Skip to content

Cooling Anesthesia for Intravitreal Injection

A Phase I Dose Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Cooling Anesthesia for Local Anesthesia During Intravitreal Injection (COOL 1)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03732287
Acronym
COOL-1
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-11-06
Start date
2018-11-30
Completion date
2019-04-26
Last updated
2020-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Local, Diabetic Macular Edema, Intravitreal Injection, Macular Degeneration

Keywords

intravitreal injection, anesthesia, macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cooling anesthesia application to the eye as anesthesia for intravitreal injection using a novel cooling anesthesia device and determine the effects of temperature and duration of application on subjective pain after intravitreal injection.

Detailed description

Intravitreal injections have become the standard of care for administering medications for retinal diseases such as age related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema. There is considerable apprehension among patients receiving these injections, primarily revolving around adequate anesthesia during the injection. Current methods of anesthesia involve topical anesthetic drops, lidocaine gels, or subconjunctival injections of lidocaine, which suffer from either poor anesthetic effect, corneal irritation, or subconjunctival hemorrhage, as well as significant time for the onset of anesthesia. Recens Medical has developed a novel medical device which can precisely and rapidly cool the surface of the eye This device cools to a temperature around -5 to -10 degrees Celsius, about the temperature of a cold ice cube, and thus has an excellent safety profile compared to conventional ophthalmic cryotherapy units. The value of such a device is both improved patient comfort, as well as increased efficiency and workflow for retina specialists administering intravitreal injections. This device has been extensively tested in animal safety studies as well as pilot human studies and has not demonstrated any serious adverse effects and has shown anesthetic effects comparable to current standard of care. This dose escalation study will test various temperatures and duration of temperatures to evaluate for safety as well as determine the optimal temperature for anesthesia during intravitreal injection.

Interventions

DEVICECooling Anesthesia

Application of cooling anesthesia device prior to intravitreal injection

Sponsors

Recens Medical, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A dose escalation strategy of differing temperatures and duration to test safety and efficacy of cooling anesthesia for intravitreal injection

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 110 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women \> 18 years old at screening visit. * Men and women who are undergoing intravitreal injections in either one eye or both eyes with either Lucentis or Eylea as part of their normal standard of care with a 30 gauge needle. * Subject has received a minimum of 3 intravitreal injections in the study eye prior to the study visit. * Subject is willing and able to sign the study written informed consent form (ICF).

Exclusion criteria

* History of presence of scleromalacia * Preexisting conjunctival, episcleral or scleral defects * Less than 18 years of age * Unable to provide informed consent * Has received less than 3 injections in the study eye * Active severe eye disease not controlled with artificial tears and requiring Restasis or Xiidra drops. * History of Endophthalmitis with intravitreal injection * History of uveitis * History of retinal detachment in either eye * History of vitrectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Pain24-48 hours after injectionPain as measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS). This was used in the previously presented SOLAR study (Clinical trials.gov, NCT01926977). Total range is 0-10, with 0 being no pain, and 10 being unbearable pain.
Number of patients with treatment adverse events as measured by slit lamp examination30 minutes after injectionFull slit lamp examination of anterior and posterior segment after intravitreal injection

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject response to needle penetrationIntraoperative (During injection)subject response to needle penetration as evaluated by physician
Time to perform intravitreal injectionIntraoperative (injection procedure)Time to perform injection, measured from beginning of anesthesia to intravitreal injection

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026