Skip to content

Recombinant FSH Investigation in the Treatment of Infertility With Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) (RITA-1)

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Groups, Multicenter Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of FE 999049 in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Women Aged 18-34 Years Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03740737
Acronym
RITA-1
Enrollment
579
Registered
2018-11-14
Start date
2018-10-26
Completion date
2020-11-11
Last updated
2024-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Brief summary

This trial investigates the effects of FE 999049 compared to placebo.

Interventions

FE 999049 was administered as single daily subcutaneous injections in the abdomen at a starting dose of 12 µg daily that was fixed for the first four stimulation days. Based on ovarian response, the dose could be adjusted by 3 µg, with dose increases implemented not more frequently than once every 2 days and dose decreases implemented per investigator's judgement. The minimum daily dose was 6 µg, and the maximum daily dose was 24 µg. Participants could be treated for a maximum of 20 days. Coasting, use of dopamine agonist or any other drug to prevent early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) with the exception of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for triggering of final follicular maturation, was not allowed.

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo was administered as single daily subcutaneous injection dialed to the same value (dose) as FE 999049. Participants could be treated for a maximum of 20 days. Coasting, use of dopamine agonist or any other drug to prevent early OHSS with the exception of GnRH agonist for triggering of final follicular maturation, was not allowed.

Sponsors

Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 34 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed Consent Documents signed prior to any trial-related procedure. * In good physical and mental health in the judgement of the investigator. * Pre-menopausal females between the ages of 18 and 34 years. The participants must be at least 18 years (including the 18th birthday) when they sign the informed consent and no more than 34 years (up to the day before the 35th birthday) at the time of randomization. * Body mass index (BMI) between 17.5 and 38.0 kg/m2 (both inclusive) at screening. * Infertile women diagnosed with tubal infertility, unexplained infertility, endometriosis stage I/II or with partners diagnosed with male factor infertility, eligible for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using fresh or frozen ejaculated sperm from male partner or sperm donor. * Documented history of infertility for at least 12 months before randomization (not applicable in case of tubal or severe male factor infertility, or when the use of donor sperm is indicated). * Regular menstrual cycles of 24-35 days (both inclusive). * Hysterosalpingography, hysteroscopy or saline infusion sonography, documenting a uterus consistent with expected normal function (e.g. no evidence of clinically interfering uterine fibroids defined as submucous fibroids of any size or intramural fibroids larger than 3 cm in diameter, no polyps and no congenital structural abnormalities which are associated with a reduced chance of pregnancy) at screening or within 1 year prior to screening. * Transvaginal ultrasound documenting presence and adequate visualization of both ovaries, without evidence of significant abnormality (e.g. enlarged ovaries which would contraindicate the use of gonadotropins) and normal adnexa (e.g. no hydrosalpinx) at screening. Both ovaries must be accessible for oocyte retrieval. * Early follicular phase (cycle day 2-4) serum levels of FSH between 1 and 15 IU/L (results obtained within 3 months prior to randomization). * Negative serum Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) antibody tests at screening or within 6 months prior to screening. * Willing to accept single blastocyst transfer in the fresh cycle and in the cryopreserved cycles initiated within 12 months from the start of COS using blastocysts obtained in this trial.

Exclusion criteria

* More than one previous COS cycle for IVF/ICSI. * Known endometriosis stage III-IV (defined by the revised ASRM classification, 2012 ). * Known history of anovulation. * One or more follicles greater than or equal to 10 mm (including cysts) observed on the transvaginal ultrasound prior to randomization on stimulation day 1. * Known history of recurrent miscarriage (defined as three consecutive losses after ultrasound confirmation of pregnancy \[excluding ectopic pregnancy\] and before week 24 of pregnancy). * Known abnormal karyotype of participant or of her partner / sperm donor, as applicable, depending on source of sperm used for insemination in this trial. In case partner sperm will be used and the sperm production is severely impaired (concentration \<1 million/mL), normal karyotype, including no Y-chromosome microdeletion, must be documented. * Any known clinically significant systemic disease (e.g. insulin-dependent diabetes). * Known inherited or acquired thrombophilia. * Active arterial or venous thromboembolism or severe thrombophlebitis, or a history of these events. * Any known endocrine or metabolic abnormalities (pituitary, adrenal, pancreas, liver or kidney) with the exception of pharmacologically controlled sub-clinical hypothyroidism. * Known tumors of the ovary, breast, uterus, adrenal gland, pituitary or hypothalamus which would contraindicate the use of gonadotropins. * Known moderate or severe impairment of renal or hepatic function. * Any abnormal finding of clinical chemistry, hematology, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) or prolactin, or vital signs at screening, which is judged clinically significant by the investigator. * Known abnormal cervical cytology of clinical significance observed within three years prior to randomization (unless the clinical significance has been resolved). * Findings at the gynecological examination at screening which preclude gonadotropin stimulation or are associated with a reduced chance of pregnancy, e.g. congenital uterine abnormalities or retained intrauterine device. * Pregnancy (negative urinary pregnancy tests must be documented at screening and prior to randomization) or contraindication to pregnancy. * Known current active pelvic inflammatory disease. * Use of fertility modifiers during the last menstrual cycle before randomization, including dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), metformin or cycle programming with oral contraceptives, progestogen or estrogen preparations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Ongoing Pregnancy Rate After the Fresh Cycle and Cryopreserved Cycles Initiated Within 12 Months From the Start of COS8-9 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 16 months after start of stimulation)Defined as at least one intrauterine viable fetus 8-9 weeks after transfer. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle and the cryopreserved cycles.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time From Start of COS to Ongoing Pregnancy Across the Fresh and Cryopreserved Cycles8-9 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 16 months after start of stimulation)Time from start of COS to ongoing pregnancy, including both the fresh and cryopreserved cycles. In the placebo group, no participants achieved an ongoing pregnancy either after 12 calendar months or after 12 study months.
Time From Start of COS to Ongoing Pregnancy Across the Fresh and Cryopreserved Cycles, Measured in Number of Cycles Before Achieving Ongoing Pregnancy8-9 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 16 months after start of stimulation)Time from start of COS to ongoing pregnancy, including both the fresh and cryopreserved cycles, measured in number of cycles before achieving ongoing pregnancy. In the placebo group, no participants achieved an ongoing pregnancy either after 12 calendar months or after 12 study months.
Ongoing Implantation Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and Cumulatively8-9 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 16 months after start of stimulation)Defined as the number of intrauterine viable fetuses 8-9 weeks after transfer divided by number of blastocysts transferred. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle, the cryopreserved cycles, and all cycles. One participant can contribute with a range from zero to multiple blastocysts. Data is not shown for placebo arm because no blastocyst transfer was performed in the fresh cycle or cryopreserved cycles. '%' in the unit of measure refers to 'percentage'.
Clinical Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and Cumulatively5-6 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 15 months after start of stimulation)Defined at least one gestational sac 5-6 weeks after transfer. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle, the cryopreserved cycles, and all cycles.
Vital Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and Cumulatively5-6 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 15 months after start of stimulation)Defined at least one intrauterine gestational sac with fetal heart beat 5-6 weeks after transfer. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle, the cryopreserved cycles, and all cycles.
Implantation Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and Cumulatively5-6 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 15 months after start of stimulation)Defined as the number of gestational sacs 5-6 weeks after transfer divided by number of blastocysts transferred. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle, the cryopreserved cycles, and all cycles. One participant can contribute with a range from zero to multiple blastocysts. Data is not shown for placebo arm because no subjects underwent blastocyst transfer in the fresh cycle or cryopreserved cycles. '%' in the unit of measure refers to 'percentage'.
Positive Beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (βhCG) Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and Cumulatively10-14 days after transfer (up to approximately 14 months after start of stimulation)Defined as positive serum βhCG test 10-14 days after transfer. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle, the cryopreserved cycles, and all cycles.
Proportion of Subjects in the Fresh Cycle With Triggering of Final Follicular Maturation (hCG, With GnRH Agonist, and in Total), Cycle Cancellation and Transfer CancellationUp to 5 days after oocyte retrieval (up to 27 days after start of stimulation)Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Number of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5On stimulation day 5The total number of follicles and the number of follicles per size category are presented
Number of Follicles at End-of-stimulationAt end-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)The total number of follicles and the number of follicles per size category is reported.
Size of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5On stimulation day 5Counted by ultrasound for the right and left ovary for each participant.
Size of Follicles at End-of-stimulationAt end-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)Counted by ultrasound for the right and left ovary for each participant.
Number of Oocytes RetrievedOn day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)The number of oocytes retrieved was recorded at the oocyte retrieval visit.
Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes RetrievedOn day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)Grouped according to the number of oocytes retrieved. Participants with cycle cancellation due to poor ovarian response are included in the \<4 oocytes group.
Number of Metaphase II OocytesOn day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)The number of MII oocytes to oocytes retrieved for participants where all oocytes were inseminated using ICSI are presented.
Number of Fertilized OocytesOn day 1 after oocyte retrieval (up to 23 days after start of stimulation)An oocyte was defined as fertilized if it had 2 pronuclei (2PN) at 19h (±2h).
Fertilization RateOn day 1 after oocyte retrieval (up to 23 days after start of stimulation)The fertilization rate was defined as the number of 2PN oocytes divided by the number of oocytes retrieved. Fertilization rate relative to oocytes retrieved has been reported. Data is not shown for placebo arm because the mean number of fertilized oocytes was 0 in all subjects, since no subjects had oocytes retrieved or fertilized.
Number and Quality of Blastocysts on Day 5 After Oocyte RetrievalOn day 5 after oocyte retrievalNumber of blastocysts (total and good-quality) on Day 5 are presented. The quality evaluation of blastocysts consisted of assessment of three parameters, as per the Gardner & Schoolcraft system: blastocyst expansion and hatching status (graded: 1-6), inner cell mass (graded: A-D) and trophectoderm (graded: A-D). A good-quality blastocyst was defined as a blastocyst of grade 3BB or higher.
Endometrial Thickness on Stimulation Day 5On stimulation day 5Mean endometrial thickness is reported.
Endometrial Thickness at End-of-stimulationAt end-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)Mean endometrial thickness is reported.
Echogenicity Pattern on Stimulation Day 5On stimulation day 5The distribution of participants with hypoechogenic, isoechogenic, or hyperechogenic endometrium is reported.
Echogenicity Pattern at End-of-stimulationAt end-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)The distribution of participants with hypoechogenic, isoechogenic, or hyperechogenic endometrium is reported.
Oocyte Utilization RateOn day of oocyte retrieval up to 12 months after start of COSDefined as the number of blastocysts transferred or cryopreserved divided by the number of oocytes retrieved. Data in this endpoint are presented for the cryopreserved cycles.
Oocyte Efficiency Index8-9 weeks after transferDefined as the cumulative number of ongoing pregnancies per oocyte retrieved. Data in this endpoint are presented for the cryopreserved cycles. The unit of measure for this endpoint is 'cumulative ongoing pregnancies/oocyte retrieved'.
Percentage of Blastocysts Surviving Cryopreservation0 hour (+0.5 hour) after thawingData in this endpoint are presented for the cryopreserved cycles. The unit is number of blastocysts with observations. One participant can contribute with a range from zero to multiple blastocysts.
Percentage of Blastocysts With Re-expansion After Cryopreservation2.5 hour (±0.5 hour) after thawingData in this endpoint are presented for the cryopreserved cycles. The unit is number of blastocysts with observations. One participant can contribute with a range from zero to multiple blastocysts.
Number of Cryopreserved Cycles Initiated Within 12 Months From the Start of COSUp to 12 months after start of stimulationThe total number of cryopreserved cycles initiated are reported. One participant can contribute with multiple cycles. Data in this endpoint are presented for the cryopreserved cycles.
Number of Cryopreserved Cycles With Blastocyst TransferUp to 12 months after start of stimulationThe total number of cryopreserved cycles with blastocyst transfer are reported. One participant can contribute with multiple cycles. Data in this endpoint are presented for the cryopreserved cycles.
Circulating Concentrations of Anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH)From screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of AMH were drawn. The median and inter-quartile range (IQR) of AMH levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.
Circulating Concentrations of Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)From screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of FSH were drawn. The median and IQR of FSH levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.
Circulating Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)From screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of LH were drawn. The median and IQR of LH levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.
Circulating Concentrations of EstradiolFrom screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of estradiol were drawn. The median and IQR of estradiol levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.
Circulating Concentrations of ProgesteroneFrom screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of progesterone were drawn. The median and IQR of progesterone levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.
Circulating Concentrations of Inhibin AFrom screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of inhibin A were drawn. The median and IQR of inhibin A levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.
Circulating Concentrations of Inhibin BFrom screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of inhibin B were drawn. The median and IQR of inhibin B levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.
Total Gonadotropin DoseUp to 20 stimulation daysCalculated by start dates, end dates and daily dose of IMP.
Number of Stimulation DaysUp to 20 stimulation daysCalculated by start dates and end dates.
Proportion of Participants With Investigator-requested Gonadotropin Dose AdjustmentsStimulation Day 5Investigator-requested decreases and increases of the gonadotropin dose.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From time of signing informed consent until the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (up to approximately 6 months)Any AE occurring after start of IMP and before the end-of-trial visit, or a pre-treatment AE or pre-existing medical condition that worsens in intensity after start of IMP and before the end-of-trial visit was considered treatment-emergent, and is presented for this endpoint. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Intensity of AEsFrom time of signing informed consent until the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (up to approximately 6 months)The intensity of AE was classified using the following 3-point scale: mild = awareness of signs or symptoms, but no disruption of usual activity; moderate = event sufficient to affect usual activity (disturbing); or severe = inability to work or perform usual activities (unacceptable). Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Albumin, ProteinFrom screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: Albumin and protein. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseFrom screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: Alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase and gamma glutamyl transferase. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumFrom screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: Bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, cholesterol, glucose, phosphate, potassium and sodium. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateFrom screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: Direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, creatinine, urate. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Lactate DehydrogenaseFrom screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: Lactate dehydrogenase. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate, PotassiumFrom screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)The table represents the percentage of participants in each group with normal baseline values and markedly abnormal end-of-stimulation or end-of-cycle visit values for phosphate and potassium. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: ErythrocytesFrom screening to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameter including: Erythrocytes. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Leukocytes and PlateletsFrom screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameters including: Leukocytes and platelets. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: HaemoglobinFrom screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameters including: Haemoglobin. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: HaematocritFrom screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameter including: Haematocrit. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular VolumeFrom screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameter including: Erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinFrom screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameter including: Erythrocyte mean corpuscular hemoglobin. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin ConcentrationFrom screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameter including: Erythrocyte mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesFrom screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameters including: Basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils/leukocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, monocytes/leukocytes and neutrophils/leukocytes. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes and Lymphocytes/Leukocytes.From screening (baseline) to the end-of-stimulation visit and end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)The table represents the percentage of participants in each group with normal baseline values and markedly abnormal end-of-stimulation or end-of-cycle visit values for Leukocytes and lymphocytes/leukocytes. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Frequency of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation PeriodEnd-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)Assessed by the participant during the stimulation period. Participants assessed the injection site reactions (redness, pain, itching, swelling and bruising) three times daily: immediately after the injection, 30 minutes after the injection and 24 hours after the injection.
Intensity of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation PeriodEnd-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)Assessed by the participant during the stimulation period as mild, moderate or severe.
Proportion of Subjects With Treatment-induced Anti-FSH Antibodies, Overall as Well as With Neutralizing CapacityUp to 28 days after end of the stimulation periodMeasured by presence of anti-FSH antibodies. 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence interval has been reported in this endpoint.
Frequency and Intensity of Immune-related AEsFrom time of signing informed consent until the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)Standardised Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQs).
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle and in the Cryopreserved Cycles8-9 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 16 months after start of stimulation)Defined as at least one intrauterine viable fetus 8-9 weeks after transfer. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle and the cryopreserved cycles.
Proportion of Subjects With OHSS, Overall and by Grade, and Proportion of Subjects With Moderate/Severe OHSS≤9 days after triggering of final follicular maturation (early OHSS), >9 days after triggering of final follicular maturation until 21-28 days after last IMP dose or up to ongoing pregnancy 8-9 weeks after transfer in pregnant participants (late OHSS)Classification of grade was according to Golan's classification system, and all OHSS cases were graded as mild, moderate or severe. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.
Proportion of Subjects Hospitalized Due to OHSS and Proportion of Subjects Undergoing Paracentesis Due to OHSS≤9 days after triggering of final follicular maturation (early OHSS), >9 days after triggering of final follicular maturation until 21-28 days after last IMP dose or up to ongoing pregnancy 8-9 weeks after transfer in pregnant participants (late OHSS)Percentage of participants hospitalized or undergoing paracentesis due to OHSS are reported.
Proportion of Participants With Multi-fetal Gestation in the Fresh CycleUp to 8-9 weeks after transferDefined as pregnancy with more than one fetus. Among participants with ongoing pregnancy, percentage of participants with twin pregnancies are presented. '%' in the unit of measure refers to 'percentage'.
Proportion of Cryopreserved Cycles With Multi-fetal GestationUp to 8-9 weeks after transferDefined as pregnancy with more than one fetus. Among cryopreserved cycles with ongoing pregnancy, percentage of cycles with twin pregnancies are presented. '%' in the unit of measure refers to 'percentage'.
Biochemical Pregnancy, Spontaneous Abortion, Ectopic Pregnancy (With and Without Medical/Surgical Intervention) and Vanishing Twins in the Fresh CycleUp to 8-9 weeks after transferThe percentage of participants with biochemical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy (with and without medical/surgical intervention) and vanishing twins in the fresh cycle are presented. The overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with positive βhCG. Data is not shown for placebo arm because no participants had a positive βhCG. '%' in the unit of measure refers to 'percentage'. Unit: Percentage of participants with early pregnancy loss.
Biochemical Pregnancy, Spontaneous Abortion, Ectopic Pregnancy (With and Without Medical/Surgical Intervention) and Vanishing Twins in the Cryopreserved CyclesUp to 8-9 weeks after transferThe percentage of cryopreserved cycles with biochemical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy (with and without medical/surgical intervention) and vanishing twins are presented. '%' in the unit of measure refers to 'percentage'. Data is not shown for placebo arm because no participants had a positive βhCG.
Proportion of Participants With Technical Malfunctions of the Administration PenUp to 20 stimulation daysIncidences of technical malfunctions of the administration pen were recorded.
Proportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellations Due to an AE, Including Immune-related AEs, or Due to Technical Malfunctions of the Administration PenUp to 20 stimulation daysFor each participant the reason for cycle cancellation is recorded. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was performed in 23 investigational sites in 17 states of the United States between Oct 2018 to Nov 2020.

Pre-assignment details

In total, 647 participants were screened of which 579 participants were randomized. Of the randomized participants, 578 participants were exposed to the investigational medicinal product (IMP): 525 to FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta) and 53 to Placebo. One participant was randomization failure and did not receive the IMP.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)
FE 999049 was administered as single daily subcutaneous injections in the abdomen at a starting dose of 12 µg daily that was fixed for the first four stimulation days. Based on ovarian response, the dose could be adjusted by 3 µg, with dose increases implemented not more frequently than once every 2 days and dose decreases implemented per investigator's judgement. The minimum daily dose was 6 µg, and the maximum daily dose was 24 µg. Participants could be treated for a maximum of 20 days. Coasting, use of dopamine agonist or any other drug to prevent early OHSS with the exception of GnRH agonist for triggering of final follicular maturation, was not allowed.
525
Placebo
Placebo was administered as single daily subcutaneous injection dialed to the same value (dose) as FE 999049. Participants could be treated for a maximum of 20 days. Coasting, use of dopamine agonist or any other drug to prevent early OHSS with the exception of GnRH agonist for triggering of final follicular maturation, was not allowed.
53
Total578

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyParticipant withdrew consent10
Overall StudyParticipant withdrew from trial21
Overall StudyProtocol deviation130
Overall StudyRandomization failure10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous30.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
30.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
30.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
Age, Customized
18-24 years
16 Participants2 Participants18 Participants
Age, Customized
25-29 years
147 Participants16 Participants163 Participants
Age, Customized
30-34 years
362 Participants35 Participants397 Participants
Body mass index (BMI)26.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
26.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
26.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
Duration of infertility (months)36.5 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.4
38.2 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.3
36.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
60 Participants6 Participants66 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
465 Participants47 Participants512 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Primary infertility318 Participants29 Participants347 Participants
Primary reason for infertility
Endometriosis stage I/II
24 Participants5 Participants29 Participants
Primary reason for infertility
Mild male factor
54 Participants3 Participants57 Participants
Primary reason for infertility
Moderate male factor
81 Participants6 Participants87 Participants
Primary reason for infertility
Severe male factor
49 Participants11 Participants60 Participants
Primary reason for infertility
Tubal infertility
83 Participants6 Participants89 Participants
Primary reason for infertility
Unexplained infertility
234 Participants22 Participants256 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
33 Participants6 Participants39 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
49 Participants2 Participants51 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
5 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
437 Participants45 Participants482 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
525 Participants53 Participants578 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 5250 / 53
other
Total, other adverse events
188 / 5252 / 53
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 5250 / 53

Outcome results

Primary

Cumulative Ongoing Pregnancy Rate After the Fresh Cycle and Cryopreserved Cycles Initiated Within 12 Months From the Start of COS

Defined as at least one intrauterine viable fetus 8-9 weeks after transfer. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle and the cryopreserved cycles.

Time frame: 8-9 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 16 months after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Cumulative Ongoing Pregnancy Rate After the Fresh Cycle and Cryopreserved Cycles Initiated Within 12 Months From the Start of COS63.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboCumulative Ongoing Pregnancy Rate After the Fresh Cycle and Cryopreserved Cycles Initiated Within 12 Months From the Start of COS0.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [55.5, 67.1]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Biochemical Pregnancy, Spontaneous Abortion, Ectopic Pregnancy (With and Without Medical/Surgical Intervention) and Vanishing Twins in the Cryopreserved Cycles

The percentage of cryopreserved cycles with biochemical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy (with and without medical/surgical intervention) and vanishing twins are presented. '%' in the unit of measure refers to 'percentage'. Data is not shown for placebo arm because no participants had a positive βhCG.

Time frame: Up to 8-9 weeks after transfer

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Biochemical Pregnancy, Spontaneous Abortion, Ectopic Pregnancy (With and Without Medical/Surgical Intervention) and Vanishing Twins in the Cryopreserved CyclesBiochemical pregnancy10.4 % of cycles with early pregnancy loss
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Biochemical Pregnancy, Spontaneous Abortion, Ectopic Pregnancy (With and Without Medical/Surgical Intervention) and Vanishing Twins in the Cryopreserved CyclesSpontaneous abortion12.4 % of cycles with early pregnancy loss
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Biochemical Pregnancy, Spontaneous Abortion, Ectopic Pregnancy (With and Without Medical/Surgical Intervention) and Vanishing Twins in the Cryopreserved CyclesInduced abortion0.0 % of cycles with early pregnancy loss
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Biochemical Pregnancy, Spontaneous Abortion, Ectopic Pregnancy (With and Without Medical/Surgical Intervention) and Vanishing Twins in the Cryopreserved CyclesEctopic pregnancy0.8 % of cycles with early pregnancy loss
Secondary

Biochemical Pregnancy, Spontaneous Abortion, Ectopic Pregnancy (With and Without Medical/Surgical Intervention) and Vanishing Twins in the Fresh Cycle

The percentage of participants with biochemical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy (with and without medical/surgical intervention) and vanishing twins in the fresh cycle are presented. The overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with positive βhCG. Data is not shown for placebo arm because no participants had a positive βhCG. '%' in the unit of measure refers to 'percentage'. Unit: Percentage of participants with early pregnancy loss.

Time frame: Up to 8-9 weeks after transfer

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Biochemical Pregnancy, Spontaneous Abortion, Ectopic Pregnancy (With and Without Medical/Surgical Intervention) and Vanishing Twins in the Fresh CycleBiochemical pregnancy9.2 % of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Biochemical Pregnancy, Spontaneous Abortion, Ectopic Pregnancy (With and Without Medical/Surgical Intervention) and Vanishing Twins in the Fresh CycleSpontaneous abortion6.5 % of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Biochemical Pregnancy, Spontaneous Abortion, Ectopic Pregnancy (With and Without Medical/Surgical Intervention) and Vanishing Twins in the Fresh CycleInduced abortion0.0 % of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Biochemical Pregnancy, Spontaneous Abortion, Ectopic Pregnancy (With and Without Medical/Surgical Intervention) and Vanishing Twins in the Fresh CycleEctopic pregnancy0.0 % of participants
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: Alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase and gamma glutamyl transferase. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAlanine aminotransferase (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.5 IU/LStandard Deviation 7.7
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAlanine aminotransferase (End-of-cycle visit)-1.2 IU/LStandard Deviation 8.6
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAlkaline phosphatase (End-of-stimulation visit)-1.9 IU/LStandard Deviation 7.1
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAlkaline phosphatase (End-of-cycle visit)0.0 IU/LStandard Deviation 10.2
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAspartate aminotransferase (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.9 IU/LStandard Deviation 5.9
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAspartate aminotransferase (End-of-cycle visit)-0.9 IU/LStandard Deviation 7.1
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseGamma glutamyl transferase (End-of-stimulation visit)-1.0 IU/LStandard Deviation 6.6
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseGamma glutamyl transferase (End-of-cycle visit)0.2 IU/LStandard Deviation 7.8
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseGamma glutamyl transferase (End-of-cycle visit)1.4 IU/LStandard Deviation 6.2
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAlanine aminotransferase (End-of-stimulation visit)2.2 IU/LStandard Deviation 8.5
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAspartate aminotransferase (End-of-stimulation visit)0.6 IU/LStandard Deviation 3.8
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAlanine aminotransferase (End-of-cycle visit)0.5 IU/LStandard Deviation 4.4
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseGamma glutamyl transferase (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.4 IU/LStandard Deviation 6.5
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAlkaline phosphatase (End-of-stimulation visit)0.6 IU/LStandard Deviation 6.6
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAspartate aminotransferase (End-of-cycle visit)-0.1 IU/LStandard Deviation 3.8
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAlkaline phosphatase (End-of-cycle visit)-0.3 IU/LStandard Deviation 6.1
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Albumin, Protein

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: Albumin and protein. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Albumin, ProteinAlbumin (End-of-stimulation visit)-1.68 g/LStandard Deviation 2.37
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Albumin, ProteinAlbumin (End-of-cycle visit)-2.03 g/LStandard Deviation 2.92
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Albumin, ProteinProtein (End-of-stimulation visit)-3.07 g/LStandard Deviation 3.83
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Albumin, ProteinProtein (End-of-cycle visit)-2.06 g/LStandard Deviation 4.2
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Albumin, ProteinProtein (End-of-cycle visit)-0.16 g/LStandard Deviation 3.87
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Albumin, ProteinAlbumin (End-of-stimulation visit)0.21 g/LStandard Deviation 3.04
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Albumin, ProteinProtein (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.02 g/LStandard Deviation 4.35
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Albumin, ProteinAlbumin (End-of-cycle visit)-0.29 g/LStandard Deviation 2.63
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and Sodium

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: Bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, cholesterol, glucose, phosphate, potassium and sodium. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumCalcium (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.02 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.09
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumCholesterol (End-of-cycle visit)0.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.6
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumBlood urea nitrogen (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumGlucose (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.8
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumCalcium (End-of-cycle visit)-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.1
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumGlucose (End-of-cycle visit)0.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.9
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumBicarbonate (End-of-cycle visit)-0.88 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.63
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumPhosphate (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.17
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumChloride (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumPhosphate (End-of-cycle visit)0.02 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.18
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumBlood urea nitrogen (End-of-cycle visit)-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.2
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumPotassium (End-of-stimulation visit)0.00 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.41
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumChloride (End-of-cycle visit)0.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumPotassium (End-of-cycle visit)0.10 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.49
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumBicarbonate (End-of-stimulation visit)0.13 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.04
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumCholesterol (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.5
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumSodium (End-of-cycle visit)-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.8
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumSodium (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumSodium (End-of-cycle visit)0.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumBicarbonate (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.20 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.85
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumBicarbonate (End-of-cycle visit)-0.65 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.02
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumBlood urea nitrogen (End-of-stimulation visit)0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.1
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumBlood urea nitrogen (End-of-cycle visit)0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumCalcium (End-of-stimulation visit)0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.08
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumCalcium (End-of-cycle visit)0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumChloride (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumChloride (End-of-cycle visit)0.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.3
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumCholesterol (End-of-stimulation visit)0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumCholesterol (End-of-cycle visit)0.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumGlucose (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.1
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumGlucose (End-of-cycle visit)-0.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.8
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumPhosphate (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.02 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.14
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumPhosphate (End-of-cycle visit)-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.18
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumPotassium (End-of-stimulation visit)0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.45
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumPotassium (End-of-cycle visit)0.13 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.46
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Bicarbonate, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Phosphate, Potassium and SodiumSodium (End-of-stimulation visit)0.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, Urate

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: Direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, creatinine, urate. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateDirect bilirubin (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.01 umol/LStandard Deviation 0.85
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateCreatinine (End-of-stimulation visit)-3.50 umol/LStandard Deviation 7.43
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateTotal bilirubin (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.26 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.99
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateDirect bilirubin (End-of-cycle visit)-0.26 umol/LStandard Deviation 0.89
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateUrate (End-of-stimulation visit)-7.48 umol/LStandard Deviation 39.36
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateTotal bilirubin (End-of-cycle visit)-1.19 umol/LStandard Deviation 3.85
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateUrate (End-of-cycle visit)-15.04 umol/LStandard Deviation 51.28
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateCreatinine (End-of-cycle visit)-3.11 umol/LStandard Deviation 10.22
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateUrate (End-of-cycle visit)14.70 umol/LStandard Deviation 43.71
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateDirect bilirubin (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.02 umol/LStandard Deviation 0.77
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateDirect bilirubin (End-of-cycle visit)0.03 umol/LStandard Deviation 0.6
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateTotal bilirubin (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.68 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.62
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateTotal bilirubin (End-of-cycle visit)0.03 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.62
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateCreatinine (End-of-stimulation visit)1.32 umol/LStandard Deviation 6.11
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateCreatinine (End-of-cycle visit)2.60 umol/LStandard Deviation 8.53
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Creatinine, UrateUrate (End-of-stimulation visit)-1.52 umol/LStandard Deviation 30.92
Secondary

Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Lactate Dehydrogenase

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including: Lactate dehydrogenase. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Lactate DehydrogenaseEnd-of-stimulation visit-13.6 U/LStandard Deviation 17.7
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Lactate DehydrogenaseEnd-of-cycle visit1.2 U/LStandard Deviation 21.6
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Lactate DehydrogenaseEnd-of-stimulation visit-4.9 U/LStandard Deviation 17
PlaceboChanges in Circulating Levels of Clinical Chemistry Compared to Baseline: Lactate DehydrogenaseEnd-of-cycle visit-1.4 U/LStandard Deviation 14.8
Secondary

Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/Leukocytes

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameters including: Basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils/leukocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, monocytes/leukocytes and neutrophils/leukocytes. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesBasophils/leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)0.01 percentageStandard Deviation 0.52
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesBasophils/leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)0.03 percentageStandard Deviation 0.45
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesEosinophils/leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.52 percentageStandard Deviation 1.25
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesEosinophils/leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)-0.18 percentageStandard Deviation 1.29
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesLymphocytes/leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)-6.25 percentageStandard Deviation 6.64
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesLymphocytes/leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)-1.86 percentageStandard Deviation 8.92
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesMonocytes/leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.45 percentageStandard Deviation 1.74
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesMonocytes/leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)0.20 percentageStandard Deviation 1.65
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesNeutrophils/leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)7.22 percentageStandard Deviation 7.48
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesNeutrophils/leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)1.80 percentageStandard Deviation 9.88
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesMonocytes/leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)0.06 percentageStandard Deviation 1.14
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesBasophils/leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)0.21 percentageStandard Deviation 0.54
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesLymphocytes/leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)-0.15 percentageStandard Deviation 6.59
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesBasophils/leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)0.07 percentageStandard Deviation 0.48
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesNeutrophils/leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)0.18 percentageStandard Deviation 6.95
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesEosinophils/leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.21 percentageStandard Deviation 1.19
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesMonocytes/leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.35 percentageStandard Deviation 1.57
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesEosinophils/leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)-0.15 percentageStandard Deviation 1.08
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesNeutrophils/leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)-1.48 percentageStandard Deviation 5.49
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes and Neutrophils/LeukocytesLymphocytes/leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)1.83 percentageStandard Deviation 5.13
Secondary

Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameter including: Erythrocyte mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin ConcentrationEnd-of-stimulation visit-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.8
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin ConcentrationEnd-of-cycle visit-0.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.8
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin ConcentrationEnd-of-stimulation visit-0.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.7
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin ConcentrationEnd-of-cycle visit-0.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameter including: Erythrocyte mean corpuscular hemoglobin. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinEnd-of-stimulation visit0.1 picogramStandard Deviation 0.8
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinEnd-of-cycle visit0.1 picogramStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinEnd-of-stimulation visit0.0 picogramStandard Deviation 0.7
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular HemoglobinEnd-of-cycle visit0.0 picogramStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameter including: Erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular VolumeEnd-of-stimulation visit1.5 femtolitersStandard Deviation 3.1
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular VolumeEnd-of-cycle visit1.1 femtolitersStandard Deviation 3
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular VolumeEnd-of-stimulation visit1.3 femtolitersStandard Deviation 3
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular VolumeEnd-of-cycle visit1.3 femtolitersStandard Deviation 3.1
Secondary

Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Erythrocytes

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameter including: Erythrocytes. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: ErythrocytesEnd-of-stimulation visit-0.13 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.22
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: ErythrocytesEnd-of-cycle visit-0.18 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.26
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: ErythrocytesEnd-of-stimulation visit-0.04 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.19
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: ErythrocytesEnd-of-cycle visit-0.08 10^12 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.22
Secondary

Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Haematocrit

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameter including: Haematocrit. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: HaematocritEnd-of-stimulation visit0.0 ratioStandard Deviation 0
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: HaematocritEnd-of-cycle visit0.0 ratioStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: HaematocritEnd-of-stimulation visit0.0 ratioStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: HaematocritEnd-of-cycle visit0.0 ratioStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Haemoglobin

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameters including: Haemoglobin. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: HaemoglobinEnd-of-stimulation visit-3.44 g/LStandard Deviation 6.54
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: HaemoglobinEnd-of-cycle visit-4.79 g/LStandard Deviation 8.11
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: HaemoglobinEnd-of-stimulation visit-0.83 g/LStandard Deviation 5.83
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: HaemoglobinEnd-of-cycle visit-1.98 g/LStandard Deviation 6.59
Secondary

Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Leukocytes and Platelets

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of haematology parameters including: Leukocytes and platelets. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Leukocytes and PlateletsLeukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)1.203 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 1.872
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Leukocytes and PlateletsLeukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)0.356 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 2.106
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Leukocytes and PlateletsPlatelets (End-of-stimulation visit)-7.2 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 39
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Changes in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Leukocytes and PlateletsPlatelets (End-of-cycle visit)10.8 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 48.7
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Leukocytes and PlateletsPlatelets (End-of-cycle visit)0.9 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 38.4
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Leukocytes and PlateletsLeukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.328 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 1.521
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Leukocytes and PlateletsPlatelets (End-of-stimulation visit)-0.4 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 43.7
PlaceboChanges in Haematology Parameters Compared to Baseline: Leukocytes and PlateletsLeukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)0.154 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 2.128
Secondary

Circulating Concentrations of Anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH)

Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of AMH were drawn. The median and inter-quartile range (IQR) of AMH levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.

Time frame: From screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.~No circulating concentrations of AMH were assessed for the oocyte retrieval visit for the placebo arm, because no participants who received placebo became pregnant.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH)End-of-stimulation visit10.4 pmol/L
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH)Stimulation day 517.6 pmol/L
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH)Oocyte retrieval visit7.9 pmol/L
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH)Stimulation day 120.7 pmol/L
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH)Stimulation day 520.4 pmol/L
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH)Stimulation day 118.5 pmol/L
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH)End-of-stimulation visit20.9 pmol/L
Secondary

Circulating Concentrations of Estradiol

Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of estradiol were drawn. The median and IQR of estradiol levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.

Time frame: From screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.~No circulating concentrations of estradiol were assessed for the oocyte retrieval visit for the placebo arm, because no participants who received placebo became pregnant.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of EstradiolEnd-of-stimulation visit1846.9 pg/mL
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of EstradiolStimulation day 5404.1 pg/mL
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of EstradiolOocyte retrieval visit931.2 pg/mL
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of EstradiolStimulation day 139.5 pg/mL
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of EstradiolStimulation day 553.6 pg/mL
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of EstradiolStimulation day 137.7 pg/mL
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of EstradiolEnd-of-stimulation visit105.5 pg/mL
Secondary

Circulating Concentrations of Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)

Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of FSH were drawn. The median and IQR of FSH levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.

Time frame: From screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.~No circulating concentrations of FSH were assessed for the oocyte retrieval visit for the placebo arm, because no participants who received placebo became pregnant.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)End-of-stimulation visit20.8 IU/L
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)Stimulation day 516.9 IU/L
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)Oocyte retrieval visit11.7 IU/L
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)Stimulation day 18.3 IU/L
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)Stimulation day 58.2 IU/L
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)Stimulation day 18.5 IU/L
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH)End-of-stimulation visit6.7 IU/L
Secondary

Circulating Concentrations of Inhibin A

Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of inhibin A were drawn. The median and IQR of inhibin A levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.

Time frame: From screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.~No circulating concentrations of Inhibin A were assessed for the oocyte retrieval visit for the placebo arm, because no participants who received placebo became pregnant.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Inhibin AEnd-of-stimulation visit329.8 pg/mL
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Inhibin AStimulation day 571.3 pg/mL
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Inhibin AOocyte retrieval visit255.6 pg/mL
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Inhibin AStimulation day 14.3 pg/mL
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Inhibin AStimulation day 57.3 pg/mL
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Inhibin AStimulation day 14.3 pg/mL
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Inhibin AEnd-of-stimulation visit12.4 pg/mL
Secondary

Circulating Concentrations of Inhibin B

Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of inhibin B were drawn. The median and IQR of inhibin B levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.

Time frame: From screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.~No circulating concentrations of Inhibin B were assessed for the oocyte retrieval visit for the placebo arm, because no participants who received placebo became pregnant.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Inhibin BEnd-of-stimulation visit1106.0 pg/mL
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Inhibin BStimulation day 5682.0 pg/mL
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Inhibin BOocyte retrieval visit445.0 pg/mL
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Inhibin BStimulation day 182.0 pg/mL
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Inhibin BStimulation day 5105.0 pg/mL
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Inhibin BStimulation day 180.0 pg/mL
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Inhibin BEnd-of-stimulation visit79.5 pg/mL
Secondary

Circulating Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)

Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of LH were drawn. The median and IQR of LH levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.

Time frame: From screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.~No circulating concentrations of LH were assessed for the oocyte retrieval visit for the placebo arm, because no participants who received placebo became pregnant.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)End-of-stimulation visit1.9 IU/L
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)Stimulation day 52.2 IU/L
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)Stimulation day 15.1 IU/L
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)Oocyte retrieval visit2.2 IU/L
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)End-of-stimulation visit7.7 IU/L
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)Stimulation day 56.0 IU/L
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)Stimulation day 14.7 IU/L
Secondary

Circulating Concentrations of Progesterone

Blood samples for analysis of circulating concentrations of progesterone were drawn. The median and IQR of progesterone levels on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5, end-of-stimulation visit and oocyte retrieval visit are presented.

Time frame: From screening to the day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.~No circulating concentrations of progesterone were assessed for the oocyte retrieval visit for the placebo arm, because no participants who received placebo became pregnant.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of ProgesteroneStimulation day 50.6 ng/mL
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of ProgesteroneStimulation day 10.6 ng/mL
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of ProgesteroneEnd-of-stimulation visit1.1 ng/mL
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Circulating Concentrations of ProgesteroneOocyte retrieval visit6.7 ng/mL
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of ProgesteroneEnd-of-stimulation visit0.5 ng/mL
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of ProgesteroneStimulation day 10.5 ng/mL
PlaceboCirculating Concentrations of ProgesteroneStimulation day 50.5 ng/mL
Secondary

Clinical Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and Cumulatively

Defined at least one gestational sac 5-6 weeks after transfer. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle, the cryopreserved cycles, and all cycles.

Time frame: 5-6 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 15 months after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Clinical Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyFresh cycle31.8 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Clinical Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyCryopreserved cycles72.3 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Clinical Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyAll cycles68.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboClinical Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyFresh cycle0 percentage of participants
PlaceboClinical Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyCryopreserved cycles0 percentage of participants
PlaceboClinical Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyAll cycles0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Clinical pregnancy rate in the fresh cyclep-value: <0.00195% CI: [24.7, 36]Fisher Exact
Comparison: Clinical pregnancy rate cumulativelyp-value: <0.00195% CI: [61.2, 72.1]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Echogenicity Pattern at End-of-stimulation

The distribution of participants with hypoechogenic, isoechogenic, or hyperechogenic endometrium is reported.

Time frame: At end-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Echogenicity Pattern at End-of-stimulationHypoechogenic68.1 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Echogenicity Pattern at End-of-stimulationIsoechogenic3.1 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Echogenicity Pattern at End-of-stimulationHyperechogenic28.4 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Echogenicity Pattern at End-of-stimulationNot possible to evaluate0.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboEchogenicity Pattern at End-of-stimulationNot possible to evaluate0 percentage of participants
PlaceboEchogenicity Pattern at End-of-stimulationHypoechogenic64.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboEchogenicity Pattern at End-of-stimulationHyperechogenic30.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboEchogenicity Pattern at End-of-stimulationIsoechogenic5.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.588Fisher Exact
Secondary

Echogenicity Pattern on Stimulation Day 5

The distribution of participants with hypoechogenic, isoechogenic, or hyperechogenic endometrium is reported.

Time frame: On stimulation day 5

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Echogenicity Pattern on Stimulation Day 5Hypoechogenic66.7 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Echogenicity Pattern on Stimulation Day 5Isoechogenic2.9 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Echogenicity Pattern on Stimulation Day 5Hyperechogenic29.9 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Echogenicity Pattern on Stimulation Day 5Not possible to evaluate0.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboEchogenicity Pattern on Stimulation Day 5Not possible to evaluate0 percentage of participants
PlaceboEchogenicity Pattern on Stimulation Day 5Hypoechogenic58.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboEchogenicity Pattern on Stimulation Day 5Hyperechogenic34.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboEchogenicity Pattern on Stimulation Day 5Isoechogenic7.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.22Fisher Exact
Secondary

Endometrial Thickness at End-of-stimulation

Mean endometrial thickness is reported.

Time frame: At end-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Endometrial Thickness at End-of-stimulation10.9 mmStandard Deviation 2.3
PlaceboEndometrial Thickness at End-of-stimulation7.5 mmStandard Deviation 2.2
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Endometrial Thickness on Stimulation Day 5

Mean endometrial thickness is reported.

Time frame: On stimulation day 5

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Endometrial Thickness on Stimulation Day 58.2 mmStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboEndometrial Thickness on Stimulation Day 55.8 mmStandard Deviation 1.8
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Fertilization Rate

The fertilization rate was defined as the number of 2PN oocytes divided by the number of oocytes retrieved. Fertilization rate relative to oocytes retrieved has been reported. Data is not shown for placebo arm because the mean number of fertilized oocytes was 0 in all subjects, since no subjects had oocytes retrieved or fertilized.

Time frame: On day 1 after oocyte retrieval (up to 23 days after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Fertilization Rate56.6 percentage of fertilized oocytesStandard Deviation 21.3
Secondary

Frequency and Intensity of Immune-related AEs

Standardised Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQs).

Time frame: From time of signing informed consent until the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Frequency and Intensity of Immune-related AEsSMQ = Anaphylactic reaction5 events
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Frequency and Intensity of Immune-related AEsSMQ = Hypersensitivity9 events
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Frequency and Intensity of Immune-related AEsSMQ = Angioedema1 events
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Frequency and Intensity of Immune-related AEsAny general and local hypersensitivity reactions10 events
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Frequency and Intensity of Immune-related AEsSMQ = Severe cutaneous adverse reactions3 events
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Immune-related AEsAny general and local hypersensitivity reactions0 events
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Immune-related AEsSMQ = Severe cutaneous adverse reactions0 events
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Immune-related AEsSMQ = Anaphylactic reaction0 events
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Immune-related AEsSMQ = Angioedema0 events
PlaceboFrequency and Intensity of Immune-related AEsSMQ = Hypersensitivity0 events
Secondary

Frequency of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation Period

Assessed by the participant during the stimulation period. Participants assessed the injection site reactions (redness, pain, itching, swelling and bruising) three times daily: immediately after the injection, 30 minutes after the injection and 24 hours after the injection.

Time frame: End-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Frequency of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation Period4.2 percentage of events
PlaceboFrequency of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation Period5.7 percentage of events
Secondary

Implantation Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and Cumulatively

Defined as the number of gestational sacs 5-6 weeks after transfer divided by number of blastocysts transferred. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle, the cryopreserved cycles, and all cycles. One participant can contribute with a range from zero to multiple blastocysts. Data is not shown for placebo arm because no subjects underwent blastocyst transfer in the fresh cycle or cryopreserved cycles. '%' in the unit of measure refers to 'percentage'.

Time frame: 5-6 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 15 months after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Implantation Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyFresh cycle53.4 % gestational sacs/blastocyst transfer
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Implantation Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyCryopreserved cycles51.7 % gestational sacs/blastocyst transfer
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Implantation Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyAll cycles52.4 % gestational sacs/blastocyst transfer
Secondary

Intensity of AEs

The intensity of AE was classified using the following 3-point scale: mild = awareness of signs or symptoms, but no disruption of usual activity; moderate = event sufficient to affect usual activity (disturbing); or severe = inability to work or perform usual activities (unacceptable). Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From time of signing informed consent until the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (up to approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Intensity of AEsMild AEs47.0 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Intensity of AEsModerate AEs16.6 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Intensity of AEsSevere AEs1.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboIntensity of AEsSevere AEs0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboIntensity of AEsMild AEs9.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboIntensity of AEsModerate AEs0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Intensity of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation Period

Assessed by the participant during the stimulation period as mild, moderate or severe.

Time frame: End-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Intensity of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation PeriodMild injection site reaction4.1 percentage of events
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Intensity of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation PeriodModerate injection site reaction0.1 percentage of events
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Intensity of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation PeriodSevere injection site reaction0.0063 percentage of events
PlaceboIntensity of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation PeriodMild injection site reaction5.7 percentage of events
PlaceboIntensity of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation PeriodModerate injection site reaction0.0458 percentage of events
PlaceboIntensity of Injection Site Reactions (Redness, Pain, Itching, Swelling and Bruising) Assessed by the Subject During the Stimulation PeriodSevere injection site reaction0 percentage of events
Secondary

Number and Quality of Blastocysts on Day 5 After Oocyte Retrieval

Number of blastocysts (total and good-quality) on Day 5 are presented. The quality evaluation of blastocysts consisted of assessment of three parameters, as per the Gardner & Schoolcraft system: blastocyst expansion and hatching status (graded: 1-6), inner cell mass (graded: A-D) and trophectoderm (graded: A-D). A good-quality blastocyst was defined as a blastocyst of grade 3BB or higher.

Time frame: On day 5 after oocyte retrieval

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number and Quality of Blastocysts on Day 5 After Oocyte RetrievalNumber of blastocysts on day 55.0 blastocystsStandard Deviation 4.3
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number and Quality of Blastocysts on Day 5 After Oocyte RetrievalNumber of good-quality blastocysts on day 53.4 blastocystsStandard Deviation 3.3
PlaceboNumber and Quality of Blastocysts on Day 5 After Oocyte RetrievalNumber of blastocysts on day 50.0 blastocystsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboNumber and Quality of Blastocysts on Day 5 After Oocyte RetrievalNumber of good-quality blastocysts on day 50.0 blastocystsStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Number of Cryopreserved Cycles Initiated Within 12 Months From the Start of COS

The total number of cryopreserved cycles initiated are reported. One participant can contribute with multiple cycles. Data in this endpoint are presented for the cryopreserved cycles.

Time frame: Up to 12 months after start of stimulation

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Cryopreserved Cycles Initiated Within 12 Months From the Start of COSProgrammed cycles initiated423 cycles
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Cryopreserved Cycles Initiated Within 12 Months From the Start of COSNatural cycles initiated43 cycles
Secondary

Number of Cryopreserved Cycles With Blastocyst Transfer

The total number of cryopreserved cycles with blastocyst transfer are reported. One participant can contribute with multiple cycles. Data in this endpoint are presented for the cryopreserved cycles.

Time frame: Up to 12 months after start of stimulation

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Cryopreserved Cycles With Blastocyst TransferProgrammed cycles with transfer380 cycles
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Cryopreserved Cycles With Blastocyst TransferNatural cycles with transfer36 cycles
Secondary

Number of Fertilized Oocytes

An oocyte was defined as fertilized if it had 2 pronuclei (2PN) at 19h (±2h).

Time frame: On day 1 after oocyte retrieval (up to 23 days after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Fertilized Oocytes8.4 oocytes (number of fertilized oocytes)Standard Deviation 6.3
PlaceboNumber of Fertilized Oocytes0.0 oocytes (number of fertilized oocytes)Standard Deviation 0
Secondary

Number of Follicles at End-of-stimulation

The total number of follicles and the number of follicles per size category is reported.

Time frame: At end-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Follicles at End-of-stimulationTotal number of follicles23.0 number of folliclesStandard Deviation 11.8
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Follicles at End-of-stimulationFollicles >= 12 mm13.0 number of folliclesStandard Deviation 7.3
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Follicles at End-of-stimulationFollicles >= 17 mm4.4 number of folliclesStandard Deviation 2.5
PlaceboNumber of Follicles at End-of-stimulationTotal number of follicles15.6 number of folliclesStandard Deviation 7.6
PlaceboNumber of Follicles at End-of-stimulationFollicles >= 12 mm0.7 number of folliclesStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboNumber of Follicles at End-of-stimulationFollicles >= 17 mm0.3 number of folliclesStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Number of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5

The total number of follicles and the number of follicles per size category are presented

Time frame: On stimulation day 5

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5Total number of follicles19.3 number of folliclesStandard Deviation 9.9
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5Follicles >= 12 mm1.7 number of folliclesStandard Deviation 2
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5Follicles >= 17 mm0.0 number of folliclesStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboNumber of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5Total number of follicles16.5 number of folliclesStandard Deviation 7.1
PlaceboNumber of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5Follicles >= 12 mm0.3 number of folliclesStandard Deviation 0.7
PlaceboNumber of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5Follicles >= 17 mm0.0 number of folliclesStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Number of Metaphase II Oocytes

The number of MII oocytes to oocytes retrieved for participants where all oocytes were inseminated using ICSI are presented.

Time frame: On day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Metaphase II Oocytes10.9 number of MII oocytesStandard Deviation 7.6
Secondary

Number of Oocytes Retrieved

The number of oocytes retrieved was recorded at the oocyte retrieval visit.

Time frame: On day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Oocytes Retrieved15.1 number of oocytes retrievedStandard Deviation 10.4
PlaceboNumber of Oocytes Retrieved0.0 number of oocytes retrievedStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Number of Stimulation Days

Calculated by start dates and end dates.

Time frame: Up to 20 stimulation days

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Number of Stimulation Days8.1 daysStandard Deviation 1.4
PlaceboNumber of Stimulation Days8.3 daysStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Ongoing Implantation Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and Cumulatively

Defined as the number of intrauterine viable fetuses 8-9 weeks after transfer divided by number of blastocysts transferred. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle, the cryopreserved cycles, and all cycles. One participant can contribute with a range from zero to multiple blastocysts. Data is not shown for placebo arm because no blastocyst transfer was performed in the fresh cycle or cryopreserved cycles. '%' in the unit of measure refers to 'percentage'.

Time frame: 8-9 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 16 months after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Ongoing Implantation Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyFresh cycle49.5 % of viable fetus/blastocyst transfer
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Ongoing Implantation Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyCryopreserved cycles44.2 % of viable fetus/blastocyst transfer
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Ongoing Implantation Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyAll cycles46.5 % of viable fetus/blastocyst transfer
Secondary

Ongoing Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle and in the Cryopreserved Cycles

Defined as at least one intrauterine viable fetus 8-9 weeks after transfer. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle and the cryopreserved cycles.

Time frame: 8-9 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 16 months after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Ongoing Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle and in the Cryopreserved CyclesFresh cycle29.5 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Ongoing Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle and in the Cryopreserved CyclesCryopreserved cycles65.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboOngoing Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle and in the Cryopreserved CyclesFresh cycle0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboOngoing Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle and in the Cryopreserved CyclesCryopreserved cycles0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Ongoing Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cyclep-value: <0.00195% CI: [22.5, 33.7]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Oocyte Efficiency Index

Defined as the cumulative number of ongoing pregnancies per oocyte retrieved. Data in this endpoint are presented for the cryopreserved cycles. The unit of measure for this endpoint is 'cumulative ongoing pregnancies/oocyte retrieved'.

Time frame: 8-9 weeks after transfer

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Oocyte Efficiency Index5.8 ongoing pregnancies/oocyte retrievedStandard Deviation 6.9
Secondary

Oocyte Utilization Rate

Defined as the number of blastocysts transferred or cryopreserved divided by the number of oocytes retrieved. Data in this endpoint are presented for the cryopreserved cycles.

Time frame: On day of oocyte retrieval up to 12 months after start of COS

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Oocyte Utilization Rate31.6 blastocysts/oocyte retrievedStandard Deviation 20.6
Secondary

Percentage of Blastocysts Surviving Cryopreservation

Data in this endpoint are presented for the cryopreserved cycles. The unit is number of blastocysts with observations. One participant can contribute with a range from zero to multiple blastocysts.

Time frame: 0 hour (+0.5 hour) after thawing

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Percentage of Blastocysts Surviving Cryopreservation98.8 percentage of blastocysts
Secondary

Percentage of Blastocysts With Re-expansion After Cryopreservation

Data in this endpoint are presented for the cryopreserved cycles. The unit is number of blastocysts with observations. One participant can contribute with a range from zero to multiple blastocysts.

Time frame: 2.5 hour (±0.5 hour) after thawing

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Percentage of Blastocysts With Re-expansion After Cryopreservation97.1 percentage of blastocysts
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Any AE occurring after start of IMP and before the end-of-trial visit, or a pre-treatment AE or pre-existing medical condition that worsens in intensity after start of IMP and before the end-of-trial visit was considered treatment-emergent, and is presented for this endpoint. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From time of signing informed consent until the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (up to approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)54.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)9.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Positive Beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (βhCG) Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and Cumulatively

Defined as positive serum βhCG test 10-14 days after transfer. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle, the cryopreserved cycles, and all cycles.

Time frame: 10-14 days after transfer (up to approximately 14 months after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Positive Beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (βhCG) Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyFresh cycle35.0 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Positive Beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (βhCG) Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyCryopreserved cycles78.1 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Positive Beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (βhCG) Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyAll cycles72.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPositive Beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (βhCG) Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyFresh cycle0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPositive Beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (βhCG) Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyCryopreserved cycles0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPositive Beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (βhCG) Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyAll cycles0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Positive βhCG rate in the fresh cyclep-value: <0.00195% CI: [28.1, 39.2]Fisher Exact
Comparison: Positive βhCG rate cumulativelyp-value: <0.00195% CI: [65.3, 76.2]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Proportion of Cryopreserved Cycles With Multi-fetal Gestation

Defined as pregnancy with more than one fetus. Among cryopreserved cycles with ongoing pregnancy, percentage of cycles with twin pregnancies are presented. '%' in the unit of measure refers to 'percentage'.

Time frame: Up to 8-9 weeks after transfer

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Cryopreserved Cycles With Multi-fetal Gestation1.1 % of cycles with twin pregnancy
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Investigator-requested Gonadotropin Dose Adjustments

Investigator-requested decreases and increases of the gonadotropin dose.

Time frame: Stimulation Day 5

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Participants With Investigator-requested Gonadotropin Dose AdjustmentsDecrease6.3 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Participants With Investigator-requested Gonadotropin Dose AdjustmentsNo change55.8 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Participants With Investigator-requested Gonadotropin Dose AdjustmentsIncrease37.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Investigator-requested Gonadotropin Dose AdjustmentsDecrease0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Investigator-requested Gonadotropin Dose AdjustmentsNo change20.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Investigator-requested Gonadotropin Dose AdjustmentsIncrease79.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Multi-fetal Gestation in the Fresh Cycle

Defined as pregnancy with more than one fetus. Among participants with ongoing pregnancy, percentage of participants with twin pregnancies are presented. '%' in the unit of measure refers to 'percentage'.

Time frame: Up to 8-9 weeks after transfer

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Participants With Multi-fetal Gestation in the Fresh Cycle1.9 % of participants with twin pregnancy
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Technical Malfunctions of the Administration Pen

Incidences of technical malfunctions of the administration pen were recorded.

Time frame: Up to 20 stimulation days

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Participants With Technical Malfunctions of the Administration Pen0.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Technical Malfunctions of the Administration Pen0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Hospitalized Due to OHSS and Proportion of Subjects Undergoing Paracentesis Due to OHSS

Percentage of participants hospitalized or undergoing paracentesis due to OHSS are reported.

Time frame: ≤9 days after triggering of final follicular maturation (early OHSS), >9 days after triggering of final follicular maturation until 21-28 days after last IMP dose or up to ongoing pregnancy 8-9 weeks after transfer in pregnant participants (late OHSS)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects Hospitalized Due to OHSS and Proportion of Subjects Undergoing Paracentesis Due to OHSSHospitalization0.2 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects Hospitalized Due to OHSS and Proportion of Subjects Undergoing Paracentesis Due to OHSSParacentesis0.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects Hospitalized Due to OHSS and Proportion of Subjects Undergoing Paracentesis Due to OHSSHospitalization0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects Hospitalized Due to OHSS and Proportion of Subjects Undergoing Paracentesis Due to OHSSParacentesis0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects in the Fresh Cycle With Triggering of Final Follicular Maturation (hCG, With GnRH Agonist, and in Total), Cycle Cancellation and Transfer Cancellation

Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: Up to 5 days after oocyte retrieval (up to 27 days after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects in the Fresh Cycle With Triggering of Final Follicular Maturation (hCG, With GnRH Agonist, and in Total), Cycle Cancellation and Transfer CancellationTriggering drug (GnRH agonist)21.5 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects in the Fresh Cycle With Triggering of Final Follicular Maturation (hCG, With GnRH Agonist, and in Total), Cycle Cancellation and Transfer CancellationCycle cancellation1.5 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects in the Fresh Cycle With Triggering of Final Follicular Maturation (hCG, With GnRH Agonist, and in Total), Cycle Cancellation and Transfer CancellationTriggering drug (None)1.5 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects in the Fresh Cycle With Triggering of Final Follicular Maturation (hCG, With GnRH Agonist, and in Total), Cycle Cancellation and Transfer CancellationTransfer cancellation38.9 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects in the Fresh Cycle With Triggering of Final Follicular Maturation (hCG, With GnRH Agonist, and in Total), Cycle Cancellation and Transfer CancellationTriggering drug (hCG)77.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects in the Fresh Cycle With Triggering of Final Follicular Maturation (hCG, With GnRH Agonist, and in Total), Cycle Cancellation and Transfer CancellationTransfer cancellation1.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects in the Fresh Cycle With Triggering of Final Follicular Maturation (hCG, With GnRH Agonist, and in Total), Cycle Cancellation and Transfer CancellationTriggering drug (hCG)1.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects in the Fresh Cycle With Triggering of Final Follicular Maturation (hCG, With GnRH Agonist, and in Total), Cycle Cancellation and Transfer CancellationTriggering drug (GnRH agonist)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects in the Fresh Cycle With Triggering of Final Follicular Maturation (hCG, With GnRH Agonist, and in Total), Cycle Cancellation and Transfer CancellationTriggering drug (None)98.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects in the Fresh Cycle With Triggering of Final Follicular Maturation (hCG, With GnRH Agonist, and in Total), Cycle Cancellation and Transfer CancellationCycle cancellation98.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved

Grouped according to the number of oocytes retrieved. Participants with cycle cancellation due to poor ovarian response are included in the \<4 oocytes group.

Time frame: On day of oocyte retrieval (up to 22 days after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved4-7 oocytes retrieved13.9 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved15-19 oocytes retrieved18.7 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved8-14 oocytes retrieved36.6 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved>=20 oocytes retrieved24.2 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved<4 oocytes retrieved6.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved>=20 oocytes retrieved0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved<4 oocytes retrieved100 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved4-7 oocytes retrieved0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved8-14 oocytes retrieved0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With <4, 4-7, 8-14, 15-19 and ≥20 Oocytes Retrieved15-19 oocytes retrieved0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellations Due to an AE, Including Immune-related AEs, or Due to Technical Malfunctions of the Administration Pen

For each participant the reason for cycle cancellation is recorded. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: Up to 20 stimulation days

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellations Due to an AE, Including Immune-related AEs, or Due to Technical Malfunctions of the Administration PenAE (including immune-related AEs)0 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellations Due to an AE, Including Immune-related AEs, or Due to Technical Malfunctions of the Administration PenTechnical malfunctions of the administration pen0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellations Due to an AE, Including Immune-related AEs, or Due to Technical Malfunctions of the Administration PenTechnical malfunctions of the administration pen0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Cycle Cancellations Due to an AE, Including Immune-related AEs, or Due to Technical Malfunctions of the Administration PenAE (including immune-related AEs)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate, Potassium

The table represents the percentage of participants in each group with normal baseline values and markedly abnormal end-of-stimulation or end-of-cycle visit values for phosphate and potassium. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate, PotassiumPhosphate (mmol/L) (End-of-stimulation visit)0.2 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate, PotassiumPotassium (mmol/L) (End-of-stimulation visit)0.2 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate, PotassiumPhosphate (mmol/L) (End-of-cycle visit)0.2 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate, PotassiumPotassium (mmol/L) (End-of-cycle visit)1.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate, PotassiumPotassium (mmol/L) (End-of-cycle visit)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate, PotassiumPhosphate (mmol/L) (End-of-stimulation visit)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate, PotassiumPhosphate (mmol/L) (End-of-cycle visit)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Phosphate, PotassiumPotassium (mmol/L) (End-of-stimulation visit)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes and Lymphocytes/Leukocytes.

The table represents the percentage of participants in each group with normal baseline values and markedly abnormal end-of-stimulation or end-of-cycle visit values for Leukocytes and lymphocytes/leukocytes. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: From screening (baseline) to the end-of-stimulation visit and end-of-cycle visit in the fresh cycle (approximately 6 months)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes and Lymphocytes/Leukocytes.Leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)0.6 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes and Lymphocytes/Leukocytes.Lymphocytes/leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)0.6 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes and Lymphocytes/Leukocytes.Leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)0.0 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes and Lymphocytes/Leukocytes.Lymphocytes/leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)0.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes and Lymphocytes/Leukocytes.Lymphocytes/leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)2.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes and Lymphocytes/Leukocytes.Leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes and Lymphocytes/Leukocytes.Leukocytes (End-of-cycle visit)2.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Changes of Haematology Parameters: Leukocytes and Lymphocytes/Leukocytes.Lymphocytes/leukocytes (End-of-stimulation visit)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With OHSS, Overall and by Grade, and Proportion of Subjects With Moderate/Severe OHSS

Classification of grade was according to Golan's classification system, and all OHSS cases were graded as mild, moderate or severe. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle.

Time frame: ≤9 days after triggering of final follicular maturation (early OHSS), >9 days after triggering of final follicular maturation until 21-28 days after last IMP dose or up to ongoing pregnancy 8-9 weeks after transfer in pregnant participants (late OHSS)

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With OHSS, Overall and by Grade, and Proportion of Subjects With Moderate/Severe OHSSOHSS (any grade)3.8 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With OHSS, Overall and by Grade, and Proportion of Subjects With Moderate/Severe OHSSOHSS (moderate/severe)2.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With OHSS, Overall and by Grade, and Proportion of Subjects With Moderate/Severe OHSSOHSS (any grade)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With OHSS, Overall and by Grade, and Proportion of Subjects With Moderate/Severe OHSSOHSS (moderate/severe)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Treatment-induced Anti-FSH Antibodies, Overall as Well as With Neutralizing Capacity

Measured by presence of anti-FSH antibodies. 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence interval has been reported in this endpoint.

Time frame: Up to 28 days after end of the stimulation period

Population: The safety analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With Treatment-induced Anti-FSH Antibodies, Overall as Well as With Neutralizing CapacityTreatment-induced anti-FSH antibodies (Overall)0.76 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Proportion of Subjects With Treatment-induced Anti-FSH Antibodies, Overall as Well as With Neutralizing CapacityTreatment-induced anti-FSH antibodies with neutralizing capacity0 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Treatment-induced Anti-FSH Antibodies, Overall as Well as With Neutralizing CapacityTreatment-induced anti-FSH antibodies (Overall)0.00 percentage of participants
PlaceboProportion of Subjects With Treatment-induced Anti-FSH Antibodies, Overall as Well as With Neutralizing CapacityTreatment-induced anti-FSH antibodies with neutralizing capacity0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Size of Follicles at End-of-stimulation

Counted by ultrasound for the right and left ovary for each participant.

Time frame: At end-of-stimulation (up to 20 stimulation days)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Size of Follicles at End-of-stimulationLargest follicle (mm)19.9 mmStandard Deviation 2
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Size of Follicles at End-of-stimulationAverage size of 2 largest follicles (mm)19.2 mmStandard Deviation 1.6
PlaceboSize of Follicles at End-of-stimulationLargest follicle (mm)13.6 mmStandard Deviation 4.8
PlaceboSize of Follicles at End-of-stimulationAverage size of 2 largest follicles (mm)10.9 mmStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Size of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5

Counted by ultrasound for the right and left ovary for each participant.

Time frame: On stimulation day 5

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Size of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5Largest follicle (mm)12.2 mmStandard Deviation 2
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Size of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5Average size of 2 largest follicles (mm)11.7 mmStandard Deviation 1.8
PlaceboSize of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5Largest follicle (mm)9.9 mmStandard Deviation 2.4
PlaceboSize of Follicles on Stimulation Day 5Average size of 2 largest follicles (mm)9.2 mmStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Time From Start of COS to Ongoing Pregnancy Across the Fresh and Cryopreserved Cycles

Time from start of COS to ongoing pregnancy, including both the fresh and cryopreserved cycles. In the placebo group, no participants achieved an ongoing pregnancy either after 12 calendar months or after 12 study months.

Time frame: 8-9 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 16 months after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Time From Start of COS to Ongoing Pregnancy Across the Fresh and Cryopreserved CyclesTotal number of days until ongoing pregnancy 12 study months133.0 daysStandard Deviation 82.5
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Time From Start of COS to Ongoing Pregnancy Across the Fresh and Cryopreserved CyclesTotal number of days until ongoing pregnancy 12 calendar months127.6 daysStandard Deviation 70
Secondary

Time From Start of COS to Ongoing Pregnancy Across the Fresh and Cryopreserved Cycles, Measured in Number of Cycles Before Achieving Ongoing Pregnancy

Time from start of COS to ongoing pregnancy, including both the fresh and cryopreserved cycles, measured in number of cycles before achieving ongoing pregnancy. In the placebo group, no participants achieved an ongoing pregnancy either after 12 calendar months or after 12 study months.

Time frame: 8-9 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 16 months after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Time From Start of COS to Ongoing Pregnancy Across the Fresh and Cryopreserved Cycles, Measured in Number of Cycles Before Achieving Ongoing PregnancyNumber of cycles until ongoing pregnancy 12 calendar months1.8 CyclesStandard Deviation 0.9
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Time From Start of COS to Ongoing Pregnancy Across the Fresh and Cryopreserved Cycles, Measured in Number of Cycles Before Achieving Ongoing PregnancyNumber of cycles until ongoing pregnancy 12 study months1.8 CyclesStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Total Gonadotropin Dose

Calculated by start dates, end dates and daily dose of IMP.

Time frame: Up to 20 stimulation days

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Total Gonadotropin Dose104.2 microgram of doseStandard Deviation 25.3
PlaceboTotal Gonadotropin Dose115.9 microgram of doseStandard Deviation 19.1
Secondary

Vital Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and Cumulatively

Defined at least one intrauterine gestational sac with fetal heart beat 5-6 weeks after transfer. Data in this endpoint are presented for the fresh cycle, the cryopreserved cycles, and all cycles.

Time frame: 5-6 weeks after transfer (up to approximately 15 months after start of stimulation)

Population: The mITT analysis set comprised all randomized and exposed participants. Participants were analyzed according to planned treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Vital Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyFresh cycle30.5 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Vital Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyCryopreserved cycles67.3 percentage of participants
FE 999049 (Follitropin Delta)Vital Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyAll cycles65.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboVital Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyFresh cycle0 percentage of participants
PlaceboVital Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyCryopreserved cycles0 percentage of participants
PlaceboVital Pregnancy Rate in the Fresh Cycle, the Cryopreserved Cycles and CumulativelyAll cycles0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Vital pregnancy rate in the fresh cyclep-value: <0.00195% CI: [23.4, 34.6]Fisher Exact
Comparison: Vital pregnancy rate cumulativelyp-value: <0.00195% CI: [57.5, 69.1]Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026