Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intrathecally Administered RO7234292 (RG6042) in Participants With Manifest Huntington's Disease

A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intrathecally Administered RO7234292 (RG6042) in Patients With Manifest Huntington's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03761849
Enrollment
899
Registered
2018-12-03
Start date
2019-01-23
Completion date
2022-03-24
Last updated
2024-03-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Huntingtons Disease

Keywords

HD, RG6042, intrathecal, ASO, antisense oligonucleotide

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and biomarker effects of RO7234292 (RG6042) compared with placebo in participants with manifest Huntington's disease (HD)

Interventions

Intrathecal injection

DRUGPlacebo

Intrathecal injection

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Manifest HD diagnosis, defined as a DCL score of 4 * Independence Scale (IS) score \>= 70 * Genetically confirmed disease by direct DNA testing with a CAP score \>400 * Clinical assessment to ensure individual has intact functional independence at baseline to maintain self-care and core activities of daily living (ADLs).

Exclusion criteria

* Any serious medical condition or clinically significant laboratory, or vital sign abnormality or claustrophobia at screening that, in the investigator's judgment, precludes the patient's safe participation in and completion of the study * Pregnant or breastfeeding, or intending to become pregnant during the study or within 5 months after the final dose of study drug

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (cUHDRS) Score-Z ScoreWeeks 21 for ODC and 69 for NDCcUHDRS includes the Total Functional Capacity (range, 0-13; higher score means better functioning), Total Motor Score (range, 0-124; higher score means worse motor severity), Symbol Digit Modality Test (range, 0-110, correctly paired numbers-symbols in 90 seconds; higher score means better cognitive performance), and Stroop Word Reading (range, 0-no max value, correctly read colour words in 45 seconds; higher score means better cognitive performance) scores. A z-score for each test is calculated, which alone can be used to describe relationship between an individual's test score and the mean score of a target population. A z-score of 0 is the mean, and ±1 is 1 standard deviation from the mean. For cUHDRS, z-scores of each test are summed, whereby a higher cUHDRS score is better (score of -3.06-no max value) and a change of ≥1.2 is a meaningful worsening, shown to track functional decline.
Change From Baseline in the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeeks 21 for ODC and 69 for NDCTotal Functional Capacity (TFC) Scores are reported at Weeks 21 and 69. Total Functional Capacity Score ranges from 0 to 13, with a higher score representing better functioning.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Stroop Word Reading (SWR) Test Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeeks 21 for ODC and 69 for NDCStroop Word Reading-SWR number of words and colors read correctly is counted, with a higher score indicating better cognitive performance scores. There is no upper limit for SWR as it is a time based task. The lower limit (worst possible) however is 0; higher score is better meaning less severity. The differences in LS mean ( +/-SE) change from baseline SWR score between the active groups compared with the placebo group at Weeks 21 and 69 were reported. A negative change from baseline in the SWR indicates disease progression. The Least Square Mean values of Stroop Word Reading (SWR) Test Scores are reported below.
Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression, Severity Scale (CGI-S) Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeek 69 for NDC OnlyThe CGI-S is a single-item measure of current global severity and is completed by the clinician at specified clinic visits. The CGI-S is assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where higher scores indicate greater severity. Only NDC participants data were reported, all other data were not available. CGI-S) Scores range from 0 (not at all severe) to 10 (Extremely severe); lower score is better meaning less severity.
Percentage of Patients With a Decrease From Baseline of >=1 Point on the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeek 69 for NDC onlyOnly NDC participant data are available and reported. Total Functional Capacity-TFC score ranges from 0 to 13, with a higher score representing better functioning. In this outcome measure, participants with 1 or higher point score decrease from the Baseline TFC Total Score was considered. The Percentage of these participants with such a change was calculated.
Percentage of Patients With a Decline From Baseline of >=1.2 Points on the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale-cUHDRS ScoreWeek 69 for NDC OnlyOnly NDC participant data are available and reported. The cUHDRS is comprised of the sum scores of the subscales, score ranges and severities mentioned in the Outcome Measure Description 1 (please see above). In this outcome measure, participants with 1.2 or higher point score decrease from the Baseline Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale- cUHDRS Total Score was considered. The Percentage of these participants with such a change was calculated. cUHDRS lowest (worst) score possible value is -3.06 but no upper limit as it involves SWR; higher score is better meaning less severity.
Percentage of Patients With an Unchanged or Improved Score on the Clinical Global Impression, Change Scale ScoreWeeks 53 and 69 NDC onlyThe Clinical Global Impression, Change - CGI-C Scale is a single-item measure of change in global status scale and total scores are summed and reported. The CGI-C has 7 response options: very much worse, much worse, minimally worse, no change, minimally improved, much improved, and very much improved. Yes, No responses collected and total scores are summed and reported below. Percentage of participants who have unchanged or improved scores from the Baseline CGI-C Scores are calculated and reported here. Total CGI-C scores range from 1 (Very much improved) to 7 (Very much worse); lower score is better meaning less severity. Only NDC Arms data were available. Minimum and maximum values are 1 and 7 respectively.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse EventsUp to 117 Weeks (29 months)
Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Up to Week 21 for ODC, Up to Week 69 for NDCODC Week 21 and NDC Week 69 data were reportable. Total MOCA scores are reported. The MoCA is a patient-completed assessment used to detect cognitive impairment. It contains a series of basic assessments, including attention and visuospatial tasks. The total score ranges from 0-30, where lower scores indicate greater impairment.
Change From Baseline in Total Motor Score (TMS)Weeks 21 for ODC and 69 for NDCThe TMS score is the sum of the individual motor ratings obtained from administration of the 31-item motor assessment. The score ranges from 0 to 124, with a higher score representing more severe impairment.
Concentration of RO7234292 in PlasmaWeek 21 for ODC and Week 69 for NDCConcentration of tominersen in plasma reported
Trough Concentration of RO7234292 in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)Week 21 for ODC and Week 69 for NDCTominersen concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid
Incidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 21 for ODC and Week 69 for NDCData at Weeks 21 and 69 for Old Design and New Design Cohorts are reported respectively. All other timepoints were not evaluable and not meaningful.
Titer and Antibody Subtype, Determined if ADAs Are IdentifiedWeek 21 for ODC and Week 69 for NDCTiter and Antibody Subtype was not analyzed and there is not data to report due to participants' discontinuation
Change From Baseline in CSF mHTT Protein LevelBaseline, Week 101Data to be reported within 12 months after the primary completion.
Change From Baseline in Whole and Regional Brain Volumes, as Detrmined by Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Week 13 for ODCData reported only for ODC Arms. Analysis of Percent Change from Baseline in Volumetric MRI / BSI at 3 Months reported. Analysis performed using analysis of covariance with covariates of CAP, CAG, Age at Baseline and treatment included. Analysis of Change from Baseline in: Caudate Volume (mL)
Change From Baseline in CSF Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Proteint LevelWeek 21 for ODC, Weeks 21 and 69 for NDC
Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreFor ODC at 13th Month, for NDC at Week 101SI-Suicidal Idealation. For ODC, only Treatment Emergent Suicide-Related Events Based on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) are reported. Four constructs are measured: severity of ideation, intensity of ideation, behavior, and lethality of actual suicide attempts. Binary (yes/no) data are collected for 10 categories, and composite endpoints based on the categories are followed over time to monitor patient safety (Posner et al. 2011). It maps to the Columbia-Classification Algorithm for Suicide Assessment and meets the criteria listed in the U.S. FDA draft guidance for assessment of suicidality in clinical trials (FDA 2012). The higher scores indicate higher severity
Change From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeeks 21 for ODC and 69 NDCSymbol Digit Modality Test -SDMT test measures the number of items correctly paired maximum of 110 correct pairs in 90 seconds, more correctly paired items representing less impairment. The differences in LS mean ( +/-SE) change from baseline SDMT score between the active groups compared with the placebo group at Weeks 21 and 69 were reported. A negative change from baseline in the SDMT indicates disease progression. The Least Square Mean values of Symbol Digit Modality Test Scores are reported below. The minimum range for the SDMT scale is 0, indicating highest severity. A max number is not possible as it is a time based task, based on the number of correct answers within a set time frame. There are no validated SDMT score thresholds to indicate the level of HD symptom severity.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Canada, Chile, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study BN40423 was originally designed (under Protocol v1-3) to include three dosing regimens under a double-blinded monthly dosing paradigm: tominersen Q4W, tominersen every 8 weeks (Q8W) with alternating placebo, and placebo Q4W. The Sponsor decided to stop enrollment into the ODC and NDC started with new participants with 120mg tominersen Q8W and Q16W

Pre-assignment details

The study has 2 parts: Original Design Cohorts (ODC) and New Design Cohorts. (NDH) Participants in the two parts' cohorts are separate and sequential.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo ODC
Matching Placebo Q4W
36
RO7234292 Q4W ODC
RO7234292 120 mg Q4W
35
RO7234292 Q8W ODC
RO7234292 120 mg Q8W
36
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDC
NDC Arms were enrolled after the completion of ODC
260
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDC
NDC Arms were enrolled after the completion of ODC
261
Placebo NDC
NDC Arms were enrolled after the completion of ODC
260
Total888

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event100023
Overall StudyDeath000113
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up010245
Overall StudyParticipant could not come to site000010
Overall StudyPatient did not attend visit000001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision000144
Overall StudyProtocol Violation000221
Overall StudyRepeated MRI dId not pass QC.010000
Overall StudySF- safety Finding000001
Overall Studytransferred to OpenLabelExtension353436000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject000414335

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo ODCRO7234292 Q4W ODCRO7234292 Q8W ODCTomi 120 mg Q8W NDCTomi 120mg Q16W NDCPlacebo NDCTotal
Age, Continuous45.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
44.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
47.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
47.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
47.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
48.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
47.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants3 Participants7 Participants34 Participants38 Participants30 Participants120 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
28 Participants32 Participants29 Participants222 Participants215 Participants222 Participants748 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants8 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants4 Participants3 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants7 Participants8 Participants11 Participants26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
33 Participants35 Participants36 Participants246 Participants245 Participants246 Participants841 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants16 Participants23 Participants111 Participants128 Participants113 Participants413 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants19 Participants13 Participants149 Participants133 Participants147 Participants475 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 360 / 360 / 361 / 2632 / 2643 / 264
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 3623 / 3619 / 36204 / 263187 / 264193 / 264
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 361 / 361 / 3650 / 26328 / 26434 / 264

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (cUHDRS) Score-Z Score

cUHDRS includes the Total Functional Capacity (range, 0-13; higher score means better functioning), Total Motor Score (range, 0-124; higher score means worse motor severity), Symbol Digit Modality Test (range, 0-110, correctly paired numbers-symbols in 90 seconds; higher score means better cognitive performance), and Stroop Word Reading (range, 0-no max value, correctly read colour words in 45 seconds; higher score means better cognitive performance) scores. A z-score for each test is calculated, which alone can be used to describe relationship between an individual's test score and the mean score of a target population. A z-score of 0 is the mean, and ±1 is 1 standard deviation from the mean. For cUHDRS, z-scores of each test are summed, whereby a higher cUHDRS score is better (score of -3.06-no max value) and a change of ≥1.2 is a meaningful worsening, shown to track functional decline.

Time frame: Weeks 21 for ODC and 69 for NDC

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who contributed to data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ODCChange From Baseline in the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (cUHDRS) Score-Z ScoreWeek 210.103 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.193
RO7234292 Q4W ODCChange From Baseline in the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (cUHDRS) Score-Z ScoreWeek 21-0.367 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.189
RO7234292 Q8W ODCChange From Baseline in the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (cUHDRS) Score-Z ScoreWeek 21-0.139 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.197
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCChange From Baseline in the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (cUHDRS) Score-Z ScoreWeek 69-1.173 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.091
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCChange From Baseline in the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (cUHDRS) Score-Z ScoreWeek 69-0.793 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.093
Placebo NDCChange From Baseline in the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (cUHDRS) Score-Z ScoreWeek 69-0.630 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.091
Primary

Change From Baseline in the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) Score

Total Functional Capacity (TFC) Scores are reported at Weeks 21 and 69. Total Functional Capacity Score ranges from 0 to 13, with a higher score representing better functioning.

Time frame: Weeks 21 for ODC and 69 for NDC

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who contributed to data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ODCChange From Baseline in the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeek 210.150 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.246
RO7234292 Q4W ODCChange From Baseline in the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeek 21-0.463 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.242
RO7234292 Q8W ODCChange From Baseline in the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeek 21-0.460 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.255
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCChange From Baseline in the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeek 69-1.284 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.124
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCChange From Baseline in the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeek 69-0.921 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.126
Placebo NDCChange From Baseline in the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeek 69-0.883 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.124
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CSF mHTT Protein Level

Data to be reported within 12 months after the primary completion.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 101

Secondary

Change From Baseline in CSF Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Proteint Level

Time frame: Week 21 for ODC, Weeks 21 and 69 for NDC

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who were contributed data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable. No data could be reported in ODC Arm Week 69 due to no data were collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Placebo ODCChange From Baseline in CSF Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Proteint LevelWeek 2112.233 ng/mL
RO7234292 Q4W ODCChange From Baseline in CSF Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Proteint LevelWeek 2134.548 ng/mL
RO7234292 Q8W ODCChange From Baseline in CSF Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Proteint LevelWeek 2116.553 ng/mL
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCChange From Baseline in CSF Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Proteint LevelWeek 699.996 ng/mL
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCChange From Baseline in CSF Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Proteint LevelWeek 2131.893 ng/mL
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCChange From Baseline in CSF Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Proteint LevelWeek 215.406 ng/mL
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCChange From Baseline in CSF Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Proteint LevelWeek 69-2.559 ng/mL
Placebo NDCChange From Baseline in CSF Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Proteint LevelWeek 695.982 ng/mL
Placebo NDCChange From Baseline in CSF Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Proteint LevelWeek 213.365 ng/mL
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

ODC Week 21 and NDC Week 69 data were reportable. Total MOCA scores are reported. The MoCA is a patient-completed assessment used to detect cognitive impairment. It contains a series of basic assessments, including attention and visuospatial tasks. The total score ranges from 0-30, where lower scores indicate greater impairment.

Time frame: Up to Week 21 for ODC, Up to Week 69 for NDC

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who were contributed data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable.~NDC participants number are different at Week 21 and 69, reported data are from all evaluable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ODCChange From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Week 21-0.07 Scores on a SclaeStandard Deviation 0.86
RO7234292 Q4W ODCChange From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Week 210.10 Scores on a SclaeStandard Deviation 1.37
RO7234292 Q8W ODCChange From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Week 210.33 Scores on a SclaeStandard Deviation 0.92
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCChange From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Week 690.15 Scores on a SclaeStandard Deviation 3.26
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCChange From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Week 210.44 Scores on a SclaeStandard Deviation 2.91
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCChange From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Week 690.43 Scores on a SclaeStandard Deviation 3.22
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCChange From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Week 210.39 Scores on a SclaeStandard Deviation 2.66
Placebo NDCChange From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Week 210.45 Scores on a SclaeStandard Deviation 2.29
Placebo NDCChange From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Week 690.61 Scores on a SclaeStandard Deviation 2.44
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Stroop Word Reading (SWR) Test Scores' Least Squares Mean Values

Stroop Word Reading-SWR number of words and colors read correctly is counted, with a higher score indicating better cognitive performance scores. There is no upper limit for SWR as it is a time based task. The lower limit (worst possible) however is 0; higher score is better meaning less severity. The differences in LS mean ( +/-SE) change from baseline SWR score between the active groups compared with the placebo group at Weeks 21 and 69 were reported. A negative change from baseline in the SWR indicates disease progression. The Least Square Mean values of Stroop Word Reading (SWR) Test Scores are reported below.

Time frame: Weeks 21 for ODC and 69 for NDC

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who contributed to data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ODCChange From Baseline in Stroop Word Reading (SWR) Test Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeek 21-1.397 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 1.902
RO7234292 Q4W ODCChange From Baseline in Stroop Word Reading (SWR) Test Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeek 210.469 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 1.847
RO7234292 Q8W ODCChange From Baseline in Stroop Word Reading (SWR) Test Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeek 21-1.036 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 1.842
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCChange From Baseline in Stroop Word Reading (SWR) Test Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeek 69-5.224 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.803
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCChange From Baseline in Stroop Word Reading (SWR) Test Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeek 69-3.949 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.815
Placebo NDCChange From Baseline in Stroop Word Reading (SWR) Test Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeek 69-2.555 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.802
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Scores' Least Squares Mean Values

Symbol Digit Modality Test -SDMT test measures the number of items correctly paired maximum of 110 correct pairs in 90 seconds, more correctly paired items representing less impairment. The differences in LS mean ( +/-SE) change from baseline SDMT score between the active groups compared with the placebo group at Weeks 21 and 69 were reported. A negative change from baseline in the SDMT indicates disease progression. The Least Square Mean values of Symbol Digit Modality Test Scores are reported below. The minimum range for the SDMT scale is 0, indicating highest severity. A max number is not possible as it is a time based task, based on the number of correct answers within a set time frame. There are no validated SDMT score thresholds to indicate the level of HD symptom severity.

Time frame: Weeks 21 for ODC and 69 NDC

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who contributed to data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ODCChange From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeek 211.865 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.886
RO7234292 Q4W ODCChange From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeek 21-1.166 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.867
RO7234292 Q8W ODCChange From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeek 211.204 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.879
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCChange From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeek 69-2.641 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCChange From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeek 69-0.996 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.385
Placebo NDCChange From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Scores' Least Squares Mean ValuesWeek 69-0.216 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.379
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression, Severity Scale (CGI-S) Scores' Least Squares Mean Values

The CGI-S is a single-item measure of current global severity and is completed by the clinician at specified clinic visits. The CGI-S is assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where higher scores indicate greater severity. Only NDC participants data were reported, all other data were not available. CGI-S) Scores range from 0 (not at all severe) to 10 (Extremely severe); lower score is better meaning less severity.

Time frame: Week 69 for NDC Only

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who were contributed data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable. No data could be reported in ODC Arms due to no data were collected.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression, Severity Scale (CGI-S) Scores' Least Squares Mean Values0.662 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.093
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression, Severity Scale (CGI-S) Scores' Least Squares Mean Values0.640 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.094
Placebo NDCChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression, Severity Scale (CGI-S) Scores' Least Squares Mean Values0.545 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.093
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Motor Score (TMS)

The TMS score is the sum of the individual motor ratings obtained from administration of the 31-item motor assessment. The score ranges from 0 to 124, with a higher score representing more severe impairment.

Time frame: Weeks 21 for ODC and 69 for NDC

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who contributed to data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ODCChange From Baseline in Total Motor Score (TMS)Week 21-1.977 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 1.407
RO7234292 Q4W ODCChange From Baseline in Total Motor Score (TMS)Week 212.570 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.542
RO7234292 Q8W ODCChange From Baseline in Total Motor Score (TMS)Week 211.493 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.78
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCChange From Baseline in Total Motor Score (TMS)Week 694.028 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.575
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCChange From Baseline in Total Motor Score (TMS)Week 693.524 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.583
Placebo NDCChange From Baseline in Total Motor Score (TMS)Week 693.513 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.573
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Whole and Regional Brain Volumes, as Detrmined by Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Data reported only for ODC Arms. Analysis of Percent Change from Baseline in Volumetric MRI / BSI at 3 Months reported. Analysis performed using analysis of covariance with covariates of CAP, CAG, Age at Baseline and treatment included. Analysis of Change from Baseline in: Caudate Volume (mL)

Time frame: Week 13 for ODC

Population: Pharmacokinetic Population. Only those participants who were contributed data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable. No data could be reported in NDC Arm Week due to no data were collected, no participants were involved in this Arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ODCChange From Baseline in Whole and Regional Brain Volumes, as Detrmined by Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Week 13 Change from Baseline in: Ventricle Volume (mL)1.537 mLStandard Error 0.686
Placebo ODCChange From Baseline in Whole and Regional Brain Volumes, as Detrmined by Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Week 13 Analysis of Change from Baseline in: Caudate Volume (mL)0.996 mLStandard Error 0.444
Placebo ODCChange From Baseline in Whole and Regional Brain Volumes, as Detrmined by Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Week 13 Change from Baseline in: Whole Brain Volume (mL)0.189 mLStandard Error 0.119
RO7234292 Q4W ODCChange From Baseline in Whole and Regional Brain Volumes, as Detrmined by Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Week 13 Change from Baseline in: Ventricle Volume (mL)3.785 mLStandard Error 0.718
RO7234292 Q4W ODCChange From Baseline in Whole and Regional Brain Volumes, as Detrmined by Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Week 13 Analysis of Change from Baseline in: Caudate Volume (mL)0.330 mLStandard Error 0.491
RO7234292 Q4W ODCChange From Baseline in Whole and Regional Brain Volumes, as Detrmined by Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Week 13 Change from Baseline in: Whole Brain Volume (mL)-0.184 mLStandard Error 0.123
RO7234292 Q8W ODCChange From Baseline in Whole and Regional Brain Volumes, as Detrmined by Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Week 13 Analysis of Change from Baseline in: Caudate Volume (mL)1.124 mLStandard Error 0.467
RO7234292 Q8W ODCChange From Baseline in Whole and Regional Brain Volumes, as Detrmined by Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Week 13 Change from Baseline in: Whole Brain Volume (mL)-0.133 mLStandard Error 0.121
RO7234292 Q8W ODCChange From Baseline in Whole and Regional Brain Volumes, as Detrmined by Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Week 13 Change from Baseline in: Ventricle Volume (mL)2.011 mLStandard Error 0.7
Secondary

Concentration of RO7234292 in Plasma

Concentration of tominersen in plasma reported

Time frame: Week 21 for ODC and Week 69 for NDC

Population: Pharmacokinetic Population. Only those participants who were contributed data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable.~NDC participants number are different at Week 21 and 69, reported data are from all evaluable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RO7234292 Q4W ODCConcentration of RO7234292 in PlasmaWeek 21 Pre--dose0.511 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.523
RO7234292 Q8W ODCConcentration of RO7234292 in PlasmaWeek 21 Pre--dose0.203 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.0948
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCConcentration of RO7234292 in PlasmaWeek 21 Pre--dose0.20 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.37
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCConcentration of RO7234292 in PlasmaWeek 69 Pre dose1.63 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.4
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCConcentration of RO7234292 in PlasmaWeek 21 Pre--dose0.06 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.22
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCConcentration of RO7234292 in PlasmaWeek 69 Pre dose0.28 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.75
Secondary

Incidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).

Data at Weeks 21 and 69 for Old Design and New Design Cohorts are reported respectively. All other timepoints were not evaluable and not meaningful.

Time frame: Week 21 for ODC and Week 69 for NDC

Population: Pharmacokinetic Population. Only those participants who were contributed data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RO7234292 Q4W ODCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 21 Total Negative94.3 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 21 Negative Treatment All Samples91.4 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 21 Total Positive Treatment unaffected2.9 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 21 Total Negative91.7 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 21 Negative Treatment All Samples91.7 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 21 Total Positive Treatment unaffected0 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 69 Negative Treatment Unaffected0 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 69 Total Negative71.1 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 69 Total Positive28.9 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 69 Positive Treatment Induced0 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 69 Negative Treatment Unaffected1.1 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 69 Total Positive18.3 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 69 Total Negative81.7 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 69 Positive Treatment Induced0 Percentage
Placebo NDCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 69 Total Negative100 Percentage
Placebo NDCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 69 Positive Treatment Induced0 Percentage
Placebo NDCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 69 Negative Treatment Unaffected0.5 Percentage
Placebo NDCIncidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs).Week 69 Total Positive22.0 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

Time frame: Up to 117 Weeks (29 months)

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo ODCPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events77.8 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events80.0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events61.1 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events92.3 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events90.0 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events93.1 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score

SI-Suicidal Idealation. For ODC, only Treatment Emergent Suicide-Related Events Based on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) are reported. Four constructs are measured: severity of ideation, intensity of ideation, behavior, and lethality of actual suicide attempts. Binary (yes/no) data are collected for 10 categories, and composite endpoints based on the categories are followed over time to monitor patient safety (Posner et al. 2011). It maps to the Columbia-Classification Algorithm for Suicide Assessment and meets the criteria listed in the U.S. FDA draft guidance for assessment of suicidality in clinical trials (FDA 2012). The higher scores indicate higher severity

Time frame: For ODC at 13th Month, for NDC at Week 101

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10)8)Interrupted Attempt0 Percentage
Placebo ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 1) Wish to Be Dead0 Percentage
Placebo ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 6) Preparatory Acts or Behavior0 Percentage
Placebo ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 4) Active Suicidal Ideation with Some Intent to Act, without Specific Plan0 Percentage
Placebo ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation or Behavior1-5)0 Percentage
Placebo ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 7) Aborted Attempt0 Percentage
Placebo ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 10) Completed Suicide0 Percentage
Placebo ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSelf-injurious Behavior without Suicidal Intent0 Percentage
Placebo ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 5) Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent0 Percentage
Placebo ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSI(1-5) 3) Active Suicidal Ideation with Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to Act0 Percentage
Placebo ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 2) Non-specific Active Suicidal Thoughts0 Percentage
Placebo ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 9) Non-fatal Suicide Attempt0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSI(1-5) 3) Active Suicidal Ideation with Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to Act2.9 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 6) Preparatory Acts or Behavior0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 7) Aborted Attempt0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 2) Non-specific Active Suicidal Thoughts8.6 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 1) Wish to Be Dead8.6 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSelf-injurious Behavior without Suicidal Intent0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10)8)Interrupted Attempt0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 10) Completed Suicide0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 4) Active Suicidal Ideation with Some Intent to Act, without Specific Plan0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation or Behavior1-5)8.6 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 9) Non-fatal Suicide Attempt0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q4W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 5) Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 6) Preparatory Acts or Behavior0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 1) Wish to Be Dead2.8 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 2) Non-specific Active Suicidal Thoughts2.8 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSI(1-5) 3) Active Suicidal Ideation with Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to Act0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 4) Active Suicidal Ideation with Some Intent to Act, without Specific Plan0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 5) Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 7) Aborted Attempt0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10)8)Interrupted Attempt0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 9) Non-fatal Suicide Attempt0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 10) Completed Suicide0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSelf-injurious Behavior without Suicidal Intent0 Percentage
RO7234292 Q8W ODCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation or Behavior1-5)2.8 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSI(1-5) 3) Active Suicidal Ideation with Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to Act3.5 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 2) Non-specific Active Suicidal Thoughts6.9 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 1) Wish to Be Dead9.7 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation or Behavior1-5)10.0 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 9) Non-fatal Suicide Attempt1.5 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 6) Preparatory Acts or Behavior0.8 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 7) Aborted Attempt0.4 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10)8)Interrupted Attempt0 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 4) Active Suicidal Ideation with Some Intent to Act, without Specific Plan2.3 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 10) Completed Suicide0 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 5) Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent1.9 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSelf-injurious Behavior without Suicidal Intent0.4 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSelf-injurious Behavior without Suicidal Intent1.2 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 2) Non-specific Active Suicidal Thoughts5.8 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 1) Wish to Be Dead11.2 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10)8)Interrupted Attempt0.4 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSI(1-5) 3) Active Suicidal Ideation with Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to Act3.5 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation or Behavior1-5)11.2 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 4) Active Suicidal Ideation with Some Intent to Act, without Specific Plan0.4 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 6) Preparatory Acts or Behavior0.8 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 10) Completed Suicide0 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 9) Non-fatal Suicide Attempt1.5 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 5) Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent0 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 7) Aborted Attempt0.4 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 10) Completed Suicide0 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 5) Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent1.2 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 1) Wish to Be Dead10.4 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10)8)Interrupted Attempt0.4 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 9) Non-fatal Suicide Attempt1.5 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSI(1-5) 3) Active Suicidal Ideation with Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to Act4.2 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 7) Aborted Attempt0.4 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 2) Non-specific Active Suicidal Thoughts5.8 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation (1-5) 4) Active Suicidal Ideation with Some Intent to Act, without Specific Plan1.2 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSelf-injurious Behavior without Suicidal Intent1.2 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Behavior (6-10) 6) Preparatory Acts or Behavior0.8 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior, as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreSuicidal Ideation or Behavior1-5)10.8 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With a Decline From Baseline of >=1.2 Points on the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale-cUHDRS Score

Only NDC participant data are available and reported. The cUHDRS is comprised of the sum scores of the subscales, score ranges and severities mentioned in the Outcome Measure Description 1 (please see above). In this outcome measure, participants with 1.2 or higher point score decrease from the Baseline Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale- cUHDRS Total Score was considered. The Percentage of these participants with such a change was calculated. cUHDRS lowest (worst) score possible value is -3.06 but no upper limit as it involves SWR; higher score is better meaning less severity.

Time frame: Week 69 for NDC Only

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who were contributed data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable. No data could be reported in ODC Arms due to no data were collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Patients With a Decline From Baseline of >=1.2 Points on the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale-cUHDRS ScoreWeek 69 No55.5 Percentage of Participants
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Patients With a Decline From Baseline of >=1.2 Points on the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale-cUHDRS ScoreWeek 69 Yes44.5 Percentage of Participants
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Patients With a Decline From Baseline of >=1.2 Points on the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale-cUHDRS ScoreWeek 69 No67.9 Percentage of Participants
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Patients With a Decline From Baseline of >=1.2 Points on the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale-cUHDRS ScoreWeek 69 Yes32.1 Percentage of Participants
Placebo NDCPercentage of Patients With a Decline From Baseline of >=1.2 Points on the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale-cUHDRS ScoreWeek 69 No70.3 Percentage of Participants
Placebo NDCPercentage of Patients With a Decline From Baseline of >=1.2 Points on the Composite Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale-cUHDRS ScoreWeek 69 Yes29.7 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With a Decrease From Baseline of >=1 Point on the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) Score

Only NDC participant data are available and reported. Total Functional Capacity-TFC score ranges from 0 to 13, with a higher score representing better functioning. In this outcome measure, participants with 1 or higher point score decrease from the Baseline TFC Total Score was considered. The Percentage of these participants with such a change was calculated.

Time frame: Week 69 for NDC only

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who contributed to data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable. No data could be reported in ODC Arms due to no data were collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Patients With a Decrease From Baseline of >=1 Point on the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeek 69 Decline from baseline at least 1.2 points Yes55.7 Percentage
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Patients With a Decrease From Baseline of >=1 Point on the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeek 69 Decline from baseline at least 1.2 points No44.3 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Patients With a Decrease From Baseline of >=1 Point on the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeek 69 Decline from baseline at least 1.2 points Yes50.3 Percentage
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Patients With a Decrease From Baseline of >=1 Point on the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeek 69 Decline from baseline at least 1.2 points No49.7 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Patients With a Decrease From Baseline of >=1 Point on the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeek 69 Decline from baseline at least 1.2 points Yes49.5 Percentage
Placebo NDCPercentage of Patients With a Decrease From Baseline of >=1 Point on the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) ScoreWeek 69 Decline from baseline at least 1.2 points No43.7 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With an Unchanged or Improved Score on the Clinical Global Impression, Change Scale Score

The Clinical Global Impression, Change - CGI-C Scale is a single-item measure of change in global status scale and total scores are summed and reported. The CGI-C has 7 response options: very much worse, much worse, minimally worse, no change, minimally improved, much improved, and very much improved. Yes, No responses collected and total scores are summed and reported below. Percentage of participants who have unchanged or improved scores from the Baseline CGI-C Scores are calculated and reported here. Total CGI-C scores range from 1 (Very much improved) to 7 (Very much worse); lower score is better meaning less severity. Only NDC Arms data were available. Minimum and maximum values are 1 and 7 respectively.

Time frame: Weeks 53 and 69 NDC only

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who were contributed data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable. No data could be reported in ODC Arms due to no data were collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Patients With an Unchanged or Improved Score on the Clinical Global Impression, Change Scale ScoreWeek 69 Yes55.4 Percentage of Participants
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCPercentage of Patients With an Unchanged or Improved Score on the Clinical Global Impression, Change Scale ScoreWeek 69 No44.6 Percentage of Participants
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Patients With an Unchanged or Improved Score on the Clinical Global Impression, Change Scale ScoreWeek 69 Yes59.6 Percentage of Participants
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCPercentage of Patients With an Unchanged or Improved Score on the Clinical Global Impression, Change Scale ScoreWeek 69 No40.4 Percentage of Participants
Placebo NDCPercentage of Patients With an Unchanged or Improved Score on the Clinical Global Impression, Change Scale ScoreWeek 69 Yes56.3 Percentage of Participants
Placebo NDCPercentage of Patients With an Unchanged or Improved Score on the Clinical Global Impression, Change Scale ScoreWeek 69 No43.7 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Titer and Antibody Subtype, Determined if ADAs Are Identified

Titer and Antibody Subtype was not analyzed and there is not data to report due to participants' discontinuation

Time frame: Week 21 for ODC and Week 69 for NDC

Population: No participants and no data to report

Secondary

Trough Concentration of RO7234292 in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)

Tominersen concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid

Time frame: Week 21 for ODC and Week 69 for NDC

Population: Pharmacokinetic Population. Only those participants who were contributed data reported in the table. All other data were not evaluable.~NDC participants number are different at Week 21 and 69, reported data are from all evaluable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RO7234292 Q4W ODCTrough Concentration of RO7234292 in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)Week 214.44 ng/mLStandard Error 2.24
RO7234292 Q8W ODCTrough Concentration of RO7234292 in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)Week 211.51 ng/mLStandard Error 0.604
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCTrough Concentration of RO7234292 in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)Week 211.54 ng/mLStandard Error 0.99
Tomi 120 mg Q8W NDCTrough Concentration of RO7234292 in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)Week 691.74 ng/mLStandard Error 1.08
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCTrough Concentration of RO7234292 in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)Week 210.70 ng/mLStandard Error 2.29
Tomi 120mg Q16W NDCTrough Concentration of RO7234292 in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)Week 690.55 ng/mLStandard Error 2.43

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 26, 2026