Skip to content

Robotic Versus Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Robotic Versus Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy for Carcinoma Esophagus: a Prospective Comparative Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03727126
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-11-01
Start date
2018-11-01
Completion date
2021-01-01
Last updated
2020-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Cancer

Keywords

Esophagectomy, Robotic esophagectomy, Laparoscopic esophagectomy, Minimally invasive esophagectomy, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, McKeown's esophagectomy

Brief summary

Esophageal cancer is a debilitating condition. The treatment involved is complex requiring a combination of chemotherapy and surgery in most cases. Complete removal of the tumor and the adjacent lymph nodes is of utmost importance in improving the survival. Lymph node yield following surgery helps in proper staging of the disease and is an important prognosticating variable. It is hypothesized that the lymph node yield following robotic esophagectomy is higher than that following thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy. The study aims to compare the short term oncological outcomes following robotic esophagectomy and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus.

Interventions

Removal of the esophagus and its draining lymph nodes using robotic surgical instruments

PROCEDUREThoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy

Removal of the esophagus and its draining lymph nodes using conventional thoracoscopic and laparoscopic techniques

Sponsors

GEM Hospital & Research Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Resectable esophageal carcinoma, either squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma in the middle or lower part the esophagus

Exclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 4 and above * Esophagectomy for other non-malignant conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lymph node yield7 days after Index SurgeryTotal number of lymph nodes harvested

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ComplicationsUp to 90 days after surgeryIntraoperative and post operative adverse events assessed by Clavien Dindo classification system
ICU stayDuring index admission or within 30 days after surgeryDuration of stay in ICU following surgery
Hospital stayDuring index admission or re admission within 30 daysLength of stay in hospital following surgery
Surgical margin status7 days after Index SurgeryThe proximal, distal and circumferential surgical margins will be assessed by pathological evaluation for the presence of tumor and will be assigned an R category as defined by the College of American Pathologists. R0 would indicate no evidence of residual tumor. Presence of microscopic tumor at margins would be designated as R1 whereas the presence of macroscopically visible tumor at margins would be designated as R2.
Duration of surgery1 day after surgeryTime taken to complete the surgical procedure recorded in minutes
Blood lossDuring surgery and up to 24 hours after index surgeryAmount of blood lost during and within 24 hours of surgery
Conversion rate1 day after surgeryNeed for conversion of the procedure to open or other alternate technique
MortalityDuring index admission or within 90 days following surgeryDeath following surgery

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactShankar Balasubramanian
shanxar@gmail.com+919910766534

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026