Skip to content

AUSTrian Randomized Interventional Study on Dialysis Accesses

Comparison of Tunneled Cuffed Dialysis Catheters Versus Arteriovenous Fistulae in Elderly or Multimorbid Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03764358
Acronym
AUSTRIA
Enrollment
220
Registered
2018-12-05
Start date
2019-03-06
Completion date
2022-10-04
Last updated
2018-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Catheter Infection, End Stage Renal Disease, Shunt Malfunction

Brief summary

Patients with diagnosed end stage renal disease and indication for chronic dialysis rely on a well-functioning access for dialysis. The KDOQI Guidelines For Vascular Access follows a fistula first approach for every patient, whenever possible. Thus, every patient, regardless of age, clinical state and co-morbidities an arteriovenous fistula should be preferred over a tunneled cuffed catheter (TCC). These recommendations are based on retrospective and register studies. There have been no prospective studies in this subject so far. In addition, most of the collected data refers to patients of all ages, regardless of their comorbidities and general clinical state. In this study, we address differences between two dialysis vascular access types in elderly or frail patients. We will compare TCCs with arteriovenous fistulas in the selected population consisting of elderly patients over 60 years of age or those with a Charlson Comorbidity Index \>6 independent of age. In our hypothesis TCCs will be superior to arteriovenous fistulas in this population regarding the examined end-points.

Interventions

DEVICEArteriovenous Fistula

Surgical implantation of an arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis

DEVICETunneled Cuffed Catheter

Placement of a tunneled cuffed catheter in surgical theatre

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age of 60 and higher * CCI Score \>6 when under 60 years * Patients with CKD G5 A1-3 with indication for hemodialysis * Stable clinical condition * Eligibility for both arteriovenous fistula on the upper extremitiesandTCC * Availability for follow-up. * Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Uncontrolled infection at screening and/or CRP \>5 mg/dl (normal \<0.5 mg/dl) at screening. * Poor general condition of health or malignancy not in remission at screening * Major surgery within 12 weeks before screening. * Pre-existent vascular access. * Patient not eligible for any one of the vascular access options.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite primary end-point of any access related complicationFrom placement of vascular access through study completion, an average of 3 years.Loss of access, catheter related bloodstream infection/shunt infection and/or thrombosis

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Primary ContactBenjamin Schairer, MD
benjamin.schairer@meduniwien.ac.at0043 40400 43890

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026