Skip to content

A Follow-up Comparison of Active Versus Passive Manual Therapy in Patients With Low Back Pain

A Follow-up Comparison of Active Versus Passive Manual Therapy in Patients With Low Back Pain: a Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03758807
Enrollment
102
Registered
2018-11-29
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
2018-12-30
Last updated
2019-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Education, Low Back Pain, Manual Therapy

Keywords

Low back pain, Manual Therapy, Education, Neuroplasticiy

Brief summary

To determine if there is any carry over difference between the type of education provided about common treatment techniques for patients with low back pain. This will be looked at right after treatment and when patients return on their second visit after they do a common exercise program for a few days.

Detailed description

Prior clinical trials have shown that patients respond differently to different explanations about interventions performed. A recent randomized clinical trial demonstrated that a 10-minute manual therapy treatment (prone lumbar Posterior to Anterior mobilization (PA's) with a neuroplasticity vs. traditional biomechanical explanation) produced an immediate, significant improvement in straight leg raise (SLR) and pain for patients with chronic low back pain. However, there is a need to examine whether there is any carry over (48-96 hours) or if utilizing a home exercise program (HEP), aimed at increasing the various sensory process applied in the clinic, produces any carry over. This will be looked at in patients with who are provided different explanations about common back treatment techniques to see if there will be any change in pain rating or back and leg movement.

Interventions

OTHERManual Therapy with Traditional Biomechanical Explanation

Patients will lie prone and receive lumbar Posterior to Anterior (AP) Pressure with a traditional biomechanical or anatomic explanation of the technique..

OTHERManual Therapy with Neuroplastiicity Explanation

Patients will lie prone and receive lumbar Posterior to Anterior (PA) Pressure with a neuroplastic explanation of the technique.

Sponsors

St. Ambrose University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups

Intervention model description

Randomized Control Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* adults over the age of 18 * patients presenting at PT with a primary complaint of LBP * LBP being present for 6 months or more * fluent in English * willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* under age 18 * not able to read/understand the English language * prisoners * no medical issues precluding physical therapy treatment (red flags) * no medical precautions to the use of manual therapy (metal, skin lesions, etc.) * prior spine surgery * unable to lay prone for the treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Low Back Pain RatingChange from baseline to initial treatmentNumeric Pain Rating Scale for Back Pain (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain). The minimal detectable change (MDC) for the NPRS for low back pain is reported to be 2.0. LBP is reported to be 2.0.
Lumbar flexionChange from baseline to initial treatmentActive trunk forward flexion in cm (distance finger tips to floor)
Straight Leg RaiseChange from baseline to initial treatmentNeurodynamic Measurement of Leg Raise (lower limb tension test)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026