Skip to content

Evaluating Wound Healing With Next Science Gel & Wash.

Assessment of the Improvement of Wound Healing Rate and Wound Bioburden With the Combination of Next Science BlastX Antimicrobial Wound Gel and TorrentX Wound Wash

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03738579
Enrollment
10
Registered
2018-11-13
Start date
2018-10-17
Completion date
2019-06-25
Last updated
2023-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Wound

Keywords

biofilm, EPS matrix, antimicrobial

Brief summary

This is a 12-week, single-site, open-label prospective study in adult with a chronic wound diagnosis. Subjects will be randomized in equal numbers to either the control treatment arm, antimicrobial control treatment arm, or Next Science treatment arm and will receive this treatment until the wound is completely healed or they are exited from the study. Subjects will have a weekly in-office debridement visit for up to 12 weeks.

Detailed description

This is a 12-week, single-site, open-label prospective study in adult subjects ages 18 years of age and older with a chronic wound diagnosis. There will be 15 completed subjects with up to 18 enrolled. Subjects will be randomized in equal numbers to control group (Mepilex Foam dressing); antimicrobial control group (Mepilex Ag Foam dressing); or Next Science group (TorrentX irrigation, BlastX application, and Mepilex foam dressing). Subjects will receive this treatment until the wound is completely healed or they are exited from the study. Subjects will have a weekly in-office debridement visit for up to 12 weeks. For the Next Science arm, TorrentX will be used during in-office debridement whereas BlastX will be applied once during the in-office visit and then mid-week with dressing change. DNA and plate count analysis will be taken at maximum of 5 time points: baseline/randomization visit, maximum of 3 treatment visits (Visits 3, 5, and 9), and Visit 13/Study exit (if applicable), with cultures taken pre- and post- debridement. Wound measurements will be taken via imaging from Silhouette camera system at every in-clinic visit.

Interventions

DEVICEAntibacterial Control Group

Foam Dressing AG will be used in conjunction with standard of care for chronic wound management, such as debridement and irrigation.

DEVICENext Science Group

TorrentX Wound Wash will be used for irrigation and then BlastX Wound Gel will be applied to the wound after debridement/irrigation during in-clinic visits. BlastX Wound Gel will be re-applied again during mid-week dressing change. Dressing used will be plain foam dressing from control group arm.

DEVICEControl Group

Foam Dressing will be used in conjunction with standard of care for chronic wound management, such as debridement and irrigation.

Sponsors

Next Science TM
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study model is modified psuedo-factorial design with a parallel base. The Next Science treatment arm (using TorrentX Wound Wash and BlastX Wound Gel) is compared against 2 controls, one using a standard dressing and another using a standard dressing with an antimicrobial component.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female 18 years or older 2. Presence of full-thickness chronic wound for more than one month (i.e. chronic) 3. Ulcer must be greater than 1 cm2 to enable biofilm sampling 4. He/she is determined to NOT require endovascular or vascular reconstructive surgery to restore blood flow to the wound within the study period 5. Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study 6. Provide signed and dated informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects unable to provide signed and dated informed consent 2. Male or female less than 18 years old 3. Presence of a full-thickness chronic wound for less than one month 4. Subjects with a history of bleeding dyscrasia or with medical conditions that would make a bleeding complication likely 5. Subjects whose wound is less than 1 cm2 6. He/she requires endovascular or surgical arterial intervention during the study period 7. Subject with known allergic reaction to the study products ingredients 8. Wound, in the investigator's clinical judgment, is not amenable to management solely with the techniques described in this study (i.e., should be managed in addition with hyperbaric oxygen, vacuum suction, or other adjunctive methods)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound Size and Volume12 weeksSignificantly Reduced Wound Size and Volume (measured using Aranz Aranz Medical Silhouette Imaging System) at One or More of the Measured Time Points with Next Science Group compared to Control Group(s)
Wound Closure12 weeksSignificantly Earlier Wound Time to Closure at One or More of the Measured Time Points with Next Science Group compared to Control Group(s)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Colony Forming Units12 weeksReduction of viable bacteria in the Next Science test group at one or more of the time points compared to the control group(s) as measured by Colony Forming Units.
DNA Quantification12 weeksReduction of bacteria in the Next Science test group at one or more of the times points compared to the control group(s) as measured by DNA quantification.
Bacterial species change12 weeksChanges in bacterial species will also be analyzed

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026