Skip to content

Cross Closure for Reconstructing the Perineal Wound of Abdominoperineal Resection

Cross Closure for Reconstructing the Perineal Wound of Abdominoperineal Resection in Rectal and Anal Cancer Patients: a Multi-center, Randomized, Open-Label, Positive, Parallel Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03731754
Acronym
CCRPWAR
Enrollment
346
Registered
2018-11-06
Start date
2018-11-20
Completion date
2020-12-20
Last updated
2018-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anal Canal Cancer, Rectal Cancer

Keywords

Traditional closure, Cross closure, Rectal cancer, Anal canal cancer, Abdominoperineal resection

Brief summary

How to reduce the complications of perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection (APR) has always been a hot topic in the medical field.To reduce the complications of perineal wound and the primary healing of perineal wound must meet the two principles of unobstructed drainage and reduced tension closure.This concept is similar to the concepts of closure of enterostomy in rectal cancer patients. It was reported that use of cross-stitch closure can significantly reduce complications of closure of enterostomy. So the investigator ever used the cross closure to reconstruct the perineal wound of APR, which was really decrease the complications of perineal wound. However, more clinical trails was needed to confirm the conclusion.

Detailed description

Perineal wound problems after abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer is reported in up to 25%~66% of patients,if the perineum does not heal primarily, the secondary wound healing may prolong hospital stay, may necessitate surgical reintervention, and often requires intensive wound care for several months. Great efforts have been taken to reduce the complications of perineal wound of APR, but the incidence of the perineal wound complications are not effectively decreased. It was reported that one of the most important factors to determine the primary healing of perineal wound is whether the anterior sacral drainage and perineal stump drainage are sufficient and effective or not, which is similar to the concept of closure of enterostomy. Previously, it was reported that cross closure is an effective method of skin closure for stoma reversal, which allows increased surgical exposure, reduces suture, smooth drainage, aesthetic healing simplifies wound care, and gives a neat cosmetic result. Therefore, because of the success use of cross closure in stoma reversal to reduce the complications of perineal wound, the investigator used the cross closure to reconstruct the perineal wound of APR, and it really can decrease the complications of perineal wound. However, more clinical trails are needed to confirm the conclusion.

Interventions

PROCEDURETraditional Closure

Primary closure discontinuously the perineal wound of APR

PROCEDURECross closure

Two triangles of skin in the horizontal direction are excised to enlarge the skin incision, and the tumor resected. Then circumferential subcuticular suture of wound, and with tightening of the circumferential suture, the wound resembles a cross.

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Southern Medical University, China
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangzhou First People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Meizhou People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Jieyang People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age: 18-75 years old; 2. ECOG performance status: 0-2; 3. Histologically confirmed rectal cancer or anal canal cancer; 4. Completely resected the primary tumor; 5. No evidence of distant metastasis; 6. Tolerable general anesthesia; 7. Total radiation dose of 45-50 Gy needed if the patient needs to receive routine segmental radiotherapy; 8. Provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Emergency surgery required when the patients combined with acute ileus, perforation and hemorrhage; 2. Extralevator abdominoperineal resection needed; 3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) IV or V; 4. Combined with other tumors; 5. Severe mental illness; (7)Serious cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled infections, or other serious uncontrolled concomitant disease; (8)Expectation of lateral lymph node dissection preoperatively

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complication rate of perineal woundWithin 30 days after operationthe complications of perineal wound are include wound infection, wound effusion, wound liquefaction, wound dehiscence, seroma or hematoma ,delayed wound healing, presacral or perineal abscess, perineal or pelvic floor hernia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CTCAE grade for complications of perineal woundWithin 30 days after surgerythe CTCAE grade for complications of perineal wound within 30 days after surgery
The incidence of each complication of perineal woundWithin 30 days after surgeryThe incidence of each complication of perineal wound within 30 days after surgery
The rate of reoperationWithin 30 days after surgeryThe rate of reoperation within 30 days after surgery
The volumes of presacral drainageWithin 3, 5, 7 days after surgeryThe volumes of presacral drainage within 3, 5, 7 days after surgery
The volumes of presacral residual cavity hydrops3 and 7 days postoperativelyThe volumes of presacral residual cavity hydrops within 3 and 7 days postoperatively
Primary wound healing rateWithin 30 days after operationthe Primary wound healing rate within 30 days after operation
Removal time of presacral drainage tubeWithin 30 days after surgeryRemoval time of presacral drainage tube within 30 days after surgery
Scar scores for perineal wound and evaluation of patients' overall satisfactionWithin 30 days after surgeryScar scores for perineal wound and evaluation of patients' overall satisfaction within 30 days after surgery
Hospital stay after surgeryWithin 30 days after surgeryHospital stay after surgery within 30 days after surgery
The operation timeIntraoperativelyThe operation time
The times of dressing change of perineal woundWithin 3, 5, 7 days after surgeryThe times of dressing change of perineal wound within 3, 5, 7 days after surgery

Contacts

Primary ContactLei Wang, MD, PhD
leiwangyinhu@126.com86-20-38254052

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026