Skip to content

Pay-it-forward RCT for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Testing

Pay-it-forward Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Testing Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03741725
Enrollment
301
Registered
2018-11-15
Start date
2018-12-08
Completion date
2019-09-02
Last updated
2020-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chlamydia;M, Gonorrhea Male

Brief summary

This is a randomized controlled trial which will evaluate dual gonorrhea/chlamydia test uptake and other outcomes in men who have sex with men (MSM) in three trial arms - 1) a pay-it-forward testing arm, 2) a pay-what-you-want testing arm, and 3) standard of care arm.

Detailed description

At both of the program sites, MSM partaking in HIV and syphilis testing will be offered dual gonorrhea/chlamydia testing. First, all men will be provided a brief (5 minute) introduction to gonorrhea and chlamydia testing using a pamphlet. Program organizers will then explain the pay-it-forward program to each man separately. Briefly, men will be told that the hospital list price of gonorrhea and chlamydia testing was 150 RMB ($24 USD), but previous men attending the clinic had donated money to cover the cost of his test. Thus, each man could receive a free gonorrhea and chlamydia test, then decide whether to donate money (pay-it-forward) for future men to receive the same option. Men will be assured that donating is completely optional and advised to pay any amount that is feasible for them. Each man's gonorrhea and chlamydia test fees will be covered by a combination of the initial funding pool from the program organizers and the donations from previous participants. Men will also be shown a postcard with a message written by a previous pay-it-forward contributor. Messages will contain information encouraging men to be tested/slogans to promote sexual health and testing (i.e. taking ownership of their health). They will be told that they could also write a postcard message for a future participant. Men will then decide whether or not to receive combined urine gonorrhea/chlamydia testing. Program organizers will inform participants of their test results via WeChat. Patients with positive test results will be counseled and directed to the WeChat page of designated hospitals where they could make an appointment to receive treatment and follow-up.

Interventions

OTHERPay-it-forward

Participants will be offered a gift of free gonorrhea and chlamydia testing made available by donations from previous testers, and asked whether they would like to donate money (pay-it-forward) for future men to receive the same option.

OTHERPay-what-you-want

Participants will be offered gonorrhoea and chlamydia testing and told that they can decide and pay any desired amount after receiving the test.

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Southern Medical University, China
CollaboratorOTHER
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Social Entrepreneurship to Spur Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Yale University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

3-arm superiority randomized controlled

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
16 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* born biologically male * age 16 years or older * report previous anal sex with another man * willing to provide mobile phone number for results notification

Exclusion criteria

* tested for both gonorrhoea and chlamydia in the past 12 months with no high-risk sexual behavior following testing * previous participation in pay-it-forward program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia TestingDuring enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hoursDual gonorrhea/chlamydia test uptake as assessed by administrative records in each arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Tested Positive for ChlamydiaDuring enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hoursThe is the number of men who tested positive for chlamydia through this study
Cost Per TestDuring enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hoursCost per test, defined as the cost associated with respective interventions (development, start-up, implementation, intervention) per individual who reported testing for gonorrhea and chlamydia following the intervention; economic test and financial cost are reported separately.
Cost Per DiagnosisDuring enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hoursCost per diagnosis, defined as the cost associated with respective interventions (development, start-up, implementation, intervention) per individual who tested positive for gonorrhea and/or chlamydia following the intervention. Cost using economic cost and financial cost were respectively reported.
Number of Participants Tested Positive for GonorrheaDuring enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hoursThe number of men who tested positive for gonorrhea through this study. Samples were collected either from urine or rectum.
Community Connectedness Scale ScoresDuring enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hoursCommunity connectedness scales include six statements and Likert scale response ranging from 1= Strongly disagree, 2= Agree, 3= Disagree, and 4= Strongly agree. For each scale item, the range spans across 1 to 4, with higher score indicating more agreement with the statement and potentially higher community connectedness.
Social Cohesion Scale ScoresDuring enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hoursSocial cohesion is a scale made of seven statements and Likert response to them ranging from 1= strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, and 4= strongly agree. Those questions asked about the feelings of being able to depend on a larger MSM community (i.e., tongzhi circle, gay online networks or groups). For each item, the range spans across 1 to 4. For items 1 to 5, the higher score, the more agreement with the statement and potentially the higher social cohesion. Item 6 and 7 are reversely scored, meaning that the higher the score, the lower social cohesion potentially.
Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesDuring enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hoursNumber of participants who reported yes/no to specific questions on the awareness of and/or participation in MSM-related causes, organizations, or community events

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pay-it-forward
Men in pay-it-forward were told that the standard price of the gonorrhea and chlamydia testing was 150RMB ($22US), and that previous participants who cared about them donated toward testing fees. Thus, men in the pay-it-forward arm received a free test, and then decided whether, and if so how much to donate toward future testing for others. Participants were shown postcards and told that testing and donating were voluntary.
101
Pay-what-you-want
After being introduced to the testing and the study, men in the pay-what-you-want arm were told that the standard price of gonorrhea and chlamydia testing was 150RMB ($22US), and that they would receive free testing and then decide the amount that they would like to pay for their own test.
100
Standard-of-care
Men in the standard of care arm received the same introduction to gonorrhea and chlamydia testing as the men in the other two arms. They were then told that the standard price of gonorrhea and chlamydia testing was 150RMB (US$22) and they had to pay the full amount for the their testing.
100
Total301

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPay-it-forwardTotalStandard-of-carePay-what-you-want
Age, Continuous28.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
28.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
29.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
26.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
Age, Customized
<= 30 years
66 Participants206 Participants66 Participants74 Participants
Age, Customized
>30 years
32 Participants82 Participants31 Participants19 Participants
Annual income (USD)
>14,294
40 Participants110 Participants37 Participants33 Participants
Annual income (USD)
<2,680
11 Participants33 Participants9 Participants13 Participants
Annual income (USD)
2,681- 5,360
7 Participants26 Participants10 Participants9 Participants
Annual income (USD)
5,361- 8,934
17 Participants43 Participants11 Participants15 Participants
Annual income (USD)
8,935- 14,294
23 Participants76 Participants30 Participants23 Participants
Condom use frequency during anal sex in the past three months
Always
52 Participants127 Participants40 Participants35 Participants
Condom use frequency during anal sex in the past three months
Non-use
5 Participants14 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Condom use frequency during anal sex in the past three months
Often
21 Participants69 Participants24 Participants24 Participants
Condom use frequency during anal sex in the past three months
Sometimes
6 Participants24 Participants9 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
101 Participants301 Participants100 Participants100 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Had anal sex in the past three months
No
14 Participants53 Participants19 Participants20 Participants
Had anal sex in the past three months
Yes
84 Participants234 Participants77 Participants73 Participants
Highest education completed
College or above
85 Participants245 Participants81 Participants79 Participants
Highest education completed
High/vocational school
8 Participants27 Participants10 Participants9 Participants
Highest education completed
Middle school or below
5 Participants16 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
HIV testing frequency in the past two years
Every six months
26 Participants76 Participants26 Participants24 Participants
HIV testing frequency in the past two years
Every three months
21 Participants73 Participants27 Participants25 Participants
HIV testing frequency in the past two years
Monthly
7 Participants16 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
HIV testing frequency in the past two years
Never tested
6 Participants26 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
HIV testing frequency in the past two years
Once a year
23 Participants63 Participants24 Participants16 Participants
HIV testing frequency in the past two years
< once every two years
15 Participants33 Participants9 Participants9 Participants
Marital status
Never married
87 Participants252 Participants81 Participants84 Participants
Marital status
Other (engaged, married, divorced or separated)
11 Participants36 Participants16 Participants9 Participants
Number of sex partners in the past three months, Categorical
0-1
47 Participants136 Participants42 Participants47 Participants
Number of sex partners in the past three months, Categorical
Multiple
49 Participants142 Participants49 Participants44 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
101 participants301 participants100 participants100 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
101 Participants301 Participants100 Participants100 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1010 / 1000 / 100
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1010 / 1000 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1010 / 1000 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing

Dual gonorrhea/chlamydia test uptake as assessed by administrative records in each arm.

Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Who Received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing57 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Who Received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing46 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Who Received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing18 Participants
Secondary

Community Connectedness Scale Scores

Community connectedness scales include six statements and Likert scale response ranging from 1= Strongly disagree, 2= Agree, 3= Disagree, and 4= Strongly agree. For each scale item, the range spans across 1 to 4, with higher score indicating more agreement with the statement and potentially higher community connectedness.

Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours

Population: Some participants declined to answer certain questions. Hence, the number analyzed in some rows is different from the overall number analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pay-it-forwardCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresYou feel that you are a part of the MSM community.3.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Pay-it-forwardCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresParticipating in MSM community is a positive thing3.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Pay-it-forwardCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresYou are proud of the MSM community2.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Pay-it-forwardCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresImportant for you to advocate for the community3.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Pay-it-forwardCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresIf you all work together, problems will be solved2.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Pay-it-forwardCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresAny problems faced by the MSM are also yours3.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Pay-what-you-wantCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresAny problems faced by the MSM are also yours3.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Pay-what-you-wantCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresYou feel that you are a part of the MSM community.3.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Pay-what-you-wantCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresImportant for you to advocate for the community3.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Pay-what-you-wantCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresIf you all work together, problems will be solved2.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Pay-what-you-wantCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresParticipating in MSM community is a positive thing3.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Pay-what-you-wantCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresYou are proud of the MSM community2.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Standard-of-careCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresParticipating in MSM community is a positive thing3.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Standard-of-careCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresYou are proud of the MSM community2.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Standard-of-careCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresAny problems faced by the MSM are also yours3.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Standard-of-careCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresImportant for you to advocate for the community3.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Standard-of-careCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresYou feel that you are a part of the MSM community.3.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Standard-of-careCommunity Connectedness Scale ScoresIf you all work together, problems will be solved2.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Secondary

Cost Per Diagnosis

Cost per diagnosis, defined as the cost associated with respective interventions (development, start-up, implementation, intervention) per individual who tested positive for gonorrhea and/or chlamydia following the intervention. Cost using economic cost and financial cost were respectively reported.

Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pay-it-forwardCost Per DiagnosisUsing economic cost11.24 USDStandard Error 1.66
Pay-it-forwardCost Per DiagnosisUsing financial cost6.52 USDStandard Error 1.47
Pay-what-you-wantCost Per DiagnosisUsing economic cost9.67 USDStandard Error 1.45
Pay-what-you-wantCost Per DiagnosisUsing financial cost6.56 USDStandard Error 1.29
Standard-of-careCost Per DiagnosisUsing financial cost1.46 USDStandard Error 0.62
Standard-of-careCost Per DiagnosisUsing economic cost6.12 USDStandard Error 1.13
Secondary

Cost Per Test

Cost per test, defined as the cost associated with respective interventions (development, start-up, implementation, intervention) per individual who reported testing for gonorrhea and chlamydia following the intervention; economic test and financial cost are reported separately.

Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pay-it-forwardCost Per TestUsing economic cost11.24 USDStandard Deviation 1.64
Pay-it-forwardCost Per TestUsing financial cost6.52 USDStandard Deviation 1.48
Pay-what-you-wantCost Per TestUsing economic cost9.67 USDStandard Deviation 1.46
Pay-what-you-wantCost Per TestUsing financial cost6.56 USDStandard Deviation 1.26
Standard-of-careCost Per TestUsing economic cost6.12 USDStandard Deviation 1.12
Standard-of-careCost Per TestUsing financial cost1.46 USDStandard Deviation 0.62
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities

Number of participants who reported yes/no to specific questions on the awareness of and/or participation in MSM-related causes, organizations, or community events

Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours

Population: Those are participants who filled out this questionnaire among those who participated in the study. In total, 3 participants did not respond in Pay-it-for-ward, 7 in Pay-what-you-want, and 3 in Standard of Care.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever participated in online forums or disYes78 Participants
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever participated in online forums or disNo17 Participants
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesAre you aware of any ongoing MSM-related communityYes48 Participants
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesAre you aware of any ongoing MSM-related communityNo45 Participants
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever encouraged someone to use MSM-relateYes77 Participants
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever encouraged someone to use MSM-relateNo16 Participants
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever attended MSM-related community eventYes31 Participants
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever attended MSM-related community eventNo63 Participants
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever donated to MSM-related causes, eventYes41 Participants
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever donated to MSM-related causes, eventNo55 Participants
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever volunteered for MSM-related causesYes19 Participants
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever volunteered for MSM-related causesNo74 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever volunteered for MSM-related causesNo78 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever participated in online forums or disYes64 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever attended MSM-related community eventYes23 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever donated to MSM-related causes, eventYes30 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever participated in online forums or disNo28 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever encouraged someone to use MSM-relateNo20 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever volunteered for MSM-related causesYes13 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesAre you aware of any ongoing MSM-related communityYes30 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever attended MSM-related community eventNo69 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever encouraged someone to use MSM-relateYes72 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesAre you aware of any ongoing MSM-related communityNo62 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever donated to MSM-related causes, eventNo62 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesAre you aware of any ongoing MSM-related communityNo52 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever encouraged someone to use MSM-relateYes70 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever donated to MSM-related causes, eventNo71 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever encouraged someone to use MSM-relateNo18 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever attended MSM-related community eventYes23 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever attended MSM-related community eventNo69 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever volunteered for MSM-related causesYes14 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever participated in online forums or disYes61 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever participated in online forums or disNo29 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever donated to MSM-related causes, eventYes23 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesAre you aware of any ongoing MSM-related communityYes37 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Reporting Community Engagement ActivitiesHave you ever volunteered for MSM-related causesNo76 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Tested Positive for Chlamydia

The is the number of men who tested positive for chlamydia through this study

Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours

Population: Overall Number of Participants Analyzed include the participants who received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Tested Positive for Chlamydia8 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Tested Positive for Chlamydia8 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Tested Positive for Chlamydia3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Tested Positive for Gonorrhea

The number of men who tested positive for gonorrhea through this study. Samples were collected either from urine or rectum.

Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours

Population: Overall Number of Participants Analyzed include the participants who received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pay-it-forwardNumber of Participants Tested Positive for Gonorrhea1 Participants
Pay-what-you-wantNumber of Participants Tested Positive for Gonorrhea2 Participants
Standard-of-careNumber of Participants Tested Positive for Gonorrhea2 Participants
Secondary

Social Cohesion Scale Scores

Social cohesion is a scale made of seven statements and Likert response to them ranging from 1= strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, and 4= strongly agree. Those questions asked about the feelings of being able to depend on a larger MSM community (i.e., tongzhi circle, gay online networks or groups). For each item, the range spans across 1 to 4. For items 1 to 5, the higher score, the more agreement with the statement and potentially the higher social cohesion. Item 6 and 7 are reversely scored, meaning that the higher the score, the lower social cohesion potentially.

Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours

Population: Some participants chose to decline certain questions, which resulted in numbers analyzed in some rows being different from the overall number analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pay-it-forwardSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresMSM you socialize with are always arguing2.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Pay-it-forwardSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresYou can count on other MSM if you need a place2.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Pay-it-forwardSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresYou can count on other MSM to talk about problems2.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Pay-it-forwardSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresMSM in your group only worry about themselves2.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Pay-it-forwardSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresYou can trust the majority of the MSM you know.2.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Pay-it-forwardSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresMSM you socialize with is an integrated group2.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Pay-it-forwardSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresYou can count on other MSM to lend money2.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Pay-what-you-wantSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresYou can count on other MSM to talk about problems2.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Pay-what-you-wantSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresMSM in your group only worry about themselves2.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Pay-what-you-wantSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresMSM you socialize with are always arguing2.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Pay-what-you-wantSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresYou can count on other MSM to lend money2.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Pay-what-you-wantSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresYou can count on other MSM if you need a place2.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Pay-what-you-wantSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresMSM you socialize with is an integrated group2.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Pay-what-you-wantSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresYou can trust the majority of the MSM you know.2.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Standard-of-careSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresYou can count on other MSM if you need a place2.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Standard-of-careSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresMSM you socialize with are always arguing2.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Standard-of-careSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresYou can trust the majority of the MSM you know.2.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Standard-of-careSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresMSM you socialize with is an integrated group2.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Standard-of-careSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresYou can count on other MSM to talk about problems2.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Standard-of-careSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresYou can count on other MSM to lend money2.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Standard-of-careSocial Cohesion Scale ScoresMSM in your group only worry about themselves2.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026