HIV Infections
Conditions
Keywords
Dolutegravir, Two-drug regimen, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, HIV Symptom Distress Module, Lamivudine, HIV treatment satisfaction questionnaire
Brief summary
This is a prospective, non-interventional, multi-center study, in participants with clinical indication of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 infection. The aim of the study was to generate the real world evidence for the use of DTG+3TC in routine clinical care in Germany to supplement data obtained from controlled clinical trials. Treatment naïve and pre-treated HIV-1 positive participants were enrolled in the study. The observation period for the study was 3 years. Data was collected from routine clinical care via electronic data capture (EDC) system.
Interventions
The SDM is a 20-item self-reported measure that addresses the presence and perceived distress linked to symptoms commonly associated with HIV or its treatment.
The HIV TSQ is a 10-item-self-reported scale that measures overall satisfaction with treatment and by specific domains e.g., convenience and flexibility.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Participants \>= 18 years of age. * Participants with documented HIV-1 infection. * Prescription of DTG + 3TC was issued independently from entering this study. * Participants with the ability to understand informed consent form and other relevant regulatory documents.
Exclusion criteria
* Any contraindication according to Tivicay or Lamivudine summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs). * Participants with VL \> 500 c/mL. * Any antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV-1 in addition to DTG and 3TC or the DTG/3TC fixed dose combination (FDC). * Participants with hepatitis B virus (HBV)- coinfection. * Participants with current participation in the ongoing non-interventional study TRIUMPH (study number: 202033, NCT number: NCT02342769) or in any interventional clinical trial irrespective of indication. * Participants who had previously participated in clinical trials assessing DTG+ 3TC.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Suppression | At Year 3 | Virologic suppression is defined as a viral load (VL) less than (\<) 50 copies (c)/mL or, if between 50-200 c/mL, with a subsequent next available measurement \<50 c/mL (within 120 days). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Low Level Viremia | At Month 6 and years 1, 2 and 3 | Low level viremia is defined as a VL measurement greater than (\>) 50 - \<200 c/mL for pre-treated participants. For naive participants, a VL measurement between \>50 to \<200 c/mL after initial suppression of \<50 c/mL was evaluated. |
| Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound | From Baseline until Year 3 | Virologic rebound is defined as 2 consecutive VL measurements \>=200 c/mL after suppression. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Percentage of Participants With Treatment Switch Due to Virologic Reasons or Due to Intolerability | From Baseline until Year 3 | The intolerability was determined at the discretion of the physician. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses | At years 1, 2 and 3 | Participants were prompted to give an estimate of their level of adherence in a single-item question part of their self-assessment questionnaires. 0-2 missed doses, 3-4 missed doses, 5-6 missed doses, and \>6 missed doses were reported. |
| Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | From Baseline until Year 3 | An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Frequency of Serious Adverse Events | From Baseline until Year 3 | An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Number of Serious and Non-serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) | From Baseline until Year 3 | An ADR is defined as a noxious and unintended response to a medicinal investigational product related to any dose where at least a reasonable possibility, i.e. the relationship cannot be ruled out. A serious ADR is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Frequency of Any Adverse Drug Reactions | From Baseline until Year 3 | Any = serious and non-serious ADRs. An ADR is defined as a noxious and unintended response to a medicinal investigational product related to any dose where at least a reasonable possibility, i.e. the relationship cannot be ruled out. A serious ADR is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TC | At Baseline | The primary reasons for therapy switch are side effects of previous ART, low potential for interaction, preference of a 2-drug regime, tolerability profile of DTG+3TC, pill size, easy to take (once daily, independent of meals), patient's preference, and other. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Percentage of Participants With VL > 50 c/mL With Emergent Resistance Mutations | From Baseline until Year 3 | Newly identified resistance-associated mutations, including those detected before initiating treatment with DTG+3TC and most recent HIV-RNA levels. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At years 1, 2 and 3 compared to Baseline | The following lipid parameters are presented: total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Percentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy Initiation | At Baseline | The primary reasons for therapy switch are low potential for interaction, preference of a 2-drug regime, prevention of potential long-term toxicities of other therapies, tolerability profile of DTG+3TC, easy to take (once daily, independent of meals), and other. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Change in Treatment Satisfaction | At years 1, 2 and 3 compared to Baseline | The change in treatment satisfaction is based on the HIV Treatment Satisfaction questionnaire (HIV TSQ). The HIV TSQ is a 10-item-self-reported scale that measures overall satisfaction with treatment and by specific domains e.g., convenience and flexibility. In treatment satisfaction score ranges from 0-60, where higher the score, greater the satisfaction with treatment. Individual item scores which included All rate score ranging from 0 (very dissatisfied, inconvenient, inflexible) to 6 (very satisfied, convenient, flexible), in case of general satisfaction, there will be 10 items which will be summed to produce a score ranging from 0 to 30, with higher the score greater the satisfaction with subscale. For lifestyle scale with 8 items which will be summed to produce a score ranging from 0 to 30, with higher the score greater the satisfaction with subscale. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Change in Symptom Distress | At years 1, 2 and 3 compared to Baseline | The change in symptom distress is based on the HIV Symptom Distress Module (SDM) questionnaire. The SDM is a 20-item self-reported tool that assesses the presence and distress of symptoms related to HIV or its treatment. It includes sub-scales for treatment satisfaction and individual satisfaction with treatment changes. The treatment satisfaction score sums all items, ranging from +30 (greater improvement) to -30 (greater deterioration). Individual item scores range from +3 (much more satisfied, convenient, flexible) to -3 (much less satisfied, convenient, flexible). General satisfaction and lifestyle scores sum all items, ranging from +15 (greater improvement) to -15 (greater deterioration). Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Number of HIV-RNA Monitoring Measures | From Baseline until Year 3 | Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Percentage of Participants Referred to Another Medical Specialist | From Baseline until Year 3 | Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
| Discontinuation Rates Due to Adverse Drug Reactions | From Baseline until Year 3 | Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC. |
Countries
Germany
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Under EU privacy laws, participants who withdraw consent can choose whether their data up to withdrawal may be used or must be deleted. Safety data (e.g., ADRs, SAEs) are exempt and must be retained. This resulted in a higher number of participants analyzed for the Safety Analysis Set (N = 368) compared to Effectiveness Analysis Set (N = 366).
Pre-assignment details
A total of 376 participants were enrolled in the Full Analysis Set, of which 10 were excluded for various reasons, including protocol violations and participant withdrawal. The remaining 366 participants were included in the Effectiveness Analysis Set.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Total Participants Antiretroviral treatment (ART) naïve and pre-treated HIV-1 positive participants for whom DTG+3TC is indicated according to local label. | 366 |
| Total | 366 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total Participants | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 47.0 Years | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Female | 25 Participants | — |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Male | 341 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 31 | 2 / 337 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 31 | 0 / 337 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 31 | 78 / 337 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Suppression
Virologic suppression is defined as a viral load (VL) less than (\<) 50 copies (c)/mL or, if between 50-200 c/mL, with a subsequent next available measurement \<50 c/mL (within 120 days).
Time frame: At Year 3
Population: The analysis was performed on the Effectiveness Set (ES) which includes all participants from the Full Analysis Set (FAS) except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Suppression | HIV-RNA <50 c/mL | 67.7 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Suppression | HIV-RNA 50-200 c/mL & subsequent measurement <50 c/mL | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Pre-treated Participants | Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Suppression | HIV-RNA <50 c/mL | 75.5 Percentage of participants |
| Pre-treated Participants | Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Suppression | HIV-RNA 50-200 c/mL & subsequent measurement <50 c/mL | 0.3 Percentage of participants |
Change in Lipid Laboratory Values
The following lipid parameters are presented: total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: At years 1, 2 and 3 compared to Baseline
Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 1 - Total cholesterol | 13.0 mg/dL |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 2 - Total cholesterol | -1.0 mg/dL |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 3 - Total cholesterol | 8.5 mg/dL |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 1 - LDL cholesterol | 3.5 mg/dL |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 2 - LDL cholesterol | 2.0 mg/dL |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 3 - LDL cholesterol | 8.5 mg/dL |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 1 - HDL cholesterol | 1.0 mg/dL |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 2 - HDL cholesterol | 3.0 mg/dL |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 3 - HDL cholesterol | 3.0 mg/dL |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 1 - Triglycerides | 6.0 mg/dL |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 2 - Triglycerides | 14.0 mg/dL |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 3 - Triglycerides | -16.5 mg/dL |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 2 - Triglycerides | -6.5 mg/dL |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 1 - Total cholesterol | -4.0 mg/dL |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 1 - HDL cholesterol | 0.0 mg/dL |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 2 - Total cholesterol | -1.0 mg/dL |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 1 - Triglycerides | -3.0 mg/dL |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 3 - Total cholesterol | -6.0 mg/dL |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 2 - HDL cholesterol | 0.0 mg/dL |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 1 - LDL cholesterol | 0.0 mg/dL |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 3 - Triglycerides | -13.0 mg/dL |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 2 - LDL cholesterol | 2.0 mg/dL |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 3 - HDL cholesterol | -1.0 mg/dL |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Lipid Laboratory Values | At Year 3 - LDL cholesterol | 0.0 mg/dL |
Change in Symptom Distress
The change in symptom distress is based on the HIV Symptom Distress Module (SDM) questionnaire. The SDM is a 20-item self-reported tool that assesses the presence and distress of symptoms related to HIV or its treatment. It includes sub-scales for treatment satisfaction and individual satisfaction with treatment changes. The treatment satisfaction score sums all items, ranging from +30 (greater improvement) to -30 (greater deterioration). Individual item scores range from +3 (much more satisfied, convenient, flexible) to -3 (much less satisfied, convenient, flexible). General satisfaction and lifestyle scores sum all items, ranging from +15 (greater improvement) to -15 (greater deterioration). Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: At years 1, 2 and 3 compared to Baseline
Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations or withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status. Only participants who completed the HIV SDM questionnaire at the specified time points, were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Symptom Distress | At Year 1 | -2.0 Scores on a scale |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Symptom Distress | At Year 2 | 3.0 Scores on a scale |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Symptom Distress | At Year 3 | -1.0 Scores on a scale |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Symptom Distress | At Year 1 | -2.0 Scores on a scale |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Symptom Distress | At Year 2 | 0.0 Scores on a scale |
| Pre-treated Participants | Change in Symptom Distress | At Year 3 | 0.0 Scores on a scale |
Change in Treatment Satisfaction
The change in treatment satisfaction is based on the HIV Treatment Satisfaction questionnaire (HIV TSQ). The HIV TSQ is a 10-item-self-reported scale that measures overall satisfaction with treatment and by specific domains e.g., convenience and flexibility. In treatment satisfaction score ranges from 0-60, where higher the score, greater the satisfaction with treatment. Individual item scores which included All rate score ranging from 0 (very dissatisfied, inconvenient, inflexible) to 6 (very satisfied, convenient, flexible), in case of general satisfaction, there will be 10 items which will be summed to produce a score ranging from 0 to 30, with higher the score greater the satisfaction with subscale. For lifestyle scale with 8 items which will be summed to produce a score ranging from 0 to 30, with higher the score greater the satisfaction with subscale. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: At years 1, 2 and 3 compared to Baseline
Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, including all FAS participants except those excluded for reasons such as protocol violations or withdrawal. Only Pre-treated participants were included, as the instrument compares to prior treatment, which requires a previous regimen before DTG + 3TC. Only those who completed the HIV TSQ at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Treatment Satisfaction | At Year 1 | 1.0 Scores on a scale |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Treatment Satisfaction | At Year 2 | 1.0 Scores on a scale |
| ART-naive Participants | Change in Treatment Satisfaction | At Year 3 | 1.0 Scores on a scale |
Discontinuation Rates Due to Adverse Drug Reactions
Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3
Population: The analysis was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, which includes all ES participants who received at least one dose, plus those excluded from ES due to withdrawal but with available safety data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Discontinuation Rates Due to Adverse Drug Reactions | 3.9 Percentage of participants |
Frequency of Any Adverse Drug Reactions
Any = serious and non-serious ADRs. An ADR is defined as a noxious and unintended response to a medicinal investigational product related to any dose where at least a reasonable possibility, i.e. the relationship cannot be ruled out. A serious ADR is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3
Population: The analysis was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, which includes all ES participants who received at least one dose, plus those excluded from ES due to withdrawal but with available safety data. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Frequency of Any Adverse Drug Reactions | 0.06 events per person-years |
| Pre-treated Participants | Frequency of Any Adverse Drug Reactions | 0.03 events per person-years |
Frequency of Serious Adverse Events
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3
Population: The analysis was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, which includes all ES participants who received at least one dose, plus those excluded from ES due to withdrawal but with available safety data. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Frequency of Serious Adverse Events | 0.01 Events per person-years |
| Pre-treated Participants | Frequency of Serious Adverse Events | 0.09 Events per person-years |
Number of HIV-RNA Monitoring Measures
Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3
Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Number of HIV-RNA Monitoring Measures | 4 measurements/year |
| Pre-treated Participants | Number of HIV-RNA Monitoring Measures | 4 measurements/year |
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3
Population: The analysis was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, which includes all ES participants who received at least one dose, plus those excluded from ES due to withdrawal but with available safety data. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | 1 Count of events |
| Pre-treated Participants | Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | 78 Count of events |
Number of Serious and Non-serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
An ADR is defined as a noxious and unintended response to a medicinal investigational product related to any dose where at least a reasonable possibility, i.e. the relationship cannot be ruled out. A serious ADR is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3
Population: The analysis was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, which includes all ES participants who received at least one dose, plus those excluded from ES due to withdrawal but with available safety data. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Number of Serious and Non-serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) | Serious ADRs | 5 Count of events |
| ART-naive Participants | Number of Serious and Non-serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) | Non-serious ADRs | 5 Count of events |
| Pre-treated Participants | Number of Serious and Non-serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) | Serious ADRs | 27 Count of events |
| Pre-treated Participants | Number of Serious and Non-serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) | Non-serious ADRs | 22 Count of events |
Percentage of Participants Referred to Another Medical Specialist
Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3
Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants Referred to Another Medical Specialist | 38.7 Percentage of participants |
| Pre-treated Participants | Percentage of Participants Referred to Another Medical Specialist | 71.6 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Low Level Viremia
Low level viremia is defined as a VL measurement greater than (\>) 50 - \<200 c/mL for pre-treated participants. For naive participants, a VL measurement between \>50 to \<200 c/mL after initial suppression of \<50 c/mL was evaluated.
Time frame: At Month 6 and years 1, 2 and 3
Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Low Level Viremia | Month 6 | 3.2 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Low Level Viremia | Year 1 | 3.2 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Low Level Viremia | Year 2 | 6.5 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Low Level Viremia | Year 3 | 3.2 Percentage of participants |
| Pre-treated Participants | Percentage of Participants With Low Level Viremia | Year 3 | 1.8 Percentage of participants |
| Pre-treated Participants | Percentage of Participants With Low Level Viremia | Month 6 | 1.8 Percentage of participants |
| Pre-treated Participants | Percentage of Participants With Low Level Viremia | Year 2 | 0.9 Percentage of participants |
| Pre-treated Participants | Percentage of Participants With Low Level Viremia | Year 1 | 1.5 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses
Participants were prompted to give an estimate of their level of adherence in a single-item question part of their self-assessment questionnaires. 0-2 missed doses, 3-4 missed doses, 5-6 missed doses, and \>6 missed doses were reported.
Time frame: At years 1, 2 and 3
Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses | At Year 1 - 0-2 missed doses | 93 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses | At Year 1 - 3-4 Missed doses | 14 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses | At Year 1 - 5-6 Missed doses | 1 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses | At Year 1 - >6 Missed doses | 1 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses | At Year 2 - 0-2 missed doses | 98 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses | At Year 2 - 3-4 Missed doses | 1 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses | At Year 2 - 5-6 Missed doses | 1 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses | At Year 2 - >6 Missed doses | 1 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses | At Year 3 - 0-2 missed doses | 99 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses | At Year 3 - 3-4 Missed doses | 1 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses | At Year 3 - 5-6 Missed doses | 0 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses | At Year 3 - >6 Missed doses | 0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy Initiation
The primary reasons for therapy switch are low potential for interaction, preference of a 2-drug regime, prevention of potential long-term toxicities of other therapies, tolerability profile of DTG+3TC, easy to take (once daily, independent of meals), and other. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: At Baseline
Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. Only ART-naive participants were included, as the instrument presents the reasons for therapy initiation, which requires no previous regimen before DTG + 3TC.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy Initiation | Low potential for interaction | 3 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy Initiation | Preference of a 2-drug regime | 45 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy Initiation | Prevention of potential long-term toxicities of other therapies | 6 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy Initiation | Tolerability profile of DTG+/3TC | 6 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy Initiation | Easy to take (once daily, independent of meals) | 16 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy Initiation | Other | 23 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TC
The primary reasons for therapy switch are side effects of previous ART, low potential for interaction, preference of a 2-drug regime, tolerability profile of DTG+3TC, pill size, easy to take (once daily, independent of meals), patient's preference, and other. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: At Baseline
Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. Only Pre-treated participants were included, as the instrument presents the reasons for therapy switch, which requires a previous regimen before DTG + 3TC.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TC | Side effects of previous ART | 39 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TC | Low potential for interaction | 14 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TC | Preference of a 2-drug regime | 62 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TC | Tolerability profile of DTG+/3TC | 26 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TC | Pill size | 1 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TC | Easy to take (once daily, independent of meals) | 21 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TC | Patient's preference | 21 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TC | Other | 15 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Switch Due to Virologic Reasons or Due to Intolerability
The intolerability was determined at the discretion of the physician. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3
Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Switch Due to Virologic Reasons or Due to Intolerability | Virologic reasons | 3.2 Percentage of participants |
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Switch Due to Virologic Reasons or Due to Intolerability | Intolerability | 9.7 Percentage of participants |
| Pre-treated Participants | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Switch Due to Virologic Reasons or Due to Intolerability | Virologic reasons | 1.5 Percentage of participants |
| Pre-treated Participants | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Switch Due to Virologic Reasons or Due to Intolerability | Intolerability | 3.6 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound
Virologic rebound is defined as 2 consecutive VL measurements \>=200 c/mL after suppression. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3
Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
| Pre-treated Participants | Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound | 0.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With VL > 50 c/mL With Emergent Resistance Mutations
Newly identified resistance-associated mutations, including those detected before initiating treatment with DTG+3TC and most recent HIV-RNA levels. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3
Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ART-naive Participants | Percentage of Participants With VL > 50 c/mL With Emergent Resistance Mutations | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Pre-treated Participants | Percentage of Participants With VL > 50 c/mL With Emergent Resistance Mutations | 0.3 Percentage of participants |