Skip to content

Narcotrend Versus Bispectral Index Monitoring During Sufentanil-Midazolam Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy

Narcotrend Versus Bispectral Index Monitoring During Sufentanil-Midazolam Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy Under Conscious Sedation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03738137
Enrollment
80
Registered
2018-11-13
Start date
2018-08-01
Completion date
2019-01-30
Last updated
2019-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchoscopy

Keywords

Narcotrend, Bispectral index, Bronchoscopy, Conscious Sedation

Brief summary

This study was aimed to determine whether narcotrend monitoring was better than bispectral index monitoring during sufentanil-midazolam anesthesia for bronchoscopy under conscious sedation. Patients were randomised to receive Narcotrend, Bispectral Index(BIS) monitoring or without monitoring. Midazolam was given by non-anaesthetist physicians to achieve moderate levels of sedation as assessed by the narcotrend index (NI; B and C) or bispectral index (BIS; between 70 and 85) or according to patient's tolerance assessed by physician . The primary end-point was dosage of midazolam. Other end-points included adverse events, patient tolerance and physician satisfaction.

Interventions

DEVICENarotrend

Narcotrend motoring

DEVICEBIS

Bispectral index monitoring

DRUGSufentanil

sufentanil is applied.

DRUGLidocaine

Topical Anesthesia

DRUGMidazolam

midazolam is applied.

Sponsors

Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

ASA grade I-II

Exclusion criteria

1. psychological disorders 2. SpO2\<90% in ambient air 3. hypersensitivity or allergy to anaesthetic drugs or benzodiazepine 4. severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (forced expiratory volume in 1 s ,50% of predicted value, requirement for oxygen therapy) 5. unstable haemodynamic status 6. habitual alcohol consumption

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dosage of Midazoamduring the proceduredosage of midazolam

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
patient's subjective tolerance30minutes after bronchoscopythe intensity of four key symptoms during bronchoscopy (pain, nausea, breathlessness and cough) and memory using a visual analogic scale (VAS: 1 mm: excellent tolerance, 100 mm very low tolerance)
patient's global tolerance assessed by operator30minutes after bronchoscopythe global tolerance of patient to the procedure using a visual analogic scale (VAS: 1 mm: excellent tolerance, 100 mm very low tolerance)
adverse events rateevery 3 minutes during the procedure and at 5, 15 and 30 minutes thereafter.hypotension (systolic BP \<100 mmHg or mean arterial blood pressure (MAP)\<60 mmHg), tachycardia (fC\>100/min and/or a variation of \>20% from baseline value), oxygen desaturation (SaO2 decrease\<90% for \>30 s), bradycardia (HR\<50/min).

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026