Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a 1060 nm Diode Laser (Flanks)

Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a 1060 nm Diode Laser for Non-invasive Fat Reduction of the Flanks

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03756168
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-11-28
Start date
2018-11-14
Completion date
2019-07-02
Last updated
2024-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fat Atrophy

Brief summary

The objective of this clinical study is to assess the safety and efficacy of using a 1060 nm diode laser for non-invasive fat reduction of the flanks.

Detailed description

Open-label, baseline-controlled, evaluator-blind, multi-center study evaluating a 1060 nm diode laser for non-invasive fat reduction of the flanks. The study will enroll up to 50 subjects requesting non-invasive lipolysis of the flanks. Each subject will receive a single study treatment. Subjects will be followed at six weeks and twelve weeks post-treatment. Twelve week outcome will be compared to baseline.

Interventions

All subjects received a single treatment with Venus Bliss' 1064 nm laser administered to the flanks Venus Bliss is a non-invasive medical aesthetic device designed for body contouring. The device contains four 1060 nm diode laser applicators which are 60x60 mm in size. It has a separate RF/PEMF applicator, but this was not used in this study. There is a belt included with the system to allow for the secure attachment of the applicators to the treatment area.

Sponsors

Venus Concept
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* able to read, understand and voluntarily provide written informed consent * healthy male or female \> 18 years of age seeking treatment for unwanted fat in the abdomen * BMI score is less then 30 * agree to not making any major changes in their diet or lifestyle during the course of the study * able and willing to comply with the treatment / follow up schedule and requirements * women of child-bearing age are required to be using a reliable method of birth control at least 3 months prior to study enrolment and for the duration of the study, have a negative urine pregnancy test baseline

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant in the last 3 months intending to become pregnant, postpartum or nursing in the last 6 months * any previous liposuction / lipo-sculpture or any type of surgical procedure in the treatment area in the past 12 months * history of immunosuppression / immune deficiency disorders including AIDS and HIV infection, or use of immunosuppressive medications, 6 month prior to and during the course of the study * History of hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hepatitis, blood coagulopathy or excessive bleeding * Use of antiplatelet medications (81 mg of acetylsalicylic acid daily is permitted), anticoagulants, thrombocytes or any-inflammatory medications within 2 weeks of treatment * Having a history of skin cancer or any other cancer in the area to be treated, including presence of malignant or pre-malignant pigmented lesions * Having a permanent implant in the treatment area such as a metal plate or injected chemical substance such as silicone pr parenteral gold therapy (gold sodium thiomalate) * Use of medications, herbs or food supplements and vitamins known to induce photosensitivity to light exposure at the wavelength used history of photosensitivity disorder * Suffering from significant skin conditions in the treatment area or inflammatory skin conditions including but not limited to open lacerations, abrasions, herpes sores, cold sores, active infections * Tattoos in the treatment area * Poor quality skin (laxity) * Abdominal wall, muscular abnormality or hernia on physical examination * Unstable weight within the last 6 months (+ or - 3% weight change in the prior six months) * Participation in another clinical study involving the same anatomical areas within the last 6 months * History of keloid and hypertrophic scar formation or poor wound healing in the treatment area * As per the investigators discretion any physician or mental condition which may make it unsafe for the subject to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Percentage of Fat Thickness From Baseline to 12-weeks Post-treatmentWeek 12Change in the percentage of fat thickness of the adipose layer as measured by ultrasound at 12 weeks post-treatment as compared to baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Abdominal Circumference From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-treatmentWeek 12Change in the abdominal circumference at 12 weeks post-treatment as compared to baseline
Subject SatisfactionWeek 12Subject satisfaction with treatment at 12 weeks was assessed using the 5-point Likert subject satisfaction scale. 5 is very satisfied, while 1 is very unsatisfied
Treatment PainDay 1Treatment pain assessed immediately post-treatment as measured using the Wong-Baker Faces Scale. Pain was measured on a scale from 0-10 (10 worst pain ever, to 0 no pain at all)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Subjects Treated
All subjects received a single treatment with Venus Bliss' 1064 nm laser administered to the flanks Venus Bliss is a non-invasive medical aesthetic device designed for body contouring. The device contains four 1060 nm diode laser applicators which are 60x60 mm in size. It has a separate RF/PEMF applicator, but this was not used in this study. There is a belt included with the system to allow for the secure attachment of the applicators to the treatment area.
29
Total29

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Subjects Treated
Age, Continuous47.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
I
0 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
II
15 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
III
8 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
IV
4 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
V
1 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
VI
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Change in the Percentage of Fat Thickness From Baseline to 12-weeks Post-treatment

Change in the percentage of fat thickness of the adipose layer as measured by ultrasound at 12 weeks post-treatment as compared to baseline.

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsChange in the Percentage of Fat Thickness From Baseline to 12-weeks Post-treatment-6.9 percentage of body fatStandard Error 1.4
Secondary

Change in Abdominal Circumference From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-treatment

Change in the abdominal circumference at 12 weeks post-treatment as compared to baseline

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsChange in Abdominal Circumference From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-treatment-0.87 centimetersStandard Error 0.55
Secondary

Subject Satisfaction

Subject satisfaction with treatment at 12 weeks was assessed using the 5-point Likert subject satisfaction scale. 5 is very satisfied, while 1 is very unsatisfied

Time frame: Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsSubject Satisfaction3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Treatment Pain

Treatment pain assessed immediately post-treatment as measured using the Wong-Baker Faces Scale. Pain was measured on a scale from 0-10 (10 worst pain ever, to 0 no pain at all)

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsTreatment Pain3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026