Skip to content

Intra Articular Injection of Botulinum Toxin Versus Corticoids in Gonarthrosis

Analysis of Antalgic Efficacy of an Intra Articular Injection of Botulinum Toxin Versus Corticoids in Gonarthrosis by Perfusion MRI:a Superiority, Randomized, Controlled, Double Blind Study

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03726788
Acronym
TOXART
Enrollment
0
Registered
2018-10-31
Start date
2019-09-30
Completion date
2022-04-30
Last updated
2025-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Joint Diseases, Knee, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Therapeutics

Keywords

knee, Arthrosis, Botulinum toxin, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Brief summary

We believe we can demonstrate a link between the analgesic action of intra-articular injection of botulinum toxin and synovial inflammation by Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DCE) perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

Detailed description

Knee osteoarthritis is one of the most common causes of joint pain and functional disability in the general population. Intra-articular infiltrations of corticoids are indicated for painful crisis especially if accompanied of effusion. However, this effect lasts only 2 weeks. Given the lack of effective long-term medical-infiltrative treatment, we believe that botulinum toxin type A could be used by its direct action on mediators of neuro-gene inflammation at the joint level and its indirect medullary action by retrograde migration. To date, 2 published randomized controlled trials and one unpublished Phase Ib clinical trial have shown that botulinum toxin injected intraarticularly improves pain and functionality in gonarthrosis. Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DCE) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) demonstrated the correlation between synovial inflammation and pain in gonarthrosis in a cohort of 454 subjects. It has also made it possible, via the monitoring of synovial inflammation, to demonstrate the efficacy of treatments in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis in the early phase, juvenile chronic arthritis or osteoarthritis. DCE MRI perfusion therefore appears here as the technique of choice to follow the evolution of synovial inflammation after botulinum toxin injection in patients with symptomatic gonarthrosis.

Interventions

one intra-articular injection of 100 U of botulinum toxin type A, diluted in 2 ml of 0.9% SSI

one intra-articular injection of 200 U of botulinum toxin type A, diluted in 4 ml of 0.9% SSI

DRUGTriamcinolone Hexacetonide Inj Susp 20 MG/ML

one intra-articular injection of 2 ml Triamcinolone Hexacetonide

Sponsors

Allergan
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Lille Catholic University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Only pharmacists and radiologists know the patient's randomizing arm.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presenting gonarthrosis of degenerative origin, Kellgren/Lawrence Radiological Stage I to III, with a maturity of more than 18 months * With pain intensity greater than or equal to 50/100 on an VAS * In case of bilateral gonarthrosis, the VAS of the contralateral knee must be less than or equal to 30/100 * Presenting a failure of conventional per os treatments (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics) * Affiliated with a social security scheme * For women of childbearing age: * effective contraception for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patient presenting at the time of the inclusion visit: an inflammatory attack, septic or inflammatory arthritis, a generalized infectious episode in progress * Local or regional local skin lesion * Need of an arthroplasty within the next 12 months * Having received corticosteroids or other molecules in intra-articular infiltration in the last 6 months * History of traumatic knee injury (bone injury in the past 24 months), bone, ligament or meniscal surgery in the past 24 months * History of disabling peripheral nerve injury * Severe bleeding disorders, anticoagulant treatment in progress or double antiplatelet aggregation * BMI \> 35 kg/m2 * Coxarthrosis with projected knee pain * Pregnant or breastfeeding woman * Patient under guardianship and protection of justice * Allergy/contraindication to botulinum toxin type A, corticoids * Usual contraindication to MRI * Allergy to the contrast product

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assesment of vascularization by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) according to the % Area Under the Curve (AUC) of perfusion valueone month post-injection

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Joint amplitude measured by goniometryat 1, 3, 6 month post-injectionTo measure range of motion of the knee
Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Indexat 1, 3, 6 month post-injectionAn arthritic pain scoring system ranging from 0-no pain/disability to 100-most severe pain/disability
Pain analysis by the visual analogue scale (VAS)during the first 3 months after injectionEvolution kinetics of daily pain collected during the first 3 months post-injection allowing to deduce the onset and duration of analgesic efficacy in number of days. The pain VAS is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal line, usually 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme: no pain (score of 0) and pain as bad as it could be (score of 100 \[100-mm scale\])
Frequency of consumption of analgesicsat 1, 3, 6 month post-injection
Amount of consumption of analgesicsat 1, 3, 6 month post-injection
Two minutes walkat 1, 3, 6 month post-injectionThis test measure the distance walked in two minutes

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026