Skip to content

Low-dose Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert for Induction of Labor

Low-dose Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert for Induction of Labor Beyond 41st Week: a Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03744364
Acronym
MADUTER
Enrollment
198
Registered
2018-11-16
Start date
2014-06-01
Completion date
2017-11-01
Last updated
2018-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Ripening, Induced Labor, Obstetric Labor, Pregnancy

Keywords

Dinoprostone, Misoprostol

Brief summary

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose protocol of vaginal misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor in women with post-term pregnancies. Methods: The investigators designed a prospective, randomized, open-labeled, blinded for the end-point evaluators trial including women of at least 41 weeks of gestational age with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies and Bishop score lower than 6. Participants were randomized into dinoprostone or misoprostol groups in a 1:1 ratio. Baseline maternal data and perinatal outcomes were recorded for statistical analysis. Successful vaginal delivery within 24 hours was the primary outcome variable.

Interventions

To determine efficacy and safety of vaginal 'Misoprostol 25 mcg' every 4 hours with a maximum of 6 doses for induction of labor.

To determine efficacy and safety of 'Dinoprostone 10mg' vaginal insert for induction of labor.

Sponsors

Hospital Miguel Servet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Singleton uncomplicated pregnancy * Nulliparity * Live fetus * 286 days of gestational age or above * Abscence of contraindication for vaginal delivery * Bishop score lower than 6

Exclusion criteria

* Multiple pregnancy * Multiparity * Stillbirth * Oligohydramnios * Suspected fetal distress * Severe asthma * Intolerance/allergy to prostaglandins * Contraindication for vaginal birth

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Successful vaginal delivery within 24 hours24 hours since induction was startedPercentage of women that achieve a vaginal delivery within 24 hours since induction process started

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Successful cervical ripening within 24 hours24 hours since induction was startedPercentage of women that achieve Bishop score \> 6 within 24 hours since induction process started
Interval time from induction to deliveryHours passed between induction of labor until delivery within 72 hoursTime passed since induction of labor started until delivery
Need for a second inductionAssessed 24 hours since induction of labor was startedPercentage of women that require to use a second method for induction of labor after 24 hours of having started induction of labor
Vaginal delivery rateSince labor induction had started until delivery had ocurred within 72 hoursPercentage of women that achieve vaginal delivery

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026