Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a 1060nm Diode Laser (Abdomen)

Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a 1060nm Diode Laser for Non-invasive Fat Reduction of the Abdomen

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03756350
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-11-28
Start date
2018-11-14
Completion date
2019-07-02
Last updated
2023-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fat Atrophy

Keywords

abdomen, adipose, fat

Brief summary

This study is evaluating a 1060nm diode laser for non-invasive fat reduction of the abdomen. The study will enrolled up to 50 subjects requesting non-invasive lipolysis of the abdomen. Each subject will receive a single study treatment. Subjects will be followed at six and twelve weeks post treatment. Twelve week outcomes will be compared to baseline.

Detailed description

Open-label baseline controlled evaluator-blind multi-centre study evaluating a 1060nm diode laser for non-invasive fat reduction of the abdomen. The study will enrolled up to 50 subjects requesting non-invasive lipolysis of the abdomen. Each subject will receive a single study treatment which takes approximately 25 minutes. Subjects will be followed at six and twelve weeks post treatment. Twelve week outcomes will be compared to baseline.

Interventions

Non-invasive medical aesthetic device designed for body contouring. The device is comprised of a console, four 1060nm diode laser applicators which are 60x60 mm in size. There is a belt included with the system to allow for the secure application of the applicators to the treatment area.

Sponsors

Venus Concept
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Blinded reviewer will evaluate the pre and post photos

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* able to read, understand and voluntarily provide written informed consent * healthy male or female \> 18 years of age seeking treatment for unwanted fat in the abdomen * BMI score is less then 30 * agree to not making any major changes in their diet or lifestyle during the course of the study * able and willing to comply with the treatment / follow up schedule and requirements * women of child-bearing age are required to be using a reliable method of birth control at least 3 months prior to study enrolment and for the duration of the study, have a negative urine pregnancy test baseline

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant in the last 3 months intending to become pregnant, postpartum or nursing in the last 6 months * any previous liposuction / lipo-sculpture or any type of surgical procedure in the treatment area in the past 12 months * history of immunosuppression / immune deficiency disorders including AIDS and HIV infection, or use of immunosuppressive medications, 6 month prior to and during the course of the study * History of hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hepatitis, blood coagulopathy or excessive bleeding * Use of antiplatelet medications (81 mg of acetylsalicylic acid daily is permitted), anticoagulants, thrombocytes or any-inflammatory medications within 2 weeks of treatment * Having a history of skin cancer or any other cancer in the area to be treated, including presence of malignant or pre-malignant pigmented lesions * Having a permanent implant in the treatment area such as a metal plate or injected chemical substance such as silicone pr parenteral gold therapy (gold sodium thiomalate) * Use of medications, herbs or food supplements and vitamins known to induce photosensitivity to light exposure at the wavelength used history of photosensitivity disorder * Suffering from significant skin conditions in the treatment area or inflammatory skin conditions including but not limited to open lacerations, abrasions, herpes sores, cold sores, active infections * Tattoos in the treatment area * Poor quality skin (laxity) * Abdominal wall, muscular abnormality or hernia on physical examination * Unstable weight within the last 6 months (+ or - 3% weight change in the prior six months) * Participation in another clinical study involving the same anatomical areas within the last 6 months * History of keloid and hypertrophic scar formation or poor wound healing in the treatment area * As per the investigators discretion any physician or mental condition which may make it unsafe for the subject to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Before and After Photograph Sets Correctly Identified by Independent, Blinded EvaluatorsWeek 12 vs baselinePhotographic evaluation by independent blinded evaluators with correct identification of pre-treatment baseline images when compared to post-treatment images taken at 12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject SatisfactionWeek 12Subject satisfaction with treatment at 12 weeks after treatment using the 5-point Likert Subject Satisfaction Scale. A score of 4 is very satisfied and 0 is very unsatisfied.
Change in Fat Thicknessweek 12Change in thickness of the adipose layer as measured by ultrasound at 12 weeks post-treatment as compared to baseline
Treatment PainWeek 1Subject assessment of discomfort and pain post treatment as measured using the Wong Baker Faces Scale, which is a 10 point scale with 10 being the worst pain ever and 0 being no pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment Subjects
Single group of subjects which will have the treatment of a 1060nm diode laser administered to them. 1060nm diode laser: Non-invasive medical aesthetic device designed for body contouring. The device is comprised of a console, four 1060nm diode laser applicators which are 60x60 mm in size. There is a belt included with the system to allow for the secure application of the applicators to the treatment area.
29
Total29

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment Subjects
Age, Continuous45 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Before and After Photograph Sets Correctly Identified by Independent, Blinded Evaluators

Photographic evaluation by independent blinded evaluators with correct identification of pre-treatment baseline images when compared to post-treatment images taken at 12 weeks

Time frame: Week 12 vs baseline

Population: All subjects who had baseline and Week 12 follow up photos.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment SubjectsNumber of Before and After Photograph Sets Correctly Identified by Independent, Blinded Evaluators54 Photo sets
Secondary

Change in Fat Thickness

Change in thickness of the adipose layer as measured by ultrasound at 12 weeks post-treatment as compared to baseline

Time frame: week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Treatment SubjectsChange in Fat Thickness-9.8 Percent change in abdominal fatStandard Error 1.56
Secondary

Subject Satisfaction

Subject satisfaction with treatment at 12 weeks after treatment using the 5-point Likert Subject Satisfaction Scale. A score of 4 is very satisfied and 0 is very unsatisfied.

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment SubjectsSubject Satisfaction2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Secondary

Treatment Pain

Subject assessment of discomfort and pain post treatment as measured using the Wong Baker Faces Scale, which is a 10 point scale with 10 being the worst pain ever and 0 being no pain.

Time frame: Week 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment SubjectsTreatment Pain2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026