Skip to content

Carvedilol for Prevention of Esophageal Varices Progression

Clinical Study of Carvedilol for the Prevention of the Progression of Esophageal Varices in Hepatitis B Related Cirrhotic Patients With Anti-Viral Therapy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03736265
Acronym
Carvedilol
Enrollment
240
Registered
2018-11-09
Start date
2017-10-09
Completion date
2022-12-30
Last updated
2022-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cirrhosis, Liver, Portal Hypertension

Keywords

Portal Hypertension, Esophageal varices, Carvedilol

Brief summary

Carvedilol has been shown to be more potent in decreasing portal hypertension to propranolol. But the efficacy of carvedilol to delay the growth of esophageal varices in chronic hepatitis B patients was unclear.

Detailed description

It has been concluded 40%-70% of chronic hepatitis B patients can achieve fibrosis/ cirrhosis reversion after effective anti-viral therapy. But there is still some patients progress to decompensation. Esophageal varices are the main complication of cirrhotic patients. Propranolol are widely used to prevent variceal bleeding in patients with large esophageal varices. It has been shown the efficacy of propranolol in the preventing of the progression from small to large varices reported no effect. Recently, carvedilol has been shown to be more potent in decreasing portal hypertension to propranolol. But the efficacy of carvedilol to delay the growth of esophageal varices in chronic hepatitis B patients was unclear. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of carvedilol in the preventing of the progression from small to large varices in hepatitis B patients.

Interventions

DRUGCarvedilol

Carvedilol is started at a dose of 6.25 mg once daily. After 1 week, this will increased to a dose of 12.5 mg once daily. Target dose of 12.5 mg once daily will be maintained if systolic blood pressure does not fall below 90 mm Hg and HR 50 beats per minute.

Sponsors

Beijing Friendship Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or Female; * HBV-related liver cirrhotic patients with at least two years of antiviral therapy; * The presence of small or medium esophageal varices without red color sign; * HBV-DNA\<1×10E3 IU/ml * Signature of informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Previous presence of decompensated cirrhosis including ascites, bleeding and HE (hepatic encephalopathy); * Any contra-indications to beta-blockers including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, allergic rhinitis, NYHA (New York Heart Association) class IV heart failure, atrioventricular block, sinus bradycardia (HR \< 50 bpm), cardiogenic shock, hypotension (SBP \< 90 mmHg), sick sinus syndrome, insulin dependent diabetes, peripheral vascular disease. * Allergic to Carvedilol; * Any malignancy that affects survival; * Renal dysfunction; * History of beta-blockers within last 3 months; * History of surgery for portal hypertension;History of prior EVL (endoscopic variceal ligation) or sclerotherapy, history of surgery for portal hypertension including portosystemic shunts, disconnection and spleen resection and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; * Severe systemic diseases; * Refusal to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The progression Incidence of esophageal varices.2 yearsProgression of esophageal varices defines as follows: 1. Varices developed from small(F1) to medium or large(F2/F3) 2. Varices developed from medium(F2) to large(F3) 3. Bleeding from esophageal varices.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of liver cirrhosis decompensation2 yearsCumulative rate of liver decompensation (including ascites,hepatic encephalopathy) after 2 year.
The incidence of hepatic cellular carcinoma, death or liver transplantation.2 yearsCumulative rate of hepatic cellular carcinoma, death or liver transplantation after 2 year.
The progression rate of non-invasive scores (Child-Pugh、MELD、APRI、FIB-4 score).2 yearsThe progression rate of Child-Pugh、MELD、APRI、FIB-4 score after 2 years.
The dynamic change of liver stiffness quantified by transient elastography.2 yearsThe dynamic change of liver stiffness quantified by transient elastography after 2 years.
The dynamic change of hemodynamics parameter2 yearsThe dynamic change of hemodynamics (HR and mean arterial pressure) after 2 years.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026