Skip to content

Testing Feasibility of Motivational Interviewing for Patient-Reported Cancer Pain Goals

Testing Feasibility of Motivational Interviewing for Patient-Reported Cancer Pain Goals

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03736746
Enrollment
54
Registered
2018-11-09
Start date
2018-11-16
Completion date
2019-08-02
Last updated
2022-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Other Cancer

Keywords

Other Cancer

Brief summary

This research study is evaluating the acceptability and feasibility of using a cognitive behavioral intervention called Motivational Interviewing to help persons with pain from cancer set goals for managing that pain.

Detailed description

This study is being conducted to evaluate a new way that clinicians can help identify the goals that cancer participants have for managing their pain. This new method uses discussion between a patient and a clinician, in this case a registered nurse, during which one or more goals may be set. At this time, there are no tested methods that clinicians can use for helping patients set these kinds of goals.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMotivational Interviewing

An investigator-led discussion about the participant's pain experience which is focused on the participant reporting of functional pain goals (FPGs)

Sponsors

Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing
CollaboratorOTHER
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least 18-years of age * Has an appointment with DFCI ambulatory palliative care service for cancer-related pain * Can speak English

Exclusion criteria

-Diagnosis of delirium or other cognitive impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of Motivational Interviewing intervention1 yearThe proportion of enrolled participants completing at least one follow-up Motivational Interviewing session (at least two sessions total). The proportion of participants completing at least one follow-up intervention session will be estimated along with an exact 90% confidence interval.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant intervention acceptability1 yearThe Participant Experience Questionnaire, developed by the investigator, will be used to summarize overall patient-reported acceptability in this study. Summary measures of median/range and mean/SD for total categorical scores, the time in weeks from the initial to follow-up intervention visit, and the number of completed intervention sessions will be reported.
Attitudinal barriers to pain1 yearAttitudinal barriers to pain management will be measured using the Barriers Questionnaire-II which measures four attitudinal realms with 27 self-rated questions about pain beliefs. The total score will be calculated at study entry and after the first follow-up visit and scores will be summarized (median/range, mean/SD). If additional sessions are completed, the scores will be plotted over time and trends will be explored with graphical methods.
Motivational Interviewing intervention usage rate1 yearThe number of interventions sessions attended divided by the total possible number of interventions sessions reported as the sample mean.
Observed engagement in goals-setting1 yearObserved engagement will be evaluated using the instrument developed by the investigator for this study in which discussions of behaviors indicating active goal setting will be tabulated and salient quotes will be extracted for dissemination. Categories are: 1. pain as an obstacle 2. what helped pain before 3. life with controlled pain 4. suggestions to control pain 5. suggestions actually used 6. help-seeking
Motivational Interviewing intervention fidelity1 yearFidelity to Motivational Interviewing methods will be assessed on 33% of interviews using the Motivational Interviewing Skills for Health Care Encounters which is used to evaluate the degree to which the person providing the intervention follows five domains key to Motivational Interviewing.The domains are: 1. Motivational Interviewing philosophy 2. health interviewing 3. motivation 4. Motivational Interviewing principles 5. interpersonal process Each domain has specific behaviors that are rated as: 1. deficient 2. developing 3. accomplished 4. not applicable
Pain Self-Efficacy1 yearPain self-efficacy will be measured using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in which participants rate their confidence in daily living activities despite pain using a Likert-type scale.The total score will be calculated at study entry and after the first follow-up visit and scores will be summarized (median/range, mean/SD). If additional sessions are completed, the scores will be plotted over time and trends will be explored with graphical methods.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026