Implant Site Reaction
Conditions
Brief summary
ASSESSMENT OF LOW SPEED DRILLING WITHOUT IRRIGATION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DRILLING WITH IRRIGATION REGARDING HEAT GENERATION AND PERI-IMPLANT MARGINAL BONE LOSS
Detailed description
Assessment of heat generation from conventional drilling speed for dental implant placement versus biological drilling (low speed without irrigation ) by thermocouples technology And measure the primary stability of dental implants placed by the two techniques by osstel device
Interventions
comparing between conventional implant placement drilling speed with irrigation and experimental arm (low speed without irrigation)
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
healthy posterior mandible
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
both sex no intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology no systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement adult patients with proper posterior mandibular ridge requires implant placement
Exclusion criteria
presence of pathological lesions heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing Patients with no enough bone in posterior mandible for implant placement
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement of heat generation from low speed hand piece drills drilling by thermocouple technology | 6 months | Measurement of 3 different depths(mms). Data analyzed with a three-way analysis of variance by Newman-Keulsmultiple comparison procedure. The significance level was set to a p-value of 0.05. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| stability-osstell device to assess the primary stability of placed dental implant | 6 months | Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) allows assess implant stability by measuring implant oscillation frequency on the bone |
Outcome results
None listed