Skip to content

Intensive Versus Conventional Glycemic Control in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing

The Effect of Intensive Versus Conventional Glycemic Control in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: a Randomised Control Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03740581
Acronym
InVeCoG:DFU
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-11-14
Start date
2017-11-01
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2018-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Keywords

Diabetic foot ulcer, Intensive glycemic control

Brief summary

Diabetic foot ulcer is one of the most serious, most costly and at times life threatening complication of diabetes. The lifetime incidence of foot ulcer occurrence in diabetes is up to 25%. Despite the advent of numerous types of wound dressings and off-loading mechanisms, the ulcer healing rates in diabetes have remained dismally low. Hyperglycemia impairs the inflammatory, proliferative and remodeling phases of an ulcer. There are retrospective studies linking improvement of HbA1c to wound area healing rate. The investigators hypothesised that intensive glycemic control in a patient of diabetic foot ulcer improves the healing process. To explore this hypothesis, the investigators are conducting this randomized control trial with the primary aim of wound healing in patients of diabetic foot ulcer on either intensive glycemic treatment or conventional (pre-existing) glycemic treatment.

Interventions

DRUGInsulin

Basal Bolus regimen (Participant to receive, Insulin \>= 3 times per day)

Sponsors

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \>18 years 2. Patients of DM according to ADA guidelines 3. HbA1c \>8% and/or FBG \>130 on 3 consecutive occasions 4. DFU: Wagner grade 2 & 3 or UTS 2-3B 5. Duration of ulcer \<12 weeks 6. Wound size: \>1cm2 7. Willingness to sign consent form & participate in the study 8. Capacity to attend visits at hospital for review

Exclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis with unpredictable healing ability e.g. malignancy, depression, HIV, CTD, steroid use 2. Dialysis requiring CKD & eGFR \<30 ml/min 3. Active Charcot foot 4. PEDIS 4: life threatening DFU 5. Pregnancy 6. ABI \<= 0.7 7. Refusal to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with complete wound closure (epithelialisation) at 12 weeks in both intensive and conventional treatment groups.12 weeksUlcer area to be measured by Wound Measurement Camera model WZ2.0 (bought from (Wound zoom incorporate, 2916, Borham Ave, Stevens Point, W1, USA 54481) at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent reduction in ulcer area (from baseline) at 4 & 12 weeks in both intensive and conventional treatment groups.4 and 12 weeksThis will be calculated using the measured ulcer area for all participants, irrespective of wound closure status.
HbA1c at 4 & 12 weeks in both intensive and conventional groups.4 and 12 weeksThis ill be done to correlate glycemic control with ulcer area at 4 and 12 weeks respectively.
Change in ulcer severity- Wagner and UTWSC classification.4 and 12 weeksDowngrade of ulcer severity based on two well established diabetic foot ulcer classification systems and there correlation with wound closure and glycemic control will be seen.
Incidence of any amputation.4 and 12 weeksThis outcome to be correlated with the glycemic control in both the groups.

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactAditya Dutta, MD
addiedutta05@gmail.com+919818892996
Backup ContactAshu Rastogi, MD, DM
ashuendo@gmail.com+919781001046

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026