Chlamydia;M, Gonorrhea Male
Conditions
Brief summary
This is a randomized controlled trial which will evaluate dual gonorrhea/chlamydia test uptake and other outcomes in men who have sex with men (MSM) in three trial arms - 1) a pay-it-forward testing arm, 2) a pay-what-you-want testing arm, and 3) standard of care arm.
Detailed description
At both of the program sites, MSM partaking in HIV and syphilis testing will be offered dual gonorrhea/chlamydia testing. First, all men will be provided a brief (5 minute) introduction to gonorrhea and chlamydia testing using a pamphlet. Program organizers will then explain the pay-it-forward program to each man separately. Briefly, men will be told that the hospital list price of gonorrhea and chlamydia testing was 150 RMB ($24 USD), but previous men attending the clinic had donated money to cover the cost of his test. Thus, each man could receive a free gonorrhea and chlamydia test, then decide whether to donate money (pay-it-forward) for future men to receive the same option. Men will be assured that donating is completely optional and advised to pay any amount that is feasible for them. Each man's gonorrhea and chlamydia test fees will be covered by a combination of the initial funding pool from the program organizers and the donations from previous participants. Men will also be shown a postcard with a message written by a previous pay-it-forward contributor. Messages will contain information encouraging men to be tested/slogans to promote sexual health and testing (i.e. taking ownership of their health). They will be told that they could also write a postcard message for a future participant. Men will then decide whether or not to receive combined urine gonorrhea/chlamydia testing. Program organizers will inform participants of their test results via WeChat. Patients with positive test results will be counseled and directed to the WeChat page of designated hospitals where they could make an appointment to receive treatment and follow-up.
Interventions
Participants will be offered a gift of free gonorrhea and chlamydia testing made available by donations from previous testers, and asked whether they would like to donate money (pay-it-forward) for future men to receive the same option.
Participants will be offered gonorrhoea and chlamydia testing and told that they can decide and pay any desired amount after receiving the test.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
3-arm superiority randomized controlled
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* born biologically male * age 16 years or older * report previous anal sex with another man * willing to provide mobile phone number for results notification
Exclusion criteria
* tested for both gonorrhoea and chlamydia in the past 12 months with no high-risk sexual behavior following testing * previous participation in pay-it-forward program
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing | During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours | Dual gonorrhea/chlamydia test uptake as assessed by administrative records in each arm. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Tested Positive for Chlamydia | During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours | The is the number of men who tested positive for chlamydia through this study |
| Cost Per Test | During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours | Cost per test, defined as the cost associated with respective interventions (development, start-up, implementation, intervention) per individual who reported testing for gonorrhea and chlamydia following the intervention; economic test and financial cost are reported separately. |
| Cost Per Diagnosis | During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours | Cost per diagnosis, defined as the cost associated with respective interventions (development, start-up, implementation, intervention) per individual who tested positive for gonorrhea and/or chlamydia following the intervention. Cost using economic cost and financial cost were respectively reported. |
| Number of Participants Tested Positive for Gonorrhea | During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours | The number of men who tested positive for gonorrhea through this study. Samples were collected either from urine or rectum. |
| Community Connectedness Scale Scores | During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours | Community connectedness scales include six statements and Likert scale response ranging from 1= Strongly disagree, 2= Agree, 3= Disagree, and 4= Strongly agree. For each scale item, the range spans across 1 to 4, with higher score indicating more agreement with the statement and potentially higher community connectedness. |
| Social Cohesion Scale Scores | During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours | Social cohesion is a scale made of seven statements and Likert response to them ranging from 1= strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, and 4= strongly agree. Those questions asked about the feelings of being able to depend on a larger MSM community (i.e., tongzhi circle, gay online networks or groups). For each item, the range spans across 1 to 4. For items 1 to 5, the higher score, the more agreement with the statement and potentially the higher social cohesion. Item 6 and 7 are reversely scored, meaning that the higher the score, the lower social cohesion potentially. |
| Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours | Number of participants who reported yes/no to specific questions on the awareness of and/or participation in MSM-related causes, organizations, or community events |
Countries
China
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Pay-it-forward Men in pay-it-forward were told that the standard price of the gonorrhea and chlamydia testing was 150RMB ($22US), and that previous participants who cared about them donated toward testing fees. Thus, men in the pay-it-forward arm received a free test, and then decided whether, and if so how much to donate toward future testing for others. Participants were shown postcards and told that testing and donating were voluntary. | 101 |
| Pay-what-you-want After being introduced to the testing and the study, men in the pay-what-you-want arm were told that the standard price of gonorrhea and chlamydia testing was 150RMB ($22US), and that they would receive free testing and then decide the amount that they would like to pay for their own test. | 100 |
| Standard-of-care Men in the standard of care arm received the same introduction to gonorrhea and chlamydia testing as the men in the other two arms. They were then told that the standard price of gonorrhea and chlamydia testing was 150RMB (US$22) and they had to pay the full amount for the their testing. | 100 |
| Total | 301 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Pay-it-forward | Total | Standard-of-care | Pay-what-you-want |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 28.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 | 28.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 | 29.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 | 26.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6 |
| Age, Customized <= 30 years | 66 Participants | 206 Participants | 66 Participants | 74 Participants |
| Age, Customized >30 years | 32 Participants | 82 Participants | 31 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Annual income (USD) >14,294 | 40 Participants | 110 Participants | 37 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Annual income (USD) <2,680 | 11 Participants | 33 Participants | 9 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Annual income (USD) 2,681- 5,360 | 7 Participants | 26 Participants | 10 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Annual income (USD) 5,361- 8,934 | 17 Participants | 43 Participants | 11 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Annual income (USD) 8,935- 14,294 | 23 Participants | 76 Participants | 30 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Condom use frequency during anal sex in the past three months Always | 52 Participants | 127 Participants | 40 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Condom use frequency during anal sex in the past three months Non-use | 5 Participants | 14 Participants | 4 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Condom use frequency during anal sex in the past three months Often | 21 Participants | 69 Participants | 24 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Condom use frequency during anal sex in the past three months Sometimes | 6 Participants | 24 Participants | 9 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 101 Participants | 301 Participants | 100 Participants | 100 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Had anal sex in the past three months No | 14 Participants | 53 Participants | 19 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Had anal sex in the past three months Yes | 84 Participants | 234 Participants | 77 Participants | 73 Participants |
| Highest education completed College or above | 85 Participants | 245 Participants | 81 Participants | 79 Participants |
| Highest education completed High/vocational school | 8 Participants | 27 Participants | 10 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Highest education completed Middle school or below | 5 Participants | 16 Participants | 6 Participants | 5 Participants |
| HIV testing frequency in the past two years Every six months | 26 Participants | 76 Participants | 26 Participants | 24 Participants |
| HIV testing frequency in the past two years Every three months | 21 Participants | 73 Participants | 27 Participants | 25 Participants |
| HIV testing frequency in the past two years Monthly | 7 Participants | 16 Participants | 4 Participants | 5 Participants |
| HIV testing frequency in the past two years Never tested | 6 Participants | 26 Participants | 6 Participants | 14 Participants |
| HIV testing frequency in the past two years Once a year | 23 Participants | 63 Participants | 24 Participants | 16 Participants |
| HIV testing frequency in the past two years < once every two years | 15 Participants | 33 Participants | 9 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Marital status Never married | 87 Participants | 252 Participants | 81 Participants | 84 Participants |
| Marital status Other (engaged, married, divorced or separated) | 11 Participants | 36 Participants | 16 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Number of sex partners in the past three months, Categorical 0-1 | 47 Participants | 136 Participants | 42 Participants | 47 Participants |
| Number of sex partners in the past three months, Categorical Multiple | 49 Participants | 142 Participants | 49 Participants | 44 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment China | 101 participants | 301 participants | 100 participants | 100 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 101 Participants | 301 Participants | 100 Participants | 100 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 101 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 101 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 101 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants Who Received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing
Dual gonorrhea/chlamydia test uptake as assessed by administrative records in each arm.
Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Who Received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing | 57 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Who Received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing | 46 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Who Received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing | 18 Participants |
Community Connectedness Scale Scores
Community connectedness scales include six statements and Likert scale response ranging from 1= Strongly disagree, 2= Agree, 3= Disagree, and 4= Strongly agree. For each scale item, the range spans across 1 to 4, with higher score indicating more agreement with the statement and potentially higher community connectedness.
Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours
Population: Some participants declined to answer certain questions. Hence, the number analyzed in some rows is different from the overall number analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay-it-forward | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | You feel that you are a part of the MSM community. | 3.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Pay-it-forward | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | Participating in MSM community is a positive thing | 3.16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| Pay-it-forward | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | You are proud of the MSM community | 2.75 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| Pay-it-forward | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | Important for you to advocate for the community | 3.24 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| Pay-it-forward | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | If you all work together, problems will be solved | 2.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| Pay-it-forward | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | Any problems faced by the MSM are also yours | 3.22 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | Any problems faced by the MSM are also yours | 3.13 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | You feel that you are a part of the MSM community. | 3.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | Important for you to advocate for the community | 3.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | If you all work together, problems will be solved | 2.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.69 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | Participating in MSM community is a positive thing | 3.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | You are proud of the MSM community | 2.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Standard-of-care | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | Participating in MSM community is a positive thing | 3.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Standard-of-care | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | You are proud of the MSM community | 2.78 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| Standard-of-care | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | Any problems faced by the MSM are also yours | 3.02 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Standard-of-care | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | Important for you to advocate for the community | 3.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Standard-of-care | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | You feel that you are a part of the MSM community. | 3.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Standard-of-care | Community Connectedness Scale Scores | If you all work together, problems will be solved | 2.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.69 |
Cost Per Diagnosis
Cost per diagnosis, defined as the cost associated with respective interventions (development, start-up, implementation, intervention) per individual who tested positive for gonorrhea and/or chlamydia following the intervention. Cost using economic cost and financial cost were respectively reported.
Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay-it-forward | Cost Per Diagnosis | Using economic cost | 11.24 USD | Standard Error 1.66 |
| Pay-it-forward | Cost Per Diagnosis | Using financial cost | 6.52 USD | Standard Error 1.47 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Cost Per Diagnosis | Using economic cost | 9.67 USD | Standard Error 1.45 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Cost Per Diagnosis | Using financial cost | 6.56 USD | Standard Error 1.29 |
| Standard-of-care | Cost Per Diagnosis | Using financial cost | 1.46 USD | Standard Error 0.62 |
| Standard-of-care | Cost Per Diagnosis | Using economic cost | 6.12 USD | Standard Error 1.13 |
Cost Per Test
Cost per test, defined as the cost associated with respective interventions (development, start-up, implementation, intervention) per individual who reported testing for gonorrhea and chlamydia following the intervention; economic test and financial cost are reported separately.
Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay-it-forward | Cost Per Test | Using economic cost | 11.24 USD | Standard Deviation 1.64 |
| Pay-it-forward | Cost Per Test | Using financial cost | 6.52 USD | Standard Deviation 1.48 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Cost Per Test | Using economic cost | 9.67 USD | Standard Deviation 1.46 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Cost Per Test | Using financial cost | 6.56 USD | Standard Deviation 1.26 |
| Standard-of-care | Cost Per Test | Using economic cost | 6.12 USD | Standard Deviation 1.12 |
| Standard-of-care | Cost Per Test | Using financial cost | 1.46 USD | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities
Number of participants who reported yes/no to specific questions on the awareness of and/or participation in MSM-related causes, organizations, or community events
Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours
Population: Those are participants who filled out this questionnaire among those who participated in the study. In total, 3 participants did not respond in Pay-it-for-ward, 7 in Pay-what-you-want, and 3 in Standard of Care.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever participated in online forums or dis | Yes | 78 Participants |
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever participated in online forums or dis | No | 17 Participants |
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Are you aware of any ongoing MSM-related community | Yes | 48 Participants |
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Are you aware of any ongoing MSM-related community | No | 45 Participants |
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever encouraged someone to use MSM-relate | Yes | 77 Participants |
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever encouraged someone to use MSM-relate | No | 16 Participants |
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever attended MSM-related community event | Yes | 31 Participants |
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever attended MSM-related community event | No | 63 Participants |
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever donated to MSM-related causes, event | Yes | 41 Participants |
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever donated to MSM-related causes, event | No | 55 Participants |
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever volunteered for MSM-related causes | Yes | 19 Participants |
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever volunteered for MSM-related causes | No | 74 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever volunteered for MSM-related causes | No | 78 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever participated in online forums or dis | Yes | 64 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever attended MSM-related community event | Yes | 23 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever donated to MSM-related causes, event | Yes | 30 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever participated in online forums or dis | No | 28 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever encouraged someone to use MSM-relate | No | 20 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever volunteered for MSM-related causes | Yes | 13 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Are you aware of any ongoing MSM-related community | Yes | 30 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever attended MSM-related community event | No | 69 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever encouraged someone to use MSM-relate | Yes | 72 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Are you aware of any ongoing MSM-related community | No | 62 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever donated to MSM-related causes, event | No | 62 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Are you aware of any ongoing MSM-related community | No | 52 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever encouraged someone to use MSM-relate | Yes | 70 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever donated to MSM-related causes, event | No | 71 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever encouraged someone to use MSM-relate | No | 18 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever attended MSM-related community event | Yes | 23 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever attended MSM-related community event | No | 69 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever volunteered for MSM-related causes | Yes | 14 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever participated in online forums or dis | Yes | 61 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever participated in online forums or dis | No | 29 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever donated to MSM-related causes, event | Yes | 23 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Are you aware of any ongoing MSM-related community | Yes | 37 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Reporting Community Engagement Activities | Have you ever volunteered for MSM-related causes | No | 76 Participants |
Number of Participants Tested Positive for Chlamydia
The is the number of men who tested positive for chlamydia through this study
Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours
Population: Overall Number of Participants Analyzed include the participants who received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Tested Positive for Chlamydia | 8 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Tested Positive for Chlamydia | 8 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Tested Positive for Chlamydia | 3 Participants |
Number of Participants Tested Positive for Gonorrhea
The number of men who tested positive for gonorrhea through this study. Samples were collected either from urine or rectum.
Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours
Population: Overall Number of Participants Analyzed include the participants who received the Dual Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Pay-it-forward | Number of Participants Tested Positive for Gonorrhea | 1 Participants |
| Pay-what-you-want | Number of Participants Tested Positive for Gonorrhea | 2 Participants |
| Standard-of-care | Number of Participants Tested Positive for Gonorrhea | 2 Participants |
Social Cohesion Scale Scores
Social cohesion is a scale made of seven statements and Likert response to them ranging from 1= strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, and 4= strongly agree. Those questions asked about the feelings of being able to depend on a larger MSM community (i.e., tongzhi circle, gay online networks or groups). For each item, the range spans across 1 to 4. For items 1 to 5, the higher score, the more agreement with the statement and potentially the higher social cohesion. Item 6 and 7 are reversely scored, meaning that the higher the score, the lower social cohesion potentially.
Time frame: During enrollment visit, an approximate total of 1.5 hours
Population: Some participants chose to decline certain questions, which resulted in numbers analyzed in some rows being different from the overall number analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay-it-forward | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | MSM you socialize with are always arguing | 2.31 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.69 |
| Pay-it-forward | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | You can count on other MSM if you need a place | 2.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
| Pay-it-forward | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | You can count on other MSM to talk about problems | 2.98 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.69 |
| Pay-it-forward | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | MSM in your group only worry about themselves | 2.48 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Pay-it-forward | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | You can trust the majority of the MSM you know. | 2.74 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Pay-it-forward | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | MSM you socialize with is an integrated group | 2.63 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Pay-it-forward | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | You can count on other MSM to lend money | 2.52 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | You can count on other MSM to talk about problems | 2.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | MSM in your group only worry about themselves | 2.54 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | MSM you socialize with are always arguing | 2.18 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | You can count on other MSM to lend money | 2.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | You can count on other MSM if you need a place | 2.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | MSM you socialize with is an integrated group | 2.68 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Pay-what-you-want | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | You can trust the majority of the MSM you know. | 2.59 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Standard-of-care | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | You can count on other MSM if you need a place | 2.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Standard-of-care | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | MSM you socialize with are always arguing | 2.26 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Standard-of-care | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | You can trust the majority of the MSM you know. | 2.61 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
| Standard-of-care | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | MSM you socialize with is an integrated group | 2.66 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| Standard-of-care | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | You can count on other MSM to talk about problems | 2.98 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
| Standard-of-care | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | You can count on other MSM to lend money | 2.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| Standard-of-care | Social Cohesion Scale Scores | MSM in your group only worry about themselves | 2.47 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |