Skip to content

A Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety Of Atezolizumab or Placebo in Combination With Neoadjuvant Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed By Paclitaxel + Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab In Early Her2-Positive Breast Cancer

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety Of Atezolizumab or Placebo in Combination With Neoadjuvant Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed By Paclitaxel + Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab In Early Her2-Positive Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03726879
Acronym
IMpassion050
Enrollment
454
Registered
2018-11-01
Start date
2019-01-11
Completion date
2023-08-24
Last updated
2024-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

This study (also known as IMpassion050) will evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab compared with placebo when given in combination with neoadjuvant dose-dense anthracycline (doxorubicin) + cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (ddAC-PacHP) in patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer (T2-4, N1-3, M0).

Interventions

DRUGAtezolizumab

Atezolizumab will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo matched to atezolizumab will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.

DRUGDoxorubicin

Doxorubicin will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.

DRUGPaclitaxel

Paclitaxel will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.

DRUGTrastuzumab

Trastuzumab will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.

DRUGPertuzumab

Pertuzumab will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.

DRUGTrastuzumab Emtansine

Participants without pCR have the option of receiving adjuvant atezolizumab/placebo combined with Trastuzumab Emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV Q3W.

Sponsors

Chugai Pharmaceutical
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of HER2-positive breast cancer, and hormonal and PD-L1 status, as documented through central testing of a representative tumor tissue specimen * Primary breast tumor size of \> 2 cm by any radiographic measurement * Stage at presentation: T2-T4, N1-N3, M0 as determined by AJCC staging system, 8th edition * Pathologic confirmation of nodal involvement with malignancy must be determined by fine needle aspiration or core-needle biopsy. Surgical excision of lymph nodes is not permitted. * Patients with multifocal tumors are eligible provided at least one focus is sampled and centrally confirmed as HER2-positive. * Patients with multicentric tumors are eligible provided all discrete lesions are sampled and centrally confirmed as HER2-positive. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1 * Baseline LVEF \>= 55% measured by echocardiogram (ECHO) or multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scans * Adequate hematologic and end-organ function obtained within 14 days prior to initiation of study treatment * For women of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent or use contraceptive methods, and agreement to refrain from donating eggs * For men: agreement to remain abstinent or use contraceptive measures, and agreement to refrain from donating sperm

Exclusion criteria

* Prior history of invasive breast cancer * Stage IV (metastatic) breast cancer * Patients with synchronous bilateral invasive breast cancer * Prior systemic therapy for treatment of breast cancer * Previous therapy with anthracyclines or taxanes for any malignancy * Ulcerating or inflammatory breast cancer * Undergone incisional and/or excisional biopsy of primary tumor and/or axillary lymph nodes * Sentinel lymph node procedure or axillary lymph node dissection prior to initiation of neoadjuvant therapy * History of other malignancy within 5 years prior to screening, with the exception of those patients who have a negligible risk of metastasis or death * Cardiopulmonary dysfunction * Dyspnea at rest * Active or history of autoimmune disease or immune deficiency * Pregnancy or breastfeeding, or intention of becoming pregnant during study treatment or within 5 months after the final dose of atezolizumab/placebo, 6 months after the final dose of doxorubicin, 12 months after the final dose of cyclophosphamide, 6 months after the final dose of paclitaxel, or 7 months after the final dose of trastuzumab, pertuzumab, or trastuzumab emtansine whichever occurs last

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the PD-L1-Positive Population (IC 1/2/3)From randomization to approximately 6 monthspCR is defined as the absence of residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) (i.e., ypT0/is ypN0 in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer \[AJCC\] staging system, 8th edition). Treatment comparison was made using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by disease stage (T2 vs. T3-4) and hormone receptor status (estrogen receptor (ER) positive and/or progesterone receptor (PgR) positive vs. ER negative and PgR negative).
pCR in the ITT PopulationFrom randomization to approximately 6 monthspCR is defined as the absence of residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) (i.e., ypT0/is ypN0 in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer \[AJCC\] staging system, 8th edition). Treatment comparison was made using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by disease stage (T2 vs. T3-4) and hormone receptor status (ER positive and/or PgR positive vs. ER negative and PgR negative).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event-Free Survival (EFS)From randomization to first documented disease recurrence, unequivocal tumor progression determined by the treating investigator, or death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)EFS defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease recurrence, unequivocal tumor progression determined by the treating investigator, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, in all patients and based upon hormone receptor status (ER/PgR positive or ER/PgR negative) and PD-L1 status (IC 0; IC 1/2/3).
Disease-Free Survival (DFS)Time from surgery to first documented disease recurrence or death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)DFS defined as the time from surgery to the first documented disease recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, in all patients who undergo surgery and based upon PD-L1 status (IC 0; IC 1/2/3).
Overall Survival (OS)From randomization to date of death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)OS defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause in all participants and based upon PD-L1 status (IC 0; IC 1/2/3).
Mean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Baseline; Day 1 of Cycle 1-9, on Day 1 of every other cycle thereafter until Cycle 22; at the treatment discontinuation or early termination visit and follow up visit. Cycle 1-4, each cycle is 14 days. Cycle 5-22, each cycle is 21 days.EORTC QLQ-C30 is a self-reported questionnaire that included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), global health scale/quality of life (GHS/QOL) and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Questions 1-28 on the QLQ-C30 were on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Questions 29-30 (GHS scale) were on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). For this instrument, GHS/QOL and functional scales were linearly transformed so each score ranged 0-100, where lower scores indicate poorer functioning (e.g., worsening) and higher scores indicate better functioning (e.g., improvement).
Mean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusBaseline; Day 1 of Cycle 1-9, on Day 1 of every other cycle thereafter until Cycle 22; at the treatment discontinuation or early termination visit and follow up visit. Cycle 1-4, each cycle is 14 days. Cycle 5-22, each cycle is 21 days.EORTC QLQ-C30 is a self-reported questionnaire that included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), GHS/QOL and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Questions 1-28 on the QLQ-C30 were on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Questions 29-30 (GHS scale) were on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). For this instrument, GHS/QOL and functional scales were linearly transformed so each score ranged 0-100, where lower scores indicate poorer functioning (e.g., worsening) and higher scores indicate better functioning (e.g., improvement).
Percentage of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom randomization up end of study (approximately 4 years and 7 months)
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab30 minutes post infusion on Day 1 Cycle (C) 1.Cmax is the maximum (or peak) concentration that a study drug achieves in the body.
Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of AtezolizumabPre-dose on Day 1 Cycle (C) 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, ATDV (an average of 1 year). C 2-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-16, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).Cmin is the minimum (or trough) concentration that a study drug achieves in the body.
Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in SerumPre-dose on Day 1 Cycle (C) 8, 12, and at treatment discontinuation visit (ATDV) (an average of 1 year). C 1-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-12, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).
Percentage of Participants With pCR Based on Hormone Receptor StatusFrom randomization to approximately 24 monthspCR (ypT0/is ypN0) based upon hormone receptor status (estrogen receptor \[ER\]/progesterone receptor \[PgR\] positive or ER/PgR negative).
Cmin of Trastuzumab Emtansine in SerumDay 1 of Cycle 9 and Cycle 12, at treatment disontinuation visit (an average of 1 year). Cycle 9 and 12 are each 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required at the time of treatment discontinuation/completion (an average of 1 year).Cmin is the minimum (or trough) concentration that a study drug achieves in the body.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to AtezolizumabDay 1 Cycle (C) 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, at treatment discontinuation visit (ATDV) (an average of 1 year). C 1-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-16, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to TrastuzumabDay 1 Cycle (C) 1, 8, 12 and at treatment discontinuation visit (ATDV) (an average of 1 year). C 1-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-12, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to PertuzumabDay 1 of Cycle (C) 1, 8, 12, and at treatment discontinuation visit (ATDV) (an average of 1 year). C 1-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-12, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to Trastuzumab EmtansineDay 1 of Cycle 9 and Cycle 12, at treatment disontinuation visit (an average of 1 year). Cycle 9 and 12 are each 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required at the time of treatment discontinuation/completion (an average of 1 year).Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).
Percentage of Participants With pCR Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusFrom randomization to approximately 24 monthspCR is defined as the absence of residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) (i.e., ypT0/is ypN0 in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer \[AJCC\] staging system, 8th edition).
EFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusFrom randomization to first documented disease recurrence, unequivocal tumor progression determined by the treating investigator, or death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)
DFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusTime from surgery to first documented disease recurrence or death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)
OS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusFrom randomization to date of death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)
Cmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine in SerumDay 1 of Cycle 9 and Cycle 12, at treatment disontinuation visit (an average of 1 year). Cycle 9 and 12 are each 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required at the time of treatment discontinuation/completion (an average of 1 year).Cmax is the maximum (or peak) concentration that a study drug achieves in the body.
Percentage of Participants With pCR in the PD-L1-Negative PopulationFrom randomization to approximately 24 monthspCR (ypT0/is ypN0) in the IC 0 Population

Countries

Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Germany, Italy, Japan, Poland, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 74 centers in 12 countries.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 669 participants were screened, of which a total of 454 participants were enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHP
Participants received atezolizumab (atezo) 840 mg IV Q2W for 4 cycles during neoadjuvant phase with ddAC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 & cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV), followed by atezo 1200 mg IV Q3W for 4 cycles with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly for 12 continuous weeks, trastuzumab 6 mg/kg IV (with initial 8mg/kg IV loading dose) Q3W for 4 cycles, & pertuzumab 420 mg IV (with initial 840-mg IV loading dose) Q3W for 4 cycles. During adjuvant phase, participants continued to receive following study treatments Q3W to complete up to 1 year HER2-target therapy inclusive of therapy given both in neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting: atezo 1200 mg IV Q3W, trastuzumab 6 mg/kg IV (with initial 8-mg/kg IV loading dose) Q3W, & pertuzumab 420 mg IV (with initial 840-mg IV loading dose) Q3W. Participants who did not achieve pCR had option of receiving blinded atezo+trastuzumab emtansine post surgery for 14 cycles. In response to USM DIL dated 3 Feb 2021 treatment with atezo was discontinued.
226
Placebo + ddAC-PacHP
Participants received placebo 840 mg IV Q2W for 4 cycles during neoadjuvant phase with ddAC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 & cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV), followed by placebo 1200 mg IV Q3W for 4 cycles with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly for 12 continuous weeks, trastuzumab 6 mg/kg IV (with initial 8-mg/kg IV loading dose) Q3W for 4 cycles & pertuzumab 420 mg IV (with initial 840-mg IV loading dose) Q3W for 4 cycles. During adjuvant phase, participants continued to receive following study treatments Q3W to complete up to 1 year HER2-target therapy inclusive of therapy given both in neoadjuvant & adjuvant setting: placebo 1200 mg IV Q3W, trastuzumab 6 mg/kg IV (with initial 8-mg/kg IV loading dose) Q3W, & pertuzumab 420 mg IV (with initial 840-mg IV loading dose) Q3W. Participants who did not achieve pCR had option of receiving blinded atezolizumab + trastuzumab emtansine post surgery for 14 cycles. In response to USM DIL, dated 3 Feb 2021 treatment with placebo was discontinued.
228
Total454

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath1113
Overall StudyDisease relapse10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up30
Overall StudyPhysician Decision02
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyTSH result is unstable01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject56

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlacebo + ddAC-PacHPAtezolizumab +ddAC-PacHP
Age, Continuous50.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
50.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
50.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
128 Participants66 Participants62 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
21 Participants13 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
59 Participants33 Participants26 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
386 Participants191 Participants195 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
9 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
7 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
291 Participants142 Participants149 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
452 Participants227 Participants225 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
11 / 22613 / 228
other
Total, other adverse events
226 / 226225 / 225
serious
Total, serious adverse events
65 / 22647 / 225

Outcome results

Primary

pCR in the ITT Population

pCR is defined as the absence of residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) (i.e., ypT0/is ypN0 in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer \[AJCC\] staging system, 8th edition). Treatment comparison was made using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by disease stage (T2 vs. T3-4) and hormone receptor status (ER positive and/or PgR positive vs. ER negative and PgR negative).

Time frame: From randomization to approximately 6 months

Population: The ITT population is defined as all randomized participants, regardless of whether the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPpCR in the ITT Population62.4 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPpCR in the ITT Population62.7 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.955195% CI: [0.67, 1.46]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the PD-L1-Positive Population (IC 1/2/3)

pCR is defined as the absence of residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) (i.e., ypT0/is ypN0 in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer \[AJCC\] staging system, 8th edition). Treatment comparison was made using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by disease stage (T2 vs. T3-4) and hormone receptor status (estrogen receptor (ER) positive and/or progesterone receptor (PgR) positive vs. ER negative and PgR negative).

Time frame: From randomization to approximately 6 months

Population: The PD-L1-positive population is defined as participants in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population whose PD-L1 status is IC1/2/3 at the time of randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the PD-L1-Positive Population (IC 1/2/3)64.2 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the PD-L1-Positive Population (IC 1/2/3)72.5 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.184695% CI: [0.37, 1.21]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Cmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Serum

Cmax is the maximum (or peak) concentration that a study drug achieves in the body.

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 9 and Cycle 12, at treatment disontinuation visit (an average of 1 year). Cycle 9 and 12 are each 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required at the time of treatment discontinuation/completion (an average of 1 year).

Population: The PK-evaluable population is defined as all participants who received any dose of study medication and who have at least one post-baseline PK sample available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPCmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine in SerumC9D184.3 ug/mLStandard Deviation 29
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPCmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine in SerumC12D182.0 ug/mLStandard Deviation 32.2
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPCmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine in SerumC9D180.5 ug/mLStandard Deviation 26.8
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPCmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine in SerumC12D182.0 ug/mLStandard Deviation 37.2
Secondary

Cmin of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Serum

Cmin is the minimum (or trough) concentration that a study drug achieves in the body.

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 9 and Cycle 12, at treatment disontinuation visit (an average of 1 year). Cycle 9 and 12 are each 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required at the time of treatment discontinuation/completion (an average of 1 year).

Population: The PK-evaluable population is defined as all participants who received any dose of study medication and who have at least one post-baseline PK sample available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPCmin of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Serum2.18 ug/mLStandard Deviation 5.09
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPCmin of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Serum1.22 ug/mLStandard Deviation 1.49
Secondary

DFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation Status

Time frame: Time from surgery to first documented disease recurrence or death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)

Population: The DFS-evaluable population is defined as participants in the ITT population who undergo surgery.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPDFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMissingNA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPDFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMutatedNA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPDFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusWildtypeNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPDFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMissingNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPDFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMutatedNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPDFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusWildtypeNA Months
Comparison: PIK3CA-Missing95% CI: [0.07, 18.91]Regression, Cox
Comparison: PIK3CA-Mutated95% CI: [0.19, 1.92]
Comparison: PIK3CA-Wildtype95% CI: [0.33, 1.55]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Disease-Free Survival (DFS)

DFS defined as the time from surgery to the first documented disease recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, in all patients who undergo surgery and based upon PD-L1 status (IC 0; IC 1/2/3).

Time frame: Time from surgery to first documented disease recurrence or death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)

Population: The DFS-evaluable population is defined as participants in the ITT population who undergo surgery.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPDisease-Free Survival (DFS)All ParticipantsNA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPDisease-Free Survival (DFS)PD-L1 IC1/2/3NA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPDisease-Free Survival (DFS)PD-L1 IC0NA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPDisease-Free Survival (DFS)All ParticipantsNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPDisease-Free Survival (DFS)PD-L1 IC1/2/3NA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPDisease-Free Survival (DFS)PD-L1 IC0NA Months
Comparison: All Participants95% CI: [0.38, 1.32]Log Rank
Comparison: PD-L1 IC1/2/395% CI: [0.51, 3.69]Log Rank
Comparison: PD-L1 IC095% CI: [0.19, 1.02]Log Rank
Secondary

EFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation Status

Time frame: From randomization to first documented disease recurrence, unequivocal tumor progression determined by the treating investigator, or death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)

Population: The ITT population is defined as all randomized participants, regardless of whether the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPEFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMissingNA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPEFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMutatedNA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPEFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusWildtypeNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPEFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMissingNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPEFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMutatedNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPEFS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusWildtypeNA Months
Comparison: PIK3CA-Missing95% CI: [0.22, 26.42]Regression, Cox
Comparison: PIK3CA-Mutated95% CI: [0.23, 1.9]Regression, Cox
Comparison: PIK3CA-Wildtype95% CI: [0.45, 1.87]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Event-Free Survival (EFS)

EFS defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease recurrence, unequivocal tumor progression determined by the treating investigator, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, in all patients and based upon hormone receptor status (ER/PgR positive or ER/PgR negative) and PD-L1 status (IC 0; IC 1/2/3).

Time frame: From randomization to first documented disease recurrence, unequivocal tumor progression determined by the treating investigator, or death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)

Population: The ITT population is defined as all randomized participants, regardless of whether the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPEvent-Free Survival (EFS)PD-L1 IC1/2/3 ParticipantsNA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPEvent-Free Survival (EFS)ER/PgR Negative ParticipantsNA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPEvent-Free Survival (EFS)PD-L1 IC0 ParticipantsNA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPEvent-Free Survival (EFS)ER/PgR Positive ParticipantsNA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPEvent-Free Survival (EFS)All ParticipantsNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPEvent-Free Survival (EFS)ER/PgR Positive ParticipantsNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPEvent-Free Survival (EFS)All ParticipantsNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPEvent-Free Survival (EFS)PD-L1 IC1/2/3 ParticipantsNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPEvent-Free Survival (EFS)PD-L1 IC0 ParticipantsNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPEvent-Free Survival (EFS)ER/PgR Negative ParticipantsNA Months
Comparison: All Participants95% CI: [0.5, 1.59]Log Rank
Comparison: PD-L1 IC1/2/395% CI: [0.65, 4.32]Log Rank
Comparison: PD-L1 IC0 Participants95% CI: [0.27, 1.22]Log Rank
Comparison: ER/PgR Negative Participants95% CI: [0.58, 2.82]Log Rank
Comparison: ER/PgR Positive Participants95% CI: [0.24, 1.36]Log Rank
Secondary

Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab

Cmax is the maximum (or peak) concentration that a study drug achieves in the body.

Time frame: 30 minutes post infusion on Day 1 Cycle (C) 1.

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK)-evaluable population is defined as all participants who received any dose of study medication and who have at least one post-baseline PK sample available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Atezolizumab348 micrograms/milliliters (ug/mL)Standard Deviation 122
Secondary

Mean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a self-reported questionnaire that included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), global health scale/quality of life (GHS/QOL) and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Questions 1-28 on the QLQ-C30 were on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Questions 29-30 (GHS scale) were on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). For this instrument, GHS/QOL and functional scales were linearly transformed so each score ranged 0-100, where lower scores indicate poorer functioning (e.g., worsening) and higher scores indicate better functioning (e.g., improvement).

Time frame: Baseline; Day 1 of Cycle 1-9, on Day 1 of every other cycle thereafter until Cycle 22; at the treatment discontinuation or early termination visit and follow up visit. Cycle 1-4, each cycle is 14 days. Cycle 5-22, each cycle is 21 days.

Population: The patient-reported outcomes (PRO)-evaluable population is defined as participants in the ITT population with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline PRO assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 7 D43-15.48 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.31
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C3D1-6.82 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.39
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Baseline91.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.28
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Cycle (C) 2 Day (D) 1-13.06 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.02
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: C3D1-17.88 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.2
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: C4D1-22.27 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.04
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: C5D1-24.08 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.21
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: C6D1-20.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.46
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: C7D1-19.21 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.5
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: C8D1-21.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.48
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 1 D1-22.82 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.7
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 13 D85-14.42 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.77
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 19 D127-14.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.26
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 25 D169-13.68 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 31 D211-13.24 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.69
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 37 D253-9.34 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.11
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: End of Treatment (EOT)-14.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.18
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Follow-Up (FU) 1 D1-11.02 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.06
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: FU2D92-9.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.24
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: FU3D183-16.67 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.67
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: FU4D274-27.78 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.46
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Baseline92.74 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C2D1-4.32 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.75
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C4D1-11.98 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.67
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C5D1-12.84 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.76
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C6D1-12.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.97
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C7D1-11.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.86
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C8D1-13.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.11
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 1 D1-12.27 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.26
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 7 D43-8.96 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.74
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 13 D85-8.38 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.97
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 19 D127-9.22 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.17
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 25 D169-9.35 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.19
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 31 D211-7.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.69
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 37 D253-7.77 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.67
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: EOT-8.20 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.78
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: FU1D1-8.06 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.11
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: FU2D92-3.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.52
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: FU3D1832.22 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.78
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: FU4D2740.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 13 D85-8.88 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.04
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: FU4D274-25.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.13
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: FU5D457-33.33 Units on a scale
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C2D1-3.88 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.44
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: FU3D183-14.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.51
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Baseline92.20 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.92
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Baseline90.85 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.26
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 19 D127-10.03 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.52
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Cycle (C) 2 Day (D) 1-9.83 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.08
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C3D1-7.18 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.91
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: C3D1-15.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.64
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: FU1D1-11.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.29
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C4D1-9.48 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.65
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: C5D1-19.79 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.36
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 25 D169-8.45 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.34
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: C6D1-18.60 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.01
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C5D1-10.67 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.91
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: C7D1-16.67 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.34
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: FU5D45760.00 Units on a scale
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: C8D1-17.79 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.39
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C6D1-11.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.05
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 1 D1-26.24 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.27
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: C4D1-17.98 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.1
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 7 D43-15.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.5
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 31 D211-9.88 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.84
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 13 D85-15.24 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.99
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C7D1-11.45 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.43
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 19 D127-15.42 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.74
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: FU2D92-9.90 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.73
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 25 D169-15.88 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.99
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: C8D1-11.56 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.54
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 31 D211-14.55 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.43
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 37 D253-10.78 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.82
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Adjuvant Week 37 D253-15.43 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.35
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 1 D1-12.19 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.27
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: End of Treatment (EOT)-18.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.04
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: FU4D274-6.67 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.93
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: Follow-Up (FU) 1 D1-17.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.21
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: Adjuvant Week 7 D43-8.60 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.33
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: FU2D92-14.65 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.94
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Physical: EOT-13.05 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.17
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Function (Role, Physical)Role: FU3D183-10.42 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.71
Secondary

Mean Changes From Baseline in Global Health Status

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a self-reported questionnaire that included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), GHS/QOL and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Questions 1-28 on the QLQ-C30 were on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Questions 29-30 (GHS scale) were on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). For this instrument, GHS/QOL and functional scales were linearly transformed so each score ranged 0-100, where lower scores indicate poorer functioning (e.g., worsening) and higher scores indicate better functioning (e.g., improvement).

Time frame: Baseline; Day 1 of Cycle 1-9, on Day 1 of every other cycle thereafter until Cycle 22; at the treatment discontinuation or early termination visit and follow up visit. Cycle 1-4, each cycle is 14 days. Cycle 5-22, each cycle is 21 days.

Population: The PRO-evaluable population is defined as participants in the ITT population with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline PRO assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 13 D85-7.07 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.31
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC4D1-13.67 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.47
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 19 D127-7.20 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.47
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC7D1-11.47 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.81
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 25 D169-8.02 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 31 D211-7.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.75
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusBaseline76.49 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.33
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 37 D253-5.95 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.71
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC8D1-12.72 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.45
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusEOT-5.96 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.08
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC5D1-14.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.76
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusFU1D1-3.90 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.64
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 1 D1-7.89 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.89
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusFU2D92-1.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.55
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC2D1-7.28 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusFU3D183-8.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.33
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 7 D43-7.51 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.97
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusFU4D274-13.89 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.73
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC6D1-12.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC3D1-10.96 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.16
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusFU4D274-31.94 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.42
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusFU5D457-16.67 Units on a scale
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 25 D169-5.05 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.39
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusBaseline76.79 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.05
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC2D1-6.31 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.54
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC3D1-8.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.93
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC4D1-10.88 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.51
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC5D1-12.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.66
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC6D1-9.99 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.96
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC7D1-10.52 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.59
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusC8D1-10.86 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.66
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 1 D1-7.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.68
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 7 D43-5.21 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.96
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 13 D85-6.75 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.13
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 19 D127-6.01 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.52
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 31 D211-7.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.56
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusAdjuvant Week 37 D253-6.03 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.72
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusEOT-9.41 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.29
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusFU1D1-5.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.01
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusFU2D92-3.03 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.11
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPMean Changes From Baseline in Global Health StatusFU3D183-7.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.06
Secondary

Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Atezolizumab

Cmin is the minimum (or trough) concentration that a study drug achieves in the body.

Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1 Cycle (C) 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, ATDV (an average of 1 year). C 2-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-16, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).

Population: The PK-evaluable population is defined as all participants who received any dose of study medication and who have at least one post-baseline PK sample available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMinimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of AtezolizumabC2D1/predose103 ug/mLStandard Deviation 40.3
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMinimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of AtezolizumabC3D1/predose163 ug/mLStandard Deviation 44.4
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMinimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of AtezolizumabC4D1/predose204 ug/mLStandard Deviation 51.9
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMinimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of AtezolizumabC8D1/predose225 ug/mLStandard Deviation 97.1
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMinimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of AtezolizumabC12D1/predose217 ug/mLStandard Deviation 101
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPMinimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of AtezolizumabC16D1/predose226 ug/mLStandard Deviation 114
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to Pertuzumab

Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle (C) 1, 8, 12, and at treatment discontinuation visit (ATDV) (an average of 1 year). C 1-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-12, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).

Population: The immunogenicity analysis included all safety evealuable participants who had at least one baseline or post-baseline ADA result from at least one sample.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to PertuzumabBL: ADA Positive6 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to PertuzumabBL: ADA Negative210 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to PertuzumabPost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Positive4 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to PertuzumabPost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Negative209 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to PertuzumabPost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Negative214 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to PertuzumabBL: ADA Positive3 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to PertuzumabPost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Positive3 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to PertuzumabBL: ADA Negative206 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to Trastuzumab

Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).

Time frame: Day 1 Cycle (C) 1, 8, 12 and at treatment discontinuation visit (ATDV) (an average of 1 year). C 1-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-12, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).

Population: The immunogenicity analysis included all safety evealuable participants who had at least one baseline or post-baseline ADA result from at least one sample.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to TrastuzumabBL: ADA Positive2 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to TrastuzumabBL: ADA Negative214 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to TrastuzumabPost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Positive1 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to TrastuzumabPost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Negative212 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to TrastuzumabPost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Negative216 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to TrastuzumabBL: ADA Positive1 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to TrastuzumabPost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Positive0 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to TrastuzumabBL: ADA Negative206 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to Trastuzumab Emtansine

Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 9 and Cycle 12, at treatment disontinuation visit (an average of 1 year). Cycle 9 and 12 are each 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required at the time of treatment discontinuation/completion (an average of 1 year).

Population: The immunogenicity analysis included all safety evealuable participants who had at least one baseline or post-baseline ADA result from at least one sample.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to Trastuzumab EmtansineBL: ADA Positive3 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to Trastuzumab EmtansineBL: ADA Negative49 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to Trastuzumab EmtansinePost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Positive1 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to Trastuzumab EmtansinePost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Negative56 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to Trastuzumab EmtansinePost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Negative54 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to Trastuzumab EmtansineBL: ADA Positive2 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to Trastuzumab EmtansinePost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Positive1 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent ADAs to Trastuzumab EmtansineBL: ADA Negative48 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab

Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).

Time frame: Day 1 Cycle (C) 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, at treatment discontinuation visit (ATDV) (an average of 1 year). C 1-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-16, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).

Population: The immunogenicity analysis included all safety evealuable participants who had at least one baseline or post-baseline ADA result from at least one sample.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to AtezolizumabBaseline (BL): ADA Positive1 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to AtezolizumabBL: ADA Negative224 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to AtezolizumabPost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Positive7 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to AtezolizumabPost-BL: Treatment-Emergent ADA Negative218 Participants
Secondary

OS Based on PIK3CA Mutation Status

Time frame: From randomization to date of death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)

Population: The ITT population is defined as all randomized participants, regardless of whether the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPOS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMissingNA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPOS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMutatedNA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPOS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusWildtypeNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPOS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMissingNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPOS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMutatedNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPOS Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusWildtypeNA Months
Comparison: PIK3CA-MissingRegression, Cox
Comparison: PIK3CA-Mutated95% CI: [0.1, 3.53]Regression, Cox
Comparison: PIK3CA-Wildtype95% CI: [0.33, 2.09]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause in all participants and based upon PD-L1 status (IC 0; IC 1/2/3).

Time frame: From randomization to date of death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)

Population: The ITT population is defined as all randomized participants, regardless of whether the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPOverall Survival (OS)All ParticipantsNA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPOverall Survival (OS)PD-L1 IC1/2/3NA Months
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPOverall Survival (OS)PD-L1 IC0NA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPOverall Survival (OS)All ParticipantsNA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPOverall Survival (OS)PD-L1 IC1/2/3NA Months
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPOverall Survival (OS)PD-L1 IC0NA Months
Comparison: All Participants95% CI: [0.4, 2]Log Rank
Comparison: PD-L1 IC1/2/395% CI: [0.42, 7.33]Log Rank
Comparison: PD-L1 IC095% CI: [0.21, 1.59]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

Time frame: From randomization up end of study (approximately 4 years and 7 months)

Population: The safety-evaluable population is defined as participants who received at least one dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events100 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events100 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With pCR Based on Hormone Receptor Status

pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) based upon hormone receptor status (estrogen receptor \[ER\]/progesterone receptor \[PgR\] positive or ER/PgR negative).

Time frame: From randomization to approximately 24 months

Population: The ITT population is defined as all randomized participants, regardless of whether the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With pCR Based on Hormone Receptor StatusER+ and/or PgR+50.9 Percentage of Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With pCR Based on Hormone Receptor StatusER- and/or PgR-74.5 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With pCR Based on Hormone Receptor StatusER+ and/or PgR+54.7 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With pCR Based on Hormone Receptor StatusER- and/or PgR-71.2 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With pCR Based on PIK3CA Mutation Status

pCR is defined as the absence of residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) (i.e., ypT0/is ypN0 in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer \[AJCC\] staging system, 8th edition).

Time frame: From randomization to approximately 24 months

Population: The ITT population is defined as all randomized participants, regardless of whether the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With pCR Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMutated40 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With pCR Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusWildtype98 Participants
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With pCR Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMissing3 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With pCR Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMutated34 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With pCR Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusWildtype101 Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With pCR Based on PIK3CA Mutation StatusMissing8 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With pCR in the PD-L1-Negative Population

pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) in the IC 0 Population

Time frame: From randomization to approximately 24 months

Population: The PD-L1-negative population is defined as participants in the ITT population whose PD-L1 status is IC 0 at the time of randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With pCR in the PD-L1-Negative Population60.7 Percentage of Participants
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPPercentage of Participants With pCR in the PD-L1-Negative Population53.8 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Serum

Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1 Cycle (C) 8, 12, and at treatment discontinuation visit (ATDV) (an average of 1 year). C 1-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-12, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).

Population: The PK-evaluable population is defined as all participants who received any dose of study medication and who have at least one post-baseline PK sample available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPTrough Concentration (Ctrough) for Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in SerumPertuzumab: C8D1/predose93.2 ug/mLStandard Deviation 40.7
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPTrough Concentration (Ctrough) for Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in SerumPertuzumab: C12D1/predose87.7 ug/mLStandard Deviation 58.4
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPTrough Concentration (Ctrough) for Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in SerumTrastuzumab: C8D1/predose58.5 ug/mLStandard Deviation 29.1
Atezolizumab +ddAC-PacHPTrough Concentration (Ctrough) for Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in SerumTrastuzumab: C12D1/predose62.4 ug/mLStandard Deviation 32.7
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPTrough Concentration (Ctrough) for Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in SerumTrastuzumab: C12D1/predose60.4 ug/mLStandard Deviation 30.9
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPTrough Concentration (Ctrough) for Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in SerumPertuzumab: C8D1/predose94.8 ug/mLStandard Deviation 39.8
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPTrough Concentration (Ctrough) for Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in SerumTrastuzumab: C8D1/predose56.5 ug/mLStandard Deviation 23.9
Placebo + ddAC-PacHPTrough Concentration (Ctrough) for Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in SerumPertuzumab: C12D1/predose91.6 ug/mLStandard Deviation 59.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026