AAA, Angiography, Iliac Aneurysm
Conditions
Brief summary
The incidence of isolated common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms is low, but in combination with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) they are found in approximately 20-40% of cases. Basically, two different endovascular strategies can be applied to treat a CIA aneurysm with, including 1. the coverage and 2. the preservation of blood flow to the internal iliac artery (IIA). Coil and coverage of the IIA is related to ischemic complications, including buttock claudication, erectile dysfunction and the more severe spinal and colonic ischemia. Iliac branched devices (IBD) have been developed to exclude CIA aneurysms preserving the IIA and currently three alternatives are on the market. Clinical results of these devices are promising but loss of patency is not uncommon. The major difference between the two devices is the IIA component. The Cook IBD uses a -non-dedicated IIA component, while in the GORE® EXCLUDER® Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (Gore IBE device) a dedicated self expanding stent is used. Stresses and forces exerted onto the endograft by aortic pulsatility may have an effect on the durability and functioning of the endograft. Intermittent hinchpoints could also have an effect on stent integrity and stenosis. By evaluating endograft movement during the cardiac cycle (ECG-gated CTA) it is possible to assess the stress and force exerted onto the endograft. This might help gain insight into mechanisms underlying potential endograft failure, and aid procedural planning and the development of future devices with long-term durability. The choice for device is not part of this study.
Detailed description
Objectives:To compare the mobility of the hypogastic artery during the cardiac cycle before and six weeks after implantation of the Gore IBE device in conjunction with its dedicated self expandable Internal Iliac component (Sub-study A);and to quantitatively characterize the displacement of stents with regard to the main body and native IIA during the cardiac cycle on an implanted iliac branched endograft in conjunction with a non-dedicated IIA component (Cook IBD with Advanta V12 or Fluency) with those in conjunction with a dedicated self expandable Internal Iliac component (Gore IBE device). (Sub-study B) Study design: Sub-study A & B: Multicenter observational case studies Study population: Sub-study A: 15 prospectively included patients and sub-study B: 15 patients in each group that have been treated in the period October 2006 - July 2016.
Interventions
RADIATIONECG gated CTA
Routine care consists of a preoperative and several postoperative CTA scans. In A. The preoperative and first postoperative CTA will be replaced by ECG-gated CTA imaging and in B. the scheduled imaging will be replaced by an ECG-gated CTA. General information: The protocol is based on the ECG gated cardiac protocol using abdominal parameter settings.
Sponsors
Rijnstate Hospital
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Masking description
The choice for the device is not part of this study and will be made by the doctor in consultation with the patient and the patients anatomy.
Intervention model description
This study is designed as a multicenter prospective case series. 1. To prospectively enroll 15 patients that are scheduled for endovascular aneurysm repair using the Gore IBE device in conjunction with its dedicated self expanding Internal Iliac component. 2. Tocompare 15 patients that have been treated in the period October 2006- July 2016 with the Cook IBD with a non-dedicated IIA component (Advanta-V12 or Fluency) and 15 matched patients treated with Gore IBE device.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Sub-study A. scheduled endovascular aneurysm repair using the Gore IBE device. * Sub-study B. Patients that have been treated with an iliac branched device in the past in conjunction with either a dedicated IIA component (Gore IBE device) or non-dedicated IIA component (Cook IBD) and who are scheduled for follow-up imaging within the period July 2016-January 2017.
Exclusion criteria
* No specific
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mobility of hypogastric artery during cardiac cycle (sub study A) | Up to 1 year follow-up | The mobility of the hypogastic artery during the cardiac cycle before and after implantation of the Gore IBE device (Sub-study A). This will be measured at 15 patients by making an ECG gated CTA per and postoperative. |
| Characterize displacement during cardiac cycle (Sub Study B) | Up to 1 year follow-up | To quantitatively characterize the displacement during the cardiac cycle on an implanted iliac branched endograft in conjunction with a non-dedicated n balloon expandable IIA component (Cook IBD with Advanta V12 or Fluency) with those in conjunction with a dedicated self expandable Internal Iliac cComponent (Gore IBE device). (Sub-study B). This will be measured by 30 patients (15 pt Cook IBD and 15 pt Gore IBE) an ECG gated CTA postoperative. |
Countries
Netherlands
Outcome results
None listed