Skip to content

Outcomes of Rotating Platform Versus Mobile Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Outcomes of Rotating Platform Versus Mobile Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03731676
Enrollment
250
Registered
2018-11-06
Start date
2000-12-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2021-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Total Knee Arthroplasty

Brief summary

Patients were randomly assigned to a fixed bearing or rotating platform of two prostheses. A subsequent study (the one retrospectively registering the original study) asked these patients a series of questions from published questionnaires to assess long term outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICEFixed bearing total knee arthroplasty

Fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty

DEVICERotating platform total knee arthroplasty

Rotating platform total knee arthroplasty

Sponsors

William Hopkinson
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Osteoarthritis 2. Rheumatoid or other inflammatory arthritis 3. Post-traumatic arthritis 4. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis 5. Avascular necrosis

Exclusion criteria

1. History of recent/active joint sepsis 2. Charcot neuropathy 3. Psycho-social disorders that would limit rehabilitation 4. Metabolic disorders of calcified tissues, such as Paget's disease 5. Joint replacement due to autoimmune disorders 6. Skeletal immaturity 7. Ligamentous laxity requiring a constrained prosthesis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Functional Status over timePre-operative, Post-operative Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Year 1, Year 2, Year 5, Year 10, Year 12, Year 15 and Year 20.Knee Society Clinical Rating Scale
Change in Osteoarthritis Status over timePre-operative, Post-operative Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Year 1, Year 2, Year 5, Year 10, Year 12, Year 15 and Year 20.Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)- A 24 item questionnaire to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items), Stiffness (2 items), Physical function (17 items)
Change in Overall Health Status over timePre-operative, Post-operative Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Year 1, Year 2, Year 5, Year 10, Year 12, Year 15 and Year 20.Medical Outcomes Study Short Form -36 Health Survey (SF-36)- A 36 item questionnaire to assess overall health.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Satisfaction of Knee over timePre-operative, Post-operative Week 6, Month 3, Month 6, Year 1, Year 2, Year 5, Year 10, Year 12, Year 15 and Year 20.4-point Likert scale used to assess satisfaction with knee Scale-1. Extremely satisfied 2. Satisfied 3. Unsatisfied 4. Extremely unsatisfied

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026