Cerebral Palsy
Conditions
Keywords
cerebral palsy, upper extremity rehabilitation, neurodevelopmental therapy, physiotherapy and rehabilitation, visual feedback device
Brief summary
The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of Cogniboard® Light Trainer, an education device with visual feedback that is added to the Neurodevelopmental Therapy Method (NDT) based upper extremity rehabilitation in children with cerebral palsy, on upper extremity functions such as joint range of motion (ROM), muscle tone, grip strength, pinch strength and functional abilities.
Detailed description
Children with the diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy, aged between 4 and 18 years were included in the study, who were volunteered to participate. The participants were randomly assigned into two groups; A total of 16 sessions of rehabilitation program were applied for 2 days a week for 8 weeks. The treatment programs applied are; Group I: NDT based upper extremity rehabilitation, Group II: NDT based upper extremity rehabilitation + Cogniboard® Light Trainer training. In the cases, pre- and post-treatment spasticity was defined with 'Modified Ashworth Scale'; upper extremity joint range of motion (ROM) with 'goniometer'; grip and pinch strength with 'dynamometer'; hand skills with 'Minnesota Hand Skill Test'; functional abilities with 'Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and functional level with 'Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)'.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Dilara Merve Sarı
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Having the diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy (CP), * Aged between 4-18, * Having 1+ upper extremity spasticity at max according to the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), * To be able to cooperate with exercises
Exclusion criteria
* Having mental retardation report, * Having congenital deformities, * Epilepsy history, * Having cardiac, orthopedic, visual and hearing problems, * Application of Botulinum Toxin (BOTOX) to the upper extremity in past six month.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Range of motion (ROM) | Eight weeks | Upper extremity ROM measured with universal goniometer. |
| Spasticity | Eight weeks | Spasticity defined with Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). The MAS measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching. Scoring: 0= normal tone. 1= slight increase in muscle tone, minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM) when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension. 1+= slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the ROM. 2= more marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved. 3= considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult. 4= affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension. |
| Grip and pinch strength | Eight weeks | Grip and pinch strength measured with dynamometer. |
| Hand Skills | Eight weeks | Hand skills was assessed with Minnesota Dexterity Test (MMDT). MMDT is a standardized test for the evaluation of a subject's ability to move small objects various distances. The score on the test is the total seconds required to complete chosen number of test trials. |
| Functional Abilities | Eight weeks | Functional abilities was assessed with Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). CHAQ is used to assess health status in children. It assesses functional ability in 8 domains of physical function (30 items) for children. Each item is scored on a four point scale ranging from 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty), 3 (unable to do). The mean score of the eight domains finally makes up the disability index and ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (disabled). |
| Functional Level | Eight weeks | Functional level was defined with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). GMFCS looks at movements such as sitting, walking and use of mobility devices. It provides a clear description of a child's current gross motor function. Level I can climb stairs without the use of a railing. Level II can walk in most settings and climb stairs holding onto a railing. Level III needs usage of a hand held mobility device, may climb stairs holding onto a railing with assistance. Level IV requires physical assistance or powered mobility in most settings. Level V children are transported in a manuel wheelchair in all settings, they are limited in their ability to maintain antigravity head and trunk postures and control leg and arm movements. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed