Assessment of the Impact of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring on People Presenting With Severe Hypoglycaemia

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemia Unawareness

Real time continuous glucose monitoring, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, self monitoring blood glucose, sensor augmented pump, severe hypoglycaemia, hypounaware

This study aims to assess the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on the frequency, duration, awareness and severity of hypoglycaemia in people with type 1 diabetes and a recent history of severe hypoglycaemia, compared to usual care.

Type 1 diabetes (T1DM), which affects 300,000 in the UK, is characterised by autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic beta cells, leading to absolute deficiency of insulin. Management of T1DM requires exogenous insulin administration, aiming for glucose concentrations as close to physiological values as possible. Intensive management of T1DM improves glucose control and reduces the risk of microvascular diabetes complications and cardiovascular disease1. In the UK diabetes consumes more than 10% of the National Health Service budget 2 and in the USA a relatively greater amount is spent on type 1 compared with type 2 diabetes (8.6% of the diabetes budget compared with 5.6% of diabetes prevalence)3. Medication and insulin pump therapy accounts for less than 10% of diabetes expenditure with the majority of costs incurred in the treatment of complications4. Optimal control remains challenging to achieve and intensive insulin treatment increases the risk of severe hypoglycaemia, with lower glucose values also associated with an increased frequency and severity of moderate hypoglycaemia5, 6. Severe hypoglycaemia is defined as any episode of hypoglycaemia requiring the assistance of a third party actively to treat. Hypoglycaemia is associated with morbidity and even mortality, and places a financial burden on health systems. Severe hypoglycaemia costs £13million per year in NHS costs7. Between 4 and 10% of deaths in people with type 1 diabetes are attributed to hypoglycaemia and the risk of severe hypoglycaemia increases 6-fold in people with impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia. Avoidance of hypoglycaemia is associated with restoration of hypoglycaemia awareness and this may be enabled by the use of continuous glucose monitoring. In type 1 diabetes real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves overall glucose control in all age groups when used continuously, reduces hypoglycaemia in people with an HbA1c \<7.0%, and may reduce severe hypoglycaemia8-10. The predictive Low-Glucose suspend (PLGS) feature in sensor augmented insulin pumps (SAP) automatically reduces insulin delivery when trends in CGM glucose concentrations predict future hypoglycaemia, and significantly reduces hypoglycaemia without rebound hyperglycaemia compared to SAP without PLGS11. In England continuous glucose monitoring is supported by NICE for people with type 1 diabetes who are willing to commit to using it at least 70% of the time and to calibrate it as needed, and who have any of the following despite optimised use of insulin therapy and conventional blood glucose monitoring12: * More than 1 episode a year of severe hypoglycaemia with no obvious preventable precipitating cause. * Complete loss of awareness of hypoglycaemia. * Frequent (more than 2 episodes a week) asymptomatic hypoglycaemia that is causing problems with daily activities. * Extreme fear of hypoglycaemia. * Hyperglycaemia (HbA1c level of 75 mmol/mol \[9%\] or higher) that persists despite testing at least 10 times a day Addressing severe hypoglycaemia, reducing the risk of further episodes and acting promptly to optimise hypoglycaemia awareness are critical in people at high risk. Continuous subcutaneous insulin pump therapy is supported for adults and children over 12 with type 1 diabetes in whom attempts to achieve target haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) with multiple daily injections (MDI) have resulted in disabling hypoglycaemia or HbA1c levels have remained high (8.5% \[69 mmol/mol\] or above) despite high level care12.

United Kingdom

Participants by arm