Skip to content

Virtual Reality for Alleviation of Peripheral IV Placement-Associated Discomfort

Virtual Reality for Alleviation of Peripheral IV Placement-Associated Discomfort

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03740607
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-11-14
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2022-09-15
Last updated
2021-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perioperative Care, Procedural Anxiety, Procedural Pain

Keywords

Adult, Peripheral IV, procedural pain, procedural anxiety, virtual reality, peripheral intravenous catheter

Brief summary

Immersive virtual reality (iVR) has been used successfully to manage pain with distraction. It is a non-invasive treatment modality unassociated with worrisome well-known side effects typically seen when opioids and NSAIDS are used, and has previously been used safely in place of analgesia during dressing changes and burn care. This study investigates whether iVR can be useful as a stand-alone option to manage the pain associated with placement of peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheters in adults.

Detailed description

This is a prospective study of the effect of immersive virtual reality on the perception of pain during peripheral IV (PIV) placement. Adult patients who require PIV placement for elective surgery will be consented for intervention while in the peri-operative suites (PS). The VR intervention will consist of a headset and immersive VR software that allows the patient to engage in a virtual world during PIV placement. Subjects will be queried immediately after PIV placement using the validated graphic rating scale regarding the sensory, cognitive, and affective aspects of discomfort they experienced with PIV placement (Appendix A). They will also be asked two validated questions concerning patient satisfaction (Dexter et al 1997). A control group of patients will undergo a similar assessment with slightly different wording after receiving PIV placement without iVR.

Interventions

DEVICEVirtual reality

Healthcare virtual reality software implemented during peripheral intravenous catheter placement

Peripheral intravenous catheters are placed in the peri-operative suites in preparation for anesthesia during surgery.

Sponsors

Brooke Army Medical Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

randomized prospective cohort

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Brooke Army Medical Center patients age 19-89 undergoing peripheral intravenous catheter placement in preparation for elective surgery will be eligible for participation.

Exclusion criteria

Patients will be excluded with head wounds/head bandages preventing the use of a headset, active nausea/vomiting, history of seizure, dementia, psychosis, mania, vertigo, or motion sickness, if the patient is pregnant or incarcerated on the day of surgery, and if the patient is unable to consent self.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Discomfort associated with peripheral IV placementThis outcome will be measured immediately after peripheral IV placementSubject experiences will be measured using a validated graphic rating scale (GRS) which enquires about the extent to which the experience was unpleasant.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time spent thinking about painThis outcome will be measured immediately after peripheral IV placementSubject will describe the amount of time spent thinking about pain during IV placement, as a proportion.
Degree to which subject felt immersed in virtual realityThis outcome will be measured immediately after peripheral IV placementThe subject will answer a question regarding the extent to which they felt they went inside the computer-generated world
NauseaThis outcome will be measured immediately after peripheral IV placementSubject will answer a question regarding extent to which nausea was experienced during IV placement
ClaustrophobiaThis outcome will be measured immediately after peripheral IV placementThe subject will be asked to answer a question about the extent to which they felt claustrophobic for any reason during IV placement
Magnitude of pain severityThis outcome will be measured immediately after peripheral IV placementSubjects will rate their worst pain during the IV placement on a scale of 1-10 out of 10 possible points
Satisfaction scoreThis outcome will be measured immediately after peripheral IV placementThe subject will be asked if they were satisfied with IV placement
Physiological parametersInitial vital signs at start of anesthesia care will be abstracted retrospectively. This reading will likely occur within an hour of the initial intervention, as start times for anesthesia cases are within an hour of initiation of peri-operative careBaseline vital signs- continuous variables
Fun factorThis outcome will be measured immediately after peripheral IV placementSubject will describe the extent to which they found the experience to be fun, on a scale of 1-10
Clinical significanceThis outcome will be measured immediately after peripheral IV placementthe subject will be asked if they would want to have their IV placed this way again

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactAnnie L Chow, MD, MPH, MS
chowanni@gmail.com6093063329
Backup ContactCheng Yang, MD
chengyang448@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026