors | 24 months | Patients'characteristics who predispose to major complications |
Countries
Italy
Contacts
Primary ContactFilomena Pietrantonio, MD
Backup ContactAntonella Valerio, PHD
Outcome results
None listed