Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Conditions
Keywords
Postoperative pain, Alternative therapy, Acupuncture, TENS, Surgical nursing, Randomised controlled trial
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation (TAES) on pain and analgesic drug consumption in patients who had undergone abdominal surgery with a midline incision. Evidence for the effects of and transcutaneous electrical stimulation on pain and analgesic consumption on patients undergoing abdominal surgery with severe pain experience and high levels of neuroendocrine stress response is uncertain.
Detailed description
This research was conducted as a randomized controlled trial. 158 patients who had undergone abdominal surgery with diagnosis of gastric and colorectal cancer were assessed for eligibility. This research sample consisted of 48 patients who underwent abdominal surgery with a midline incision. The patients were randomized into three groups, the first intervention group, which used TENS (around the incision), the second intervention group, which used TAES (ST25, P6, ST36, Lİ4 acupuncture points) and the control group, which did not. Electric stimulation was performed at the 30th minute, second, 18th, 21st, 40th, and 45th hours after the operation. Pain scores and analgesic consumption were assessed in the first 48 hours after surgical intervention.
Interventions
OTHERTENS
4 electrodes were placed 2-3 cm lateral to the incision of the patients at the 30th minute and 2, 18, 22, 42, and 46th hours after the surgery and electrical stimulation was implemented at varying frequencies of 2-100 Hz for 30 minutes, at a maximum current intensity of 12 milliamperes that would not bother the patient or create muscle contractions, with a pulse duration of 0.25 min
OTHERTAES
4 electrodes were placed at the ST25, P6, ST36, and LI4 acupuncture points of the patients at the 30th minute and 2, 18, 22, 42, and 46th hours after the surgery and electrical stimulation was implemented at varying frequencies of 2-100 Hz for 30 minutes, at a maximum current intensity of 12 milliamperes that would not bother the patient or create muscle contractions, with a pulse duration of 0.25 min
Sponsors
Yuksek Ihtisas University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
TENS was applied to around the insicion: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was applied to around the incision. TAES was applied to acupuncture points: Transcutaneous electrical stimulation was applied to acupuncture points. No intervention: No stimulation was performed to the patients. A standard analgesia protocol for post-operative pain control was used in all patients included in the study. A standard antiemetic protocol was used for all patients after surgery.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Patients who had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of I-II * Patients were aged over 18 years * Patients who could read and write Turkish * Patients who were scheduled to undergo elective abdominal surgery with a midline incision for a diagnosis of stomach or colorectal cancer * Patients without any impairment of vision, hearing or speech
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who had a pacemaker * Patients whose skin integrity around the incision was degraded * Patients had a cognitive disorder, had a history of chronic pain, or were suffering from neurological, renal, cardiac or pulmonary disorders that could affect the test results * Patients with an opioid addiction * Patients those who had previously undergone electrical stimulation treatment * Morbidly obese subjects * Patients using psychoactive drugs
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative pain intensity | The pain levels were evaluated and compared within postoperative first 48 hours. | First Intervention Group: Electrical stimulation was implemented at the 30th minute and 2, 18, 22, 42, and 46th hours after the surgery. Second Intervention Group: Electrical stimulation was implemented at acupuncture points of the patients at the 30th minute and 2, 18, 22, 42, and 46th hours after the surgery. Control Group: No intervention was performed to the patients in the control group. The pain intensity of each groups' patients were recorded and compred at the post-operative 2, 18, 22, 42, and 46th hours. Pain intensity was evaluated with VAS. VAS with a range of 1-10 points was used while evaluating the pain intensity of all patients .The increase of the scale score shows that the pain intensity increases. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Nausea severity | The nausea severity of the patients were evaluated at the periods of 0-6, 6-24, 24-48 hours. Patients were assessed in postoperative first 48 hours. | VAS with a range of 1-10 points was used while evaluating the nausea severity of all patients .The increase of the scale score shows that the nausea severity increases. |
| Antiemetic drug consumption | Antiemetic drug consumption of the patients was evaluated at the periods of 0-24 and 24-48 hours. Patients were assessed in postoperative first 48 hours. | The antiemetic drug amount administered to the patients was recorded in mg. |
| Pulmonary function tests | Pulmonary function evaluations of the patients were performed at the 24th and 48th hours. Patients were assessed in postoperative first 48 hours. | The pulmonary functions of the patients were evaluated with a portable spirometer. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced vital capacity (FVC) values were recorded. The measurement of respiratory functions was performed with the patient wrapping the disposable mouthpiece well with the lips during the measurement. The patient was asked to breathe deeply and exhale suddenly and quickly. This process was repeated three times and the best performance was taken as the base value. |
| Vomiting | Vomiting status of the patients were evaluated at the periods of 0-6, 6-24, 24-48 hours. Patients were assessed in postoperative first 48 hours. | Vomiting: The number of times the patients vomited was recorded |
| Analgesic drug consumption | Analgesic drug consumption of the patients was evaluated at the periods of 0-24 and 24-48 hours. Patients were assessed in postoperative first 48 hours. | All patients were administered intravenous tramadol hydrochloride infusion with the Patient Controlled Analgesia for the first 48 hours. Dexketoprofen trometamol vial intravenous and/or 50 mg. Pethidine hydrochloride intramuscular was used as the rescue analgesic. |
Outcome results
None listed