Skip to content

Description of Real World Antiviral Effectiveness and Sustainability of the 2-Drug Regimen Dolutegravir + Lamivudine in Untreated and Pre-treated Patients in Routine Clinical Care in Germany

Description of Real World Antiviral Effectiveness and Sustainability of the 2-Drug Regimen Dolutegravir + Lamivudine in Untreated and Pre-treated Patients in Routine Clinical Care in Germany

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03754803
Acronym
URBAN
Enrollment
376
Registered
2018-11-27
Start date
2018-11-08
Completion date
2024-05-06
Last updated
2025-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

Dolutegravir, Two-drug regimen, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, HIV Symptom Distress Module, Lamivudine, HIV treatment satisfaction questionnaire

Brief summary

This is a prospective, non-interventional, multi-center study, in participants with clinical indication of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 infection. The aim of the study was to generate the real world evidence for the use of DTG+3TC in routine clinical care in Germany to supplement data obtained from controlled clinical trials. Treatment naïve and pre-treated HIV-1 positive participants were enrolled in the study. The observation period for the study was 3 years. Data was collected from routine clinical care via electronic data capture (EDC) system.

Interventions

OTHERHIV symptom distress module (SDM) questionnaire

The SDM is a 20-item self-reported measure that addresses the presence and perceived distress linked to symptoms commonly associated with HIV or its treatment.

OTHERHIV treatment satisfaction questionnaire (TSQ)

The HIV TSQ is a 10-item-self-reported scale that measures overall satisfaction with treatment and by specific domains e.g., convenience and flexibility.

Sponsors

MUC Research GmbH
CollaboratorOTHER
ViiV Healthcare
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants \>= 18 years of age. * Participants with documented HIV-1 infection. * Prescription of DTG + 3TC was issued independently from entering this study. * Participants with the ability to understand informed consent form and other relevant regulatory documents.

Exclusion criteria

* Any contraindication according to Tivicay or Lamivudine summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs). * Participants with VL \> 500 c/mL. * Any antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV-1 in addition to DTG and 3TC or the DTG/3TC fixed dose combination (FDC). * Participants with hepatitis B virus (HBV)- coinfection. * Participants with current participation in the ongoing non-interventional study TRIUMPH (study number: 202033, NCT number: NCT02342769) or in any interventional clinical trial irrespective of indication. * Participants who had previously participated in clinical trials assessing DTG+ 3TC.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic SuppressionAt Year 3Virologic suppression is defined as a viral load (VL) less than (\<) 50 copies (c)/mL or, if between 50-200 c/mL, with a subsequent next available measurement \<50 c/mL (within 120 days).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Low Level ViremiaAt Month 6 and years 1, 2 and 3Low level viremia is defined as a VL measurement greater than (\>) 50 - \<200 c/mL for pre-treated participants. For naive participants, a VL measurement between \>50 to \<200 c/mL after initial suppression of \<50 c/mL was evaluated.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic ReboundFrom Baseline until Year 3Virologic rebound is defined as 2 consecutive VL measurements \>=200 c/mL after suppression. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Switch Due to Virologic Reasons or Due to IntolerabilityFrom Baseline until Year 3The intolerability was determined at the discretion of the physician. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly DosesAt years 1, 2 and 3Participants were prompted to give an estimate of their level of adherence in a single-item question part of their self-assessment questionnaires. 0-2 missed doses, 3-4 missed doses, 5-6 missed doses, and \>6 missed doses were reported.
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From Baseline until Year 3An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Frequency of Serious Adverse EventsFrom Baseline until Year 3An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Number of Serious and Non-serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)From Baseline until Year 3An ADR is defined as a noxious and unintended response to a medicinal investigational product related to any dose where at least a reasonable possibility, i.e. the relationship cannot be ruled out. A serious ADR is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Frequency of Any Adverse Drug ReactionsFrom Baseline until Year 3Any = serious and non-serious ADRs. An ADR is defined as a noxious and unintended response to a medicinal investigational product related to any dose where at least a reasonable possibility, i.e. the relationship cannot be ruled out. A serious ADR is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TCAt BaselineThe primary reasons for therapy switch are side effects of previous ART, low potential for interaction, preference of a 2-drug regime, tolerability profile of DTG+3TC, pill size, easy to take (once daily, independent of meals), patient's preference, and other. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Percentage of Participants With VL > 50 c/mL With Emergent Resistance MutationsFrom Baseline until Year 3Newly identified resistance-associated mutations, including those detected before initiating treatment with DTG+3TC and most recent HIV-RNA levels. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Change in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt years 1, 2 and 3 compared to BaselineThe following lipid parameters are presented: total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Percentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy InitiationAt BaselineThe primary reasons for therapy switch are low potential for interaction, preference of a 2-drug regime, prevention of potential long-term toxicities of other therapies, tolerability profile of DTG+3TC, easy to take (once daily, independent of meals), and other. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Change in Treatment SatisfactionAt years 1, 2 and 3 compared to BaselineThe change in treatment satisfaction is based on the HIV Treatment Satisfaction questionnaire (HIV TSQ). The HIV TSQ is a 10-item-self-reported scale that measures overall satisfaction with treatment and by specific domains e.g., convenience and flexibility. In treatment satisfaction score ranges from 0-60, where higher the score, greater the satisfaction with treatment. Individual item scores which included All rate score ranging from 0 (very dissatisfied, inconvenient, inflexible) to 6 (very satisfied, convenient, flexible), in case of general satisfaction, there will be 10 items which will be summed to produce a score ranging from 0 to 30, with higher the score greater the satisfaction with subscale. For lifestyle scale with 8 items which will be summed to produce a score ranging from 0 to 30, with higher the score greater the satisfaction with subscale. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Change in Symptom DistressAt years 1, 2 and 3 compared to BaselineThe change in symptom distress is based on the HIV Symptom Distress Module (SDM) questionnaire. The SDM is a 20-item self-reported tool that assesses the presence and distress of symptoms related to HIV or its treatment. It includes sub-scales for treatment satisfaction and individual satisfaction with treatment changes. The treatment satisfaction score sums all items, ranging from +30 (greater improvement) to -30 (greater deterioration). Individual item scores range from +3 (much more satisfied, convenient, flexible) to -3 (much less satisfied, convenient, flexible). General satisfaction and lifestyle scores sum all items, ranging from +15 (greater improvement) to -15 (greater deterioration). Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Number of HIV-RNA Monitoring MeasuresFrom Baseline until Year 3Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Percentage of Participants Referred to Another Medical SpecialistFrom Baseline until Year 3Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.
Discontinuation Rates Due to Adverse Drug ReactionsFrom Baseline until Year 3Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Under EU privacy laws, participants who withdraw consent can choose whether their data up to withdrawal may be used or must be deleted. Safety data (e.g., ADRs, SAEs) are exempt and must be retained. This resulted in a higher number of participants analyzed for the Safety Analysis Set (N = 368) compared to Effectiveness Analysis Set (N = 366).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 376 participants were enrolled in the Full Analysis Set, of which 10 were excluded for various reasons, including protocol violations and participant withdrawal. The remaining 366 participants were included in the Effectiveness Analysis Set.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Total Participants
Antiretroviral treatment (ART) naïve and pre-treated HIV-1 positive participants for whom DTG+3TC is indicated according to local label.
366
Total366

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal Participants
Age, Continuous47.0 Years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
25 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
341 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 312 / 337
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 310 / 337
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 3178 / 337

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Suppression

Virologic suppression is defined as a viral load (VL) less than (\<) 50 copies (c)/mL or, if between 50-200 c/mL, with a subsequent next available measurement \<50 c/mL (within 120 days).

Time frame: At Year 3

Population: The analysis was performed on the Effectiveness Set (ES) which includes all participants from the Full Analysis Set (FAS) except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic SuppressionHIV-RNA <50 c/mL67.7 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic SuppressionHIV-RNA 50-200 c/mL & subsequent measurement <50 c/mL0 Percentage of participants
Pre-treated ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic SuppressionHIV-RNA <50 c/mL75.5 Percentage of participants
Pre-treated ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic SuppressionHIV-RNA 50-200 c/mL & subsequent measurement <50 c/mL0.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Lipid Laboratory Values

The following lipid parameters are presented: total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: At years 1, 2 and 3 compared to Baseline

Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 1 - Total cholesterol13.0 mg/dL
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 2 - Total cholesterol-1.0 mg/dL
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 3 - Total cholesterol8.5 mg/dL
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 1 - LDL cholesterol3.5 mg/dL
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 2 - LDL cholesterol2.0 mg/dL
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 3 - LDL cholesterol8.5 mg/dL
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 1 - HDL cholesterol1.0 mg/dL
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 2 - HDL cholesterol3.0 mg/dL
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 3 - HDL cholesterol3.0 mg/dL
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 1 - Triglycerides6.0 mg/dL
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 2 - Triglycerides14.0 mg/dL
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 3 - Triglycerides-16.5 mg/dL
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 2 - Triglycerides-6.5 mg/dL
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 1 - Total cholesterol-4.0 mg/dL
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 1 - HDL cholesterol0.0 mg/dL
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 2 - Total cholesterol-1.0 mg/dL
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 1 - Triglycerides-3.0 mg/dL
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 3 - Total cholesterol-6.0 mg/dL
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 2 - HDL cholesterol0.0 mg/dL
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 1 - LDL cholesterol0.0 mg/dL
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 3 - Triglycerides-13.0 mg/dL
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 2 - LDL cholesterol2.0 mg/dL
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 3 - HDL cholesterol-1.0 mg/dL
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Lipid Laboratory ValuesAt Year 3 - LDL cholesterol0.0 mg/dL
Secondary

Change in Symptom Distress

The change in symptom distress is based on the HIV Symptom Distress Module (SDM) questionnaire. The SDM is a 20-item self-reported tool that assesses the presence and distress of symptoms related to HIV or its treatment. It includes sub-scales for treatment satisfaction and individual satisfaction with treatment changes. The treatment satisfaction score sums all items, ranging from +30 (greater improvement) to -30 (greater deterioration). Individual item scores range from +3 (much more satisfied, convenient, flexible) to -3 (much less satisfied, convenient, flexible). General satisfaction and lifestyle scores sum all items, ranging from +15 (greater improvement) to -15 (greater deterioration). Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: At years 1, 2 and 3 compared to Baseline

Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations or withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status. Only participants who completed the HIV SDM questionnaire at the specified time points, were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Symptom DistressAt Year 1-2.0 Scores on a scale
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Symptom DistressAt Year 23.0 Scores on a scale
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Symptom DistressAt Year 3-1.0 Scores on a scale
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Symptom DistressAt Year 1-2.0 Scores on a scale
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Symptom DistressAt Year 20.0 Scores on a scale
Pre-treated ParticipantsChange in Symptom DistressAt Year 30.0 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change in Treatment Satisfaction

The change in treatment satisfaction is based on the HIV Treatment Satisfaction questionnaire (HIV TSQ). The HIV TSQ is a 10-item-self-reported scale that measures overall satisfaction with treatment and by specific domains e.g., convenience and flexibility. In treatment satisfaction score ranges from 0-60, where higher the score, greater the satisfaction with treatment. Individual item scores which included All rate score ranging from 0 (very dissatisfied, inconvenient, inflexible) to 6 (very satisfied, convenient, flexible), in case of general satisfaction, there will be 10 items which will be summed to produce a score ranging from 0 to 30, with higher the score greater the satisfaction with subscale. For lifestyle scale with 8 items which will be summed to produce a score ranging from 0 to 30, with higher the score greater the satisfaction with subscale. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: At years 1, 2 and 3 compared to Baseline

Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, including all FAS participants except those excluded for reasons such as protocol violations or withdrawal. Only Pre-treated participants were included, as the instrument compares to prior treatment, which requires a previous regimen before DTG + 3TC. Only those who completed the HIV TSQ at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Treatment SatisfactionAt Year 11.0 Scores on a scale
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Treatment SatisfactionAt Year 21.0 Scores on a scale
ART-naive ParticipantsChange in Treatment SatisfactionAt Year 31.0 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Discontinuation Rates Due to Adverse Drug Reactions

Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3

Population: The analysis was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, which includes all ES participants who received at least one dose, plus those excluded from ES due to withdrawal but with available safety data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsDiscontinuation Rates Due to Adverse Drug Reactions3.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Frequency of Any Adverse Drug Reactions

Any = serious and non-serious ADRs. An ADR is defined as a noxious and unintended response to a medicinal investigational product related to any dose where at least a reasonable possibility, i.e. the relationship cannot be ruled out. A serious ADR is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3

Population: The analysis was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, which includes all ES participants who received at least one dose, plus those excluded from ES due to withdrawal but with available safety data. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsFrequency of Any Adverse Drug Reactions0.06 events per person-years
Pre-treated ParticipantsFrequency of Any Adverse Drug Reactions0.03 events per person-years
Secondary

Frequency of Serious Adverse Events

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3

Population: The analysis was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, which includes all ES participants who received at least one dose, plus those excluded from ES due to withdrawal but with available safety data. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsFrequency of Serious Adverse Events0.01 Events per person-years
Pre-treated ParticipantsFrequency of Serious Adverse Events0.09 Events per person-years
Secondary

Number of HIV-RNA Monitoring Measures

Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3

Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ART-naive ParticipantsNumber of HIV-RNA Monitoring Measures4 measurements/year
Pre-treated ParticipantsNumber of HIV-RNA Monitoring Measures4 measurements/year
Secondary

Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3

Population: The analysis was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, which includes all ES participants who received at least one dose, plus those excluded from ES due to withdrawal but with available safety data. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsNumber of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1 Count of events
Pre-treated ParticipantsNumber of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)78 Count of events
Secondary

Number of Serious and Non-serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)

An ADR is defined as a noxious and unintended response to a medicinal investigational product related to any dose where at least a reasonable possibility, i.e. the relationship cannot be ruled out. A serious ADR is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3

Population: The analysis was performed on the Safety Analysis Set, which includes all ES participants who received at least one dose, plus those excluded from ES due to withdrawal but with available safety data. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsNumber of Serious and Non-serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)Serious ADRs5 Count of events
ART-naive ParticipantsNumber of Serious and Non-serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)Non-serious ADRs5 Count of events
Pre-treated ParticipantsNumber of Serious and Non-serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)Serious ADRs27 Count of events
Pre-treated ParticipantsNumber of Serious and Non-serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)Non-serious ADRs22 Count of events
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Referred to Another Medical Specialist

Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3

Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Referred to Another Medical Specialist38.7 Percentage of participants
Pre-treated ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Referred to Another Medical Specialist71.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Low Level Viremia

Low level viremia is defined as a VL measurement greater than (\>) 50 - \<200 c/mL for pre-treated participants. For naive participants, a VL measurement between \>50 to \<200 c/mL after initial suppression of \<50 c/mL was evaluated.

Time frame: At Month 6 and years 1, 2 and 3

Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Low Level ViremiaMonth 63.2 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Low Level ViremiaYear 13.2 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Low Level ViremiaYear 26.5 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Low Level ViremiaYear 33.2 Percentage of participants
Pre-treated ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Low Level ViremiaYear 31.8 Percentage of participants
Pre-treated ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Low Level ViremiaMonth 61.8 Percentage of participants
Pre-treated ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Low Level ViremiaYear 20.9 Percentage of participants
Pre-treated ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Low Level ViremiaYear 11.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Missed Monthly Doses

Participants were prompted to give an estimate of their level of adherence in a single-item question part of their self-assessment questionnaires. 0-2 missed doses, 3-4 missed doses, 5-6 missed doses, and \>6 missed doses were reported.

Time frame: At years 1, 2 and 3

Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Missed Monthly DosesAt Year 1 - 0-2 missed doses93 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Missed Monthly DosesAt Year 1 - 3-4 Missed doses14 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Missed Monthly DosesAt Year 1 - 5-6 Missed doses1 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Missed Monthly DosesAt Year 1 - >6 Missed doses1 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Missed Monthly DosesAt Year 2 - 0-2 missed doses98 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Missed Monthly DosesAt Year 2 - 3-4 Missed doses1 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Missed Monthly DosesAt Year 2 - 5-6 Missed doses1 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Missed Monthly DosesAt Year 2 - >6 Missed doses1 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Missed Monthly DosesAt Year 3 - 0-2 missed doses99 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Missed Monthly DosesAt Year 3 - 3-4 Missed doses1 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Missed Monthly DosesAt Year 3 - 5-6 Missed doses0 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Missed Monthly DosesAt Year 3 - >6 Missed doses0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy Initiation

The primary reasons for therapy switch are low potential for interaction, preference of a 2-drug regime, prevention of potential long-term toxicities of other therapies, tolerability profile of DTG+3TC, easy to take (once daily, independent of meals), and other. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: At Baseline

Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. Only ART-naive participants were included, as the instrument presents the reasons for therapy initiation, which requires no previous regimen before DTG + 3TC.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy InitiationLow potential for interaction3 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy InitiationPreference of a 2-drug regime45 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy InitiationPrevention of potential long-term toxicities of other therapies6 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy InitiationTolerability profile of DTG+/3TC6 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy InitiationEasy to take (once daily, independent of meals)16 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for DTG+3TC Therapy InitiationOther23 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TC

The primary reasons for therapy switch are side effects of previous ART, low potential for interaction, preference of a 2-drug regime, tolerability profile of DTG+3TC, pill size, easy to take (once daily, independent of meals), patient's preference, and other. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: At Baseline

Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. Only Pre-treated participants were included, as the instrument presents the reasons for therapy switch, which requires a previous regimen before DTG + 3TC.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TCSide effects of previous ART39 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TCLow potential for interaction14 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TCPreference of a 2-drug regime62 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TCTolerability profile of DTG+/3TC26 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TCPill size1 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TCEasy to take (once daily, independent of meals)21 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TCPatient's preference21 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Reasons for Therapy Switch to DTG+3TCOther15 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Switch Due to Virologic Reasons or Due to Intolerability

The intolerability was determined at the discretion of the physician. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3

Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Switch Due to Virologic Reasons or Due to IntolerabilityVirologic reasons3.2 Percentage of participants
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Switch Due to Virologic Reasons or Due to IntolerabilityIntolerability9.7 Percentage of participants
Pre-treated ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Switch Due to Virologic Reasons or Due to IntolerabilityVirologic reasons1.5 Percentage of participants
Pre-treated ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Treatment Switch Due to Virologic Reasons or Due to IntolerabilityIntolerability3.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound

Virologic rebound is defined as 2 consecutive VL measurements \>=200 c/mL after suppression. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3

Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound3.4 Percentage of participants
Pre-treated ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound0.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With VL > 50 c/mL With Emergent Resistance Mutations

Newly identified resistance-associated mutations, including those detected before initiating treatment with DTG+3TC and most recent HIV-RNA levels. Baseline represents the last visit before the start of therapy with DTG+3TC.

Time frame: From Baseline until Year 3

Population: The analysis was performed on the ES, which includes all participants from the FAS except those excluded for various reasons, such as protocol violations and participant withdrawal. As per protocol, data for this outcome measure were analyzed separately for ART-naive and Pre-treated participants, as the variable required different and/or additional response options depending on prior treatment status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ART-naive ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With VL > 50 c/mL With Emergent Resistance Mutations0 Percentage of participants
Pre-treated ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With VL > 50 c/mL With Emergent Resistance Mutations0.3 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026