Skip to content

Comparison of Effectiveness Between PL and PRP on Knee Osteoarthritis: a Prospective,Randomized,Placebo-controlled Trial

Comparison of Effectiveness Between Platelet Lysate and Platelet-rich Plasma on Knee Osteoarthritis: a Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03734900
Enrollment
150
Registered
2018-11-08
Start date
2018-05-15
Completion date
2022-05-14
Last updated
2021-09-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee

Brief summary

This study will focus on grade I to III knee osteoarthritis by randomized controlled trials which comparing the effectiveness between placebo, autologous platelet rich plasma and autologous platelet lysate injections.

Detailed description

The current methods for treating knee osteoarthritis include delaying the disease progression and joint replacement surgery. The usual treatment methods are mostly temporary, such as taking drug and hyaluronic acid injection. Therefore, finding the safe and effective methods will greatly reduce medical resource, medical expenses and surgery cost, etc., and restore the patient's quality of life. Platelet lysate is the product of complete activation from autologous platelet. It contains rich growth factors and cytokines such as PDGF, TGF-β, VEGF, EGF and IGF, etc. It can support cell growth and doesn't have any white blood cells in it. It is superior to the platelet rich plasma because of reducing the overall inflammatory response and pain of the patient during treatment.

Interventions

OTHERSaline injection

5ml Placebo infusion of 0.9% Sodium Chloride

BIOLOGICALPRP injection

Device: Aeon Acti-PRP 5ml autologous platelet rich plasma injection

BIOLOGICALPL injection

Device: Aeon Acti-PRP 5ml autologous platelet lysate injection

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 50 to 80 years old * Study Subjects must be willing to sign Informed Consent to participate in the study * In the past month, at least seven consecutive days in the squat, standing, walking or going up and down the stairs, the most serious degree of visual analogy of the knee pain (Visual Analogue Scale) is greater than or equal to 40 (the most pain is 100, not painful is 0) * Morning joint stiffness is less than 30 minutes * X-ray:Grade 1-3 radiographic OA as defined by the K-L classification

Exclusion criteria

* Knee instability * The knee joint is obviously deformed (\> 5 degree valgus or varus deviation on X-ray) * Clinical diagnosed as Pes tendinitis, Chondromalacia * Taking NSAIDs or steroids (including oral and injection) within one week * Using anticoagulant drugs for a long time * Platelet count is less than 150,000 / UL, or coagulation disorders, prothrombin time (PT value) is less than 11 seconds or greater than 16 seconds * Leukemia, sepsis, platelet dysfunction or other blood related diseases * tumors, infections or the trauma before the same site * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain score of the patientup to 24 weeks after surgeryUsing Visual Analog Score (from 0 to 10, 0 indicate no pain and 10 indicate maximal pain) to evaluate pain of surgical wound of the patient

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee functional scoreup to 24 weeks after surgeryUsing Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
X-rayup to 24 weeks after surgeryKnee X-ray image
Ultrasonic imageup to 24 weeks after surgeryUltrasonic-between thickness of the medial and lateral sides of the femoral condyle
adverse eventsup to 24 weeks after surgeryadverse events in clinical trial

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactWU Chueh-Hung, MD, CIPS
nojred@gmail.com0223123456
Backup ContactWang Tyng-Guey, MD
tgw@ntu.edu.tw0223123456

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026