Skip to content

An Investigation of the Impact of Localized Topical Anesthesia of the Ocular Surface on End-of-day Contact Lens Discomfort

An Investigation of the Impact of Localized Topical Anesthesia of the Ocular Surface on End-of-day Contact Lens Discomfort

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03733899
Enrollment
22
Registered
2018-11-07
Start date
2018-11-07
Completion date
2019-02-07
Last updated
2025-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Visual Acuity

Brief summary

This is a controlled, randomized, subject-masked, 3x3 crossover, non-dispensing, contralateral study. Twenty subjects will be recruited based on their scores (with their habitual lenses) from the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 and examined on four occasions.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTLocal Anesthesia

Minims Proxymetacaine hydrochloride Eye Drops

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTPlacebo

Sodium Chloride Solution

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study: 1. They are of legal age (18 years) and capacity of volunteer. 2. The subject must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form. 3. They must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol. 4. They have worn the same brand of soft spherical contact lenses for at least the previous three months, by self-report. 5. They are defined as 'symptomatic' contact lens wearers (CLDEQ-8 score of 20-37) with their habitual contact lenses. 6. They are willing to wear their lenses for approximately 14 hours on study days. 7. They have a wearable pair of spectacles, if applicable. 8. They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study. 9. They can attain high contrast logMAR visual acuity of 0.20 or better in their habitual contact lenses in each eye.

Exclusion criteria

* Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study: 1. They have an ocular disorder, which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. 2. They have a systemic disorder, which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. 3. They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment. 4. They have had cataract or corneal refractive surgery. 5. They are pregnant or breast-feeding by self-report. 6. They have any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis) or any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), by self-report. 7. They have any known hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any of the known ingredients in the anesthetic. 8. They have a history of severe allergic reaction or anaphylaxis. 9. They have a history of cardiac disease or hyperthyroidism. 10. They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study. 11. They are an employee or immediate family member of an employee of clinical site (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician). 12. They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus. 13. They have grade 3 or greater of any of the following ocular surface signs which would contraindicate contact lens wear: corneal edema, corneal vascularisation, corneal staining, tarsal conjunctival changes or any other abnormality which would normally contraindicate contact lens wear.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Comfort Scores5 and 10 Minutes post-treamentSubjects were asked to rate how comfortable each eye was overall using a visual analog scale of 0 to 100 where 0=worse comfort imaginable and 100=best comfort imaginable.
Change in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment14-Hours upon Lens-Insertion (pre-treatment), and 10 Minutes post-treamentSubjects were asked to rate how comfortable each eye was overall using a visual analog scale of 0 to 100 where 0=worse comfort imaginable and 100=best comfort imaginable. Subjects wore their habitual contacts during the pre-treatment assessment.
Subjective Comfort Score Difference Between Post-treatment and Post-insertion Within AnestheticImmediately after lens-insertion, 5 and 10 minutes post-treatmentSubjects were asked to rate how comfortable each eye was overall on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0=worse comfort imaginable and 100=best comfort imaginable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Subjective Comfort Between Ocular Regions at Posttreatment Within Anesthetic5 and 10 minutes post treatmentSubjects were asked to rate how comfortable each eye was overall on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0=worse comfort imaginable and 100=best comfort imaginable.
Change in Subjective Comfort From Pre-treatment to Post-Treatment Between Ocular Regions14 hours upon lens-insertion (pre-treatment), 5- and 10- minutes post-treatmentSubjects were asked to rate how comfortable each eye was overall on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0=worse comfort imaginable and 100=best comfort imaginable.
Subjective Comfort Difference Between Post-removal and Preinsertion Within Anesthetic and CorneaImmediately before lens-insertion (pre-insertion), 30 seconds after lens removalSubjects were asked to rate how comfortable each eye was overall on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0=worse comfort imaginable and 100=best comfort imaginable.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 22 subjects were enrolled in this study. Of those enrolled, 20 were dispensed at least one study lens while 2 subjects failed to meet all eligibility criteria. Of those dispensed, 17 completed the study while 3 subjects were discontinued.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Dispensed Subjects
All subjects dispensed at least one study lens.
20
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Period 1Protocol Violation000001
Period 2Unscuccessful Treatment010000
Period 3Withdrawal by Subject100000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Dispensed Subjects
Age, Continuous26.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 70
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
8 Count of Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African Amercian
2 Count of Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
10 Count of Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment

Subjects were asked to rate how comfortable each eye was overall using a visual analog scale of 0 to 100 where 0=worse comfort imaginable and 100=best comfort imaginable. Subjects wore their habitual contacts during the pre-treatment assessment.

Time frame: 14-Hours upon Lens-Insertion (pre-treatment), and 10 Minutes post-treament

Population: All randomized subjects regardless of actual treatment and subsequent withdrawl from the study or deviation from protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment10- Mintues Post Treatment18.50 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.265
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment5- Mintues Post Treatment79.25 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.925
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatmentPre-treatment62.35 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.238
Placebo- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment10- Mintues Post Treatment72.33 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.43
Placebo- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment5- Mintues Post Treatment70.93 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.838
Placebo- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatmentPre-treatment60.16 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.862
Test (Anesthetic) - Upper Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment10- Mintues Post Treatment65.11 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.766
Test (Anesthetic) - Upper Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment5- Mintues Post Treatment61.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.807
Test (Anesthetic) - Upper Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatmentPre-treatment56.67 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.867
Placebo- Upper Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment10- Mintues Post Treatment64.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.239
Placebo- Upper Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment5- Mintues Post Treatment61.94 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.783
Placebo- Upper Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatmentPre-treatment58.35 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.746
Test (Anesthetic)- Lower Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment10- Mintues Post Treatment70.79 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.511
Test (Anesthetic)- Lower Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment5- Mintues Post Treatment64.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.915
Test (Anesthetic)- Lower Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatmentPre-treatment60.11 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.669
Placebo- Lower Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment5- Mintues Post Treatment61.06 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.292
Placebo- Lower Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatmentPre-treatment57.94 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.939
Placebo- Lower Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Scores From Pre-treatment to Post-treatment10- Mintues Post Treatment63.17 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.667
Comparison: 5-Mintues Post Treatment95% CI: [-10.3, 14.4]Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: 10-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-12.1, 12.9]Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: 5-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-11.4, 12.1]Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: 10-Mintues Post Treatment95% CI: [-9.2, 14]Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: 5-Mintues Post Treatment95% CI: [-8.5, 14.3]Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: 10-Mintues Post Treatment95% CI: [-3.7, 18.8]Linear Mixed Model
Primary

Subjective Comfort Score Difference Between Post-treatment and Post-insertion Within Anesthetic

Subjects were asked to rate how comfortable each eye was overall on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0=worse comfort imaginable and 100=best comfort imaginable.

Time frame: Immediately after lens-insertion, 5 and 10 minutes post-treatment

Population: All randomized subjects regardless of actual treatment and subsequent withdrawal from study or deviation from protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaSubjective Comfort Score Difference Between Post-treatment and Post-insertion Within Anesthetic5-Minutes Post Treatment79.25 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.925
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaSubjective Comfort Score Difference Between Post-treatment and Post-insertion Within AnestheticImmediate Post Lens Insertion78.06 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.243
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaSubjective Comfort Score Difference Between Post-treatment and Post-insertion Within Anesthetic10 Minutes Post Treatment78.50 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.265
Placebo- CorneaSubjective Comfort Score Difference Between Post-treatment and Post-insertion Within Anesthetic5-Minutes Post Treatment61.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.807
Placebo- CorneaSubjective Comfort Score Difference Between Post-treatment and Post-insertion Within AnestheticImmediate Post Lens Insertion73.33 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 22.646
Placebo- CorneaSubjective Comfort Score Difference Between Post-treatment and Post-insertion Within Anesthetic10 Minutes Post Treatment65.11 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.766
Test (Anesthetic) - Upper Lid MarginSubjective Comfort Score Difference Between Post-treatment and Post-insertion Within AnestheticImmediate Post Lens Insertion80.37 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.064
Test (Anesthetic) - Upper Lid MarginSubjective Comfort Score Difference Between Post-treatment and Post-insertion Within Anesthetic10 Minutes Post Treatment70.79 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.511
Test (Anesthetic) - Upper Lid MarginSubjective Comfort Score Difference Between Post-treatment and Post-insertion Within Anesthetic5-Minutes Post Treatment64.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.915
Comparison: 10-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-16.7, 0.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: 5-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-13.2, 5.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: 10-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-13.9, 5.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: 5-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-24.4, -8.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: 10-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-17.8, -1.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: 5-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-20.6, -4.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Subjective Comfort Scores

Subjects were asked to rate how comfortable each eye was overall using a visual analog scale of 0 to 100 where 0=worse comfort imaginable and 100=best comfort imaginable.

Time frame: 5 and 10 Minutes post-treament

Population: All randomized subjects regardless of actual treatment and subsequent withdrawl from the study or deviation from protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaSubjective Comfort Scores5- Mintues Post Treatment79.25 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.925
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaSubjective Comfort Scores10- Mintues Post Treatment18.50 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.265
Placebo- CorneaSubjective Comfort Scores5- Mintues Post Treatment70.93 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.838
Placebo- CorneaSubjective Comfort Scores10- Mintues Post Treatment72.33 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.43
Test (Anesthetic) - Upper Lid MarginSubjective Comfort Scores5- Mintues Post Treatment61.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.807
Test (Anesthetic) - Upper Lid MarginSubjective Comfort Scores10- Mintues Post Treatment65.11 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.766
Placebo- Upper Lid MarginSubjective Comfort Scores5- Mintues Post Treatment61.94 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.783
Placebo- Upper Lid MarginSubjective Comfort Scores10- Mintues Post Treatment64.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.239
Test (Anesthetic)- Lower Lid MarginSubjective Comfort Scores5- Mintues Post Treatment64.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.915
Test (Anesthetic)- Lower Lid MarginSubjective Comfort Scores10- Mintues Post Treatment70.79 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.511
Placebo- Lower Lid MarginSubjective Comfort Scores5- Mintues Post Treatment61.06 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.292
Placebo- Lower Lid MarginSubjective Comfort Scores10- Mintues Post Treatment63.17 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.667
Comparison: 5-Mintues Post Treatment95% CI: [-7.3, 12.4]Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: 10-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-9.6, 11.5]Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: 5-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-8.2, 9.8]Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: 10-Mintues Post Treatment95% CI: [-6.5, 12.2]Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: 5-Mintues Post Treatment95% CI: [-5.7, 11.7]Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: 10-Mintues Post Treatment95% CI: [-1.4, 16.8]Linear Mixed Model
Secondary

Change in Subjective Comfort Between Ocular Regions at Posttreatment Within Anesthetic

Subjects were asked to rate how comfortable each eye was overall on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0=worse comfort imaginable and 100=best comfort imaginable.

Time frame: 5 and 10 minutes post treatment

Population: All randomized subjects regardless of actual treatment and subsequent withdrawal from study or deviation from protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort Between Ocular Regions at Posttreatment Within Anesthetic5-Minutes Post Treatment79.25 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.925
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort Between Ocular Regions at Posttreatment Within Anesthetic10 Minutes Post Treatment78.50 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.265
Placebo- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort Between Ocular Regions at Posttreatment Within Anesthetic5-Minutes Post Treatment61.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.807
Placebo- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort Between Ocular Regions at Posttreatment Within Anesthetic10 Minutes Post Treatment65.11 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.766
Test (Anesthetic) - Upper Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Between Ocular Regions at Posttreatment Within Anesthetic5-Minutes Post Treatment64.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.915
Test (Anesthetic) - Upper Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort Between Ocular Regions at Posttreatment Within Anesthetic10 Minutes Post Treatment70.79 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.511
Comparison: 10-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-8.7, 11.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: 5-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-1, 18]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: 10-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-3.5, 17]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: 5-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [1.6, 20.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Subjective Comfort From Pre-treatment to Post-Treatment Between Ocular Regions

Subjects were asked to rate how comfortable each eye was overall on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0=worse comfort imaginable and 100=best comfort imaginable.

Time frame: 14 hours upon lens-insertion (pre-treatment), 5- and 10- minutes post-treatment

Population: All randomized subjects regardless of actual treatment and subsequent withdrawal from study or deviation from protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort From Pre-treatment to Post-Treatment Between Ocular Regions5-Minutes Post Treatment79.25 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.925
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort From Pre-treatment to Post-Treatment Between Ocular RegionsPre-Treatment62.35 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.238
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort From Pre-treatment to Post-Treatment Between Ocular Regions10-Minutes Post Treatment78.50 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.265
Placebo- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort From Pre-treatment to Post-Treatment Between Ocular Regions5-Minutes Post Treatment61.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.807
Placebo- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort From Pre-treatment to Post-Treatment Between Ocular RegionsPre-Treatment56.67 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.867
Placebo- CorneaChange in Subjective Comfort From Pre-treatment to Post-Treatment Between Ocular Regions10-Minutes Post Treatment65.11 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.766
Test (Anesthetic) - Upper Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort From Pre-treatment to Post-Treatment Between Ocular RegionsPre-Treatment60.16 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.862
Test (Anesthetic) - Upper Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort From Pre-treatment to Post-Treatment Between Ocular Regions10-Minutes Post Treatment70.79 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.511
Test (Anesthetic) - Upper Lid MarginChange in Subjective Comfort From Pre-treatment to Post-Treatment Between Ocular Regions5-Minutes Post Treatment64.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.915
Comparison: 10-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-11.4, 12.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: 5-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-4.9, 19.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: 10-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-9.3, 15.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: 5-Minutes Post Treatment95% CI: [-4.9, 19.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Subjective Comfort Difference Between Post-removal and Preinsertion Within Anesthetic and Cornea

Subjects were asked to rate how comfortable each eye was overall on the scale of 0 to 100 where 0=worse comfort imaginable and 100=best comfort imaginable.

Time frame: Immediately before lens-insertion (pre-insertion), 30 seconds after lens removal

Population: All randomized subjects regardless of actual treatment and subsequent withdrawl from study or deviation from protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaSubjective Comfort Difference Between Post-removal and Preinsertion Within Anesthetic and CorneaPre-Insertion81.53 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.784
Test (Anesthetic)- CorneaSubjective Comfort Difference Between Post-removal and Preinsertion Within Anesthetic and CorneaPost-Removal69.12 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.508
95% CI: [-20.9, -3.9]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026