Skip to content

The Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Dispersible and Immediate Release Tablets in HIV-1-Infected Children Less Than 12 Years of Age

Phase I/II Study of the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Dispersible and Immediate Release Tablets in HIV-1-Infected Children Less Than 12 Years of Age

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03760458
Enrollment
57
Registered
2018-11-30
Start date
2020-09-09
Completion date
2022-05-31
Last updated
2023-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of abacavir/dolutegravir/lamivudine dispersible and immediate release tablets in children living with HIV less than 12 years of age.

Detailed description

This study examined the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of fixed-dose combination abacavir (ABC)/dolutegravir (DTG)/lamivudine (3TC) dispersible and immediate release tablets in children living with HIV less than 12 years of age. Children were enrolled into one of five ABC/DTG/3TC dosing groups based on their weight. The first 5-7 children within each weight-band underwent intensive PK assessments 5-10 days after starting ABC/DTG/3TC to confirm dose selection. Children remained on their initial dose of ABC/DTG/3TC through Week 4. After Week 4, ABC/DTG/3TC dosing was adjusted based on PK results at the individual or weight-band level, and/or an individual child's growth and weight gain over time. Follow-up study visits for all participants occurred at Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. If participants had a known M184 resistance mutation, they had additional study visits at Weeks 8, 16, and 20. Study visits included physical examination, study drug adherence and tolerability questionnaires, blood collection, and intensive PK sampling. Following the Week 48 study visit, some children were allowed to continue follow-up through up to 144 weeks if alternative post-study drug supply was not yet available.

Interventions

DRUGAbacavir (ABC)/Dolutegravir (DTG)/Lamivudine (3TC) Dispersible Tablets

Fixed-dose combination dispersible tablets containing 60 mg ABC, 5 mg DTG, and 30 mg 3TC; administered orally once daily with or without food

DRUGAbacavir (ABC)/Dolutegravir (DTG)/Lamivudine (3TC) Immediate Release Tablets (Immediate release)

Fixed-dose combination immediate release tablets containing 600 mg ABC, 50 mg DTG, and 300 mg 3TC; administered orally once daily with or without food

Sponsors

International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group
CollaboratorNETWORK
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
ViiV Healthcare
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Weight 6 kg to less than 40 kg at entry * Antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve at entry or has been taking a stable ART regimen for at least six consecutive months at entry * Note: For ART-naïve children, receipt of antiretroviral (ARV) prophylaxis prior to diagnosis of HIV infection is permitted. For these children, ascertainment of this criterion may be based on parent or guardian report only, but available medical records should also be reviewed in relation to this criterion. * Note: For ART-experienced children (on a stable ART regimen), dose and formulation changes (e.g., for growth) within the six months prior to entry are permitted. For these children, ascertainment of this criterion must be based on medical records. * For ART-experienced children (on a stable ART regimen), has had a suppressed HIV viral load (HIV-1 RNA less than 200 copies/mL) for at least six consecutive months prior to entry * Note: To fulfill this criterion, at least two documented HIV-1 RNA results less than 200 copies/mL must be available, one based on a specimen collected at least six months prior to entry and one based on a specimen collected within 30 days prior to entry. * Note: Any documented HIV-1 RNA result greater than or equal to 200 copies/mL based on a specimen collected within six months prior to entry is exclusionary (see exclusion criterion below). * At screening, has normal, Grade 1, or Grade 2 laboratory test results for all of the following, based on testing of specimens collected within 30 days prior to entry and grading per the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (refer to the study protocol for guidance on severity grading): * Hemoglobin (greater than or equal to 8.5 g/dL or greater than or equal to 5.25 mmol/L) * Absolute neutrophil count (greater than or equal to 600 cells/mm\^3 or greater than or equal to 0.600 x 10\^9 cells/L) * Platelet count (greater than or equal to 50,000 cells/mm\^3 or greater than or equal to 50.00 x 10\^9 cells/L) * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; bedside Schwartz formula; greater than or equal to 60 ml/min/1.73 m\^2) * Alanine transaminase (ALT) (less than 5.0 x ULN) * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (less than 5.0 x ULN) * Total bilirubin (less than 2.6 x ULN) * Direct bilirubin (less than or equal to ULN) * Note: Laboratory tests may be repeated during the screening period (i.e., within 30 days prior to entry), with the latest results used for eligibility determination. * Note: For treatment-experienced children on an atazanavir-containing ART regimen, Grade 3 or higher total bilirubin is permitted. * At screening, has a negative test result for hepatitis B surface antigen based on testing of a specimen collected within 30 days prior to entry * Confirmed HIV-1-infection based on documented testing of two samples collected at different time points: * Sample #1 may be tested using any of the following: * Two rapid antibody tests from different manufacturers or based on different principles and epitopes * One enzyme immunoassay OR Western Blot OR immunofluorescence assay OR chemiluminescence assay * One HIV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR)\* * One quantitative HIV RNA PCR (above the limit of detection of the assay)\* * One qualitative HIV RNA PCR\* * One HIV total nucleic acid test\* * Sample #2 may be tested using any of the following: * Rapid antibody test. If this option is used in combination with two rapid tests for Sample #1, at least one of the three rapid tests must be United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, and the third rapid test must be from a third manufacturer or based on a third principle or epitope. * One enzyme immunoassay OR Western Blot OR immunofluorescence assay OR chemiluminescence assay * One HIV DNA PCR\* * One quantitative HIV RNA PCR (above the limit of detection of the assay)\* * One qualitative HIV RNA PCR\* * One HIV total nucleic acid test\* * For participants who are less than two years of age, or who are two years of age and older with any exposure to breast milk in the past 28 days, HIV-1 infection must be confirmed using the tests indicated above with an asterisk (\*) for Sample #1 and Sample #2. * Whole blood, plasma, or serum samples must be tested. If both samples are tested using antibody tests, at least one of the samples must be tested in a laboratory that operates according to Good Clinical Laboratory Practice guidelines and participates in an appropriate external quality assurance program. If nucleic acid testing is used, at least one test must be performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certified (for US sites) or Virology Quality Assurance (VQA) certified (for non-US sites) laboratory. For tests performed in other settings, adequate source documentation including the date of specimen collection, date of testing, test performed, and test result must be available. FDA approved testing methods should be used when possible. * HLA-B\*5701-negative based on documented testing at any time prior to entry * Note: Documented testing is required even if the potential participant has received ABC prior to study entry. * For females of reproductive potential (defined as having experienced menarche), not pregnant based on testing performed at screening * For females of reproductive potential who are engaging in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy, willing to use two methods of contraception while receiving study drug, based on participant and parent or guardian report at entry * One of the two methods must be highly effective; highly effective methods include surgical sterilization (i.e., hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, tubal ligation, or salpingectomy) and the following: * Contraceptive intrauterine device or intrauterine system * Subdermal contraceptive implant * Progestogen injections * Combined estrogen and progestogen oral contraceptive pills * Percutaneous contraceptive patch * Contraceptive vaginal ring * The highly effective method must be initiated prior to study entry. The second method should ideally be a barrier method. Male or female condom use is recommended with all other methods of contraception for dual protection against pregnancy and to avoid transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. * Based on parent or guardian report at entry, child is expected to be available for 48 weeks of follow-up * Parent or legal guardian is willing and able to provide written informed consent for child's study participation and, when applicable per local institutional review board/ethics committee (IRB/EC) policies and procedures, child is willing and able to provide written informed assent for study participation

Exclusion criteria

* Documented resistance to ABC, DTG, or 3TC * Note: Testing to rule out resistance is not required, and the M184V resistance mutation is not exclusionary. * For ART-experienced children (on a stable ART regimen), documented HIV-1 RNA result greater than or equal to 200 copies/mL based on a specimen collected within six months prior to entry * History of any of the following as determined by the site investigator based on participant/parent/guardian report and available medical records: * Malignancy (ever) * Hypersensitivity reaction to ABC (ever) * Receipt of any prohibited medication (refer to the study protocol for more information) within 30 days prior to study entry * Receipt of systemic interferon or any chronic systemic immunosuppressant medication within 30 days prior to study entry * Note: Systemic corticosteroids (e.g., prednisone or equivalent up to 2 mg/kg) taken for replacement or short course therapy are permitted. Intranasal or inhaled steroid use is also permitted. * Has any of the following as determined by the site investigator based on participant/parent/guardian report and available medical records * Current clinical evidence of pancreatitis * Currently-active tuberculosis (TB) and/or currently receiving rifampicin-containing TB treatment * Currently-active AIDS-defining (WHO Clinical Stage 4) opportunistic infection * Has any documented or suspected clinically significant medical condition or any other condition that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would make participation in the study unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCWeek 1; Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post dosing.Based on analysis of intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) samples. The geometric mean AUC0-24h for each Weight Band was compared to the lower and upper reference values (in ug\*h/mL) for DTG (35.1, 134), ABC (6.3, 50.4), and 3TC (6.3, 26.5). Steady state was measured at Week 1, but was re-collected later for two participants due to a specimen handling error for the Week 1 specimens.
Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCWeek 1; Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post dosing.Based on analysis of intensive PK samples. Steady state was measured at Week 1, but was re-collected later for two participants due to a specimen handling error for the Week 1 specimens.
Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCWeek 1; Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post dosing.Based on analysis of intensive PK samples. The geometric mean C24h for each Weight Band was compared to the lower and upper reference values (in ug/mL) for DTG (0.67, 2.97). Steady state was measured at Week 1, but was re-collected later for two participants due to a specimen handling error for the Week 1 specimens.
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 24Measured from treatment initiation through Week 24Adverse event (AE) grading was based on the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table), Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported.
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 24Measured from treatment initiation through Week 24AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 24Measured from treatment initiation through Week 24AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 24Measured from treatment initiation through Week 24AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator. Life-threatening was defined according to Version 2.0 of the Manual for Expedited Reporting of Adverse Events to DAIDS (DAIDS EAE Manual).
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 24Measured from treatment initiation through Week 24AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator. Seriousness was defined according to Version 2.0 of the DAIDS EAE Manual.
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 24Measured from treatment initiation through Week 24AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 48Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 48Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator. Life-threatening was defined according to Version 2.0 of the DAIDS EAE Manual.
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 48Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator. Seriousness was defined according to Version 2.0 of the DAIDS EAE Manual.
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 48Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 60Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported.
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 60Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 60Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 60Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator. Life-threatening was defined according to Version 2.0 of the DAIDS EAE Manual.
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 60Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator. Seriousness was defined according to Version 2.0 of the DAIDS EAE Manual.
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 60Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 48Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48Percentage of participants who experienced virologic failure based on the following definition: ART-experienced participants who had two subsequent viral loads greater or equal to 200 copies/mL at any time, or for ART-naive participants, two subsequent viral loads greater to or equal to 200 copies/mL at 24 weeks or after. The results are presented by ART experienced, ART naïve, and overall.
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 60Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60Percentage of participants who experienced virologic failure based on the following definition: ART-experienced participants who had two subsequent viral loads greater or equal to 200 copies/mL at any time, or for ART-naive participants, two subsequent viral loads greater to or equal to 200 copies/mL at 24 weeks or after. The results are presented by ART experienced, ART naïve, and overall.
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeeks 4, 24, and 48Viral loads less than the lower limit of quantification were imputed as one less than the lower limit.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeeks 4, 24, and 48Percentage of participants with virologic success of HIV-1 RNA less than 200 copies/mL using FDA snapshot algorithm at Weeks 4, 24, and 48. Viral loads less than the lower limit of quantification were imputed as one less than the lower limit.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeeks 4, 24, and 48Percentage of participants with virologic success of HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/mL using FDA snapshot algorithm at Weeks 4, 24, and 48. Viral loads less than the lower limit of quantification were imputed as one less than the lower limit.
Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeeks 4, 24, and 48Per protocol, CD4 + cell counts were not required at Week 60. CD4 results were therefore analyzed through Week 48. For participants who discontinued study drug prior to the other timepoints due to safety or virologic failure, results imputed using the baseline value.
Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeeks 4, 24, and 48Per protocol, CD4+ cell count percentages were not required at Week 60. CD4 results were therefore analyzed through Week 48. For participants who discontinued study drug prior to the other timepoints due to safety or virologic failure, results imputed using the baseline value.
Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in Total CholesterolBaseline, Weeks 24 and 48Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Where time was not collected, assessments on the day of treatment initiation are assumed to be taken prior to first dose. Missing results for participants who discontinued study treatment prior to the specified timepoint due to safety or virologic failure were imputed using the baseline value. Per protocol, there was no expectation of evaluating lipids in a fasting state for this study. A relative few participants were identified as having been in a fasted state at a given study visit, but the majority did not fast for this evaluation.
Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in HDLBaseline, Weeks 24 and 48Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Where time was not collected, assessments on the day of treatment initiation are assumed to be taken prior to first dose. Missing results for participants who discontinued study treatment prior to the specified timepoint due to safety or virologic failure were imputed using the baseline value. Per protocol, there was no expectation of evaluating lipids in a fasting state for this study. A relative few participants were identified as having been in a fasted state at a given study visit, but the majority did not fast for this evaluation.
Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in LDLBaseline, Weeks 24 and 48Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Where time was not collected, assessments on the day of treatment initiation are assumed to be taken prior to first dose. Missing results for participants who discontinued study treatment prior to the specified timepoint due to safety or virologic failure were imputed using the baseline value. Per protocol, there was no expectation of evaluating lipids in a fasting state for this study. A relative few participants were identified as having been in a fasted state at a given study visit, but the majority did not fast for this evaluation.
Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in TriglyceridesBaseline, Weeks 24 and 48Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Where time was not collected, assessments on the day of treatment initiation are assumed to be taken prior to first dose. Missing results for participants who discontinued study treatment prior to the specified timepoint due to safety or virologic failure were imputed using the baseline value. Per protocol, there was no expectation of evaluating lipids in a fasting state for this study. A relative few participants were identified as having been in a fasted state at a given study visit, but the majority did not fast for this evaluation.
Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeeks 4, 24, and 48Parent/guardian-reported percent adherence to study drug in the 30 days prior to the study visit according to adherence questionnaire responses.
Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TCMeasured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dosePopulation PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.
Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeeks 4, 24, and 48Parent/guardian-reported reason for missed doses of study drug in the 30 days prior to the study visit according to adherence questionnaire responses.
Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeeks 4, 24, and 48Parent/guardian-reported response of how well the person usually responsible administered the study drug in the way they were supposed to in the 30 days prior to the study visit according to adherence questionnaire responses.
Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeeks 4, 24, and 48Parent/guardian-reported response of how often the child received the study drug in the way they were supposed to in the 30 days prior to the study visit according to adherence questionnaire responses.
Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeeks 4, 12, 24, and 48Parent/guardian-reported ease of giving study drug according to palatability questionnaire responses.
Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeeks 4, 12, 24, and 48Parent/guardian-reported response of child's face when taking study drug according to palatability questionnaire responses.
Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeeks 4, 12, 24, and 48Parent/guardian-reported response of child's face when taking favorite food according to palatability questionnaire responses.
Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeeks 4, 12, 24, and 48Parent/guardian-reported time for study drug tablets to dissolve according to acceptability questionnaire responses
Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeeks 4, 12, 24, and 48Parent/guardian-reported satisfaction with the number of study drug tablets to dissolve according to acceptability questionnaire responses
Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry and confirmation of virologic failureARV resistance mutations at time of virologic failure and at entry for children with virologic failure.
Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeeks 4, 24, and 48Parent/guardian-reported number of missed doses of study drug in the 30 days prior to the study visit according to adherence questionnaire responses.
Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCMeasured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dosePopulation PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.
Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCMeasured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dosePopulation PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.
Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCMeasured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dosePopulation PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.
Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCMeasured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dosePopulation PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.
Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCMeasured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dosePopulation PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.
Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCMeasured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dosePopulation PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 48Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported.
Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 48Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.

Countries

Botswana, South Africa, Thailand, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Accrual occurred between September 2020 and June 2021 in Botswana, South Africa, Thailand, and the United States at 14 different medical clinic sites.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)
Children weighing 6 to less than 10 kg at study entry. These children received 3 dispersible tablets of ABC/DTG/3TC daily while weighing 6-\<10 kg; as their weight increased, they received higher doses consistent with their new weight band. Abacavir (ABC)/Dolutegravir (DTG)/Lamivudine (3TC) Dispersible Tablets: Fixed-dose combination dispersible tablets containing 60 mg ABC, 5 mg DTG, and 30 mg 3TC; administered orally once daily with or without food
9
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)
Children weighing 10 to less than 14 kg at study entry. These children received 4 dispersible tablets of ABC/DTG/3TC daily while weighing 10-\<14 kg; as their weight increased, they received higher doses consistent with their new weight band. Abacavir (ABC)/Dolutegravir (DTG)/Lamivudine (3TC) Dispersible Tablets: Fixed-dose combination dispersible tablets containing 60 mg ABC, 5 mg DTG, and 30 mg 3TC; administered orally once daily with or without food
12
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)
Children weighing 14 to less than 20 kg at study entry. These children received 5 dispersible tablets of ABC/DTG/3TC daily while weighing 14-\<20 kg; as their weight increased, they received higher doses consistent with their new weight band. Abacavir (ABC)/Dolutegravir (DTG)/Lamivudine (3TC) Dispersible Tablets: Fixed-dose combination dispersible tablets containing 60 mg ABC, 5 mg DTG, and 30 mg 3TC; administered orally once daily with or without food
15
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)
Children weighing 20 to less than 25 kg at study entry. These children received 6 dispersible tablets of ABC/DTG/3TC daily while weighing 20-\<25 kg; as their weight increased, they received higher doses consistent with their new weight band. Abacavir (ABC)/Dolutegravir (DTG)/Lamivudine (3TC) Dispersible Tablets: Fixed-dose combination dispersible tablets containing 60 mg ABC, 5 mg DTG, and 30 mg 3TC; administered orally once daily with or without food
10
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)
Children weighing 25 kg or greater at study entry. These children received 1 immediate release tablet of ABC/DTG/3TC daily. Abacavir (ABC)/Dolutegravir (DTG)/Lamivudine (3TC) Immediate Release Tablets (Immediate release): Fixed-dose combination immediate release tablets containing 600 mg ABC, 50 mg DTG, and 300 mg 3TC; administered orally once daily with or without food
11
Total57

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Main Study (Through Week 48)Withdrawal by Subject11000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWeight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Total
Age, Continuous1.35 years3.56 years6.44 years8.41 years9.74 years6.38 years
Age, Customized
6 to <12 years
0 Participants0 Participants8 Participants10 Participants11 Participants29 Participants
Age, Customized
<6 years
9 Participants12 Participants7 Participants0 Participants0 Participants28 Participants
CD4+ Cell Count2321 cells/mm^31452 cells/mm^3886 cells/mm^31155 cells/mm^3915 cells/mm^31201 cells/mm^3
CD4+ Percentage34.0 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes33.9 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes32.9 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes32.6 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes37.7 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes35.1 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants12 Participants15 Participants10 Participants7 Participants53 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol0.98 mmol/L1.53 mmol/L1.38 mmol/L1.67 mmol/L1.34 mmol/L1.37 mmol/L
HIV-1 RNA
<200 copies/mL
5 Participants12 Participants15 Participants10 Participants11 Participants53 Participants
HIV-1 RNA
≥200 copies/mL
4 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Known M184V mutation
No
9 Participants12 Participants13 Participants10 Participants9 Participants53 Participants
Known M184V mutation
Yes
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol2.52 mmol/L2.25 mmol/L2.50 mmol/L3.04 mmol/L2.36 mmol/L2.52 mmol/L
Pre-study Antiretroviral (ART) experience
ART-experienced
6 Participants12 Participants15 Participants10 Participants11 Participants54 Participants
Pre-study Antiretroviral (ART) experience
ART-naive
3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants1 Participants7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants10 Participants7 Participants6 Participants8 Participants37 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Botswana
4 Participants2 Participants3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
2 Participants7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
3 Participants1 Participants6 Participants4 Participants3 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants7 Participants5 Participants3 Participants6 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants5 Participants10 Participants7 Participants5 Participants31 Participants
Total Cholesterol4.01 mmol/L4.61 mmol/L4.51 mmol/L5.19 mmol/L4.27 mmol/L4.51 mmol/L
Triglycerides1.71 mmol/L1.20 mmol/L1.23 mmol/L1.08 mmol/L1.76 mmol/L1.20 mmol/L
Weight9.2 kilograms12.9 kilograms17.0 kilograms21.5 kilograms28.5 kilograms17.0 kilograms

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 90 / 120 / 150 / 100 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 910 / 1215 / 1510 / 1010 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 91 / 120 / 151 / 100 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC

Based on analysis of intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) samples. The geometric mean AUC0-24h for each Weight Band was compared to the lower and upper reference values (in ug\*h/mL) for DTG (35.1, 134), ABC (6.3, 50.4), and 3TC (6.3, 26.5). Steady state was measured at Week 1, but was re-collected later for two participants due to a specimen handling error for the Week 1 specimens.

Time frame: Week 1; Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post dosing.

Population: Participants receiving treatment at timepoint who received treatment for their enrollment weight band through the intensive PK collection, and through either the Week 4 visit or the occurrence of an adverse event prior to the Week 4 visit that 1) was grade 3 or higher and assessed as related to study drug, or 2) resulted in premature discontinuation of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCAbacavir (ABC)17.7 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.8
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCLamivudine (3TC)10.7 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 46
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDolutegravir (DTG)75.9 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.7
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDolutegravir (DTG)91.0 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.5
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCAbacavir (ABC)19.8 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 50.6
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCLamivudine (3TC)14.2 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.9
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDolutegravir (DTG)71.4 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.5
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCAbacavir (ABC)15.1 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.3
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCLamivudine (3TC)13.0 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.6
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCAbacavir (ABC)17.4 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.4
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCLamivudine (3TC)14.5 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.6
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDolutegravir (DTG)84.4 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.3
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDolutegravir (DTG)71.8 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.9
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCAbacavir (ABC)25.7 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.6
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCLamivudine (3TC)21.7 h*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.2
Primary

Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC

Based on analysis of intensive PK samples. The geometric mean C24h for each Weight Band was compared to the lower and upper reference values (in ug/mL) for DTG (0.67, 2.97). Steady state was measured at Week 1, but was re-collected later for two participants due to a specimen handling error for the Week 1 specimens.

Time frame: Week 1; Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post dosing.

Population: Participants receiving treatment at timepoint who received treatment for their enrollment weight band through the intensive PK collection, and through either the Week 4 visit or the occurrence of an adverse event prior to the Week 4 visit that 1) was grade 3 or higher and assessed as related to study drug, or 2) resulted in premature discontinuation of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.003 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 127.6
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.055 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.5
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG0.91 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 67.6
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG1.22 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 77.5
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.005 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 127.4
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.046 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48.3
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG0.79 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44.2
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.003 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 107.5
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.058 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.7
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.004 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 84.9
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.060 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.3
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG1.35 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 95.5
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG0.98 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.9
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.011 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 228.5
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.084 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35
Primary

Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC

Based on analysis of intensive PK samples. Steady state was measured at Week 1, but was re-collected later for two participants due to a specimen handling error for the Week 1 specimens.

Time frame: Week 1; Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post dosing.

Population: Participants receiving treatment at timepoint who received treatment for their enrollment weight band through the intensive PK collection, and through either the Week 4 visit or the occurrence of an adverse event prior to the Week 4 visit that 1) was grade 3 or higher and assessed as related to study drug, or 2) resulted in premature discontinuation of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC7.30 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.5
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC2.29 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.8
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG7.40 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG8.85 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.3
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC8.36 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 43.7
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC3.55 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.7
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG7.04 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC6.26 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC2.92 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC6.65 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.7
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC2.99 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.9
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG7.29 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.7
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG6.25 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.6
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC9.04 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.9
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC4.15 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.3
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 24

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 24

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 24

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 24

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 24

Adverse event (AE) grading was based on the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table), Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 24

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 24100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 2490.9 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 24100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 2480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 2480.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 24

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 24

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 24

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator. Life-threatening was defined according to Version 2.0 of the Manual for Expedited Reporting of Adverse Events to DAIDS (DAIDS EAE Manual).

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 24

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 24

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator. Seriousness was defined according to Version 2.0 of the DAIDS EAE Manual.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 24

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance Mutations

ARV resistance mutations at time of virologic failure and at entry for children with virologic failure.

Time frame: Entry and confirmation of virologic failure

Population: Participants experiencing confirmed virologic failure. Due to assay limitations, mutation results could not be obtained from the specimen collected at the virologic failure confirmation visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase V245E1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase A272P1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase R277K1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase T286A1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase L295L/I1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase E312N1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase I326V1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase I329V1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase G335D1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase M357K1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase K358R1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase G359S1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase K366R1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase A371V1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase T377S1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase K390R1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase K395R1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase A400T1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase K14R1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase A21T1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase V31I1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase V72I1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase L74I1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase T112V1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase V113I1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase T125A1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase V126L1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase G134N1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase I135V1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase K136R1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase V165I1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase A196P1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase V236I1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase V281M1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Integrase S283G1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Protease L10V1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Protease I13V1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Protease G16E1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Protease E35D1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Protease M36I1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Protease R41K1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Protease K43R1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Protease H69K1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Protease I72V1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Protease L89M1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase E6D1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase K11T1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase K20R1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase V35T1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase T39K1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase K43E1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase Q102K1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase K122E1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase D123S1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase C162S1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase T165I1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase K173A1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase Q174K1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase D177E1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase T200A1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase I202V1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase Q207A1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase L210M1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Antiretroviral (ARV) Resistance MutationsEntry Visit: Reverse Transcriptase R211S1 Participants
Secondary

Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell Count

Per protocol, CD4 + cell counts were not required at Week 60. CD4 results were therefore analyzed through Week 48. For participants who discontinued study drug prior to the other timepoints due to safety or virologic failure, results imputed using the baseline value.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 24, and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 242208 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 43528 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 481853 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 41385 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 481235 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 241184 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 4812 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 24894 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 48930 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 48942 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 4992 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 24944 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 24920 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 4841 cells/mm^3
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Cell CountWeek 48777 cells/mm^3
Secondary

Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ Percentage

Per protocol, CD4+ cell count percentages were not required at Week 60. CD4 results were therefore analyzed through Week 48. For participants who discontinued study drug prior to the other timepoints due to safety or virologic failure, results imputed using the baseline value.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 24, and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 441.6 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 4834.8 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 2436.6 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 2435.2 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 433.9 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 4834.1 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 2433.5 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 432.4 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 4830.5 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 434.4 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 4833.5 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 2437.7 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 2438.6 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 439.5 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1, Q3) CD4+ PercentageWeek 4837.6 percentage of CD4+ in total lymphocytes
Secondary

Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in HDL

Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Where time was not collected, assessments on the day of treatment initiation are assumed to be taken prior to first dose. Missing results for participants who discontinued study treatment prior to the specified timepoint due to safety or virologic failure were imputed using the baseline value. Per protocol, there was no expectation of evaluating lipids in a fasting state for this study. A relative few participants were identified as having been in a fasted state at a given study visit, but the majority did not fast for this evaluation.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in HDLBaseline to Week 24-0.01 mmol/L
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in HDLBaseline to Week 48-0.10 mmol/L
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in HDLBaseline to Week 24-0.06 mmol/L
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in HDLBaseline to Week 48-0.20 mmol/L
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in HDLBaseline to Week 24-0.19 mmol/L
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in HDLBaseline to Week 48-0.24 mmol/L
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in HDLBaseline to Week 48-0.19 mmol/L
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in HDLBaseline to Week 24-0.15 mmol/L
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in HDLBaseline to Week 24-0.06 mmol/L
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in HDLBaseline to Week 480.05 mmol/L
Secondary

Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in LDL

Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Where time was not collected, assessments on the day of treatment initiation are assumed to be taken prior to first dose. Missing results for participants who discontinued study treatment prior to the specified timepoint due to safety or virologic failure were imputed using the baseline value. Per protocol, there was no expectation of evaluating lipids in a fasting state for this study. A relative few participants were identified as having been in a fasted state at a given study visit, but the majority did not fast for this evaluation.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in LDLBaseline to Week 240.18 mmol/L
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in LDLBaseline to Week 480.05 mmol/L
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in LDLBaseline to Week 24-0.20 mmol/L
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in LDLBaseline to Week 48-0.13 mmol/L
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in LDLBaseline to Week 24-0.26 mmol/L
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in LDLBaseline to Week 48-0.30 mmol/L
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in LDLBaseline to Week 480.00 mmol/L
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in LDLBaseline to Week 24-0.22 mmol/L
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in LDLBaseline to Week 24-0.21 mmol/L
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in LDLBaseline to Week 480.03 mmol/L
Secondary

Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol

Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Where time was not collected, assessments on the day of treatment initiation are assumed to be taken prior to first dose. Missing results for participants who discontinued study treatment prior to the specified timepoint due to safety or virologic failure were imputed using the baseline value. Per protocol, there was no expectation of evaluating lipids in a fasting state for this study. A relative few participants were identified as having been in a fasted state at a given study visit, but the majority did not fast for this evaluation.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in Total CholesterolBaseline to Week 24-0.31 mmol/L
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in Total CholesterolBaseline to Week 480.00 mmol/L
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in Total CholesterolBaseline to Week 24-0.70 mmol/L
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in Total CholesterolBaseline to Week 48-0.50 mmol/L
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in Total CholesterolBaseline to Week 24-0.67 mmol/L
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in Total CholesterolBaseline to Week 48-0.68 mmol/L
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in Total CholesterolBaseline to Week 48-0.25 mmol/L
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in Total CholesterolBaseline to Week 24-0.32 mmol/L
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in Total CholesterolBaseline to Week 24-0.18 mmol/L
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in Total CholesterolBaseline to Week 48-0.09 mmol/L
Secondary

Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in Triglycerides

Baseline is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Where time was not collected, assessments on the day of treatment initiation are assumed to be taken prior to first dose. Missing results for participants who discontinued study treatment prior to the specified timepoint due to safety or virologic failure were imputed using the baseline value. Per protocol, there was no expectation of evaluating lipids in a fasting state for this study. A relative few participants were identified as having been in a fasted state at a given study visit, but the majority did not fast for this evaluation.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in TriglyceridesBaseline to Week 24-0.51 mmol/L
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in TriglyceridesBaseline to Week 48-0.43 mmol/L
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in TriglyceridesBaseline to Week 24-0.51 mmol/L
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in TriglyceridesBaseline to Week 48-0.32 mmol/L
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in TriglyceridesBaseline to Week 24-0.17 mmol/L
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in TriglyceridesBaseline to Week 48-0.21 mmol/L
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in TriglyceridesBaseline to Week 480.00 mmol/L
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in TriglyceridesBaseline to Week 24-0.20 mmol/L
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in TriglyceridesBaseline to Week 24-0.24 mmol/L
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Median (Q1,Q3) Change From Baseline in TriglyceridesBaseline to Week 48-0.27 mmol/L
Secondary

Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study Drug

Parent/guardian-reported ease of giving study drug according to palatability questionnaire responses.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who received at least one dose of study treatment. One participant in Weight Band #4 discontinued treatment following the Week 24 visit and was not included in analysis at Week 48.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes by themselves easily0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes easily with help6 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4You need to hold and force the child2 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes by themselves easily0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes easily with help8 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes by themselves easily0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes easily with help8 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes by themselves easily0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes easily with help8 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes easily with help5 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes easily with help6 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes by themselves easily3 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes by themselves easily5 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes easily with help8 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes by themselves easily2 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes by themselves easily4 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes easily with help5 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48You need to hold and force the child1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward2 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes easily with help4 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes by themselves easily10 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes easily with help5 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes by themselves easily12 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes easily with help3 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes by themselves easily10 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes by themselves easily11 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes easily with help4 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes easily with help2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes easily with help2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes easily with help2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes by themselves easily6 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes by themselves easily9 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes by themselves easily7 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes by themselves easily8 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes easily with help0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes by themselves easily10 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes easily with help3 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes by themselves easily9 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes easily with help2 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes easily with help2 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24The child takes by themselves easily8 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes by themselves easily9 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 24You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 12The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 48The child takes easily with help1 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4You need to hold and force the child0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Ease of Giving Study DrugWeek 4The child takes with help but you need to threaten, bribe, or promise a reward0 Participants
Secondary

Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study Drug

Parent/guardian-reported number of missed doses of study drug in the 30 days prior to the study visit according to adherence questionnaire responses.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 24, and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who received at least one dose of study treatment. One participant in Weight Band #4 discontinued treatment following the Week 24 visit and was not included in analysis at Week 48.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 40 missed doses
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 480 missed doses
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 240 missed doses
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 240 missed doses
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 40 missed doses
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 480 missed doses
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 240 missed doses
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 40 missed doses
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 480 missed doses
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 40 missed doses
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 480 missed doses
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 240 missed doses
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 240 missed doses
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 40 missed doses
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Number of Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 480 missed doses
Secondary

Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study Drug

Parent/guardian-reported percent adherence to study drug in the 30 days prior to the study visit according to adherence questionnaire responses.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 24, and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who received at least one dose of study treatment. One participant in Weight Band #4 discontinued treatment following the Week 24 visit and was not included in analysis at Week 48.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 4100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 48100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 24100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 24100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 4100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 48100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 24100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 4100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 48100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 4100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 48100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 24100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 24100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 4100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Percent Adherence to Study DrugWeek 48100.0 percentage of study drug taken
Secondary

Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study Drug

Parent/guardian-reported reason for missed doses of study drug in the 30 days prior to the study visit according to adherence questionnaire responses.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 24, and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who received at least one dose of study treatment. One participant in Weight Band #4 discontinued treatment following the Week 24 visit and was not included in analysis at Week 48. All other instances of missing data were due to participants with no missed doses not responding to this question specifying the reason.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Change in daily routine0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Forgot to administer medication0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4No missed doses8 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Change in daily routine0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Forgot to administer medication0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24No missed doses7 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Both parents were admitted in the hospital1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Caregiver was too busy to give the medication1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Change in daily routine0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Forgot to administer medication0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48No missed doses5 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Forgot to administer medication1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Change in daily routine1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Change in daily routine1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Forgot to administer medication1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Forgot to administer medication0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Change in daily routine0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24No missed doses8 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48No missed doses9 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4No missed doses10 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Change in daily routine0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4No missed doses14 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24No missed doses13 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Change in daily routine0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Forgot to administer medication1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48No missed doses14 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Caregiver too sick1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Forgot to administer medication1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Change in daily routine0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Forgot to administer medication0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Forgot to administer medication0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Forgot to administer medication0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4No missed doses10 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Change in daily routine0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Forgot to administer medication0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48No missed doses9 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24No missed doses9 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Change in daily routine0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Change in daily routine0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24No missed doses10 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Change in daily routine0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Forgot to administer medication0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Change in daily routine0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4No missed doses10 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Mom was in a hurry and forgot to give child medication1 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Change in daily routine1 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 24Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Forgot to administer medication0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Tried to spit it out because of taste (away from caregiver)0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Caregiver too sick0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Both parents were admitted in the hospital0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 4Forgot to administer medication0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48Caregiver was too busy to give the medication0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Reason for Missed Doses of Study DrugWeek 48No missed doses10 Participants
Secondary

Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite Food

Parent/guardian-reported response of child's face when taking favorite food according to palatability questionnaire responses.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who received at least one dose of study treatment. One participant in Weight Band #4 discontinued treatment following the Week 24 visit and was not included in analysis at Week 48.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Average1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Average1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Good1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Very good6 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Very good3 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Average0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Good4 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Good0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Very good4 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Very good8 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Good1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Average3 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Good2 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Very good7 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Good4 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Very good7 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Very good6 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Very good6 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Average1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Good3 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Average0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Average1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Average3 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Good4 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Average0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Very good4 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Good9 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Average2 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Very good7 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Good4 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Average3 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Very bad1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Very good8 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Good5 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Average2 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Very good9 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Good6 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Bad1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Average1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Average0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Bad1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Good3 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Very good6 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Very good4 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Very good7 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Good2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Average3 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Average0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Good3 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Very good6 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Good2 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Good2 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Average0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Average1 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Good1 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Good0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Good0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Very good10 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Very good8 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Average1 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 12Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 4Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 24Very good10 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Average0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Favorite FoodWeek 48Very good11 Participants
Secondary

Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study Drug

Parent/guardian-reported response of child's face when taking study drug according to palatability questionnaire responses.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who received at least one dose of study treatment. One participant in Weight Band #4 discontinued treatment following the Week 24 visit and was not included in analysis at Week 48.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Average2 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Average4 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Good3 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Very good2 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Very good1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Bad1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Average3 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Very bad1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Good1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Good2 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Very good2 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Very good3 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Good2 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Average4 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Bad1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Good3 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Very good5 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Good3 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Very bad1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Very good5 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Very good5 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Very good3 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Average2 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Very bad1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Good4 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Average1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Average3 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Average4 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Good4 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Average1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Very good0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Good10 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Average4 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Bad1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Very good4 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Good5 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Average3 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Bad2 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Very bad1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Very good5 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Good4 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Average3 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Bad2 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Very bad1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Very good5 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Good6 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Bad1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Very bad2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Bad1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Bad1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Average3 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Average2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Bad2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Good3 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Very good3 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Very good2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Very good3 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Very bad1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Good3 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Bad2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Average3 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Average1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Good2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Very good3 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Very bad1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Very bad1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Good2 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Good2 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Average3 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Average1 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Good2 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Good0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Good4 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Very good6 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Very good5 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Average4 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 12Bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 4Very bad0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 24Very good6 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Average5 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of Child's Face When Taking Study DrugWeek 48Very good6 Participants
Secondary

Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed to

Parent/guardian-reported response of how often the child received the study drug in the way they were supposed to in the 30 days prior to the study visit according to adherence questionnaire responses.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 24, and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who received at least one dose of study treatment. One participant in Weight Band #4 discontinued treatment following the Week 24 visit and was not included in analysis at Week 48.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Never0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Usually0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Always8 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Sometimes1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Usually0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Usually1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Never0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Almost always0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Never0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Almost always0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Always6 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Always7 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Almost always1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Always9 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Almost always2 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Always9 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Always7 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Usually0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Almost always3 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Almost always0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Never0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Usually1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Never1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Usually0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Never1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Usually0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Always14 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Almost always1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Usually0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Never0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Always12 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Almost always3 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Never0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Always13 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Almost always1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Usually1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Never0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Always9 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Usually0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Never1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Usually0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Never0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Almost always0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Never0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Usually1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Always10 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Almost always0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Almost always2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Always6 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Never0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Never0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Always10 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Always11 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Sometimes0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Almost always0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Usually0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Never0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Usually0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Almost always1 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Usually0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Almost always2 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Often the Child Received the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Always9 Participants
Secondary

Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed to

Parent/guardian-reported response of how well the person usually responsible administered the study drug in the way they were supposed to in the 30 days prior to the study visit according to adherence questionnaire responses.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 24, and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who received at least one dose of study treatment. One participant in Weight Band #4 discontinued treatment following the Week 24 visit and was not included in analysis at Week 48.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Good1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Excellent4 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Fair1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Good1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Good0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Very good5 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Very good3 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Excellent2 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Excellent2 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Very good5 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Excellent7 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Very good3 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Excellent7 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Excellent7 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Good1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Very good3 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Very good4 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Good0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Good1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Good1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Excellent12 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Very good2 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Good1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Excellent10 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Very good4 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Excellent12 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Very good2 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Good1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Excellent7 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Good1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Poor1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Good1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Very good2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Good3 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Excellent7 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Very good1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Very good1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Excellent5 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Excellent9 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Excellent11 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Fair0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Very good0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Good0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Poor0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 48Good0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 4Very good2 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Good0 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Very good2 Participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Response of How Well the Person Usually Responsible Administered the Study Drug in the Way They Were Supposed toWeek 24Excellent9 Participants
Secondary

Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to Dissolve

Parent/guardian-reported satisfaction with the number of study drug tablets to dissolve according to acceptability questionnaire responses

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who received at least one dose of study treatment. One participant in Weight Band #4 prematurely discontinued treatment and was not included in analysis at Week 48. Weight Band #5 dosing was not in tablet form, so this question did not apply to Weight Band #5 or to Weight Band #4 participants following dose escalation.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48It is acceptable7 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48It is too few1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24It is too many0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4It is acceptable7 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12It is acceptable8 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4It is too many1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48It is too many0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12It is too many0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24It is acceptable8 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4It is too many1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24It is acceptable10 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12It is acceptable11 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48It is acceptable11 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24It is too many1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4It is acceptable10 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12It is too many0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48It is too many0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24It is too many1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4It is acceptable15 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4It is too many0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12It is acceptable15 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12It is too many0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24It is acceptable14 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48It is acceptable15 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48It is too many0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12It is too many1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4It is acceptable8 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48It is acceptable4 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12It is acceptable9 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48It is too few0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48It is too many0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24It is too many0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24It is acceptable10 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4It is too many2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Satisfaction With the Number of Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24It is too few0 Participants
Secondary

Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to Dissolve

Parent/guardian-reported time for study drug tablets to dissolve according to acceptability questionnaire responses

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who received at least one dose of study treatment. One participant in Weight Band #4 prematurely discontinued treatment and was not included in analysis at Week 48. Weight Band #5 dosing was not in tablet form, so this question did not apply to Weight Band #5 or to Weight Band #4 participants following dose escalation.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48Less than 1 minute3 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 483 to 5 minutes2 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 241 to less than 3 minutes5 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4Less than 1 minute3 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 243 to 5 minutes1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 43 to 5 minutes2 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12Less than 1 minute2 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 41 to less than 3 minutes3 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 481 to less than 3 minutes3 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 121 to less than 3 minutes5 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 123 to 5 minutes1 Participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24Less than 1 minute2 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 41 to less than 3 minutes5 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24Less than 1 minute5 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12Less than 1 minute2 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 243 to 5 minutes0 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48Less than 1 minute4 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 241 to less than 3 minutes6 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4Less than 1 minute5 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 123 to 5 minutes2 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 121 to less than 3 minutes7 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 43 to 5 minutes1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 483 to 5 minutes1 Participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 481 to less than 3 minutes6 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 241 to less than 3 minutes10 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4Less than 1 minute0 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 41 to less than 3 minutes11 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 43 to 5 minutes4 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12Less than 1 minute4 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 121 to less than 3 minutes8 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 123 to 5 minutes3 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24Less than 1 minute4 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 243 to 5 minutes1 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48Less than 1 minute2 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 481 to less than 3 minutes11 Participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 483 to 5 minutes2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 123 to 5 minutes3 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 121 to less than 3 minutes6 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 4Less than 1 minute2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 48Less than 1 minute2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 12Less than 1 minute1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 43 to 5 minutes1 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 483 to 5 minutes0 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 481 to less than 3 minutes2 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 241 to less than 3 minutes5 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 24Less than 1 minute3 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 41 to less than 3 minutes7 Participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Parent/Guardian-reported Time for Study Drug Tablets to DissolveWeek 243 to 5 minutes2 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 48

Percentage of participants who experienced virologic failure based on the following definition: ART-experienced participants who had two subsequent viral loads greater or equal to 200 copies/mL at any time, or for ART-naive participants, two subsequent viral loads greater to or equal to 200 copies/mL at 24 weeks or after. The results are presented by ART experienced, ART naïve, and overall.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 48ART-naive33.3 percentage of participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 48ART-experienced0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 48Overall12.5 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 48ART-experienced0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 48Overall0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 48Overall0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 48ART-experienced0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 48Overall0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 48ART-experienced0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 48Overall0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 48ART-experienced0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 60

Percentage of participants who experienced virologic failure based on the following definition: ART-experienced participants who had two subsequent viral loads greater or equal to 200 copies/mL at any time, or for ART-naive participants, two subsequent viral loads greater to or equal to 200 copies/mL at 24 weeks or after. The results are presented by ART experienced, ART naïve, and overall.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 60ART-experienced0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 60Overall12.5 percentage of participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 60ART-naive33.3 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 60ART-experienced0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 60Overall0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 60ART-experienced0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 60Overall0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 60ART-experienced0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 60Overall0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 60Overall0.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Virologic Failure Through Week 60ART-experienced0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 48

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 60

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had a Grade 5 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 48

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 4810.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 60

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 6010.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug That Led to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 60

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 60100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 6090.9 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 60100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 60100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 6090.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 48

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 4820.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 60

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 6020.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade 3 or Grade 4 Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 48

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator. Life-threatening was defined according to Version 2.0 of the DAIDS EAE Manual.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 60

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator. Life-threatening was defined according to Version 2.0 of the DAIDS EAE Manual.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Life-threatening Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 48

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator. Seriousness was defined according to Version 2.0 of the DAIDS EAE Manual.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 4810.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 480.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 60

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported. The relationship to study drug was assessed by the site investigator. Seriousness was defined according to Version 2.0 of the DAIDS EAE Manual.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 60

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 6010.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants Who Had at Least One Serious Adverse Event Assessed as Related to Study Drug Through Week 600.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 48

AE grading was based on DAIDS AE Grading Table, Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017. AEs of any grade were reported.

Time frame: Measured from treatment initiation through Week 48

Population: All participants who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 48100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 4890.9 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 48100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 48100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event Through Week 4890.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL

Viral loads less than the lower limit of quantification were imputed as one less than the lower limit.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 24, and 48

Population: All participants taking treatment at timepoint who started treatment for their enrollment weight band and whose dose may have been increased to a higher weight band due to weight gain, who either completed treatment through Week 24 or discontinued treatment due to toxicity prior to Week 24. One participant in Weight Band #4 discontinued study treatment between Weeks 24 and 48, so this participant was excluded from analysis at Week 48.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 2487.5 percentage of participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 475.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 48100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 24100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 4100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 48100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 48100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 4100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 24100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 24100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 4100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 48100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 24100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 4100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mLWeek 48100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot Algorithm

Percentage of participants with virologic success of HIV-1 RNA less than 200 copies/mL using FDA snapshot algorithm at Weeks 4, 24, and 48. Viral loads less than the lower limit of quantification were imputed as one less than the lower limit.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 24, and 48

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 466.7 percentage of participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 4888.9 percentage of participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 2477.8 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 2491.7 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 4100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 4891.7 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 24100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 4100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 48100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 4100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 4890.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 24100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 24100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 4100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 48100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot Algorithm

Percentage of participants with virologic success of HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/mL using FDA snapshot algorithm at Weeks 4, 24, and 48. Viral loads less than the lower limit of quantification were imputed as one less than the lower limit.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 24, and 48

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 444.4 percentage of participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 4877.8 percentage of participants
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 2477.8 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 2483.3 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 491.7 percentage of participants
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 4866.7 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 2493.3 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 486.7 percentage of participants
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 4886.7 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 480.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 4870.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 24100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 24100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 4100.0 percentage of participants
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success of HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL Using FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 4890.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC

Population PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.

Time frame: Measured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dose

Population: All participants with intensive or sparse PK results at the recommended doses according to their enrollment weight band. Two participants who discontinued the study in the first week were not included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC10.40 L/hour
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC9.03 L/hour
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG0.18 L/hour
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG0.23 L/hour
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC12.70 L/hour
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC8.04 L/hour
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG0.35 L/hour
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC17.40 L/hour
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC11.00 L/hour
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC18.40 L/hour
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC13.80 L/hour
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG0.37 L/hour
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG0.69 L/hour
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC23.00 L/hour
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC14.80 L/hour
Secondary

Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TC

Population PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.

Time frame: Measured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dose

Population: All participants with intensive or sparse PK results at the recommended doses according to their enrollment weight band. Two participants who discontinued the study in the first week were not included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC17.30 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC9.97 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG82.20 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG86.90 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC18.90 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC14.90 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG71.50 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC17.20 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC13.60 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC19.50 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC13.10 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG81.60 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG72.60 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC26.10 ug*h/mL
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean AUC0-24h for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC20.30 ug*h/mL
Secondary

Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC

Population PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.

Time frame: Measured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dose

Population: All participants with intensive or sparse PK results at the recommended doses according to their enrollment weight band. Two participants who discontinued the study in the first week were not included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.01 ug/mL
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.01 ug/mL
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG1.08 ug/mL
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG1.35 ug/mL
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.02 ug/mL
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.02 ug/mL
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG0.71 ug/mL
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.01 ug/mL
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.01 ug/mL
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.01 ug/mL
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.02 ug/mL
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG1.09 ug/mL
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG1.01 ug/mL
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.02 ug/mL
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.03 ug/mL
Secondary

Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC

Population PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.

Time frame: Measured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dose

Population: All participants with intensive or sparse PK results at the recommended doses according to their enrollment weight band. Two participants who discontinued the study in the first week were not included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.01 ug/mL
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.01 ug/mL
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG1.08 ug/mL
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG1.35 ug/mL
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.02 ug/mL
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.03 ug/mL
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG0.71 ug/mL
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.01 ug/mL
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.02 ug/mL
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.01 ug/mL
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.01 ug/mL
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG1.09 ug/mL
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG1.01 ug/mL
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC0.02 ug/mL
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Concentration at Time 0 (Pre-dose) (C0h) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC0.02 ug/mL
Secondary

Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC

Population PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.

Time frame: Measured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dose

Population: All participants with intensive or sparse PK results at the recommended doses according to their enrollment weight band. Two participants who discontinued the study in the first week were not included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC3.21 hours
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC3.38 hours
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG8.34 hours
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG9.42 hours
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC3.43 hours
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC3.23 hours
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG6.75 hours
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC3.72 hours
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC2.97 hours
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC3.32 hours
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC3.46 hours
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG8.34 hours
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG8.14 hours
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC3.30 hours
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Half-life (t1/2) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC3.51 hours
Secondary

Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC

Population PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.

Time frame: Measured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dose

Population: All participants with intensive or sparse PK results at the recommended doses according to their enrollment weight band. Two participants who discontinued the study in the first week were not included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC6.04 ug/mL
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC2.29 ug/mL
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG6.79 ug/mL
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG6.63 ug/mL
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC7.42 ug/mL
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC2.64 ug/mL
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG6.36 ug/mL
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC7.07 ug/mL
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC2.98 ug/mL
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC8.04 ug/mL
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC2.65 ug/mL
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG6.59 ug/mL
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG5.43 ug/mL
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC9.60 ug/mL
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC3.59 ug/mL
Secondary

Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC

Population PK: Geometric Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for ABC, DTG, and 3TC derived from population PK model. Population apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were determined with non-linear mixed effects modeling. DTG and 3TC were fit to a 1-compartment model and ABC was fit to 2-compartment model. Weight was a covariate on clearance and volume for all drugs and enzyme maturation as a covariate on apparent oral clearance for DTG. The posthoc parameter of AUC0-24 was estimated using non-compartmental analysis of simulated steady-state concentration-time profiles and stratified by weight band.

Time frame: Measured from Week 1 through Week 48 over 24 hours post-dose

Population: All participants with intensive or sparse PK results at the recommended doses according to their enrollment weight band. Two participants who discontinued the study in the first week were not included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC1.00 hours
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC2.00 hours
Weight Band #1 (6 to Less Than 10 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG2.00 hours
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG2.00 hours
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC1.00 hours
Weight Band #2 (10 to Less Than 14 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC2.00 hours
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG2.00 hours
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC1.00 hours
Weight Band #3 (14 to Less Than 20 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC2.00 hours
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC1.00 hours
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC2.00 hours
Weight Band #4 (20 to Less Than 25 kg at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG2.50 hours
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCDTG3.00 hours
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TCABC1.00 hours
Weight Band #5 (25 kg or Greater at Study Entry)Population PK: Geometric Mean Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for ABC, DTG, and 3TC3TC2.00 hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 14, 2026