Skip to content

Liposomal Bupivacaine in One-level Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion

Does Liposomal Bupivacaine Improve Postoperative Pain Control After One Level Posterior Spinal Fusion With Instrumentation

Status
Suspended
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03745040
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-11-19
Start date
2019-01-26
Completion date
2028-08-31
Last updated
2024-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Disc Disease, Lumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Brief summary

This study will describe postoperative pain management for spine surgery patients receiving liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel®) compared to patients not receiving the drug.

Detailed description

This study will describe postoperative pain management for spine surgery patients receiving liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel®) compared to patients not receiving the drug. It is a prospective, randomized clinical trial with two cohorts: Group A: standard of care (SOC) plus liposomal bupivacaine (n=30) and Group B: SOC (n=30). All subjects will undergo open single-level posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. The surgery is not an experimental procedure. Prior to closing the surgical wound, liposomal bupivacaine will be administered to Group A. The administration of the drug is a study procedure, but note that this is an indicated use of the drug. Postoperatively, subjects will be assessed for pain and opioid consumption. The investigator's hypothesis for statistical analysis is that there will be a 30% decrease in pain medication requirement for the experimental group (Group A: Liposomal bupivacaine ) versus the control group (Group B: No Liposomal bupivacaine).

Interventions

DRUGLiposomal bupivacaine

20ml bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension 1.3% (266mg) + 50ml 0.25% Bupivacaine (150mg) + 70ml preservative-free 0.9% neutral saline

Sponsors

Twin Cities Spine Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Allina Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Subjects will be blinded and will not be informed if they received the study drug or not.

Intervention model description

This is a prospective randomized clinical trial with two cohorts: one experimental and one control.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Has a primary diagnosis of single-level lumbar stenosis, disc herniation, and/or spondylolisthesis excluding degenerative disc disease * Receives open, one-level posterior spinal fusion

Exclusion criteria

* Is opioid-tolerant. Opioid tolerant patients are receiving, for one week or longer, at least 60 mg oral morphine/day, 25 mcg transdermal fentanyl/hour, 30 mg oral oxycodone/day, 8 mg oral hydromorphone/day, 25 mg oral oxymorphone/day, or an equianalgesic dose of another opioid. * Experienced intraoperative complications (i.e., a dural tear or durotomy). Intra- and post-operative data will be excluded from the analysis for these patients. * Has severe liver disease. Bupivacaine is primarily metabolized in the liver via conjugation with glucuronic acid. Patients with liver disease, especially severe disease may be more susceptible to toxicity. * Has severe renal disease. Bupivacaine and the metabolite are primarily excreted by the kidneys. Excretion can be significantly changed by urinary perfusion, the presence of renal disease, factors affecting urinary pH, and renal blood flow * Is less than 18 years old. * Is pregnant. * Cannot read and speak English.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Visual Analog Pain ScoresThrough study completion, an average of 2.5 daysChange in Visual Analog Pain Scores over time; respondents report pain at incision site and at drain site on a scale of No pain (0) to Intolerable pain (10).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DiscomfortThrough study completion, an average of 2.5 daysOverall Benefit of Analgesia Score. Respondents complete seven questions, each with a score of 0 (minimal or not at all) to 4 (maximum or very much); the total OBAS ranges between 0 (complete relief of pain) and 28 (no benefit).
Total Opioid ConsumptionThrough study completion, an average of 2.5 daysTotal postsurgical opioid consumption in morphine equivalents
Number of Participants with PainThrough study completion, an average of 2.5 daysProportion of pain free subjects, an average of 2.5 days
Patient Cost of In-Hospital StayThrough study completion, an average of 2.5 daysTotal combined cost in dollars of hospital room, drugs, laboratory tests, physical therapy, and respiratory therapy
Length of StayThrough study completion, an average of 2.5 daysNumber of days in the hospital
Number of Opioid-related Adverse EventsThrough study completion, an average of 2.5 daysAverage number of opioid-related adverse events per patient

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026