Skip to content

Dental Implants With a SLActive® vs. SLA® Surface

A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess Intra-patient Clinical Performance of Dental Implants With a SLActive® vs. SLA® Surface

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03737357
Enrollment
70
Registered
2018-11-09
Start date
2019-10-09
Completion date
2023-06-23
Last updated
2025-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Partially Edentulous Patients

Keywords

dental implants, SLActive® surface, biomarkers, BLT implant

Brief summary

This post-market study is to show that dental implants with a SLActive® surface (SLActive® implants) show non-inferior clinical performance compared to dental implants with a SLA® surface (SLA® implants). The primary hypothesis is that 12 months after implant loading, the bone loss around the SLActive® implants will not be appreciably greater than around the SLA® implants. The occurrence of adverse events and device deficiencies will also be recorded to confirm once more the safety of the Straumann® Bone Level Tapered (BLT), Roxolid® implant. Osseointegration and anti-inflammatory potential of SLActive® implants will be evaluated in the study as secondary endpoints.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, paired sample, multi-center clinical study. Eight visits per patient are scheduled in this study. The final analysis will be conducted after all patients completed the 12-month visit. The study devices are CE- (Conformité Européenne, meaning European Conformity) marked products and used within their intended use. Two centers in Spain will participate.

Interventions

DEVICESLActive® implant

One study test (SLActive® surface) (and simultaneously, in a split-mouth design one study control (SLA® surface) implant (Bone Level Tapered, Roxolid®)) will be placed in two different quadrants of partially edentulous patients. The implants will be placed at premolars, molars and canine positions in the mandible and maxilla (healed extraction sites). Implants will be restored with a single crown or splinted restorations 8 weeks after implant placement.

DEVICESLA® implant

One study test (SLActive® surface) (and simultaneously, in a split-mouth design one study control (SLA® surface) implant (Bone Level Tapered, Roxolid®)) will be placed in two different quadrants of partially edentulous patients. The implants will be placed at premolars, molars and canine positions in the mandible and maxilla (healed extraction sites). Implants will be restored with a single crown or splinted restorations 8 weeks after implant placement.

Sponsors

Institut Straumann AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* males and females, at least 18 years old * partially edentulous patients in need of two or more dental implants (canine to molars) placed in two different quadrants in healed sites (3 months post extraction) * subject must have voluntarily signed the informed consent, is willing and able to attend scheduled follow-up visits, and agrees that the encoded data will be collected and analyzed

Exclusion criteria

* any contraindications for oral surgical procedures * dental implant placement contraindicated according to Instructions for Use (IFU) * subjects with inadequate oral hygiene (FMPS ≥ 20%) * subjects who are currently heavy smokers (defined \>10 cigarettes per day or \>1 cigar per day) or who use chewing tobacco * subjects with drug or alcohol abuse * patients requiring soft tissue and bone grafting procedures * inadequate bone volume * severe bruxism or clenching habits * women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant at any point during the study duration. * patients who have systemic factors that could interfere with the healing process of either bone or soft tissue or the osseointegration process (e.g. bone metabolism disturbances, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, anticoagulation drugs/ hemorrhagic diatheses) * patients with local factors that could interfere with the healing process, such as untreated periodontal diseases, acute infection of implant site, temporomandibular joint disorders, treatable pathologic diseases of the jaw and changes in the oral mucosa) * conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance, or unreliability.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone Level Change 12 Months After Implant Loading12 months after implant loadingThe primary efficacy objective of this study was to confirm the performance of the SLActive® implants by means of bone level change 12 months after implant loading, as described in the CIP (CR2017-05, v03).
Occurrence of Adverse Device Effects and Device Deficiencies That Could Have Led to a Serious Adverse Device Effect12 months after implant loadingOccurrence of adverse device effects and device deficiencies that could have led to a serious adverse device effect

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsAt implant placement, 1 and 4 weeks after implant placementChange in inflammatory and anti-inflammatory biomarkers (IL-10, IL-4, IL-6, IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, IL-2) concentrations in gingival crevicular fluid samples.
Change in Osseointegration Biomarkers Concentrations1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks after implant placementChange in osseointegration biomarkers ( VEGF, osteocalcin (OCN), osteopontin (OPN)) concentrations in gingival crevicular fluid samples.
Implant Survival12 months after implant loadingImplant survival at 12 months after implant loading

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were screened at 2 investigational centers in Spain

Pre-assignment details

A total of 70 patients were screened. Of those, 68 subjects were enrolled

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SLActive® Implant
SLActive® implant: One study test (SLActive® surface) (and simultaneously, in a split-mouth design one study control (SLA® surface) implant (Bone Level Tapered, Roxolid®)) will be placed in two different quadrants of partially edentulous patients. The implants will be placed at premolars, molars and canine positions in the mandible and maxilla (healed extraction sites). Implants will be restored with a single crown or splinted restorations 8 weeks after implant placement.
68
SLActive® Implant
SLActive® implant: One study test (SLActive® surface) (and simultaneously, in a split-mouth design one study control (SLA® surface) implant (Bone Level Tapered, Roxolid®)) will be placed in two different quadrants of partially edentulous patients. The implants will be placed at premolars, molars and canine positions in the mandible and maxilla (healed extraction sites). Implants will be restored with a single crown or splinted restorations 8 weeks after implant placement.
68
SLA® Implant
SLA® implant: One study test (SLActive® surface) (and simultaneously, in a split-mouth design one study control (SLA® surface) implant (Bone Level Tapered, Roxolid®)) will be placed in two different quadrants of partially edentulous patients. The implants will be placed at premolars, molars and canine positions in the mandible and maxilla (healed extraction sites). Implants will be restored with a single crown or splinted restorations 8 weeks after implant placement.
68
SLA® Implant
SLA® implant: One study test (SLActive® surface) (and simultaneously, in a split-mouth design one study control (SLA® surface) implant (Bone Level Tapered, Roxolid®)) will be placed in two different quadrants of partially edentulous patients. The implants will be placed at premolars, molars and canine positions in the mandible and maxilla (healed extraction sites). Implants will be restored with a single crown or splinted restorations 8 weeks after implant placement.
68
Total272

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalSLA® ImplantSLActive® Implant
Age, Continuous56 years56 years56 years
Number of Implants1.2 Implants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
1.2 Implants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
1.2 Implants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
Number of missing teeth10.5 Teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
10.5 Teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
10.5 Teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
Number of planned implants3.1 Implants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
3.1 Implants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
3.1 Implants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
European
134 Participants67 Participants67 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Other
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants35 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
66 Participants33 Participants33 Participants
Smoking status (never, past, current)
Current smoker (<= 10 cigarettes per day)
20 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Smoking status (never, past, current)
Current smoker (> 10 cigarettes per day)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Smoking status (never, past, current)
Current smoker (>1 cigar per day)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Smoking status (never, past, current)
Current smoker (1 cigar per day)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Smoking status (never, past, current)
Current smoker (e-cigs)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Smoking status (never, past, current)
Never smoked
52 Participants26 Participants26 Participants
Smoking status (never, past, current)
Past smoker (<10 years since cessation)
26 Participants13 Participants13 Participants
Smoking status (never, past, current)
Past smoker (>=10 years since cessation)
38 Participants19 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 680 / 68
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 6826 / 68
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 682 / 68

Outcome results

Primary

Bone Level Change 12 Months After Implant Loading

The primary efficacy objective of this study was to confirm the performance of the SLActive® implants by means of bone level change 12 months after implant loading, as described in the CIP (CR2017-05, v03).

Time frame: 12 months after implant loading

Population: Per protocol Population: defined as each eligible study subject with one study control and one study test implant and who performed all follow-up visits.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SLActive® ImplantBone Level Change 12 Months After Implant Loading0.214 mmStandard Deviation 0.391
SLA® ImplantBone Level Change 12 Months After Implant Loading0.056 mmStandard Deviation 0.093
p-value: 0.074t-test, 1 sided
Primary

Occurrence of Adverse Device Effects and Device Deficiencies That Could Have Led to a Serious Adverse Device Effect

Occurrence of adverse device effects and device deficiencies that could have led to a serious adverse device effect

Time frame: 12 months after implant loading

Population: The SAF populations defined as all patients who were enrolled in the study and who received a study device

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SLActive® ImplantOccurrence of Adverse Device Effects and Device Deficiencies That Could Have Led to a Serious Adverse Device EffectNumber of ADE14 events
SLActive® ImplantOccurrence of Adverse Device Effects and Device Deficiencies That Could Have Led to a Serious Adverse Device EffectNumber of DD0 events
SLA® ImplantOccurrence of Adverse Device Effects and Device Deficiencies That Could Have Led to a Serious Adverse Device EffectNumber of ADE20 events
SLA® ImplantOccurrence of Adverse Device Effects and Device Deficiencies That Could Have Led to a Serious Adverse Device EffectNumber of DD0 events
Secondary

Change in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers Concentrations

Change in inflammatory and anti-inflammatory biomarkers (IL-10, IL-4, IL-6, IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, IL-2) concentrations in gingival crevicular fluid samples.

Time frame: At implant placement, 1 and 4 weeks after implant placement

Population: Intention To Treat (ITT) population: each eligible and randomized study patient who received control and test implants in two different quadrants and from whom at least one follow-up measurement after placement is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SLActive® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (IL-6) at implant placement437.4 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 1056.2
SLActive® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (IL-6) at implant Week 417.2 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 77.4
SLActive® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (IL-1B) at implant placement11.3 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 26.8
SLActive® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (IL-1B) at Week 429.2 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 65.8
SLActive® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (TNF-a) at implant placement13.3 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 36.4
SLActive® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (TNF-a) at Week 414.2 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 25.7
SLActive® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (IL-2) at implant placement1.9 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 3.1
SLActive® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (IL-2) at Week 10.4 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0.5
SLActive® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsAnti-inflammation (IL-10) at implant placement18.3 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 35.2
SLActive® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsAnti-inflammation (IL-10) at Week 422.5 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 40
SLActive® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsAnti-inflammation (IL-4) at implant placement3.7 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 7.3
SLActive® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsAnti-inflammation (IL-4) at Week 43.3 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 3.6
SLA® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsAnti-inflammation (IL-4) at implant placement5.7 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.5
SLA® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (IL-6) at implant placement508.3 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 1296.7
SLA® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (IL-2) at implant placement1.7 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.8
SLA® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (IL-6) at implant Week 48.6 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 38.5
SLA® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsAnti-inflammation (IL-10) at Week 428.0 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 51.3
SLA® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (IL-1B) at implant placement8.4 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 17.2
SLA® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (IL-2) at Week 10.9 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 2
SLA® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (IL-1B) at Week 435.2 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 88.1
SLA® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsAnti-inflammation (IL-4) at Week 43.6 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 4.5
SLA® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (TNF-a) at implant placement13.0 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 30.1
SLA® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsAnti-inflammation (IL-10) at implant placement17.7 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 44.4
SLA® ImplantChange in Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers ConcentrationsInflammation (TNF-a) at Week 420.1 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 46.3
Secondary

Change in Osseointegration Biomarkers Concentrations

Change in osseointegration biomarkers ( VEGF, osteocalcin (OCN), osteopontin (OPN)) concentrations in gingival crevicular fluid samples.

Time frame: 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks after implant placement

Population: ITT population: each eligible and randomized study patient who received control and test implants in two different quadrants and from whom at least one follow-up measurement after placement is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SLActive® ImplantChange in Osseointegration Biomarkers ConcentrationsVEGF-a at implant placement39.3 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 295.2
SLActive® ImplantChange in Osseointegration Biomarkers ConcentrationsVEGF-a at 4 weeks73.6 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 504.4
SLActive® ImplantChange in Osseointegration Biomarkers ConcentrationsOCN at implant placement760.3 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 1394.5
SLActive® ImplantChange in Osseointegration Biomarkers ConcentrationsOCN at 8 weeks159.8 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 79.6
SLActive® ImplantChange in Osseointegration Biomarkers ConcentrationsOPN at implant placement6064.2 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 11713.2
SLActive® ImplantChange in Osseointegration Biomarkers ConcentrationsOPN at 8 weeks939.3 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 1677.1
SLA® ImplantChange in Osseointegration Biomarkers ConcentrationsOPN at implant placement4419.0 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 7887
SLA® ImplantChange in Osseointegration Biomarkers ConcentrationsVEGF-a at implant placement26.0 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 272.7
SLA® ImplantChange in Osseointegration Biomarkers ConcentrationsOCN at 8 weeks117.7 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 76.3
SLA® ImplantChange in Osseointegration Biomarkers ConcentrationsVEGF-a at 4 weeks28.6 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 573.5
SLA® ImplantChange in Osseointegration Biomarkers ConcentrationsOPN at 8 weeks876.6 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 1789.8
SLA® ImplantChange in Osseointegration Biomarkers ConcentrationsOCN at implant placement2408.6 picograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 8935.4
Secondary

Implant Survival

Implant survival at 12 months after implant loading

Time frame: 12 months after implant loading

Population: ITT population - defined as each eligible and randomized study patient who received control and test implants in two different quadrants and from whom at least one follow-up measurement after placement is available

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SLActive® ImplantImplant Survival3 number of lost implants
SLA® ImplantImplant Survival2 number of lost implants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026