Skip to content

High-Frequency Oscillation Ventilation Versus Conventional Mechanical Ventilation in Very Preterm Infants With Perinatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Multicenters Randomized Controlled, Superiority Trial

High-Frequency Oscillation Ventilation Versus Conventional Mechanical Ventilation in Very Preterm Infants With Perinatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Multicenters Randomized Controlled, Superiority Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03736707
Acronym
HFOV for ARDS
Enrollment
400
Registered
2018-11-09
Start date
2025-10-01
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Conventional Mechanical Ventilation, High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation, Preterm

Brief summary

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a complex disorder and remains the most common complication in very preterm infants. Its incidence is increased with gestational age from 95.5% among infants born at 22 weeks' gestation to 22.2% among those born at 29 weeks' gestation. BPD is associated with the increased risks of delayed neurodevelopment and pulmonary impairment. High incidences of BPD and morbidities indicate inadequacy of current management guidelines of BPD.3 Caffeine reduces the development of BPD by lowering the duration of intubation.4 How to further reduce the risk of BPD and the duration of invasive ventilation remain the key focus for neonatologists.

Detailed description

Before 2017, the management guideline of pediatric and adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exclude perinatal triggers-induced ARDS. Moreover, there is insufficient evidence to recommend high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) as the preferred fist-line therapy in pediatric and adult ARDS. In contrast, HFOV may benefit preterm baboons with acute pulmonary dysfunction-typically due to respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)-by using low tidal volume, supra-physiologically higher respiratory rate, and lower peak inspiratory pressure to enhance oxygenation and gas exchange. The team also reported that use of HFOV is associated with a modest reduction referring to BPD. However, European consensus guideline of RDS only recommend HFOV being a reasonable alternative to CMV when high pressure is needed to achieve adequate lung inflation. Because randomized controlled trials in humans have yielded inconsistent findings. These differences between animal models-where RDS was induced and treated with surfactant alone-and clinical scenarios, where preterm birth often involved complex etiologies requiring both surfactant and antibiotics for placental insufficiency or intrauterine infection, may be the diagnosis of RDS and ARDS or the mixture of RDS and ARDS. Such findings highlighted the lack of robust evidence for optimizing ventilation strategies in preterm infants born \<32 weeks with perinatal ARDS, and the need for well-designed multi-center randomized controlled trials in this high-risk population.

Interventions

DEVICEHFOV

HFOV + volume guarantee (VG) as the intervention group HFOV was provided only with piston or membrane oscillators capable of delivering true oscillatory pressure with an active expiratory phase (i.e., Acutronic FABIAN-III, SLE 5000, Löwenstein Med LEONI+, or Sensormedics 3100A). Other machines offering high frequency ventilation were excluded. The lung recruitment maneuver was performed as previously described, and lung volume was assessed by chest radiography or lung ultrasound, targeting the right diaphragm at the level of 8th-9th rib (or 7th-8th rib in case of air leak). Crossover between HFOV and CMV This study allowed infants who failed to respond to their assigned ventilation mode to receive a trial of the alternate mode. Crossover criteria for HFOV-assigned neonates included failure for 3 hours to maintain SpO2 ≥ 50% despite FiO2 of 1.0, PaCO2 \> 60 mmHg for 3 hours, or signs of ventilator-induced cardiac output reduction. Non-responders to HFOV were switched to CMV.

DEVICECMV

CMV as the standard group CMV was delivered by time-cycled, pressure-limited ventilators. Only pressure regulated volume control (PRVC) will be provided by any type of neonatal ventilator. Crossover criteria for CMV-assigned neonates included failure for 3 hours to maintain SpO2 ≥ 50% despite FiO2 of 1.0, PaCO2 \> 60 mmHg for 3 hours, or requiring \> 30 cm H2O PIP to sustain ventilation. Non-responders to CMV were switched to HFOV. Ventilator settings were adjusted at the discretion of the attending clinician to maintain a SpO2 between 90%-94%, a PaO2 between 50 and 80 mm Hg and a PaCO2 between 35 and 60 mm Hg and a pH between 7.20 and 7.45. PO2 and PCO2 levels were monitored using arterial blood gas analysis and/or transcutaneous monitoring in both groups.

Sponsors

Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Jiulongpo No.1 People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Chongqing Maternal and Child Health Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital of The Capital Institute of Pediatrics
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University Third Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
First Hospital of Tsinghua University
CollaboratorOTHER
Women and Children's Hospital, Branch of Chongqing Sanxia Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Quanzhou Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Xiamen Maternity & Child Care Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhujiang Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangdong Academy of Medical Science and General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangdong Women and Children Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Women and Children's Health Hospital of Yulin
CollaboratorOTHER
Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Guiyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First People's Hospital of Zunyi
CollaboratorOTHER
Lanzhou University Second Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Gansu Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
LanZhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhengzhou Children's Hospital, China
CollaboratorOTHER
Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hainan Province
CollaboratorOTHER
Bethune International Peace Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Hospital of Jilin University
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital of Fudan University
CollaboratorOTHER
Maternal and Children's Healthcare Hospital of Taian
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Hospital of Shandong University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanxi Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Chengdu Women and Children's Center Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Hospital Of Southwest Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Medical College of Jinan University
CollaboratorOTHER
Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics
CollaboratorOTHER
People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
CollaboratorOTHER
Kunming Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First People's Hospital of Yunnan
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Yan'an Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Women and Children's Health Hospital of Qujing
CollaboratorOTHER
The People's Hospital of Dehong Autonomous Prefecture
CollaboratorOTHER
The First People's Hospital of Yinchuan
CollaboratorOTHER
The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang University
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing 302 Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Hunan Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Women and Children Hospital of Qinghai Province
CollaboratorOTHER
Jiangxi Province Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Mianyang Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
People's Liberation Army No.202 Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Ningbo Women & Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai Children's Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Nanjing Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Xianyang Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Qinhuangdao Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Xuzhou Children Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The caregivers will not be blinded, and the outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the intervention.

Intervention model description

Very preterm neonates with perinatal acute respiratory distress syndrome will be randomized and assigned to high frequency oscillation ventilation (HFOV) or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Minutes to 1 Hours
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. GA was between 24+0 and 31+6 weeks. 2. Preterm neonates were admitted to NICU within 1 hours after birth, diagnosed with perinatal ARDS using Montreux guidelines and stable supported by CMV. 3. Stabilization for 2 hours before randomization: FiO2 0.40, mean airway pressure (MAP) 10-14 cmH2O, ≤ 40 bpm of respiratory rate, 90%-94% of SpO2, pH \> 7.20, PaCO2 60 mmHg, tidal volume of 5 ml/kg and \> 35% of hematocrit (these may be evaluated by arterial blood gas analysis).

Exclusion criteria

Neonates were not included if any of the following criteria were met: 1. Parents or guardians' decision not to participate. 2. Major congenital anomalies or chromosomal abnormalities 3. Need for surgery or more than grade 2nd of IVH before randomization.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia(BPD)36 weeks' gestational ageBPD is defined according to the 2019 diagnostic criteria. For infants discharged before 36 weeks' GA, BPD severity was assessed based on respiratory support at the time of discharge. Infants receiving no supplemental respiratory support were divided into no BPD, those treated with nasal cannula (≤ 2 L/min) as grade 1 BPD, those treated with nasal cannula (\> 2 L/min) or noninvasive positive airway pressure as grade 2 BPD and those treated with invasive mechanical ventilation as grade 3 BPD.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mortality36 weeks' gestational age or before dischargethe included neonates were diagnosed with death
air leak (pneumothorax and/or pneumomediastinum) occurred36 weeks' gestational age or before dischargethe included neonates were diagnosed with air leak
the incidence of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA)36 weeks' gestational age or before dischargethe included neonates were diagnosed with hsPDA.
duration of invasive ventilation36 weeks' gestational ageduration of invasive ventilation for HFOV or CMV
the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)≥2nd stages36 weeks' gestational age or before dischargethe development of NEC, specifically focusing on cases classified as Bell's stage ≥2, according to the modified Bell's staging criteria for NEC.
intraventricular hemorrhage(IVH)>2nd grade36 weeks' gestational age or before dischargeIVH with grades 1-4 were defined by Papile et al
the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity(ROP)> 2nd grades36 weeks' gestational age or before dischargeROP was categorized according to the International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, revised in 2005

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026