Skip to content

Reliability and Validity of Kinect Detector for Fitness Tests and Gait Performance Analysis

To Verify the Reliability and Validity of Kinect Detector While Apply to Physical Fitness Tests and Gait Performance Analysis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03733613
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-11-07
Start date
2018-11-01
Completion date
2019-10-31
Last updated
2019-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Adults

Keywords

Kinect, somatosensory detector, physical fitness, gait analysis

Brief summary

Background: Depending on nature and needs, physical fitness can be divided into healthy fitness and physical fitness (also known as competitive fitness). Healthy fitness includes cardio-respiratory fitness, muscle fitness, muscular endurance, flexibility, and body composition. Physical fitness includes coordination, speed, explosiveness, balance, agility, and reaction time. Although the monitoring of fitness is very important, most of the tests need to be assisted by professionally trained fitness inspectors, so that the public who wants to regularly check their fitness status will facing a dilemma-- insufficient of inspectors. In the face of such a situation, the somatosensory detector may be a choice which is relatively objective, convenient and no need to rely on the inspectors. Therefore, the validity and retest reliability of the somatosensory detector need to be verified in order to achieve accurate and objective measurement results.

Detailed description

Background: Depending on nature and needs, physical fitness can be divided into healthy fitness and physical fitness (also known as competitive fitness). Healthy fitness includes cardio-respiratory fitness, muscle fitness, muscular endurance, flexibility, and body composition. Physical fitness includes coordination, speed, explosiveness, balance, agility, and reaction time. Although the monitoring of fitness is very important, most of the tests need to be assisted by professionally trained fitness inspectors, so that the public who wants to regularly check their fitness status will facing a dilemma-- insufficient of inspectors. In the face of such a situation, the somatosensory detector may be a choice which is relatively objective, convenient and no need to rely on the inspectors. Therefore, the validity and retest reliability of the somatosensory detector need to be verified in order to achieve accurate and objective measurement results. Research purposes: To verify the retest reliability and validity of the somatosensory detector on physical fitness and gait performance. Methods: The trial will enroll 60 subjects, 30 of them were healthy individuals between the ages of 20 and 65, and 30 are healthy elderly than 65 years of age. The exclusion criteria including: (1) those who are unable to follow the instructions and who have orthopedic, nervous system or cardiopulmonary system disorders, or who have abnormal gait pattern, or who are affected by the above physiological system disorders. Subjects will receive two tests, there's a one-week interval between each test. In the first test, the fitness assessment of the fitness inspector and the somatosensory detector was performed simultaneously, and the fitness evaluation of the somatosensory detector was performed only for the second time. And use statistical software to analyze the reliability and validity of the somatosensory detector. Statistical Analysis: Using SPSS 20.0 for data archiving and statistical analysis, the reliability and validity of the test will be detected by intraclass correlation one-way random model, and presenting by the intraclass correlation coefficient and 95% confidence interval.

Interventions

OTHERno intervention

no intervention

Sponsors

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy adults

Exclusion criteria

* those unable to follow to instructions * those have abnormal gait pattern which caused by orthopedics system disorders, nervous system disorders or cardio-respiratory disorders * those with abnormal movement performance which caused by physiological system obstacles

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gait speedChange from baseline at one weekGait speed is calculated using distance in meters and time in seconds.
Gait cadenceChange from baseline at one weekCadence is the rate at which a person walk, expressed in steps per minute.
Gait stride lengthChange from baseline at one weekThe stride length is the distance between two successive placements of the same foot.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Upper arm curl testChange from baseline at one weekTo test functional muscle strength of upper extremities
One leg standing testChange from baseline at one weekTo test balance ability
2 minutes stepping testChange from baseline at one weekTo test cardiopulmonary ability
30 seconds sit-stand-sit testChange from baseline at one weekTo test functional muscle strength of lower extremities
Functional forward reach testChange from baseline at one weekTo test functional balance performance
Timed up and go testChange from baseline at one weekTo test functional balance performance

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactYea-Ru Yang, Ph.D.
yryang@ym.edu.tw+88628267279

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026