Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Conditions
Keywords
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, X-Ray Computed Tomography, Liquid Biopsy, Quality of Life, Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Follow-up
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to improve early detection of treatable relapse of lung cancer and thereby improve survival and quality of life for the patients. The investigators will perform a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to 1) assess if surveillance with whole body Positron Emission Tomography combined with Computer Tomography (PET/CT) including the brain can increase the number of treatable relapses and 2) concurrently collect liquid biopsies for later analysis, potentially enabling even earlier and minimally invasive detection and characterization of relapse.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTWhole body 18F-FDG PET/CT
In the experimental arm (A), an FDG-PET/CT scan will replace the CT-scan at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-treatment. A standard CT-scan will be performed at 3, 9, 15 and 21 months post-treatment. All patients will be asked for a blood sample for liquid biopsy and to fill in a quality of life questionnaire, concurrently every 3 months.
Sponsors
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Danish Lung Cancer Group
Danish Comprehensive Cancer Center
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Multicenter, randomized controlled trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patient with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), proven by cytology or histology * Patient in clinical stages I-III * Age≥ 18 years * Performance status ≤ 2 at the time of referral to therapy * Patient referred for definitive treatment (e.g. surgery, surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, concomitant radio-chemotherapy, conventional or stereotactic radiotherapy or radiofrequency ablation). * Patient has given his/her written informed consent before any specific procedure from protocol
Exclusion criteria
* Patient, whose disease has progressed within the first 3 months after cancer treatment, e.g. confirmed progressive disease on CT. * Persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship or curators * Dementia, mental alteration, severe psychiatric disease or other circumstances that can compromise informed consent from the patient and/or adherence to the protocol and the monitoring of the trial * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Patient participating in another interventional study during the surveillance period. This is only relevant for studies that might interfere with the intervention, whereas studies on late effects will not preclude participation in SUPE-R. Participation in protocols related only to initial treatment will not preclude participation in SUPE-R. Cases of doubt will be settled by the steering committee.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of relapses treatable with curative intent | Until first detected relapse or 2 years after enrollment | As decided by multidisciplinary meetings |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of life / QLQ-C30 | From randomization until first detected relapse or 24 months | Quality of life will be assessed every 3rd month using a validated questionnaire, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionaire Core Questionaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The questionaire is filled out by study participants at each control visit and patients score severity of a range of symptoms during the past week on a scale of 1 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"). |
| Quality of life / QLQ-LC13 | From randomization until first detected relapse or 24 months | Quality of life will be assessed every 3rd month using a validated questionnaire, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionair Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13). The questionaire is filled out by study participants at each control visit and patients score severity of a range of symptoms during the past week on a scale of 1 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"). |
| Quality of life / Raw score | From randomization until first detected relapse or 24 months | From the results of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 a Raw Score (RS) is calculated (average of all scores) and Quality of Life is calculated as (RS - 1)/3 which outputs a value between 0 and 1, where 0 is a complete absence of symptoms and 1 is the maximum severity of all related symptoms. This will be used for calculation of QALY in the cost-effectiveness analysis. |
| Number of procedures to assess incidental findings | From randomization until 24 months or first detected relapse or until death (whichever comes first) | Procedures resulting from an incidental finding on a follow up scan |
| Types of procedures to assess incidental findings | From randomization until 24 months or first detected relapse or until death (whichever comes first) | Invasive / non-invasive |
| Adverse events due to invasive procedures done to assess incidental findings | From randomization until 24 months or first detected relapse or until death (whichever comes first) | For example: Bleeding, pneumothorax, hospital admission |
| Time to verified relapse | From date of randomization until the date of first documented relapse assessed up to 24 months | Relapse verified by histology or imaging combined with MDM review |
| Overall survival | From date of randomization until the date of censoring or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 36 months | Death of any course or censoring |
| Overall survival for patients with relapse | From randomization until 12 months after first detected relapse or until death (whichever comes first) | Death of any course or censoring |
| Cost-effectiveness analysis of intervention | From randomization until 24 months or 12 months after first detected relapse or until death (whichever comes first) | Cost-effectiveness of the PET/CT regimen vs the CT regimen is assessed with the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio), i.e. the ratio of net health care costs to net QALYs ( quality-adjusted life years). Net health care costs are estimated as the health care costs difference between the two arms and net QALYs likewise. Health care costs are calculated from register-based information on health care consumption cumulated in 2-yrs follow-up (DRG-rates) supplemented by intervention costs based on project costs. The relevant cost data are available at "Sundhedsdatastyrelsen" using their research service. |
| Performance status at relapse | From randomization until first detected relapse or 24 months | Performance status of study participants at relapse will be assessed using Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scale from grade 0 to grade 4, where grade 0 corresponds to a patient who is "fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction" and grade 4 is a patient who is "completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair". |
| Type of treatment after verification of relapse | From randomization until 12 months after first detected relapse or until death (whichever comes first) | Description of treatment - e.g. surgical, radiotherapy, stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy, medical treatment |
Countries
Denmark
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBarbara M Fischer, MD PhD DMSci
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Outcome results
None listed