Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Four Doses of Cenerimod Compared to Placebo in Adult Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

A Phase 2b, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Cenerimod in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03742037
Enrollment
427
Registered
2018-11-15
Start date
2018-12-21
Completion date
2022-08-25
Last updated
2026-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Keywords

Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 4 doses of cenerimod versus placebo in adult subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Detailed description

This is a Phase 2b, multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4 doses of cenerimod versus placebo in adult subjects with moderately to severely active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Interventions

Cenerimod will be supplied as a film-coated tablets at the dose of 0.5 mg

DRUGCenerimod 1 mg

Cenerimod will be supplied as a film-coated tablets at the dose of 1 mg

DRUGCenerimod 2 mg

Cenerimod will be supplied as a film-coated tablets at the dose of 2 mg

Cenerimod will be supplied as a film-coated tablets at the dose of 4 mg

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo will be supplied as identical film-coated tablets formulated with the same excipients but without the active ingredient, cenerimod

DRUGcenerimod 2 mg (ex-4 mg)

Cenerimod will be supplied as a film-coated tablets at the dose of 2 mg

Sponsors

Viatris Innovation GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Participants randomized to the 4 mg arm who are still on treatment at month 6 will be re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to placebo or cenerimod 2 mg to enter Treatment Period 2 and will continue study treatment for a total maximum of 12 months.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed Informed Consent Form prior to any study-mandated procedure * Diagnosis of SLE made at least 6 months prior to Screening, by fulfilling at least 4 of the 11 criteria for SLE as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria * A mSLEDAI-2K score ≥ 6 of at least 2 points for musculoskeletal or mucocutaneous manifestations (i.e., myositis, arthritis, rash, alopecia, mucosal ulcers). * Currently treated with stable doses of one or more of the following background medications: * NSAIDs * Anti-malarials (≤ 400 mg/day hydroxychloroquine, ≤ 500 mg/day chloroquine, ≤ 100 mg/day quinacrine) * Mycophenolate mofetil (≤ 2 g/day) * Mycophenolic acid (≤ 1440 mg/day) * Azathioprine (≤ 2 mg/kg/day) * Methotrexate (≤ 20 mg/week) * Corticosteroids (≤ 40 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) * Belimumab (≤10 mg/kg every 4 weeks intravenously, or 200 mg/week subcutaneously). * History or presence of positive autoantibodies measured by central laboratory defined as follows: (a) Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test measured by immunofluorescence assay (IFA) with titre ≥1:80; AND/OR (b) positive anti-double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (anti-dsDNA) antibodies with titre ≥30 IU/mL * Women of childbearing potential: * Must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening * Must agree to undertake monthly urine pregnancy tests during the study * Must use highly effective methods of contraception from the screening visit until 6 months after taking the last dose of study treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Active lupus nephritis or a renal biopsy demonstrating immune complex mediated glomerulonephritis compatible with lupus nephritis. * CNS (Central Nervous System) lupus and severe forms of vasculitis requiring systemic immunosuppressive treatment * A diagnosis of mixed connective tissue disease or any history of overlap syndromes of SLE with rheumatoid arthritis, erosive arthritis, scleroderma or autoimmune hepatitis * History or presence of Mobitz type II or third-degree atrioventricular block, sick sinus syndrome, symptomatic bradycardia or syncope associated with cardiac disorders * Subjects who experienced myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, stroke, transient ischemic attack, vascular thrombosis, decompensated heart failure requiring hospitalization, or heart failure defined by the New York Heart Association Class III/IV within six months prior to Screening * An elevated QT corrected for HR (Heart Rate) on the basis of Fridericia's formula interval of \> 470 ms (females) / \> 450 ms (males) * History or presence of severe respiratory disease or pulmonary fibrosis * Active or latent tuberculosis * Ongoing bacterial, viral or fungal infection that is of clinical concern in the judgment of the investigator or history of any serious infection * Subjects who have congenital or acquired severe immunodeficiency or known HIV infection or positive HIV testing * Presence of macular edema or active uveitis * Type 1 or 2 diabetes that is poorly controlled according to investigator judgment, or diabetes complicated with organ involvement such as diabetic nephropathy or retinopathy * Significant hematology abnormality: Lymphocyte count \< 800 /μL (0.8 × 10e9/L); hemoglobin \< 9 g/dL; WBC (White Blood Cell) count \< 2500/μL (2.5 × 10e9/L) or platelets \< 75000/μL (75 × 10e9/L) * Estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 * Known allergy to S1P (sphingosine-1-phosphate) receptor modulators or any of the cenerimod formulation excipients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in the Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) ScoreBaseline (Day 1) and Month 6The primary endpoint is the absolute change from baseline in the modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) score. The SLEDAI-2K is a cumulative index of lupus disease activity scored by the physician. It is calculated from 24 individual descriptors across 9 organ systems, with weighted scores of 2-8, and measures disease activity within the last 10 days. 0 points indicates inactive disease, and 105 points is the maximum possible score. In this study the SLEDAI-2K was modified, to exclude leucopenia (minus 1 point), due to the mechanism of action of cenerimod. Improvement in systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity is defined as a reduction in SLEDAI-2K score of greater than or equal to 4. A decreased score, i.e., a negative change, indicates an improvement in systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity from baseline to Month 6.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineBaseline (Day 1) and Month 6A responder could only be assessed if the full information of all body systems was available. A participant was defined as a responder based on the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) was a composite, binary endpoint based on three variables: * mSLEDAI-2K score had to have a reduction from baseline greater than or equal to 4, * Physician Global Assessment (PGA) had to have an increase from baseline less than or equal to 0.3. The PGA is a 100 mm visual analog scale used by the physician to assess disease activity ranging for 0 to 3. The scale is anchored with values from 0 = "none" and 3 = "severe"), and * BILAG-2004 (no new BILAG A organ domain score and at most one new BILAG B organ domain score) compared with baseline. If one of the SRI-4 mSLEDAI-2K, PGA and BILAG variables were not met the subject was scored a non-responder. Participants that did not fit at least one of the above criteria were assigned to the missing group.
British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-2004 (BILAG) Disease Activity Index Response at Month 6Baseline (Day 1) and Month 6The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-2004 (BILAG) is a comprehensive tool used by the physician to assess disease activity and is sensitive to small changes over time. Response (no worsening) at Month 6 on BILAG-2004 disease activity index was defined as no new BILAG A organ domain score and no more than one new BILAG B organ domain score compared with baseline. No analysis is reported because the model did not meet the convergence criteria.

Countries

Bulgaria, Chile, Czechia, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Philippines, Poland, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORClinical Trials

Viatris Innovation GmbH

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was done from 21 December 2018 to 25 August 2022.

Pre-assignment details

427 participants are considered to be enrolled in the study and were randomized to study treatment. This represents the Full Analysis Set (treatment as assigned). 810 adult subjects with SLE have been screened and 427 subjects randomized in a 1:1:1:1:1 ratio to placebo, 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 mg once daily (o.d.) of cenerimod, in addition to background SLE therapy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cenerimod 0.5 mg
Participants were randomized to receive cenerimod 0.5 mg once daily in addition to background SLE therapy for up to 6 months in Treatment Period 1.
85
Cenerimod 1 mg
Participants were randomized to receive cenerimod 1 mg once daily in addition to background SLE therapy for up to 6 months in Treatment Period 1.
85
Cenerimod 2 mg
Participants were randomized to receive cenerimod 2 mg once daily in addition to background SLE therapy for up to 6 months in Treatment Period 1.
86
Cenerimod 4 mg
Participants were randomized to receive cenerimod 4 mg once daily in addition to background SLE therapy for up to 6 months in Treatment Period 1.
85
Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive placebo once daily in addition to background SLE therapy for up to 6 months in Treatment Period 1.
86
Total427

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalCenerimod 0.5 mgCenerimod 1 mgCenerimod 2 mgCenerimod 4 mgPlacebo
Age, Continuous41.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.94
42.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.41
40.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.77
42.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.06
42.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.44
41.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.94
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 45 years
259 years49 years54 years49 years50 years57 years
Age, Customized
Between 45 and 64 years
156 years31 years29 years36 years33 years27 years
Age, Customized
Between 64 and 75 years
12 years5 years2 years1 years2 years2 years
Body Mass Index26.14 kilograms/square meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.33
25.67 kilograms/square meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.67
25.55 kilograms/square meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.95
26.16 kilograms/square meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
26.82 kilograms/square meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.15
26.49 kilograms/square meter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.24
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
89 Participants16 Participants17 Participants18 Participants19 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
336 Participants69 Participants68 Participants68 Participants65 Participants66 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
modified SLEDAI at baseline9.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.99
9.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.69
10.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.71
9.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.88
10.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
10.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.05
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
18 Participants5 Participants3 Participants6 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
33 Participants5 Participants9 Participants7 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
33 Participants3 Participants6 Participants8 Participants10 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
337 Participants72 Participants67 Participants65 Participants65 Participants68 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
13 participants5 participants2 participants1 participants3 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
18 participants1 participants3 participants2 participants5 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
7 participants2 participants2 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
1 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Georgia
15 participants5 participants3 participants1 participants4 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
2 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
4 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
39 participants10 participants6 participants10 participants6 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Philippines
27 participants4 participants7 participants6 participants5 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
21 participants6 participants2 participants3 participants3 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
2 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
24 participants2 participants8 participants7 participants5 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
7 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
2 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
2 participants0 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
150 participants36 participants29 participants29 participants27 participants29 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
3 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
88 participants11 participants17 participants21 participants21 participants18 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
406 Participants79 Participants83 Participants80 Participants82 Participants82 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants6 Participants2 Participants6 Participants3 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 842 / 850 / 870 / 350 / 350 / 140 / 86
other
Total, other adverse events
37 / 8454 / 8553 / 8723 / 3520 / 3513 / 1439 / 86
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 8412 / 854 / 871 / 350 / 352 / 146 / 86

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in the Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score

The primary endpoint is the absolute change from baseline in the modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) score. The SLEDAI-2K is a cumulative index of lupus disease activity scored by the physician. It is calculated from 24 individual descriptors across 9 organ systems, with weighted scores of 2-8, and measures disease activity within the last 10 days. 0 points indicates inactive disease, and 105 points is the maximum possible score. In this study the SLEDAI-2K was modified, to exclude leucopenia (minus 1 point), due to the mechanism of action of cenerimod. Improvement in systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity is defined as a reduction in SLEDAI-2K score of greater than or equal to 4. A decreased score, i.e., a negative change, indicates an improvement in systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity from baseline to Month 6.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 6

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Cenerimod 0.5 mgChange From Baseline to Month 6 in the Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score-3.2 score on a scale
Cenerimod 1 mgChange From Baseline to Month 6 in the Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score-3.41 score on a scale
Cenerimod 2 mgChange From Baseline to Month 6 in the Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score-2.84 score on a scale
Cenerimod 4 mgChange From Baseline to Month 6 in the Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score-4.04 score on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 6 in the Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Index 2000 (mSLEDAI-2K) Score-2.85 score on a scale
Comparison: The analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included all participants who were randomized. Baseline was defined as the last measurement before randomization.p-value: 0.474995% CI: [-1.45, 0.68]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included all participants who were randomized. Baseline was defined as the last measurement before randomization.p-value: 0.294195% CI: [-1.65, 0.49]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included all participants who were randomized. Baseline was defined as the last measurement before randomization.p-value: 0.980295% CI: [-1.05, 1.08]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included all participants who were randomized. Baseline was defined as the last measurement before randomization.p-value: 0.029195% CI: [-2.25, -0.12]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-2004 (BILAG) Disease Activity Index Response at Month 6

The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-2004 (BILAG) is a comprehensive tool used by the physician to assess disease activity and is sensitive to small changes over time. Response (no worsening) at Month 6 on BILAG-2004 disease activity index was defined as no new BILAG A organ domain score and no more than one new BILAG B organ domain score compared with baseline. No analysis is reported because the model did not meet the convergence criteria.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 6

Population: Full analysis set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cenerimod 0.5 mgBritish Isles Lupus Assessment Group-2004 (BILAG) Disease Activity Index Response at Month 698.8 percentage of participants
Cenerimod 1 mgBritish Isles Lupus Assessment Group-2004 (BILAG) Disease Activity Index Response at Month 698.7 percentage of participants
Cenerimod 2 mgBritish Isles Lupus Assessment Group-2004 (BILAG) Disease Activity Index Response at Month 697.5 percentage of participants
Cenerimod 4 mgBritish Isles Lupus Assessment Group-2004 (BILAG) Disease Activity Index Response at Month 698.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboBritish Isles Lupus Assessment Group-2004 (BILAG) Disease Activity Index Response at Month 697.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Response on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to Baseline

A responder could only be assessed if the full information of all body systems was available. A participant was defined as a responder based on the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) was a composite, binary endpoint based on three variables: * mSLEDAI-2K score had to have a reduction from baseline greater than or equal to 4, * Physician Global Assessment (PGA) had to have an increase from baseline less than or equal to 0.3. The PGA is a 100 mm visual analog scale used by the physician to assess disease activity ranging for 0 to 3. The scale is anchored with values from 0 = none and 3 = severe), and * BILAG-2004 (no new BILAG A organ domain score and at most one new BILAG B organ domain score) compared with baseline. If one of the SRI-4 mSLEDAI-2K, PGA and BILAG variables were not met the subject was scored a non-responder. Participants that did not fit at least one of the above criteria were assigned to the missing group.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Month 6

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cenerimod 0.5 mgResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineMissing4 participants
Cenerimod 0.5 mgResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineNon-responder45 participants
Cenerimod 0.5 mgResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineResponder36 participants
Cenerimod 1 mgResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineNon-responder38 participants
Cenerimod 1 mgResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineResponder41 participants
Cenerimod 1 mgResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineMissing6 participants
Cenerimod 2 mgResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineMissing7 participants
Cenerimod 2 mgResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineResponder38 participants
Cenerimod 2 mgResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineNon-responder41 participants
Cenerimod 4 mgResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineNon-responder36 participants
Cenerimod 4 mgResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineResponder41 participants
Cenerimod 4 mgResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineMissing8 participants
PlaceboResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineMissing9 participants
PlaceboResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineResponder34 participants
PlaceboResponse on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) at Month 6 as Compared to BaselineNon-responder43 participants
Comparison: A generalized mixed effects model for repeated measures was applied to the SRI-4 response from Month 1 through 6 with treatment group, month, treatment group by month interaction, and stratification factors (oral corticosteroids dose \& mSLEDAI-2K) as fixed effects \& participant as random effect.p-value: 0.97495% CI: [0.54, 1.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: A generalized mixed effects model for repeated measures was applied to the SRI-4 response from Month 1 through 6 with treatment group, month, treatment group by month interaction, and stratification factors (oral corticosteroids dose \& mSLEDAI-2K) as fixed effects \& participant as random effect.p-value: 0.284595% CI: [0.75, 2.65]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: A generalized mixed effects model for repeated measures was applied to the SRI-4 response from Month 1 through 6 with treatment group, month, treatment group by month interaction, and stratification factors (oral corticosteroids dose \& mSLEDAI-2K) as fixed effects \& participant as random effect.p-value: 0.511595% CI: [0.66, 2.32]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: A generalized mixed effects model for repeated measures was applied to the SRI-4 response from Month 1 through 6 with treatment group, month, treatment group by month interaction, and stratification factors (oral corticosteroids dose \& mSLEDAI-2K) as fixed effects \& participant as random effect.p-value: 0.511595% CI: [0.66, 2.32]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 30, 2026