Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of MEDI7352 in Participants With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Response Study of the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI7352 in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03755934
Enrollment
112
Registered
2018-11-28
Start date
2018-11-19
Completion date
2023-06-29
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Brief summary

This is a study investigating the effect of MEDI7352 on chronic pain in participants with painful diabetic neuropathy. The study incudes a screening period of up to 45 days and a 12-week treatment period during which MEDI7352 or placebo will be administered intravenously (IV) on 6 occasions, with each dose separated by 14 days. There will be a 6-week follow-up period. Participants will randomly be assigned to double-blind treatment with one of 4 dose levels of MEDI7352 or placebo.

Interventions

Participants will receive IV infusion of MEDI7352 as stated in arm description.

OTHERPlacebo

Participants will receive IV infusion of placebo as stated in arm description.

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion criteria: * Male, or postmenopausal or surgically sterile female, 18 to 80 years of age * Body mass index of ≤ 42 kg/m\^2. * Chronic painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) persistent for 6 months or longer, not adequately controlled by standard of care treatments. * Mean pain intensity score of ≥ 4, as measured on an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale (NRS). * Willing and able to discontinue all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) analgesic therapy. * Currently be taking medication for the treatment of PDN. Participants should be taking at least one of the first-line medications (consistent with regional or local standard of care guidelines for PDN). Key

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of other clinically significant neuropathy (eg, hereditary neuropathy, inflammatory neuropathy) or other clinically significant disorder (eg, nerve compression injury) involving abnormal peripheral sensation, with an aetiology that is considered to be distinct from that of PDN, and that is likely to interfere with assessment of peripheral nerve function, as judged by the investigator. * History of osteonecrosis, rapidly progressing osteoarthritis (OA), subchondral insufficiency fractures, neurogenic arthropathy, or analgesia-induced arthropathy. * Diagnosis of clinically significant OA currently affecting a major joint in the upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, or wrist) or lower extremity (hip, knee, or ankle) or axial spine; or other degenerative disease affecting any joint in participants for whom, in the opinion of the investigator, there is an identified risk of osteonecrosis, rapidly progressing OA, subchondral insufficiency fractures, neurogenic arthropathy, or analgesia-induced arthropathy. * Chronic pain condition, other than PDN, that is likely to interfere with the evaluation of the participant's PDN pain, as judged by the investigator. * Haemoglobin A1C greater than 10.0% (\> 10.0%).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score to Week 12Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive) through Week 12Change from baseline to Week 12 in weekly average of average daily pain score is reported. Participants assessed their perceived daily average neuropathic pain over the previous 24 hours using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS), with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. Participants were instructed to assess their average daily pain at approximately the same time every morning, and to record the response in a subject diary (electronic patient-reported outcome \[ePRO\]).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreBaseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 18 (follow-up)Percentage of participants with \>= 30% and \>= 50% decrease in weekly average of average daily pain score from baseline is reported. Participants assessed their perceived daily average neuropathic pain over the previous 24 hours using an 11-point NRS, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. Participants were instructed to assess their average daily pain at approximately the same time every morning, and to record the response in a subject diary (ePRO).
Change From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 18 (follow-up)Participants were assessed for their neuropathic pain using the Galer NPS, which included 2 descriptors of pain, including intensity and unpleasantness, and 8 descriptors that assessed specific qualities of neuropathic pain: sharp, hot, dull, cold, sensitive, itchy, deep, and surface pain. Each of these 10 dimensions had a 0 to 10 NRS in which 0 is equal to no pain and 10 equals most intense pain. Galer NPS total score (ranges from 0 to 100; with 0 and 100 representing the no and highest degree of neuropathic-like symptoms, respectively) is sum of pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, pain sharpness, pain hotness, pain dullness, pain coldness, pain sensitivity, pain itching, deep pain intensity, and surface pain intensity (all in an 11-point NRS). Change from baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 18 (follow-up) in Galer NPS total score is reported.
Change From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 18 (follow-up)Participants were assessed for how their neuropathic pain interferes with their sleep using the DSIS. It has an 11 point Likert response scale (0-10) that asked participants to select the number that best describes how much your pain has interfered with your sleep during the past 24 hours. Responses vary from 0 (did not interfere with sleep) to 10 (completely interfered with sleep-unable to sleep due to pain). The DSIS was completed by participants once a day (upon awakening) to accurately capture variability in sleep interference due to pain on a daily basis, thus minimizing recall bias. Change from baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 18 (follow-up) in DSIS is reported.
Percentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 18 (follow-up)Participants rated their overall improvement in health status using the PGIC. The PGIC consisted of a 7-point scale where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. The participants were asked the following question: How would you rate your overall improvement with treatment during the clinical study?, where the response options included the following: Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse, and Very Much Worse.
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive) and Week 12Change from baseline to Week 12 in SF-36 is reported. The SF-36 assesses 8 health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems (physical functioning); 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems (social functioning); 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems (role physical); 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health; 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems (role emotional); 7) vitality; and 8) general health perceptions. The items use Likert-type scales with either 5 or 6 points, or 2 or 3 points. Higher SF-36 scores indicate a better state of health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Percentage of Participants Taking Any Rescue MedicationBaseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive) through Week 12Percentage of participants taking any rescue medication are reported. Participants were asked to record all rescue medications they take for neuropathic pain in a paper diary.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDay 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with abnormal vital signs reported as TEAEs are reported. Abnormal vital signs are defined as any abnormal finding in the vital sign parameters (body temperature, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, heart \[pulse\] rate, and respiratory rate).
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECGs are reported.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsDay 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with abnormal clinical laboratory parameters reported as TEAEs are reported. Abnormal clinical laboratory parameters defined as any abnormal finding during analysis of hematology, clinical chemistry, coagulation, and urinalysis.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreBaseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 18Change from baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 18 in weekly average of average daily pain score is reported. Participants assessed their perceived daily average neuropathic pain over the previous 24 hours using an 11-point NRS, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. Participants were instructed to assess their average daily pain at approximately the same time every morning, and to record the response in a subject diary (ePRO).
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Neurological ExaminationDay 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with clinically significant findings in neurological examination is reported.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthDay 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with abnormal dorsiflexion strength is reported. Dorsiflexion strength is scored on 0-4 scale. The scale indicated 0 = normal power, 1 = mild weakness, 2 = moderate weakness, 3 = severe weakness, and 4 = paralysis.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with abnormal deep tendon reflex are reported. Deep tendon reflex (knee and ankle) strength is scored on 0-4 scale. The scale indicated 0 = normal, 1 = ankle reflex reduced, 2 = ankle reflex absent, 3 = ankle reflex absent and knee reflex reduced, and 4 = all reflexes (both ankle and knee) absent. Participants within a specific row are not included in any other row in the data table below.
Change From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Baseline (Day -45 to -1), pre-dose on Day 1, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 18/early terminationThe TNSn, a semi-quantitative clinical assessment of peripheral nervous system function, was administered at baseline (Screening), Day 1, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and Week 18/early termination. The TNSn provides for an assessment of motor symptom score, autonomic symptom score, pin sensibility score, and vibration sensibility score. Each neuropathy item is scored on a 0-4 scale. The scores are summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 20. Higher total scores correlate with more severe neuropathy. Not all of the early terminated participants completed the 18 week assessment. Only 3 early terminated participants contributed data at the Week 18 assessment.
Number of Participants With Investigator Reported Significant Changes From Baseline in Motor and Sensory Nerve ConductionDay 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)Motor and sensory nerve conduction studies were performed in relevant lower and upper limb nerves (sural, peroneal, median/ulnar, fibular, and tibial nerves) wherein amplitude, peak latency, conduction velocity, and duration of nerve action potentials were recorded.
Number of Participants With at Least One Concomitant MedicationDay 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with at least one concomitant medication is reported. A concomitant medication is defined as any medication continuing or starting after first dose of study medication.
Number of Participants With Injection Site ReactionDay 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with injection site reaction is reported.
Number of Participants With Infusion ReactionDay 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with infusion reaction is reported.
Serum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsDay 1 (pre-dose; baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 (Day 70; pre-dose, immediately before end of infusion, 8 hours and 24 hours post Day 70 infusion [Day 71]), 11, and 12 (approximately same time of day as Week 10 infusion)Serum concentrations of total NGF in ADA positive or negative participants are reported.
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Pre-dose at baseline (Day -45 to -1) and Study Weeks 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, and 18 (follow-up)Number of participants with positive ADA to MEDI7352 are reported. Treatment-induced ADA positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and positive at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Treatment-boosted ADA positive is defined as ADA positive at baseline with pre-existing titre boosted by 4-fold or greater during the study period. Persistent positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and positive at least 2 post-baseline assessments (with \>= 16 weeks between first and last positive) or ADA positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and at least one post-baseline ADA positive measurement and not fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination Reported as TEAEsDay 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with clinically significant findings in physical examination reported as TEAE are reported. A complete physical examination (excluding the genitourinary examination, unless warranted) was performed.

Countries

Denmark, Hungary, Poland, Romania, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 45 sites in 4 countries (the United Kingdom, Hungary, Poland, and Romania).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 112 participants were randomized, of which 107 participants received at least one dose of study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received 6 doses of intravenous (IV) placebo infusion matched to MEDl7352 during 12-week treatment period.
54
MEDl7352 Low Dose
Participants received 6 doses of IV MEDl7352 during 12-week treatment period.
6
MEDl7352 Meduim Dose
Participants received 6 doses of IV MEDl7352 during 12-week treatment period.
16
MEDI7352 High Dose
Participants received 6 doses of IV MEDl7352 during 12-week treatment period.
36
Total112

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event4113
Overall StudyOther3131
Overall StudyPhysician Decision2001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboMEDl7352 Low DoseMEDl7352 Meduim DoseMEDI7352 High Dose
Age, Continuous60.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.73
60.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.02
60.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.14
60.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.49
60.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.21
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
112 Participants54 Participants6 Participants16 Participants36 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
109 Participants53 Participants6 Participants14 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants20 Participants0 Participants5 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
72 Participants34 Participants6 Participants11 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 540 / 40 / 140 / 35
other
Total, other adverse events
30 / 544 / 410 / 1423 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 540 / 40 / 140 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score to Week 12

Change from baseline to Week 12 in weekly average of average daily pain score is reported. Participants assessed their perceived daily average neuropathic pain over the previous 24 hours using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS), with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. Participants were instructed to assess their average daily pain at approximately the same time every morning, and to record the response in a subject diary (electronic patient-reported outcome \[ePRO\]).

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive) through Week 12

Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and have at least 1 daily NRS assessment while receiving the treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score to Week 12-1.244 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7327
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score to Week 12-3.387 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9605
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score to Week 12-0.615 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0431
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score to Week 12-2.699 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0819
p-value: 0.043795% CI: [-3.87, -0.06]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.187895% CI: [-0.36, 1.79]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.000995% CI: [-2.19, -0.58]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

Change from baseline to Week 12 in SF-36 is reported. The SF-36 assesses 8 health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems (physical functioning); 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems (social functioning); 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems (role physical); 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health; 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems (role emotional); 7) vitality; and 8) general health perceptions. The items use Likert-type scales with either 5 or 6 points, or 2 or 3 points. Higher SF-36 scores indicate a better state of health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive) and Week 12

Population: mITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and have at least 1 daily NRS assessment while receiving the treatment. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Functioning11.282 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.0412
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role Physical7.372 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.0159
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Bodily Pain8.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)General Health-2.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Vitality-0.160 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6039
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Social Functioning1.92 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.772
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role Emotional-1.923 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.3248
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health-5.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.82
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Social Functioning31.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.936
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Vitality3.125 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5359
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role Physical28.125 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.7169
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health10.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.41
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role Emotional8.333 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.911
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)General Health-2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Bodily Pain9.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.75
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Functioning21.248 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1526
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role Emotional-5.556 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.8748
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Bodily Pain12.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.11
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)General Health-5.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.72
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Vitality-0.521 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7695
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Social Functioning-1.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.108
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health-1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.48
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Functioning0.417 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7084
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role Physical0.000 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.3101
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Bodily Pain14.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)General Health0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.98
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role Physical6.681 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4338
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Functioning12.759 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6141
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Vitality-4.095 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.0486
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.41
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role Emotional-1.724 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9681
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Social Functioning9.05 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.121
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)

Participants were assessed for how their neuropathic pain interferes with their sleep using the DSIS. It has an 11 point Likert response scale (0-10) that asked participants to select the number that best describes how much your pain has interfered with your sleep during the past 24 hours. Responses vary from 0 (did not interfere with sleep) to 10 (completely interfered with sleep-unable to sleep due to pain). The DSIS was completed by participants once a day (upon awakening) to accurately capture variability in sleep interference due to pain on a daily basis, thus minimizing recall bias. Change from baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 18 (follow-up) in DSIS is reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 18 (follow-up)

Population: mITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and have at least 1 daily NRS assessment while receiving the treatment. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Here, number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 4-0.760 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1212
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 8-1.417 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7654
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 12-1.668 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1928
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 18 (follow-up)-1.824 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2582
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 8-3.143 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.743
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 12-3.735 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7598
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 18 (follow-up)-3.036 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6557
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 4-2.810 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6979
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 12-1.077 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4769
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 8-1.127 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4907
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 18 (follow-up)-0.865 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2795
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 4-0.979 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.793
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 18 (follow-up)-2.602 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4427
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 8-2.373 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1368
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 4-1.790 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5688
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS)Week 12-2.725 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2484
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)

Participants were assessed for their neuropathic pain using the Galer NPS, which included 2 descriptors of pain, including intensity and unpleasantness, and 8 descriptors that assessed specific qualities of neuropathic pain: sharp, hot, dull, cold, sensitive, itchy, deep, and surface pain. Each of these 10 dimensions had a 0 to 10 NRS in which 0 is equal to no pain and 10 equals most intense pain. Galer NPS total score (ranges from 0 to 100; with 0 and 100 representing the no and highest degree of neuropathic-like symptoms, respectively) is sum of pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, pain sharpness, pain hotness, pain dullness, pain coldness, pain sensitivity, pain itching, deep pain intensity, and surface pain intensity (all in an 11-point NRS). Change from baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 18 (follow-up) in Galer NPS total score is reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 18 (follow-up)

Population: mITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and have at least 1 daily NRS assessment while receiving the treatment. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Here, number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 4-13.333 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.0461
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 8-19.136 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.5577
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 12-24.385 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.1081
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 18 (follow-up)-25.722 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.6151
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 8-8.750 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2094
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 12-28.750 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6808
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 18 (follow-up)-23.000 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3095
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 4-5.750 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5317
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 12-22.000 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.9379
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 8-19.333 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7538
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 18 (follow-up)-27.909 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.3725
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 4-10.727 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3967
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 18 (follow-up)-25.414 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.8947
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 8-29.516 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.314
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 4-26.387 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.9922
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)Week 12-34.586 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.2622
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)

The TNSn, a semi-quantitative clinical assessment of peripheral nervous system function, was administered at baseline (Screening), Day 1, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and Week 18/early termination. The TNSn provides for an assessment of motor symptom score, autonomic symptom score, pin sensibility score, and vibration sensibility score. Each neuropathy item is scored on a 0-4 scale. The scores are summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 20. Higher total scores correlate with more severe neuropathy. Not all of the early terminated participants completed the 18 week assessment. Only 3 early terminated participants contributed data at the Week 18 assessment.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -45 to -1), pre-dose on Day 1, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 18/early termination

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Here, number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Day 1-0.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.957
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 8-1.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.082
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 6-1.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.071
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 18-2.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.631
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 12-1.73 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.562
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 10-1.90 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.458
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 4-0.90 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.982
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 2-0.54 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.304
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 8-2.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 2-1.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.258
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 4-2.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.786
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 6-0.75 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.872
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 10-2.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.916
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 12-2.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.062
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 18-2.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.512
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 4-0.85 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.819
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 8-0.92 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.881
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 10-1.67 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.435
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 20.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.354
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 18-2.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.329
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 12-2.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.899
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 6-1.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.859
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Day 11.00 Units on a scale
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 4-1.19 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.891
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 6-1.85 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.093
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 8-1.84 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.665
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 2-0.94 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.117
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 18-2.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.053
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 12-2.53 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.515
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)Week 10-2.45 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.042
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score

Change from baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 18 in weekly average of average daily pain score is reported. Participants assessed their perceived daily average neuropathic pain over the previous 24 hours using an 11-point NRS, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. Participants were instructed to assess their average daily pain at approximately the same time every morning, and to record the response in a subject diary (ePRO).

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 18

Population: mITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and have at least 1 daily NRS assessment while receiving the treatment. Here, number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 2-0.385 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6863
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 4-0.563 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0173
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 6-0.955 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3236
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 8-1.236 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6026
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 10-1.418 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6274
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 18-1.764 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8415
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 18-2.607 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.202
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 8-2.393 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0249
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 2-1.089 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0258
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 6-2.458 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2156
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 4-2.173 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4266
MEDl7352 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 10-2.595 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2003
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 4-0.144 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9143
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 6-0.578 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0715
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 8-0.690 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2819
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 18-0.550 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2333
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 10-0.712 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2164
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 2-0.311 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6285
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 10-2.629 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9943
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 18-2.559 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1241
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 4-1.508 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.513
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 8-2.372 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0607
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 2-0.540 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2503
MEDI7352 High DoseChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain ScoreWeek 6-2.044 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7916
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs

Number of participants with abnormal clinical laboratory parameters reported as TEAEs are reported. Abnormal clinical laboratory parameters defined as any abnormal finding during analysis of hematology, clinical chemistry, coagulation, and urinalysis.

Time frame: Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAlanine aminotransferase increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsUrine analysis abnormal1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBacterial test positive1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAspartate aminotransferase increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood bilirubin increased1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsProtein urine present1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood glucose increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood glucose decreased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypercholesterolaemia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsC-reactive protein increased1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCoagulation test abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypoglycemia1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlomerular filtration rate decreased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperglycaemia1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsWhite blood cells urine positive0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsWhite blood cells urine positive0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsUrine analysis abnormal0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsC-reactive protein increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBacterial test positive0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood glucose decreased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsProtein urine present0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypoglycemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood bilirubin increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAspartate aminotransferase increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlomerular filtration rate decreased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperglycaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypercholesterolaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCoagulation test abnormal0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood glucose increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAlanine aminotransferase increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsWhite blood cells urine positive0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAlanine aminotransferase increased2 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood glucose decreased1 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAspartate aminotransferase increased1 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood glucose increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsC-reactive protein increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCoagulation test abnormal0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlomerular filtration rate decreased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBacterial test positive0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood bilirubin increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsProtein urine present0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsUrine analysis abnormal0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypoglycemia1 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypercholesterolaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperglycaemia1 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlomerular filtration rate decreased1 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood glucose decreased1 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsUrine analysis abnormal0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCoagulation test abnormal1 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsC-reactive protein increased1 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAlanine aminotransferase increased0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypoglycemia1 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood glucose increased1 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAspartate aminotransferase increased0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperglycaemia0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood bilirubin increased0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBacterial test positive0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypercholesterolaemia1 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsProtein urine present0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsWhite blood cells urine positive1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)

Number of participants with abnormal deep tendon reflex are reported. Deep tendon reflex (knee and ankle) strength is scored on 0-4 scale. The scale indicated 0 = normal, 1 = ankle reflex reduced, 2 = ankle reflex absent, 3 = ankle reflex absent and knee reflex reduced, and 4 = all reflexes (both ankle and knee) absent. Participants within a specific row are not included in any other row in the data table below.

Time frame: Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Here, number of participants analyzed (N) denotes those participants who were assessed for strength and deep tendon reflexes assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)Ankle reflex reduced5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)Ankle reflex absent4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)Ankle reflex absent and knee reflex reduced11 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)All reflexes absent15 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)Ankle reflex absent0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)Ankle reflex absent and knee reflex reduced1 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)All reflexes absent0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)Ankle reflex reduced2 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)Ankle reflex absent and knee reflex reduced3 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)Ankle reflex absent1 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)All reflexes absent6 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)Ankle reflex reduced2 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)All reflexes absent5 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)Ankle reflex absent5 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)Ankle reflex reduced3 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Deep Tendon Reflex (Knee and Ankle)Ankle reflex absent and knee reflex reduced13 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion Strength

Number of participants with abnormal dorsiflexion strength is reported. Dorsiflexion strength is scored on 0-4 scale. The scale indicated 0 = normal power, 1 = mild weakness, 2 = moderate weakness, 3 = severe weakness, and 4 = paralysis.

Time frame: Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Here, number of participants analyzed (N) denotes those participants who were assessed for strength and deep tendon reflexes assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthMild Weakness9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthModerate Weakness8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthSevere Weakness0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthParalysis0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthModerate Weakness0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthSevere Weakness0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthParalysis0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthMild Weakness0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthSevere Weakness0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthModerate Weakness0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthParalysis0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthMild Weakness7 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthParalysis0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthModerate Weakness2 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthMild Weakness18 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Dorsiflexion StrengthSevere Weakness0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs

Number of participants with abnormal vital signs reported as TEAEs are reported. Abnormal vital signs are defined as any abnormal finding in the vital sign parameters (body temperature, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, heart \[pulse\] rate, and respiratory rate).

Time frame: Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypertension1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypotension0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBlood pressure increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypertension0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypotension0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBlood pressure increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBlood pressure increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypotension0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypertension0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypertension0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypotension1 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBlood pressure increased1 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One Concomitant Medication

Number of participants with at least one concomitant medication is reported. A concomitant medication is defined as any medication continuing or starting after first dose of study medication.

Time frame: Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With at Least One Concomitant Medication54 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With at Least One Concomitant Medication4 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With at Least One Concomitant Medication14 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With at Least One Concomitant Medication35 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)

Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECGs are reported.

Time frame: Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants who were evaluable for the specified outcome measure. Here, number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 80 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Day 11 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 121 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 40 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 18 (follow-up)0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 80 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 40 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 120 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Day 10 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 18 (follow-up)0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 18 (follow-up)1 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Day 10 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 41 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 80 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 120 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 18 (follow-up)0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 121 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 40 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Day 10 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 81 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Neurological Examination

Number of participants with clinically significant findings in neurological examination is reported.

Time frame: Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Neurological Examination0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Neurological Examination0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Neurological Examination0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Neurological Examination0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs

Number of participants with clinically significant findings in physical examination reported as TEAE are reported. A complete physical examination (excluding the genitourinary examination, unless warranted) was performed.

Time frame: Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs1 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Infusion Reaction

Number of participants with infusion reaction is reported.

Time frame: Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Infusion Reaction0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Infusion Reaction0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Infusion Reaction0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Infusion Reaction2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Injection Site Reaction

Number of participants with injection site reaction is reported.

Time frame: Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site Reaction1 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Injection Site Reaction1 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Injection Site Reaction0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Injection Site Reaction0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Investigator Reported Significant Changes From Baseline in Motor and Sensory Nerve Conduction

Motor and sensory nerve conduction studies were performed in relevant lower and upper limb nerves (sural, peroneal, median/ulnar, fibular, and tibial nerves) wherein amplitude, peak latency, conduction velocity, and duration of nerve action potentials were recorded.

Time frame: Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Investigator Reported Significant Changes From Baseline in Motor and Sensory Nerve Conduction2 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Investigator Reported Significant Changes From Baseline in Motor and Sensory Nerve Conduction0 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Investigator Reported Significant Changes From Baseline in Motor and Sensory Nerve Conduction0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Investigator Reported Significant Changes From Baseline in Motor and Sensory Nerve Conduction0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352

Number of participants with positive ADA to MEDI7352 are reported. Treatment-induced ADA positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and positive at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Treatment-boosted ADA positive is defined as ADA positive at baseline with pre-existing titre boosted by 4-fold or greater during the study period. Persistent positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and positive at least 2 post-baseline assessments (with \>= 16 weeks between first and last positive) or ADA positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and at least one post-baseline ADA positive measurement and not fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive.

Time frame: Pre-dose at baseline (Day -45 to -1) and Study Weeks 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, and 18 (follow-up)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Here, number of participants analyzed (N) denotes those participants who had adequate ADA sample.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-induced ADA0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-boosted ADA0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Persistently positive ADA0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Transiently positive ADA0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-boosted ADA0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Persistently positive ADA3 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Transiently positive ADA0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-induced ADA3 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Persistently positive ADA6 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-boosted ADA1 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Transiently positive ADA1 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-induced ADA7 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Transiently positive ADA2 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-boosted ADA1 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-induced ADA28 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Persistently positive ADA26 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug.

Time frame: Day 1 through 20.42 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs30 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs1 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs0 Participants
MEDl7352 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs4 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs10 Participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DoseNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs0 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs23 Participants
MEDI7352 High DoseNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Taking Any Rescue Medication

Percentage of participants taking any rescue medication are reported. Participants were asked to record all rescue medications they take for neuropathic pain in a paper diary.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive) through Week 12

Population: mITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and have at least 1 daily NRS assessment while receiving the treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Taking Any Rescue Medication13 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants Taking Any Rescue Medication0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants Taking Any Rescue Medication14.3 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants Taking Any Rescue Medication8.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score

Percentage of participants with \>= 30% and \>= 50% decrease in weekly average of average daily pain score from baseline is reported. Participants assessed their perceived daily average neuropathic pain over the previous 24 hours using an 11-point NRS, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. Participants were instructed to assess their average daily pain at approximately the same time every morning, and to record the response in a subject diary (ePRO).

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 18 (follow-up)

Population: mITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and have at least 1 daily NRS assessment while receiving the treatment. Here, number of participants analyzed (N) denotes those participants who were evaluable for the specified outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 828.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 1232.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 813.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 1815.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 41.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 1835.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 1211.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 43.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 1250.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 40 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 825.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 875.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 475.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 1275.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 1825.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 1850.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 88.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 128.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 180 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 816.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 128.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 47.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 1825.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 40 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 1840.0 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 434.3 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 857.6 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 1266.7 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=30%: Week 1856.7 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 414.3 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 836.4 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain Score>=50%: Week 1242.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Participants rated their overall improvement in health status using the PGIC. The PGIC consisted of a 7-point scale where 1 = very much improved and 7 = very much worse. The participants were asked the following question: How would you rate your overall improvement with treatment during the clinical study?, where the response options included the following: Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse, and Very Much Worse.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 18 (follow-up)

Population: mITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and have at least 1 daily NRS assessment while receiving the treatment. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants who were PGIC responders. Here, number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 12: Improved48.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 8: Improved36.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 18: Much Improved25.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 8: Very Much Improved2.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 8: Much Improved31.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4: Much Improved2.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4: Improved50.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 18: Improved36.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 12: Very Much Improved5.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4: Very Much Improved2.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 18: Very Much Improved11.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 12: Much Improved28.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 18: Very Much Improved25.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4: Improved50.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4: Much Improved25.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4: Very Much Improved0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 8: Improved25.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 8: Much Improved50.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 8: Very Much Improved0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 12: Improved0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 12: Much Improved75.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 12: Very Much Improved25.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 18: Improved25.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Low DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 18: Much Improved50.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 12: Improved54.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4: Much Improved27.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 18: Very Much Improved9.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 18: Improved27.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 12: Much Improved36.4 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 18: Much Improved54.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4: Very Much Improved0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 8: Much Improved41.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4: Improved45.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 8: Improved58.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 12: Very Much Improved0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Meduim DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 8: Very Much Improved0 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 12: Very Much Improved10.3 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4: Very Much Improved6.5 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 12: Improved44.8 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 18: Much Improved41.4 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 12: Much Improved41.4 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4: Much Improved29.0 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 8: Very Much Improved6.5 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 18: Improved31.0 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 8: Improved41.9 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4: Improved41.9 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 8: Much Improved38.7 Percentage of participants
MEDI7352 High DosePercentage of Participants With 'Improved', 'Much Improved', or 'Very Much Improved' Status in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 18: Very Much Improved13.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Serum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Concentrations

Serum concentrations of total NGF in ADA positive or negative participants are reported.

Time frame: Day 1 (pre-dose; baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 (Day 70; pre-dose, immediately before end of infusion, 8 hours and 24 hours post Day 70 infusion [Day 71]), 11, and 12 (approximately same time of day as Week 10 infusion)

Population: Safety population: participants received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to treatment actually received. Number of participants analyzed: participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Number analyzed (n): participants evaluable at specified time point. MEDl7352 low and medium dose group data is not reported due to change in assay during course of study and stability data not supporting re-analysis of early study samples with new in-house assay.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 262.613 pg/mLStandard Deviation 15.1088
PlaceboSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 10 (before end of infusion)57.308 pg/mLStandard Deviation 13.3588
PlaceboSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 664.661 pg/mLStandard Deviation 18.6478
PlaceboSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 10 (8 hours post-dose)177.323 pg/mLStandard Deviation 554.8131
PlaceboSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsDay 152.303 pg/mLStandard Deviation 11.6178
PlaceboSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 10 (post 24 hours)222.980 pg/mLStandard Deviation 772.9408
PlaceboSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 863.291 pg/mLStandard Deviation 16.5332
PlaceboSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 1159.441 pg/mLStandard Deviation 13.6892
PlaceboSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 478.209 pg/mLStandard Deviation 92.0122
PlaceboSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 1263.416 pg/mLStandard Deviation 18.4243
PlaceboSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 10 (pre-dose)173.383 pg/mLStandard Deviation 563.8921
MEDI7352 High DoseSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 121710.966 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2838.0975
MEDI7352 High DoseSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsDay 165.687 pg/mLStandard Deviation 60.4036
MEDI7352 High DoseSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 22384.760 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1989.0309
MEDI7352 High DoseSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 42213.699 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2408.3112
MEDI7352 High DoseSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 62361.855 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2645.8141
MEDI7352 High DoseSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 81992.129 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2507.9826
MEDI7352 High DoseSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 10 (pre-dose)1681.073 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2455.0666
MEDI7352 High DoseSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 10 (before end of infusion)1992.756 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2968.1285
MEDI7352 High DoseSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 10 (8 hours post-dose)2012.384 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2795.8138
MEDI7352 High DoseSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 10 (post 24 hours)1849.835 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2671.9526
MEDI7352 High DoseSerum Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationsWeek 111743.100 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2621.0687

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026