Skip to content

Optimal Treatment for Poor Efficacy of Entecavir in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Study on the Optimal Treatment for Poor Efficacy of Entecavir in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03733652
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-11-07
Start date
2018-11-15
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2018-11-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis b, Efficacy, Self

Keywords

Chronic Hepatitis B, entecavir

Brief summary

There are chronic hepatitis B patients with poor antiviral efficacy of entecavir in clinical practice. Tenofovir or interferon alfa is the optimal choice right now. The aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic effect of using tenofovir of interferon alfa in these patients.

Detailed description

There are chronic hepatitis B patients with poor antiviral efficacy of entecavir in clinical practice. Poor efficacy is defined as hepatitis b virus DNA is still positive and decreases \> 2 lg from baseline. Sequential therapy by using tenofovir or interferon alfa is the optimal choice right now. 100 patients with poor antiviral efficacy of entecavir will be recruited in this study. They are randomly divided into tenofovir group or interferon alfa group. The aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic effect of using tenofovir of interferon alfa in these patients.

Interventions

Patents are treated with interferon alfa 2a 180μg hypodermic injection once per week for 48 weeks. Then, interferon alfa 2a will be stopped if there is HBsAg clearance. Else, oral tenofovir 300mg once per day will be used if HBsAg is positive.

Sponsors

Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Hepatitis b virus DNA or HBsAg positive for over half a year; 2. Age from 18 to 65; 3. With poor efficacy of entecavir: Hepatitis b virus DNA is still positive at 24 weeks, and decrease \> 2 lg from baseline . 4. Not be treated with interferon alfa ever before.

Exclusion criteria

1. Other active liver diseases; 2. Cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma or other malignancy; 3. Pregnancy or lactation; 4. Human immunodeficiency virus infection or congenital immune deficiency diseases; 5. Severe diabetes, autoimmune diseases; 6. Other important organ dysfunctions; 7. Patients can not follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HBsAg decrease after 48 weeks treatment48 weeksThe patients recruited will be treated with tenofovir or interferon alfa. After 48 weeks treatment, level of HBsAg will be tested again. The investigators want to know the rate of patients with HBsAg level that decreases more than 2 lg from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HBsAg clearance after 48 weeks treatment48 weeksThe patients recruited would be treated with tenofovir or interferon alfa. After 48 weeks treatment, level of HBsAg will be tested again. The investigators want to know the rate of patients with HBsAg clearance which is lower than 0.05 IU/ml.
Undetectable hepatitis b virus DNA after 48 weeks treatment48 weeksThe patients recruited would be treated with tenofovir or interferon alfa. After 48 weeks treatment, level of hepatitis b virus DNA will be tested again. The investigators want to know the rate of patients with undetectable hepatitis b virus DNA which is lower than 20 IU/ml.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactWenxiong Xu, Doctor
xwx1983@163.com+8613760783281
Backup ContactLiang Peng, Doctor
pzp33@hotmail.com+8613533978874

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026