Skip to content

Compensation for Smaller Portion Sizes and Portion Size Normality

Compensation for Smaller Portion Sizes and Portion Size Normality: Two Laboratory

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03731273
Enrollment
90
Registered
2018-11-06
Start date
2016-10-04
Completion date
2017-07-25
Last updated
2018-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Portion Size

Brief summary

Reducing food portion size is a potential strategy to reduce energy intake. However it is unclear at what point consumers compensate for reductions in portion size by increasing energy intake from other items. The investigators tested the hypothesis that reductions to food portion size will only result in significant compensatory eating when the reduced portion size is no longer visually perceived as 'normal'. In two within-subjects experiments, participants (Study 1: N = 45, M BMI = 26.9; Study 2: N = 37, M BMI = 26.9; 51% female) were served different sized portions of a lunchtime meal on three occasions: a 'large-normal', a 'small-normal', and a 'smaller than normal' portion. Both the reduction from 'large-normal' to 'small-normal' and from 'small-normal' to 'smaller than normal' portions represented the same change in food volume and energy content (84g, 77kcal Study 1; 98g, 117kcal Study 2). Participants were able to serve themselves additional helpings of the same food (Study 1), or dessert items (Study 2).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALportion size

Smaller than normal portion size - the intervention is the meal size perceived as 'smaller than normal' that participants are provided with during a lunchtime session in the laboratory. 'Small-normal' portion size - the intervention is the meal size perceived as 'small normal' that participants are provided with during a lunchtime session in the laboratory. 'Large normal' portion size - the intervention is the meal size perceived as 'large normal' that participants are provided with during a lunchtime session in the laboratory.

Sponsors

Medical Research Council
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Liverpool
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* general liking and willingness to consume the test foods in each study

Exclusion criteria

* food allergies, intolerances or specific dietary requirements (including being vegetarian or vegan) * a history of eating disorders;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Meal energy intakeImmediateEnergy intake from the served portion
'Compensatory' (additional) energy intakeImmediateEnergy intake from additional food provided for consumption after the portion-manipulated meal

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026