Skip to content

Early LA Venting During Venoaterial ECMO Support

Early Left Atrial Venting Versus Conventional Treatment For Left Ventricular Decompression During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support (EVOLVE-ECMO Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03740711
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-11-14
Start date
2018-12-12
Completion date
2022-08-30
Last updated
2022-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiogenic Shock, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support, Refractory Pulmonary Edema

Keywords

Cardiogenic shock, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support, Left atrial venting

Brief summary

The EVOLVE-ECMO(Early Left Atrial Venting Versus Conventional Treatment For Left VEntricular Decompression During Venoarterial ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support) study is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the prognostic effect of early LA venting(when detect B-line on serial lung ultrasound) on weaning VA-ECMO support in refractory CS who receive VA-ECMO support. The aim of EVOLVE-ECMO trial is to test the hypothesis that early LA venting would result in a significant reduction in failure of weaning ECMO support in refractory CS.

Interventions

PROCEDURELeft atrial venting

The contralateral femoral vein is assessed with an 7-French(Fr) sheath() and femoral artery is assessed with 5-Fr sheath( ) for fluoroscopic guidance using 5-Fr pig-tail catheter. In some cases trans-esophageal echo is used. The inter-atrial septum in punctured with a standard BRK™tran-septal needle(St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN) under direct visualization via an 8-Fr Mullin sheath(St. Jude Medical Inc.). A SAFARI™(Boston Scientific, Galway, Ireland) guidewire is advanced into the LA. An 8-Fr Mullin-sheath is removed and atrial septostomy is performed using 21-Fr dilator. A 17-Fr or 21-Fr Biomedicus Percutaneous Femoral cannula(Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN) is then placed in the LA and was attached to the ECMO circuit using a Y connector.

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled test

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject was \> 18 years of age. * Subjects who underwent successful VA-ECMO support * Subjects with refractory cardiogenic shock who had pulmonary edema confirmed by chest X ray or lung sonogram. * The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion criteria

* subject was \<80 years of age * Pregnant and/or lactate women * Subjects who underwent VA-ECMO after recent open heart surgery * Subjects who underwent VA-ECMO after non-cardiogenic arrest(trauma, hypothermia, submersion, drug overdose, asphyxia, intracranial hemorrhage etc) * Severe bleeding tendency * Terminal malignancy * Known severe irreversible brain damage * Subject was unable to provide written informed consent or participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
weaning rate of VA-ECMOduring index admissionWeaning of VA-ECMO support

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
In hospital mortalityduring index admission
Adverse outcome due to LA ventingduring index admission
Free days for mechanical ventilationduring index admission
Success rate to heart transplantationduring index admission
rate of improving for pulmonary edemaduring index admission

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026