Skip to content

Cross-sectional Analysis of Non-technical Attributes and Surgical Experience in Surgical Staff, Trainees and Applicants.

Non-technical Attributes and Surgical Experience: a Cross-sectional Study Comparing Communication Styles and Attitudes in Surgical Staff, Trainees and Applicants

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03728088
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-11-01
Start date
2016-09-01
Completion date
2025-10-01
Last updated
2024-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

Non-technical attributes, Surgical training, Communication style, Risk aversion, Reaction to uncertainty, Self-assessment

Brief summary

This study consists of an analysis of the communication styles and attitudes towards risk and uncertainty (i.e. non-technical attributes) in a surgical population with varying clinical experience. The study aims to investigate the differences and specific patterns in non-technical attributes that may be discerned in these groups and how these non technical attributes develop throughout surgical training.

Detailed description

This study evaluated the communication styles and attitudes towards risk and uncertainty in a population of surgical candidates (pre- and postgraduates), surgical trainees and surgical staff members, from the specialties of general surgery, orthopedics, urology and plastic surgery. After signing informed consent, participants complete an on-line questionnaire, which contains a set of validated tools. Initially, a cross-sectional analysis of the non-technical attributes will be conducted, to identify any patters, similarities or differences between participant groups. The study hypothesis is that significant differences can be observed in participant attributes, which relate to their clinical experience. Additionally, surgical candidates who agree to participate in this study and are accepted for a surgical training in either general surgery, orthopaedics, urology or plastic surgery, will be invited to repeat the questionnaire at a 2-year interval, to investigate the evolution of their non-technical attributes throughout their training and to identify general patterns.

Interventions

OTHERRating scales concerning non-technical attributes

Sponsors

University Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL

Inclusion criteria

* Participant is part of any of the following groups: * Applicant for surgical training in general surgery, orthopedics, urology or plastic surgery. * Trainee in general surgery, orthopedics, urology, plastic surgery. * Staff in general surgery, orthopedics, urology, plastic surgery. * Participant is active at Ghent University Hospital or an affiliated training hospital. No

Exclusion criteria

apply to this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant communication stylesRating scale is completed by all groups on study inclusion, after signing informed consent.Communication Styles Inventory-96 scale:Subdomains: Expressiveness (range: 1-5); Preciseness (range: 1-5); Verbal aggressiveness (range: 1-5); Questioningness (range: 1-5); Emotionality (range: 1-5); Impression manipulativeness (range: 1-5)
Participant attitudes towards uncertaintyRating scale is completed by all groups on study inclusion, after signing informed consent. For the candidate group, this measure is repeated on a selection day during the surgical selection process, +- 1 - 2 months after study inclusionPhysicians' Reactions to Uncertainty (PRU) scale: Anxiety due to uncertainty (Range: 5-30 ); Concern about bad outcomes (3-18); Reluctance to disclose uncertainty to patients (Range: 5-30); Reluctance to disclose mistakes to physicians (Range 2-12)
Participant attitudes towards taking risksRating scale is completed by all groups on study inclusion, after signing informed consent. For the candidate group, this measure is repeated on a selection day during the surgical selection process, +- 1 - 2 months after study inclusionPhysicians' risk attitude (PRA) Scale (Range: 2-12)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant perceived actual health statusRating scale is completed by all groups on study inclusion, after signing informed consent.Short Form-36 scale (Range: 10-50)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026