Skip to content

PF-06651600 for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata

A PHASE 2B/3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOSE-RANGING STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PF-06651600 IN ADULT AND ADOLESCENT ALOPECIA AREATA (AA) SUBJECTS WITH 50% OR GREATER SCALP HAIR LOSS

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03732807
Acronym
ALLEGRO-2b/3
Enrollment
718
Registered
2018-11-07
Start date
2018-12-03
Completion date
2021-06-24
Last updated
2022-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alopecia Areata

Keywords

Alopecia, Alopecia totalis, Alopecia universalis, Patchy hair loss, Diffuse hair loss, Hair loss, Hair disease, PF-06651600, Ritlecitinib

Brief summary

This is a global Phase 2b/3 study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an investigational study drug (called PF-06651600) in adults and adolescents (12 years and older) who have 50% or greater scalp hair loss. The study is placebo-controlled, meaning that some patients entering the study will not receive active study drug but will receive tablets with no active ingredients (a placebo). This is a dose-ranging study, investigating 5 different dosing regimens. It will be double-blinded, meaning that the sponsor, the study doctors, the staff, and the patients will not know whether a patient is on active study drug (or the dose) or placebo.

Interventions

DRUGPF-06651600 Induction Dose

Oral tablets taken once daily (QD)

DRUGPF-06651600 Maintenance Dose #1

Oral tablets taken QD

DRUGPF-06651600 Maintenance Dose #2

Oral tablets taken QD

DRUGPF-06651600 Maintenance Dose #3

Oral tablets taken QD

DRUGPlacebo

Oral tablets taken QD

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of alopecia areata with no other cause of hair loss * ≥50% hair loss of the scalp, including alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis, without evidence of terminal hair regrowth within 6 months * Current episode of hair loss ≤10 years

Exclusion criteria

* Other types of alopecia or other diseases that can cause hair loss * Other scalp diseases that could interfere with assessment of hair loss/regrowth * Subjects with shaved heads must not enter the study until hair has grown back & is considered stable by the investigator * Any previous use of any Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24Week 24SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to (\<=) 20 at week 24 were reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48EBA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyebrow hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where, 0= no eyebrow, 1=minimal eyebrow, 2=moderate eyebrow and 3= normal eyebrow, where higher scores represent less hair loss of eyebrows.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48ELA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyelash hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where, 0=no eyelash, 1=minimal eyelash, 2=moderate eyelash and 3=normal eyelash, where higher scores represent less hair loss of eyelash.
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48PGI-C is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. PGI-C was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale ranged from 1 (greatly improved) to 7 (greatly worsened). Categories were defined based on the PGI-C scores as follows: 1=greatly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=slightly improved, 4=not changed, 5=slightly worsened, 6=moderately worsened and 7=greatly worsened.
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsBaseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24AAPPO scale is 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 1-4 assessed current hair loss, eyebrow loss, eyelash loss and body hair loss and were analyzed separately on scale of 0-4, with 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss'. Items 5-8 assessed emotional symptoms. Response choices on these items were scored from 0 ='never' to 4='always'. Items 9-11 assessed activity limitations. Response choices on these items were scored from 0='not at all' to 4='completely'. Change from baseline in AAPPO emotional symptoms sub score were calculated as mean of items 5-8 and ranged from 0(never) to 4(always), where higher scores indicated more emotional symptoms. Change from baseline in AAPPO activity limitations sub score was calculated as mean of items 9-11 and ranged from 0(not at all) to 4(completely), where higher scores indicated more activity limitations. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsBaseline (Day 1), Week 34, 40, and 48AAPPO scale is 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 1-4 assessed current hair loss, eyebrow loss, eyelash loss and body hair loss and were analyzed separately on scale of 0-4, with 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss'. Items 5-8 assessed emotional symptoms. Response choices on these items were scored from 0 ='never' to 4='always'. Items 9-11 assessed activity limitations. Response choices on these items were scored from 0='not at all' to 4='completely'. Change from baseline in AAPPO emotional symptoms sub score were calculated as mean of items 5-8 and ranged from 0(never) to 4(always), where higher scores indicated more emotional symptoms. Change from baseline in AAPPO activity limitations sub score was calculated as mean of items 9-11 and ranged from 0(not at all) to 4(completely), where higher scores indicated more activity limitations. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over the past week. Items 1-4 were to assess the current hair loss, eyebrow loss, eyelash loss and body hair loss and were analyzed separately on a scale of 0-4, with 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss', where higher scores indicated more hair loss.
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 4Week 24SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score \<= 10 at week 24 were reported.
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 1Week 24SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score \<= 10 at week 24 were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 24Week 24PGI-C is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. PGI-C was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale ranged from 1 (greatly improved) to 7 (greatly worsened). Categories were defined based on the PGI-C scores as follows: 1=greatly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=slightly improved, 4=not changed, 5=slightly worsened, 6=moderately worsened and 7=greatly worsened.
Exposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) ModelWeek 24The exposure response of Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) on the regrowth of scalp hair was characterized using a Bayesian three-parameter hyperbolic Emax model for the SALT score \<=20 at Week 24 with an additional term for effect of loading dose. In Emax exposure-response model the response function was the log odds of the percentage of participants with response based on SALT \<=20 at Week 24, which was fit on the logistic scale and then back-transformed to percentage. The effect of loading dose is included as fixed factor in the model. The variable that represents loading dose has values of 1 for groups 200/50 mg once daily and 200/30 mg once daily and of 0 for the remaining groups. SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease.
Exposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) ModelWeek 24The exposure response of Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) on the regrowth of scalp hair was characterized using a Bayesian three-parameter hyperbolic Emax model for the SALT score \<=10 at Week 24 with an additional term for effect of loading dose. In Emax exposure-response model the response function was the log odds of the percentage of participants with response based on SALT \<=10 at Week 24, which was fit on the logistic scale and then back-transformed to percentage. The effect of loading dose is included as fixed factor in the model. The variable that represents loading dose has values of 1 for groups 200/50 mg once daily and 200/30 mg once daily and of 0 for the remaining groups. SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease.
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score \<=10 were reported.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. A SALT 75 response was a 75% or greater reduction from baseline in SALT score.
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Baseline (Day 1), Week 28, 34, 40, and 48SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, and 24HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for anxiety subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline (Day 1), Week 48HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for anxiety subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for depression subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms.
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assessed states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for anxiety subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline (Day 1), Week 48HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for depression subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, and 24HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for depression subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Czechia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Total 1097 participants signed the informed consent form. Out of which 379 participants were screen failures, 718 actually enrolled into the study and were assigned to study treatments.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
132
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
130
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
130
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
132
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
63
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
65
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
66
Total718

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)Adverse Event0221002
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)Lack of Efficacy2103301
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)Lost to Follow-up0021120
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)Non-Compliant with study drug0100000
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)Other1402000
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)Physician Decision0101100
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)Withdrawal by Subject3211011
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)Adverse Event3024201
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)Lack of Efficacy0000010
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)Lost to Follow-up1012100
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)Physician Decision0125001
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)Pregnancy1000101
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)Protocol Violation1100000
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)Withdrawal by Subject4444112

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgRitlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgRitlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgRitlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgRitlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgRitlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPlacebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgTotal
Age, Continuous33.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.01
34.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.98
33.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.75
32.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.36
33.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.83
34.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.88
35.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.89
33.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.33
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants18 Participants16 Participants11 Participants23 Participants8 Participants4 Participants87 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
58 Participants113 Participants114 Participants116 Participants109 Participants55 Participants61 Participants626 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
14 Participants33 Participants28 Participants43 Participants34 Participants17 Participants17 Participants186 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants6 Participants7 Participants5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
47 Participants92 Participants90 Participants79 Participants91 Participants42 Participants47 Participants488 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants81 Participants85 Participants71 Participants80 Participants43 Participants40 Participants446 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants51 Participants45 Participants59 Participants52 Participants20 Participants26 Participants272 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1310 / 1290 / 1300 / 1320 / 620 / 650 / 66
other
Total, other adverse events
84 / 13176 / 12981 / 13077 / 13232 / 6239 / 6539 / 66
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1312 / 1292 / 1301 / 1322 / 620 / 653 / 66

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to (\<=) 20 at week 24 were reported.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Participants with missing SALT scores due to coronavirus disease-19 related reasons were excluded from this analysis, while participants with missing data due to other reasons were considered as non-responders. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 2430.65 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 2422.31 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 2423.39 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 2414.29 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 241.69 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 241.54 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00000195% CI: [21.17, 37.91]Miettinen and Nurminen method
p-value: <0.00000195% CI: [13.65, 29.18]Miettinen and Nurminen method
p-value: <0.00000195% CI: [14.65, 30.23]Miettinen and Nurminen method
p-value: 0.00015495% CI: [6.69, 20.36]Miettinen and Nurminen method
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations

AAPPO scale is 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 1-4 assessed current hair loss, eyebrow loss, eyelash loss and body hair loss and were analyzed separately on scale of 0-4, with 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss'. Items 5-8 assessed emotional symptoms. Response choices on these items were scored from 0 ='never' to 4='always'. Items 9-11 assessed activity limitations. Response choices on these items were scored from 0='not at all' to 4='completely'. Change from baseline in AAPPO emotional symptoms sub score were calculated as mean of items 5-8 and ranged from 0(never) to 4(always), where higher scores indicated more emotional symptoms. Change from baseline in AAPPO activity limitations sub score was calculated as mean of items 9-11 and ranged from 0(not at all) to 4(completely), where higher scores indicated more activity limitations. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: activity limitations-0.37 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: emotional symptoms-0.96 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: activity limitations-0.44 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: activity limitations-0.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: emotional symptoms-0.78 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: emotional symptoms-0.84 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: emotional symptoms-0.72 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: activity limitations-0.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: activity limitations-0.31 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: emotional symptoms-0.84 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: activity limitations-0.39 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: emotional symptoms-0.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: activity limitations-0.26 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: emotional symptoms-0.85 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: emotional symptoms-0.81 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: emotional symptoms-0.72 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: activity limitations-0.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: activity limitations-0.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: activity limitations-0.42 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: activity limitations-0.36 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: emotional symptoms-0.71 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: emotional symptoms-0.83 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: emotional symptoms-0.72 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: activity limitations-0.37 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: activity limitations-0.23 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: emotional symptoms-0.62 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: activity limitations-0.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: emotional symptoms-0.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: emotional symptoms-0.62 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: activity limitations-0.26 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: activity limitations-0.44 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: activity limitations-0.36 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: emotional symptoms-0.83 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: activity limitations-0.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: emotional symptoms-0.98 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: emotional symptoms-0.77 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: activity limitations-0.39 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 40: emotional symptoms-0.66 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: activity limitations-0.42 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 34: emotional symptoms-0.64 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: activity limitations-0.36 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 48: emotional symptoms-0.68 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations

AAPPO scale is 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 1-4 assessed current hair loss, eyebrow loss, eyelash loss and body hair loss and were analyzed separately on scale of 0-4, with 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss'. Items 5-8 assessed emotional symptoms. Response choices on these items were scored from 0 ='never' to 4='always'. Items 9-11 assessed activity limitations. Response choices on these items were scored from 0='not at all' to 4='completely'. Change from baseline in AAPPO emotional symptoms sub score were calculated as mean of items 5-8 and ranged from 0(never) to 4(always), where higher scores indicated more emotional symptoms. Change from baseline in AAPPO activity limitations sub score was calculated as mean of items 9-11 and ranged from 0(not at all) to 4(completely), where higher scores indicated more activity limitations. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 18: emotional symptoms-0.64 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 12: emotional symptoms-0.53 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 24: activity limitations-0.30 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 18: activity limitations-0.35 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 12: activity limitations-0.27 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 8: activity limitations-0.24 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 8: emotional symptoms-0.50 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 4: emotional symptoms-0.37 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 4: activity limitations-0.19 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 24: emotional symptoms-0.61 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 8: emotional symptoms-0.46 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 4: emotional symptoms-0.22 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 12: emotional symptoms-0.54 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 18: emotional symptoms-0.57 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 24: emotional symptoms-0.61 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 4: activity limitations-0.04 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 8: activity limitations-0.25 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 12: activity limitations-0.22 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 18: activity limitations-0.26 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 24: activity limitations-0.30 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 18: emotional symptoms-0.60 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 12: activity limitations-0.21 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 4: emotional symptoms-0.33 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 24: emotional symptoms-0.69 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 12: emotional symptoms-0.48 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 8: emotional symptoms-0.50 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 4: activity limitations-0.16 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 18: activity limitations-0.23 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 24: activity limitations-0.31 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 8: activity limitations-0.18 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 8: activity limitations-0.09 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 12: activity limitations-0.24 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 8: emotional symptoms-0.36 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 24: activity limitations-0.28 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 18: activity limitations-0.23 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 4: emotional symptoms-0.31 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 4: activity limitations-0.13 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 24: emotional symptoms-0.58 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 18: emotional symptoms-0.54 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 12: emotional symptoms-0.49 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 8: activity limitations-0.21 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 18: emotional symptoms-0.44 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 24: emotional symptoms-0.49 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 4: activity limitations-0.20 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 4: emotional symptoms-0.29 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 12: activity limitations-0.27 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 24: activity limitations-0.31 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 18: activity limitations-0.28 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 12: emotional symptoms-0.50 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 8: emotional symptoms-0.45 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 4: activity limitations-0.18 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 24: activity limitations-0.29 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 8: emotional symptoms-0.39 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 12: emotional symptoms-0.36 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 24: emotional symptoms-0.47 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 8: activity limitations-0.20 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 18: emotional symptoms-0.43 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 12: activity limitations-0.21 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 4: emotional symptoms-0.28 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity LimitationsChange at Week 18: activity limitations-0.26 Units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 28, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 48-49.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.09
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Baseline90.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.05
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 28-44.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.35
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 34-48.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.16
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 40-49.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.11
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 40-38.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.14
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 48-40.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.27
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 28-33.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.85
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 34-35.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.5
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Baseline90.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.28
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Baseline90.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.69
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 34-43.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.35
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 48-48.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.63
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 28-36.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.42
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 40-46.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.68
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 40-35.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.9
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 48-40.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.87
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Baseline90.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.07
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 28-29.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.56
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 34-33.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.01
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Baseline88.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.87
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 34-7.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.61
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 28-5.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.15
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 40-11.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.01
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 48-13.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 40-36.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Baseline94.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 48-46.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 34-27.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 28-11.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.75
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 48-32.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.39
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 34-12.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.47
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Baseline91.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.22
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 28-5.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.51
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Change at Week 40-23.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.64
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 8-12.8 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 12-22.7 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 24-36.5 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 4-2.3 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 18-31.2 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 24-29.2 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 8-12.5 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 4-2.7 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 18-25.0 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 12-20.1 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 18-22.5 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 24-33.3 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 12-12.4 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 8-6.3 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 4-1.8 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 8-5.0 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 18-17.5 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 4-1.3 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 12-10.3 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 24-23.6 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 8-1.7 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 24-4.2 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 4-1.3 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 18-2.4 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 12-3.5 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 8-1.2 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 4-0.9 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 12-2.4 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 24-5.1 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Change at Week 18-3.9 Units on a scale
Secondary

Exposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model

The exposure response of Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) on the regrowth of scalp hair was characterized using a Bayesian three-parameter hyperbolic Emax model for the SALT score \<=10 at Week 24 with an additional term for effect of loading dose. In Emax exposure-response model the response function was the log odds of the percentage of participants with response based on SALT \<=10 at Week 24, which was fit on the logistic scale and then back-transformed to percentage. The effect of loading dose is included as fixed factor in the model. The variable that represents loading dose has values of 1 for groups 200/50 mg once daily and 200/30 mg once daily and of 0 for the remaining groups. SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgExposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model21.29 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgExposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model13.76 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgExposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model14.43 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgExposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model9.02 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgExposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model3.88 Percentage of participants
PlaceboExposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model1.66 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Exposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model

The exposure response of Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) on the regrowth of scalp hair was characterized using a Bayesian three-parameter hyperbolic Emax model for the SALT score \<=20 at Week 24 with an additional term for effect of loading dose. In Emax exposure-response model the response function was the log odds of the percentage of participants with response based on SALT \<=20 at Week 24, which was fit on the logistic scale and then back-transformed to percentage. The effect of loading dose is included as fixed factor in the model. The variable that represents loading dose has values of 1 for groups 200/50 mg once daily and 200/30 mg once daily and of 0 for the remaining groups. SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgExposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model32.37 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgExposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model20.57 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgExposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model22.52 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgExposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model13.58 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgExposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model4.81 Percentage of participants
PlaceboExposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model1.63 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 1

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score \<= 10 at week 24 were reported.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Analysis 1: Participants with missing SALT score at Week 24 due to COVID-19 related reasons excluded from analysis at that time point, participants with missing SALT scores due to other reasons counted as non-responders at that time point.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 121.77 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 113.22 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 113.71 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 110.92 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 11.69 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 11.54 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00000195% CI: [13.23, 28.49]Miettinen and Nurminen method
p-value: 0.00033795% CI: [5.82, 19.07]Miettinen and Nurminen method
p-value: 0.00022895% CI: [6.27, 19.53]Miettinen and Nurminen method
p-value: 0.00187595% CI: [3.86, 16.46]Miettinen and Nurminen method
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 4

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score \<= 10 at week 24 were reported.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Analysis 4: Data imputed by using a missing at random (MAR) mechanism for participants with missing data due to COVID-19. Missing data due to reasons not related to COVID-19 were consider as non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 421.29 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 412.87 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 413.42 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 410.62 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 41.65 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 41.54 Percentage of participants
Comparison: A generalized linear mixed effect model without imputation using observed data up to Week 24 was used as the imputation model. A single complete imputed data set for Week 24 was analyzed using the Miettinen and Nurminen method as the analysis model.p-value: <0.00000195% CI: [11.91, 27.59]Miettinen and Nurminen method
Comparison: A generalized linear mixed effect model without imputation using observed data up to Week 24 was used as the imputation model. A single complete imputed data set for Week 24 was analyzed using the Miettinen and Nurminen method as the analysis model.p-value: 0.00052695% CI: [4.93, 17.74]Miettinen and Nurminen method
Comparison: A generalized linear mixed effect model without imputation using observed data up to Week 24 was used as the imputation model. A single complete imputed data set for Week 24 was analyzed using the Miettinen and Nurminen method as the analysis model.p-value: 0.00031195% CI: [5.42, 18.33]Miettinen and Nurminen method
Comparison: A generalized linear mixed effect model without imputation using observed data up to Week 24 was used as the imputation model. A single complete imputed data set for Week 24 was analyzed using the Miettinen and Nurminen method as the analysis model.p-value: 0.00292295% CI: [3.1, 15.07]Miettinen and Nurminen method
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score \<=10 were reported.

Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3430.40 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1812.40 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4031.25 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 126.35 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4833.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2829.17 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 82.34 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.78 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 187.44 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4025.20 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.83 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3418.70 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2816.81 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 125.65 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4827.87 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2818.49 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.82 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 125.56 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 186.56 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3423.39 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4027.05 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4831.20 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3422.13 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4025.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 185.13 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2816.39 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4825.41 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 120.82 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 343.39 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 181.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 486.56 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 121.69 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 283.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 403.39 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4018.46 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 181.67 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 120.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4824.62 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 281.75 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3413.11 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 283.17 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 409.23 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4814.06 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 181.61 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 121.59 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 344.62 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease.

Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1211.90 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3438.40 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 85.47 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.78 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2834.17 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4039.06 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4839.53 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1819.83 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1813.22 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 128.87 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4033.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3427.64 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4834.43 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2823.53 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 84.13 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2826.05 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 82.46 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 126.35 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1813.11 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3433.87 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4039.34 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4843.20 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4831.15 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3428.69 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4030.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 189.40 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 123.28 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2820.49 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 123.39 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 285.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 406.78 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 345.08 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 489.84 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 183.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 121.64 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4833.85 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 181.67 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 281.75 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4023.08 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3419.67 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4015.38 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 181.61 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 121.59 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 349.23 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4818.75 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 286.35 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. A SALT 75 response was a 75% or greater reduction from baseline in SALT score.

Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1820.66 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2431.45 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3438.40 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4839.53 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4039.84 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 84.69 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1211.90 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.78 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2834.17 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4836.07 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 83.31 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4034.96 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2420.66 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3432.52 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2824.37 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 128.06 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1814.88 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3438.71 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4042.62 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 126.35 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 81.64 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4846.40 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 189.84 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2422.58 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2827.73 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 122.46 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1811.11 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.83 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2413.45 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2821.31 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3428.69 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4030.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4831.15 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 489.84 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 345.08 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 181.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 405.08 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 285.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 241.69 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 121.69 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 241.54 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 283.51 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 81.59 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3421.31 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4832.31 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4023.08 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 121.64 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 181.67 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4821.88 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4015.38 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 121.59 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3410.77 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 181.61 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 284.76 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 243.08 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48

EBA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyebrow hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where, 0= no eyebrow, 1=minimal eyebrow, 2=moderate eyebrow and 3= normal eyebrow, where higher scores represent less hair loss of eyebrows.

Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3441.35 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1222.86 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2837.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4043.40 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1829.70 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4842.99 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 810.28 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2433.98 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 41.87 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2829.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4832.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1217.48 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3430.77 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1818.81 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4030.39 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 42.88 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 813.86 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2425.49 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4039.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2827.27 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2429.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 82.97 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4843.56 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3434.65 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 129.62 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1817.82 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2824.76 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1812.87 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4033.65 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 127.62 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3431.43 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 84.90 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.93 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2416.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4833.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3414.58 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2812.24 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 41.96 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 83.85 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 126.25 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1810.20 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 248.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4016.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4816.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 284.17 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 243.64 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 180.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3415.69 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 120.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 83.77 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4020.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4830.91 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 286.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4831.37 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 188.16 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 245.77 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4026.92 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3413.46 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 124.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 43.85 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.00 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48

ELA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyelash hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where, 0=no eyelash, 1=minimal eyelash, 2=moderate eyelash and 3=normal eyelash, where higher scores represent less hair loss of eyelash.

Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2430.21 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1216.49 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4039.80 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1825.53 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 43.03 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4838.38 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2829.79 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 89.09 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3434.02 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 84.44 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3426.37 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1210.99 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2825.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1820.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4829.55 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4028.09 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2421.35 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 41.08 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2836.78 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3438.89 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4038.20 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 45.38 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 88.79 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1211.70 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4840.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1820.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2428.89 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4830.53 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 1812.09 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 84.35 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 41.03 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2824.21 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 127.37 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3426.32 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 2426.09 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4027.66 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 124.76 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 186.98 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 82.22 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 347.32 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4018.60 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4820.93 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 44.55 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 284.76 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 244.88 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 3416.67 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 82.04 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 249.80 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 120.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 182.17 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 286.82 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 42.04 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4025.49 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4837.25 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 240.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4835.56 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 4017.39 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 180.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 120.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 80.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 40.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 346.52 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Week 284.55 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48

AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over the past week. Items 1-4 were to assess the current hair loss, eyebrow loss, eyelash loss and body hair loss and were analyzed separately on a scale of 0-4, with 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss', where higher scores indicated more hair loss.

Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on scalp41.80 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyebrows42.71 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyebrows17.35 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyebrows32.29 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on scalp11.48 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyebrows27.84 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyebrows27.66 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on body14.74 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on body11.46 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on body35.11 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on body25.81 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyelashes41.86 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyelashes43.02 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on body34.74 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyelashes40.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyelashes31.40 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on scalp35.83 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on body19.78 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyelashes31.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on scalp20.66 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on scalp11.38 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on scalp42.02 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyelashes29.41 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyelashes17.44 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on body17.02 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on scalp42.28 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on scalp27.35 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyelashes11.49 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyebrows44.90 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyebrows9.09 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on body33.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyebrows42.27 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on scalp19.51 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on scalp36.59 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on scalp16.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on scalp30.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyebrows21.05 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on body33.70 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyebrows32.98 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on body19.15 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyelashes37.65 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyebrows33.68 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyelashes17.65 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyebrows27.84 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on body25.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on scalp33.61 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on body15.96 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyelashes4.60 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on body9.28 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyebrows34.04 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on scalp34.45 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on body36.17 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on scalp25.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyelashes37.35 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyelashes26.74 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyelashes39.29 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyebrows7.14 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyebrows36.84 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on body34.41 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on body27.96 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyelashes36.59 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on scalp9.76 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyelashes42.17 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyebrows38.71 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyelashes31.17 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on scalp13.79 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on body20.43 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on body31.52 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on body30.77 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on body36.56 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on scalp26.27 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on scalp29.31 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on scalp35.65 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on scalp4.17 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on scalp42.37 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyebrows7.45 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyebrows11.96 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyebrows18.09 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyebrows27.47 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyebrows30.43 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyebrows38.89 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on scalp7.76 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyebrows38.89 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyebrows43.96 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyelashes7.59 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyelashes12.82 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyelashes16.46 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyelashes21.05 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on scalp12.71 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyelashes37.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyelashes32.89 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyelashes38.16 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on body10.42 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on body13.98 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on body14.89 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on body15.05 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on scalp30.25 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyelashes34.52 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyelashes19.05 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on scalp8.47 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on body14.29 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on body30.43 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on scalp4.84 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on scalp24.58 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyebrows19.78 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyelashes22.22 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on body10.11 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyelashes28.05 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyebrows39.36 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyebrows29.35 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on body15.91 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyebrows15.96 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on body26.09 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on scalp32.77 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on body6.38 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on body22.22 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyelashes9.30 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyebrows4.17 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyelashes34.52 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on body25.56 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyebrows38.04 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on scalp32.48 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on scalp16.38 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyelashes14.81 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyebrows31.91 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyelashes36.59 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on scalp13.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyebrows10.99 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on scalp8.93 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyebrows16.28 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyebrows20.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyebrows15.56 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on scalp1.72 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyelashes5.26 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on body11.36 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyelashes7.89 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on scalp7.14 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyelashes8.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on scalp5.26 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on body6.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyelashes7.89 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on body2.17 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on scalp8.62 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyelashes8.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on body10.64 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on body10.87 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyelashes11.43 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on body4.44 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyelashes10.81 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on scalp3.57 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on body8.70 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyelashes8.11 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on scalp8.62 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on body2.13 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyebrows11.63 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyebrows13.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyebrows6.52 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyebrows6.82 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on scalp1.69 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyebrows4.35 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyelashes28.26 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyebrows11.11 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyebrows4.17 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on scalp4.76 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on body11.36 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyelashes8.89 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyebrows12.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyelashes39.13 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on scalp6.67 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyebrows32.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on body22.73 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on body6.38 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on scalp29.23 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on body9.09 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyebrows11.11 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on body34.69 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyelashes12.20 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyebrows38.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyelashes13.04 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyebrows22.73 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on scalp6.35 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on scalp10.77 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyelashes14.63 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on body16.33 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on body4.26 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyelashes21.43 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on scalp22.03 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on scalp8.33 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on body22.45 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on scalp33.85 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyelashes6.67 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyebrows6.25 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on body20.45 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on scalp3.17 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on scalp8.06 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on scalp4.92 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on scalp6.78 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on scalp6.35 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on scalp11.29 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on scalp19.05 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on scalp20.97 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyebrows8.70 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyebrows11.11 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyebrows6.82 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyebrows7.14 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyebrows10.87 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyebrows13.33 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyebrows23.91 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyebrows33.33 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on eyelashes5.26 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on eyelashes8.11 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on eyelashes8.33 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on eyelashes2.94 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on eyelashes2.63 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on eyelashes13.51 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on eyelashes13.16 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: current hair loss on eyelashes28.95 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: current hair loss on body11.36 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: current hair loss on body11.63 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: current hair loss on body7.14 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: current hair loss on body7.50 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: current hair loss on body11.36 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: current hair loss on body9.30 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: current hair loss on body11.36 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 24

PGI-C is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. PGI-C was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale ranged from 1 (greatly improved) to 7 (greatly worsened). Categories were defined based on the PGI-C scores as follows: 1=greatly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=slightly improved, 4=not changed, 5=slightly worsened, 6=moderately worsened and 7=greatly worsened.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 2452.19 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 2445.40 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 2449.17 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 2441.95 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 2411.36 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 249.23 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00000195% CI: [31.68, 54.25]Miettinen and Nurminen method
p-value: <0.00000195% CI: [25.22, 47.14]Miettinen and Nurminen method
p-value: <0.00000195% CI: [28.85, 51.06]Miettinen and Nurminen method
p-value: <0.00000195% CI: [21.95, 43.5]Miettinen and Nurminen method
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48

PGI-C is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. PGI-C was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale ranged from 1 (greatly improved) to 7 (greatly worsened). Categories were defined based on the PGI-C scores as follows: 1=greatly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=slightly improved, 4=not changed, 5=slightly worsened, 6=moderately worsened and 7=greatly worsened.

Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: greatly improved44.96 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: moderately improved13.18 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: moderately improved16.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: moderately improved23.58 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: greatly improved36.51 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: moderately improved15.63 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: greatly improved43.75 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: greatly improved17.19 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: moderately improved12.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: moderately improved13.28 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: greatly improved22.83 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: greatly improved43.20 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: moderately improved18.11 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: greatly improved5.43 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: moderately improved3.10 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: greatly improved27.64 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: moderately improved11.29 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: greatly improved33.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: greatly improved34.68 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: greatly improved35.54 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: greatly improved14.88 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: moderately improved17.36 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: moderately improved14.52 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: moderately improved21.49 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: greatly improved22.58 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: greatly improved4.03 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: moderately improved20.66 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: moderately improved23.97 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: moderately improved18.70 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: greatly improved26.45 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: moderately improved19.35 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: greatly improved22.31 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: greatly improved2.36 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: moderately improved4.72 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: greatly improved18.03 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: greatly improved13.60 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: moderately improved14.75 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: moderately improved15.45 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: greatly improved37.70 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: greatly improved37.40 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: greatly improved8.13 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: greatly improved42.40 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: greatly improved28.80 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: moderately improved13.60 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: moderately improved14.40 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: moderately improved20.80 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: moderately improved27.87 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: moderately improved7.32 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: moderately improved19.17 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: greatly improved31.15 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: moderately improved18.03 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: moderately improved7.87 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: greatly improved4.13 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: moderately improved16.53 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: greatly improved12.20 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: moderately improved14.63 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: greatly improved0 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: greatly improved19.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: moderately improved15.13 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: greatly improved28.93 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: moderately improved13.22 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: greatly improved31.97 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: moderately improved15.57 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: greatly improved30.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: greatly improved1.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: greatly improved1.64 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: moderately improved9.84 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: moderately improved3.39 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: moderately improved6.56 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: greatly improved5.08 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: moderately improved4.92 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: greatly improved1.64 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: greatly improved3.39 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: greatly improved6.56 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: moderately improved6.78 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: greatly improved0 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: moderately improved1.61 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: moderately improved11.86 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: greatly improved6.78 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: moderately improved10.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: greatly improved1.54 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: greatly improved1.67 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: greatly improved0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: moderately improved10.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: greatly improved30.77 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: moderately improved9.23 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: moderately improved22.03 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: moderately improved24.62 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: greatly improved0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: moderately improved3.17 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: greatly improved42.19 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: moderately improved1.59 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: greatly improved18.64 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: moderately improved10.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: greatly improved1.59 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: moderately improved17.19 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: moderately improved17.19 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: greatly improved4.62 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: greatly improved0 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 4: moderately improved1.54 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: greatly improved1.56 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 8: moderately improved4.69 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: greatly improved3.17 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 12: moderately improved7.94 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: greatly improved3.28 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 18: moderately improved4.92 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 24: moderately improved3.08 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: greatly improved7.81 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 34: moderately improved20.31 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: greatly improved13.85 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 40: moderately improved15.38 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Week 48: greatly improved26.56 Percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48

HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for anxiety subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline4.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.84
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline4.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.18
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline4.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.31
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.09
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline4.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.42
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline5.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.38
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-1.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline5.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.31
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline5.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.53
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24

HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for anxiety subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, and 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 12-0.7 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 24-0.8 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-0.3 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 8-0.8 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 24-0.7 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-0.4 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 8-0.4 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 12-0.9 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 8-0.8 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-0.4 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 12-0.7 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 24-0.8 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 24-0.3 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-0.5 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 8-0.3 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 12-0.3 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-0.6 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 24-1.0 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 12-0.9 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 8-0.9 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 24-0.6 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-0.1 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 8-0.5 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 12-0.4 Units on a scale
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48

HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for depression subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.13
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline2.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline3.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.16
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.15
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline2.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline2.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.99
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline2.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline3.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.36
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Baseline3.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.54
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48Change at Week 48-0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.28
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24

HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for depression subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, and 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-0.1 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 8-0.5 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 12-0.6 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 24-0.4 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 12-0.4 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 8-0.3 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-0.4 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 24-0.8 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 24-0.3 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 120.0 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 8-0.2 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-0.1 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-0.1 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 24-0.2 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 80.2 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 120.1 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 12-0.5 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 24-0.4 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 8-0.2 Units on a scale
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-0.3 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 8-0.3 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 12-0.1 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 240.0 Units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Change at Week 4-0.3 Units on a scale
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48

HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assessed states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for anxiety subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms.

Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1250.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 451.72 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4853.85 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 846.43 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2451.85 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1257.89 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 850.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2465.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 445.45 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4866.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4860.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 868.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 434.62 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1238.46 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2450.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1256.25 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 437.50 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 841.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2446.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4850.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 440.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4861.54 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1242.86 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2457.14 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 871.43 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 431.58 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4857.89 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2444.44 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 833.33 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1247.37 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2438.46 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 846.15 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1241.67 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 430.77 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4858.33 Percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48

HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for depression subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms.

Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4850.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 442.86 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 866.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2471.43 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1250.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1263.64 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 460.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2463.64 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4863.64 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 845.45 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2441.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4858.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 858.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1266.67 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 453.85 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2442.86 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4846.15 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 442.86 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 833.33 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1230.77 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 440.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 820.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4880.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2450.00 Percentage of participants
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1220.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1260.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2450.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4860.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 850.00 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 460.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 840.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 2450.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 450.00 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 1262.50 Percentage of participants
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mgPercentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48Week 4860.00 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026