Skip to content

Von Willebrand Factor Point-of-care Testing to Improve Minimally Invasive TAVI Outcomes

Point-of-care Haemostasis Testing of Von Willebrand Factor Function Embedded in Catheterization Laboratory to Improve Real-time Management of Paravalvular Regurgitation During Minimally Invasive TAVI

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03728049
Acronym
WITAVI-REAL
Enrollment
944
Registered
2018-11-01
Start date
2019-12-18
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Aortic Valve Stenosis

Keywords

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, Paravalvular regurgitation, Point-of-care test, Biomarker, Aortic stenosis, Von willebrand Factor

Brief summary

Paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is an important complication of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) that is associated with a 2.5-fold increase risk of mortality. Transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) is considered as the gold standard to assess the severity of PVR and guide the physician to perform corrective procedures during TAVI, but it requires general anesthesia (GA). With such approach (TEE+GA), the PARTNERII trial has demonstrated that very low rate of PVR (3,5%) can be achieved with current devices. Registries have demonstrated a strong trend for using a mini-invasive approach in which the procedure is performed under conscious sedation (CS) without TEE. However, several studies raised concerns on the safety of this mini-invasive approach concerning the PVR rate. Thus, the accurate and real-time assessment of the presence and severity of PVR is an unmet clinical need to optimize TAVI without TEE guidance. A recent study reported that a blood biomarker reflecting the Von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity, i.e. the closure time with adenosine diphosphate (CT-ADP), is a valuable non-invasive, highly reproducible, and easy to perform alternative to TEE for PVR evaluation. The hypothesis is that the measurement of CT-ADP during TAVI performed without TEE guidance can improve both the detection of significant PVR and thus the procedural and clinical outcomes (primary objective).

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCT-ADP performed during TAVI procedure

The CT-ADP will be performed in the catheterization laboratory and revealed to the operator. The decision to undertake corrective procedure will be based on CT-ADP on top of standard methods of PVR assessment.

OTHERNo CT-ADP performed during TAVI procedure

PVR assessment with the standard methods only (TTE and/or angiography and/or hemodynamics but excluding TEE and CT-ADP). The decision to undertake corrective procedure will be left at the discretion of the operator.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Lille
Lead SponsorOTHER
Siemens Healthineers, France
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Multicenter open-label randomized controlled clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients scheduled to undergo mini-invasive TAVI at any of the participating centers and fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be eligible for entry in the study. The decision to undertake TAVI will be made by the local heart team. * Symptomatic aortic stenosis scheduled to undergo TAVI * TAVI performed via mini-invasive approach defined as: transfemoral access route; local anesthesia/conscious sedation; no TEE guidance. * All types of prosthetic valves (balloon-expandable, self-expandable, others) are accepted

Exclusion criteria

* TAVI through non-transfemoral approach * TAVI with concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention * TAVI performed under general anesthesia * TAVI performed under TEE guidance * Valve-in-valve procedure * Inability to provide informed consent * Associated ≥ moderate mitral regurgitation * Peri-procedural treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel treatment / direct oral anticoagulant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
composite 1-year event rate ofAt 1 yearrate of All-cause death; rate of Paravalvular regurgitation ≥ moderate; rate of Rehospitalization; rate of Stroke; rate of Delayed valve re-intervention; rate of Mean transaortic gradient \>20mmHg.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause death rateAt 30 days, at 1 yearAll-cause death
PVR rateAt 30 days, at 1 yearPVR superior or egal to moderate
Rehospitalization for heart failure rateAt 30 days, at 1 yearRehospitalization for heart failure
Delayed valve re-intervention rateAt 1 yearDelayed valve re-intervention
Mean transaortic gradient >20mmHg rateAt 30 daysMean transaortic gradient \>20mmHg
composite event rateAt 30 daysAll-cause death; PVR superior or egal to moderate; Rehospitalization for heart failure; All stroke (transient or definite); Delayed valve re-intervention; Mean transaortic gradient \>20mmHg
composite event rate of the following individual safety endpointsat 24hoursAortic injury; Coronary artery occlusion; Tamponade; All stroke (transient or definite)
Aortic injury rateat 24hoursAortic injury
Coronary artery occlusion rateat 24hoursCoronary artery occlusion
Tamponade rateat 24hoursTamponade
All stroke (transient or definite) rateat 24hoursAll stroke (transient or definite)

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTEric Van Belle, MD,PhD
eric.vanbelle2@chru-lille.fr03 20 44 50 15
CONTACTFlavien Vincent, MD, PhD
flavien.vincent@chru-lille.fr03 20 44 59 62 (31588)
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREric Vanbelle, MD, PhD

University Hospital, Lille

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 23, 2026