Skip to content

ACL Versus ALL + ACL Study

Assessment of the Results of Combined Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) + Antero Crusader Ligament (ACL) Plasty Compared to Classical KJ Plasty in Isolated ACL Ruptures

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03740022
Enrollment
592
Registered
2018-11-14
Start date
2016-11-02
Completion date
2024-06-10
Last updated
2024-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Ligament Rupture

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to show a reduction of a re-rupture rate with an ACL (antero crusader ligament) + ALL (anterolateral ligament) combined technique compared to a classical Kenneth-Jones ACL (antero crusader ligament) reconstruction technique.

Detailed description

The aim is to evaluate the rate of re-rupture and to analyze knee function through scores analysis as International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee (IKDC), Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), Lysholm-Tegner, and by objective measurements of laximetry and rotation. This study should include 2 groups of 296 patients with isolated ACL (antero crusader ligament) with clinical rotation : * operated by a conventional patellar tendon technique (first group) * operated by a technique combining a ALL (anterolateral ligament) and ACL plasty for the second group

Interventions

PROCEDUREACL plasty

standard ligamentoplasty by Kenneth Jones

PROCEDUREACL + ALL plasty

standard ligamentoplasty and anterolateral plasty

Sponsors

Ramsay Générale de Santé
CollaboratorOTHER
Ascopharm Groupe Novasco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with total isolated antero crusader ligament (ACL) rupture who are candidates for surgical reconstruction * Patients between 18 and 35 years old * Patients with weekly sporting activities * Patients with chronic rotatory instability with a positive pivot shift * Patients who have been informed and do not object the research

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with multi-ligament knee involvement * Patients under 18 years old or over 35 years old * Patients with a BMI of under 18.5 or over 30 * Patients with any contraindication to general anaesthesia * Professional sportsmen/women * Patients with congenital malformation or a rheumatic disease * Patients with repeated antero crusader ligament (ACL) rupture * Patients with serious ligament disease in the contralateral knee * Patients who refuse to take part in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ligament re-rupture rate3 yearsClinical instability, laximetry, IRM

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tegner Lysholm scorePreoperatively, 1 year and 3 yearsSpecific knee questionnaire : patient-reported instrument that consists of subscales for pain, instability, locking, swelling, limp, stair climbing, squatting, and the need for support. Scores range from 0 (worse disability) to 100 (less disability).
Rolimeter testpre-operatively, 6 months, 1 year and 3 yearsAntero-posterior laximetry
International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee (IKDC) clinical scorepreoperatively, 1 year and 3 yearsInternational Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee allows a subjective assessment including symptoms, activity and knee function; is scored by summing the scores for the individual items and then transforming the score to a scale that ranges from 0 to 100 (no limitation with activities of daily living or sports activities and the absence of symptoms)
Knee radiographypreoperatively and 3 yearsDevelopment of osteoarthritis signs
Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) clinical scorepreoperative, 1 year and 3 yearsKnee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score is a specific knee questionnaire which evaluates : pain, symptoms, knee function in daily life, knee function in sport practice and quality of life. Scale : None (0) Mild Moderate Severe Extreme (4) Each subscale score is calculated independently. Calculate the mean score of the individual items of each subscale and divide by 4. Traditionally in orthopedics, 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates extreme problems
KiRA testpreoperatively, 6 months and 3 yearsRotatory laximetry

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026