Skip to content

Remembered Meal Satisfaction, Satiety and Later Snack Food Intake

Remembered Meal Satisfaction, Satiety and Later Snack Food Intake: A Laboratory Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03750019
Enrollment
146
Registered
2018-11-21
Start date
2017-08-07
Completion date
2017-12-08
Last updated
2018-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overweight and Obesity

Keywords

food intake, memory, remembered satisfaction, memory for recent eating, satiety, eating behavior

Brief summary

This study examined whether remembered meal satisfaction (encompassing memory for meal liking and satiety) can be manipulated in the laboratory and whether this influences later food intake.

Detailed description

This study examined whether remembered meal satisfaction (encompassing memory for meal liking and satiety) can be manipulated in the laboratory and whether this influences later food intake. In a between-subjects design participants consumed a fixed lunch and then rehearsed the satisfying or dissatisfying aspects of the meal, or a neutral experience (control), in order to manipulate memory for meal satisfaction. Three hours later, in a second visit to the laboratory, participants completed a bogus taste-test to measure food intake and meal memory measures.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDissatisfying rehearsal task

Participants rehearsed dissatisfying aspects of the lunchtime meal they just ate.

BEHAVIORALNeutral rehearsal

Participants rehearsed their journey to campus that day.

BEHAVIORALSatisfying rehearsal task

Participants rehearsed satisfying aspects of the lunchtime meal they just ate.

Sponsors

University of Liverpool
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Fluent English * Not taking medication that affects appetite * No known history of food allergies or disordered eating

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ad libitum snack intakeMeasured during second visit that took place 3 hours after the baseline visitEnergy intake (kcal) measured from a bogus taste-test task. Lower intake in those in the satisfying rehearsal condition compared to the control condition and greater intake in the dissatisfying rehearsal condition compared to the control condition were expected.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Memory for general satisfactionMeasured during second visit that took place 3 hours after the baseline visitMemory for general satisfaction with the lunchtime meal was measured via five questions: 'Overall, how satisfying did you find the lunchtime meal?', 'Overall, how dissatisfying did you find the lunchtime meal?', 'I liked the lunchtime meal', 'How satisfied were you with the taste of the lunchtime meal?' and 'How dissatisfied were you with the taste of the lunchtime meal?'. Responses were measured using 100-point visual analogue scales with anchors 'not at all' and 'extremely' (0-100). A higher score in those in the satisfying rehearsal condition compared to the control condition and a lower score in the dissatisfying rehearsal condition compared to the control condition were expected.
Memory for satisfaction with meal satietyMeasured during second visit that took place 3 hours after the baseline visitMemory for general satisfaction with the lunchtime meal was measured via two questions: 'How satisfied were you with how filling the lunchtime meal was?' and 'How dissatisfied were you with how filling the lunchtime meal was?'. Responses were measured using 100-point visual analogue scales with anchors 'not at all' and 'extremely' (0-100). A higher score in those in the satisfying rehearsal condition compared to the control condition and a lower score in the dissatisfying rehearsal condition compared to the control condition were expected.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hunger before lunchMeasured before lunch (during baseline visit)Hunger before lunch was measured via a single question asking 'How hungry do you feel right now?'. Responses were measured via a 100-point visual analogue scale with anchors 'not at all' and 'extremely'. No directional hypothesis was made for this outcome.
Hunger after the bogus taste-testMeasured after the bogus taste-test (in second visit that took place 3 hours after the baseline visit)Hunger before lunch was measured via a single question asking 'How hungry do you feel right now?'. Responses were measured via a 100-point visual analogue scale with anchors 'not at all' and 'extremely'. No directional hypothesis was made for this outcome.
Hunger after lunchMeasured after lunch (during baseline visit)Hunger before lunch was measured via a single question asking 'How hungry do you feel right now?'. Responses were measured via a 100-point visual analogue scale with anchors 'not at all' and 'extremely'. No directional hypothesis was made for this outcome.
Hunger before the bogus taste-testMeasured before the bogus taste-test (in second visit that took place 3 hours after the baseline visit)Hunger before lunch was measured via a single question asking 'How hungry do you feel right now?'. Responses were measured via a 100-point visual analogue scale with anchors 'not at all' and 'extremely'. No directional hypothesis was made for this outcome.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026